
Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$28.95$28.95
FREE delivery
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $19.87

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


America Fooled: The Truth About Antidepressants, Antipsychotics And How We've Been Deceived Hardcover – April 26, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length523 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherArgo Pub Llc
- Publication dateApril 26, 2006
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.5 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100977307506
- ISBN-13978-0977307500
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Publisher
From the Inside Flap
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Argo Pub Llc; 1st edition (April 26, 2006)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 523 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0977307506
- ISBN-13 : 978-0977307500
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.5 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,929,773 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #486 in Pharmaceutical Drug Guides
- #2,076 in Depression (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Our society needs to be more alive, alert and aware, not dumbed down and dulled by drugs and therapies that kill our brain cells. I hope this book is one avenue to get people to wake up and realize that when you dull the negative feelings that are part of the ups and downs in life, you lose the ability to feel the joy and happiness too.
However, it is troubling that the author goes on to support his alternative views of depression and schizophrenia with mere correlations as well. In fact his reliance on correlation is often much worse than that of the studies he critiques. Many of his correlations are not supported by any statistics whatsoever--indeed several are only suggested by way of his posing rhetorical questions. And of course, posing rhetorical questions is no substitute for making strong positive arguments on the basis of evidence or reason.
Additionally while the author criticizes the biological model of mental problems, what he offers in return could hardly be called a model at all. He has no positive, scientific account of depression or schizophrenia. He has no precise recommendations for the treatment of these problems. Instead he offers vague, subjective, mundane suggestions such as "don't violate your own values."
The author criticizes many psychologists and doctors for failing to consider evidence that contravenes their assumptions. However this author does the very same thing! Nowhere in this book is there an adequate discussion of the fact that many people benefit tremendously from anti-depressant and anti-psychotic medications.
Throughout the book the author complains that many studies of the effectiveness of pharmaceutical treatments of depression are funded by pharmaceutical companies themselves. Now in the first place, one might worry about the genetic fallacy here: the fact that these studies are (arguably) put forward by agents for drug companies does not logically entail that their findings are skewed. But I agree with the author that this fact at least raises some suspicion. It certainly would be better if all studies were conducted by independent, disinterested researchers. However, the practical situation is that research requires money and much more research can and will be done if funds from companies with vested interests are allowed and accepted. It should be noted that there are checks on the quality of research that is done. Publishers, e.g., have an interest in insuring the quality of the scientific findings they report. Ultimately the value of all research that is done must be judged on its own merits. More important than the question "Who funded this research?" are the questions "Is this study valid? Is there good evidence for the hypothesis being advanced?"
Inasmuch as the author raises the question of what agenda might be behind the research he criticizes, it is fair to ask the same questions regarding him. It is troubling to me that the author has published this book under the name Timothy Scott. I could find no record of any such doctor or researcher. However, after digging around using Google, I did find one site that names the author of this book as Timothy Scott Rampey. Rampey earned his PhD from Nebraska and his lower degrees from a small Christian college. He taught at Victoria College. On RateMyProfessors, some of his students complained that he would frequently inject his Christian ideology into his lectures. The fact that Rampey taught at a relatively obscure school belies that suggestion made throughout his book that he is a well-recognized expert who has had ample occasion to refute many doctors who were taking his classes.
Rampey/Scott recently accepted an award/commendation from Concerned Citizens for Human Rights, a group founded by the Church of Scientology. And two of the people he cites in this book as "real heroes" of his anti-biological-psychiatry cause also have previous connections to Scientology. (One wonders why Rampey/Scott would ally himself explicitly with Tom Cruise in the first lines of the book.) If the author wants us to judge the research done by others by the company they keep and by the possible motives they might have, it seems fair for us to press this sort of issue back in his direction. Why not publish under his own full name? He would want those he criticizes--at a minimum--to face squarely the suspicion-raising issues that could come up from explicit disclosure of those who have an interest in promoting their findings. He ought to do the same. Especially given the lack of rigorous positive support for his own views, one worries that this book is at least as ideologically driven as the research it purports to expose.
All that being said, Scott/Rampey does make some negative arguments that should be carefully considered regarding the strength of the research that supports the currently dominant thinking and practices regarding mental illness. Still, he overstates his case against this dominant view. He under-supports his own alternative view. He fails to consider evidence that supports the view he opposes and that undercuts his own view. And while he raises suspicions that are probably worth raising, he is at least equally suspect. The fact that Rampey/Scott fails to live up to his own avowed canons of scientific, critical thinking and that he is susceptible to the very same criticisms he levels at his opponents calls into question his own work and view.