This really ought to be required viewing for any potential juror. In a day and age where the internet can mobilize and swarm on a person's reputation in mere moments, this movie is a crystal clear reminder of "reasonable doubt." Justice does not come at the cost of rational discussion. These twelve men, none of them particularly malicious, one by one put aside their prejudices, assumptions, and hang-ups to decide the life or death of an 18 year old young man.
This is, in all honesty, probably Henry Fonda's best role as Juror #8. It takes unflappable courage to think carefully, to admit "I don't know." He moves around the room in pronounced tall, long strides like the Colossus at Rhodes, while Lee Cobb's Juror #3 hunches over, ready to leap across the table. The movie embraces archetypes and imbues each of the jurors with a crystal clear personality, so everyone can find themselves in that room. We want to be Juror #8, but in reality, we all carry baggage that warps our sense of justice.
I could rewatch this movie and find something new to love about it each time. And I'm happiest that there are plenty of holes in Juror #8's defense. There's a real possibility the kid killed his dad. The dad deserves justice, too, and if Juror #8 convinces the whole room, they might be letting his murderer walk free. That is why the real villain of the room isn't Juror #3, or even the bigoted Juror #10. It's Juror #7, watching the clock and changing his vote to whatever gets him to his ballgame the fastest. The victim and the defendant both deserve a thoughtful vote.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$12.99
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
Odd Bookworm
Sold by:
Odd Bookworm
(4679 ratings)
94% positive over last 12 months
94% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$12.99
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
Scruffyduck
Sold by:
Scruffyduck
(4 ratings)
75% positive
75% positive
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$9.98
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Deep_Discount_Entertainment
Sold by:
Deep_Discount_Entertainment
(529910 ratings)
96% positive over last 12 months
96% positive over last 12 months
Only 6 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Image Unavailable
Image not available for
Color:
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
12 Angry Men
50th Anniversary Edition, 0th Anniversary Edition
IMDb7.8/10.0
Amazon's Choice highlights highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately.
Amazon's
Choice
for "twelve angry men"
| List Price: | $14.98 Details |
| Price: |
$9.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
&
FREE Returns
Return this item for free
How to return the item?
|
| You Save: | $4.99 (33%) |
| Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs |
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
DVD
November 22, 2011
"Please retry"
|
Special
|
2
|
$19.49 | $13.00 |
|
DVD
December 4, 2007
"Please retry"
|
— |
2
|
$11.84 | $4.98 |
Watch Instantly with
|
Rent | Buy |
Enhance your purchase
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
One of 12 jurors holds out in the case of a boy from the slums who is accused of killing his father. Directed by Sidney Lumet.
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.66:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : NR (Not Rated)
- Product Dimensions : 0.6 x 5.4 x 7.5 inches; 2.53 Ounces
- Item model number : M109710
- Director : Sidney Lumet
- Media Format : Black & White, Widescreen, Subtitled
- Run time : 1 hour and 36 minutes
- Release date : March 4, 2008
- Actors : Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, Ed Begley, E.G. Marshall, Jack Warden
- Dubbed: : French
- Subtitles: : Spanish, French
- Studio : WarnerBrothers
- ASIN : B0010YSD7W
- Country of Origin : USA
- Number of discs : 1
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#4,267 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #41 in Documentary (Movies & TV)
- #204 in Mystery & Thrillers (Movies & TV)
- #770 in Drama DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
4.9 out of 5
2,429 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2018
Verified Purchase
80 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 12, 2018
Verified Purchase
I've seen '12 Angry Men' perhaps 37 or more times and each time I watch it, it is like the first time all over again. I know the film scene by scene, almost word for word. Yet still, my nerves get wracked in anxiety as if I don't know how it will all end. Yes, even though I know the outcome, the pit of my stomach still gets filled with suspense when I start watching it. That's how masterful the story, and the acting is here.
I fell in love with 'Twelve Angry Men' during my AP English class in high school. We read and analyzed the play as a class and I portrayed juror #4 - the rational stockbroker who is unflinching, calm, and analytical; the juror who throughout the deliberations, remains neutral, as he prefers to deal with facts rather than act on emotional bias. I remember that first initial experience vividly. Not only for admiring the logic that my juror #4 exhibited, but for the brilliance all the jurors depicted. Even the vexing and irascible jurors such as number 3 the sadist, and number 10, the bigot and racist, lend themselves to being conduits for important lessons to be learned by the reader.
Also being a lover of classic films, it was a delight when soon after reading the play for the first time in school, I watched Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, et al., masterfully depict and bring to life the jurors on Turner Classic Movies. That first time watching this film, I was in awe, transfixed, and stirred at how each actor embodied their role perfectly.
