- Audible Audio Edition
- Listening Length: 17 hours and 21 minutes
- Program Type: Audiobook
- Version: Unabridged
- Publisher: Tantor Audio
- Audible.com Release Date: September 10, 2012
- Whispersync for Voice: Ready
- Language: English
- ASIN: B0098ERFN4
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
America's Great Debate: Henry Clay, Stephen A. Douglas, and the Compromise that Preserved the Union Audible – Unabridged
|New from||Used from|
|Free with your Audible trial|
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
The insights into the workings of Congress alone are worth the price of admission. And, oh, what a cast of characters that jump from the pages full of life: Stephen A.Douglas, Jefferson Davis, Millard Fillmore, Henry Clay, John C Calhoun, Daniel Webster, Sam Houston. I have to quote a line here from the dust jacket that says it all: "A peerless narrative of one of the most momentous --and ambiguous- episodes in American History: the compromise that both saved the Union and, ultimately, destroyed it."
Now, lately, I'm thinking about the Compromise of 1850 a lot thanks to this marvelous historical tome. Highly recommended.
This book is all about debate. But the problem is that debate (especially political debate) gets to be pretty convoluted and complex. Bordewich seems to leave nothing out. Every idea, every proposal, every speech, every piece of minutia is included. It gets to be a bit head-spinning as the story line seems to lurch back and forth through varying versions of varying ideas.
Now, I'm not saying it's all bad. It's a very laudable effort. This is a daunting topic and I'm glad Bordewich took it on, but it seems like this book could have benefitted from a bit more editing or a better approach. It's far too overwhelming to comprehend for the average reader. Unless you enjoy the nitty gritty of political and legislative debate, this book is probably not the best book for understanding the 1850 compromise.
The subtitle is also a bit misleading. It seems to suggest that Clay and Douglas will feature equally in this book, but they do not. Douglas gets limited mention until near the end when he manages to do what Clay had failed to do, but even then Douglas seems like a minor character in this grand scheme. This is not so much a complaint about the content of the book, but of the poorly chosen subtitle.
All in all, if you are interested in the debate over slavery and the causes of the Civil War, this is probably worth reading, but it might be worth taking the time to become fully familiar with the 1850 compromise first so everything will make sense.
I agree with Brodewitch's conclusion that the Compeomise of 1850 gave the North a precious 10 years it needed to get ready for the war that came. The North became radicalized over the Fugitive Slave Law and began to muster the will and the means to fight and win the war with the South. I am left to wonder if a Clay or Douglas will emerge today to forge an economic compromise we so desperately need today?
Great history well told.
There is an excellent cast of characters, most notably Henry Clay at the end of his career and life, Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, and others of great statesmanship, superb oratory, and intensely opinionated regarding their views on slavery, and its containment or expansion.
As you read through this book, you understand that the South was not interested in compromise, and certainly not in being a part of a Union that they felt was set up against them. I suppose that a bloody civil war was unavoidable and so it came about a little more than a decade later. No matter how stirring the prose, the oratory, the reasoning, and the appealing, it is evident that the nation was bent on self destruction. For those who would argue that the war was not about slavery, this book will certainly expel that idea. It was totally about slavery, and while it may have been disguised in states rights, it was about slavery.
This book is a good companion to We Have the War Upon Us: The Onset of the Civil War, November 1860-April 1861 and provides excellent background material to help the reader understand that by the end of 1860, after the Lincoln election and prior to the inaugural, we were destined to be divided and resolve the political differences on the battlefields that proved to be the deadliest war in our history.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Fantastic book everyone interested in American History should read it twice. I did and I may read it again.Published 27 days ago by HARMONY
America's fight for its independence was much alike a brewing tea kettle. It simmered for many decades in the mind and hearts of our most notable leaders. Read morePublished 13 months ago by richard e whitelock
A well documented history of the events that led to the bloodiest conflict in American history. A valiant attempt to stem the rising sectional conflict.Published 15 months ago by Harry Freind
This is a very good and detailed book even for those who are already versed in the history of the times. Read morePublished 19 months ago by J. M. Lawniczak
Very well written , a page turner, history but like a mystery novel . I read a lot on the Civil War . One of the best i have had the pleasure of readingPublished on July 12, 2014 by Brian Sullivan