There are some movies that words aren't enough to describe how good and important they are. This film is one of them. Simply put, this is a classic masterpiece. The acting is masterful. The writing, which is directly from the play, is top notch, the directing is fresh and tight, and the black & while cinematography makes the whole ensemble even more visceral and raw than if it had been filmed in color. 5 full stars! If this is your first time watching '12 Angry Men', I implore you to watch it more than once. It pays off every time.
I fell in love with 'Twelve Angry Men' during my AP English class in high school. We read and analyzed the play as a class and I portrayed juror #4 - the rational stockbroker who is unflinching, calm, and analytical; the juror who throughout the deliberations, remains neutral, as he prefers to deal with facts rather than act on emotional bias. I remember that first initial experience vividly. Not only for admiring the logic that my juror #4 exhibited, but for the brilliance all the jurors depicted. Even the vexing and irascible jurors such as number 3 the sadist, and number 10, the bigot and racist, lend themselves to being conduits for important lessons to be learned by the reader.
Also being a lover of classic films, it was a delight when soon after reading the play for the first time in school, I watched Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, et al., masterfully depict and bring to life the jurors on Turner Classic Movies. That first time watching this film, I was in awe, transfixed, and stirred at how each actor embodied their role perfectly.
There are some movies that words aren't enough to describe how good and important they are. This film is one of them. Simply put, this is a classic masterpiece. The acting is masterful. The writing, which is directly from the play, is top notch, the directing is fresh and tight, and the black & while cinematography makes the whole ensemble even more visceral and raw than if it had been filmed in color. 5 full stars! If this is your first time watching '12 Angry Men', I implore you to watch it more than once. It pays off every time.
36 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2020
Verified Purchase
It seems a simple plot involving 12 men, reviewing evidence in a murder trial with all the essential action in a single room is simply NOT substantial enough to support a movie. And with the current audience expectations this movie would very likely not be made. But the movie is not about that. Instead, It's about the interplay of people's biases. When one of the twelve remains calm but unsure of the defendant's guilt and doggedly wants to go through the evidence, the movie comes alive! In the discussions of his areas of doubt, elements in the evidence convince others in the group. The movie is about highlighting how biases we carry about with us, can prevent us from stepping back and examining things for what they are. The movie illustrates how easy it is for biases to influence a decision without realizing it's taking place.
One additional thing: I'm often more interested in supporting characters/actors than the lead. In this case there's an older character that remains rather like a throwaway taking up a chair. But, as the movie continues he emerges as THE one that comes up with the element that convinces the final member to change his vote. And, he's the one that gets the final scene with the lead on the court steps as the movie ends.
One additional thing: I'm often more interested in supporting characters/actors than the lead. In this case there's an older character that remains rather like a throwaway taking up a chair. But, as the movie continues he emerges as THE one that comes up with the element that convinces the final member to change his vote. And, he's the one that gets the final scene with the lead on the court steps as the movie ends.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
I've seen this movie MANY times and loved this 50th Anniversary Edition. Glad I own it now.
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2016Verified Purchase
This will be a short review, which I recognize isn't always helpful.
1. The "extras" in this 50th Anniversary Edition are excellent. Even if you've seen 12 Angry Men a GILLION times (because it is the kind of film one sees multiple times), you'll love the extras and will learn/glean something from them.
2. If you've never seen this movie but were told you should have seen it, this version will cover everything because the extras will bring you up to speed on the film's significance.
3. In my entire life, I've never heard anyone say they didn't like this movie. Ever. So, again, if you've never seen it or are considering buying it for someone, do it. It's a can't-fail movie. It stands the test of time because "12 people on a jury" is a timeless proposition.
1. The "extras" in this 50th Anniversary Edition are excellent. Even if you've seen 12 Angry Men a GILLION times (because it is the kind of film one sees multiple times), you'll love the extras and will learn/glean something from them.
2. If you've never seen this movie but were told you should have seen it, this version will cover everything because the extras will bring you up to speed on the film's significance.
3. In my entire life, I've never heard anyone say they didn't like this movie. Ever. So, again, if you've never seen it or are considering buying it for someone, do it. It's a can't-fail movie. It stands the test of time because "12 people on a jury" is a timeless proposition.
27 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Miss Scarlett
5.0 out of 5 stars
A classic
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 26, 2016Verified Purchase
I love this film, its about twelve men who get pretty cheesed off with each other while serving as the jury in a murder case. And its all Henry Fondas fault. They were pretty much all convinced of the verdict till old mr Fonda casts doubts all over the place. I'll be honest, I've never been that keen on Henry Fonda, but he is excellent in this sweaty old black and white film. I say sweaty, because they're all sweating their moobs off all the way through it, due to a heatwave and their increased frustration. Every other film or tv drama that is based around the jury of a criminal court case is a direct rip off of this classic film, and none of them do it like this one.
14 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Evil Homer
3.0 out of 5 stars
Lacking subtitles
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 6, 2020Verified Purchase
Whilst I love the film, it’s one of my favourites, the criterion collection bluray has no option to adjust the audio and subtitles menu. The subtitles can be changed but only via my dedicated subtitle button on my bluray player remote control once the film has started. It’s a shame because otherwise the superb extras and included booklet make this release well worth a look. But sadly I cannot in good conscience give this release more then 3 stars because of the appalling oversight of losing subtitles/audio menu on the title screen.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
TIV
5.0 out of 5 stars
COMPELLING DRAMA
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 5, 2017Verified Purchase
Great film from start to finish, well worth my 5 star rating- never boring, with fine direction, and fine performances from Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, Jack Klugman and the rest of the cast. One of my favorite films of Henry Fonda's. Courtroom drama lovers will love this, you won't be disappointed.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Mister_Critique
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great acting and superb script---but 'bad' OGM message to the public!!!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 25, 2016Verified Purchase
Very well scripted and acted---each actor does his part with excellent dramatic effect! There were two versions, but his, the original, was (and still is) the best!!!
Despite the good script and superb acting by the leading players, one gete the overall feeling that this film may have done immense misjustice to 'real' court-room events where the accused was actually guilty of homicide; and in that sense it is a disturbing film in putting across the "wrong message" that if a juror feels there is a 'easonable cause for doubt' as to the accused's innocene they should acquit him/ her of a heinous crime!!!
Despite the good script and superb acting by the leading players, one gete the overall feeling that this film may have done immense misjustice to 'real' court-room events where the accused was actually guilty of homicide; and in that sense it is a disturbing film in putting across the "wrong message" that if a juror feels there is a 'easonable cause for doubt' as to the accused's innocene they should acquit him/ her of a heinous crime!!!
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Siriam
5.0 out of 5 stars
A powerful courtroom drama without the court!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 17, 2012Verified Purchase
There is little I can add to the many review comments already made but would add three observations as to why on seeing this 1957 film for the first time in 2012, I feel it is remains so powerful:
1. The film works so perfectly because it breaks all the rules of such courtroom dramas. In 1957 it must have been truly revolutionary viewing, explaining why four Oscar nominations including Best Picture followed. The claustrophobia of the jury room including its washroom under NY summer heat as the only set locations over 97% of the film are used to great effect.
2. The piece succeeds dramatically not just because it is well scripted (from a predecessor teleplay) but as the title "Twelve Angry Men" infers, from its power of great ensemble and emotional range playing by all the cast and not just a few leads. I would single out Joseph Sweeney as the retired but knowledgable observer and E. G. Marshall as the cool headed logical analyst alongside the already famous or soon to be famous cast in proving that the film works so well because it does not let Henry Fonda or Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley have all the running time and lines.
3. Finally, given limited sets the creative use of camera positions especially the closing in on faces with different lens at key points shows how keeping it simple can also be very effective.
In answer to why this film does not make more top film lists, I suspect its too theatric style staging leaves many feeling it is not their view of what great cinema is about. It is also interesting that when director Sidney Lumet returned to shoot another courtroom drama later in life ("The Verdict" from 1982 which included Jack Warden again in the cast), he adopted the completely opposite approach to lesser effect as per my Amazon review (http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R4ZZN5KBIMHOW/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0090NAFOO&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=283926&store=dvd)
1. The film works so perfectly because it breaks all the rules of such courtroom dramas. In 1957 it must have been truly revolutionary viewing, explaining why four Oscar nominations including Best Picture followed. The claustrophobia of the jury room including its washroom under NY summer heat as the only set locations over 97% of the film are used to great effect.
2. The piece succeeds dramatically not just because it is well scripted (from a predecessor teleplay) but as the title "Twelve Angry Men" infers, from its power of great ensemble and emotional range playing by all the cast and not just a few leads. I would single out Joseph Sweeney as the retired but knowledgable observer and E. G. Marshall as the cool headed logical analyst alongside the already famous or soon to be famous cast in proving that the film works so well because it does not let Henry Fonda or Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley have all the running time and lines.
3. Finally, given limited sets the creative use of camera positions especially the closing in on faces with different lens at key points shows how keeping it simple can also be very effective.
In answer to why this film does not make more top film lists, I suspect its too theatric style staging leaves many feeling it is not their view of what great cinema is about. It is also interesting that when director Sidney Lumet returned to shoot another courtroom drama later in life ("The Verdict" from 1982 which included Jack Warden again in the cast), he adopted the completely opposite approach to lesser effect as per my Amazon review (http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R4ZZN5KBIMHOW/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0090NAFOO&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=283926&store=dvd)
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: g rated christmas movies, casper movie






![Rear Window [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51cGMSDR2aL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)





