Buy new:
$21.01$21.01
$3.99
delivery:
Feb 14 - 15
Ships from: OurBooksToLove Sold by: OurBooksToLove
Buy Used: $17.73
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia Paperback – December 15, 1983
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle
"Please retry" |
—
| — | — |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry" | $12.89 | $10.00 |
Enhance your purchase
- Print length432 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniv Of Minnesota Press
- Publication dateDecember 15, 1983
- Dimensions6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100816612250
- ISBN-13978-0816612253
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
From the Back Cover
Product details
- Publisher : Univ Of Minnesota Press; 58083rd edition (December 15, 1983)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0816612250
- ISBN-13 : 978-0816612253
- Item Weight : 1.27 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,480,318 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,042 in Modern Philosophy (Books)
- #3,860 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- #7,802 in Cultural Anthropology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Gilles Deleuze (1925–1995) was professor of philosophy at the University of Paris, Vincennes–St. Denis. He coauthored Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus with Félix Guattari. These works, as well as Cinema 1, Cinema 2, The Fold, Proust and Signs, and others, are published in English by Minnesota.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on January 29, 2020
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As far as the content of the book, I have mixed feelings - this book is a hot mess. The best thing anyone could say about it is what Foucault states in the preface, about the book being more a work of art than a great theoretical system (like Kant, or Hegel lets say). And I'll accept the book as that, just art. The book starts off very strong, but, once you realize the authors are basically saying the same thing ten different ways, it loses its magic.
The read itself can be difficult at times, but, it is very well paced, so that once you trudge through enough technical philosophy, things open up quite brilliantly - like having gotten through the forest into the open field. That feeling in-itself, ends up being a highlight of the book in a sense. The philosophy itself is messy, lacks focus towards the end, is packed far too much with neologisms, and in many ways ends up seeming unoriginal. The concept of a "Body Without Organs" aside - Essentially you have a Spinozist materialism that integrates itself with Freud, Marx, Nietzsche, and a bunch of others far too obscure for most readers to have any reference to. This is also a weakness of the text, as it is not very accessible (even to philosophers) in terms knowing whether the authors' interpretations of these other writers are actually spot on, or not. This makes critical analysis a daunting task, coupled with the neologisms, and messy layout of ideas.
Another critique is that (being someone who has worked extensively, and intimately with the mentally ill - most notably schizophrenics - for many years) I wonder about the depth of understanding of schizophrenia. Philosophy proper, yes - economics, sure - a properly thoughtful and empirical sense of schizophrenia? I am doubtful. Guattari, maybe - but I am very skeptical that Deleuze has any significant experience with schizophrenics, and in fact, in the text, most references to schizophrenia are from other peoples case notes/research - notably, the authors who themselves malign Freud. ... I also have a hard time getting past the vast amount of undue credit given to Oedipus as an institution, and deeply engrained unconscious pattern, social, and individual.
Still, if one approaches the book as a work of art, its fantastic, entertaining, and at times hilarious. All criticism aside, the book has a compelling sense of mystery that it instills, a wonderful aesthetic. This alone can bring me back to this book, for likely, the rest of my life. There are grand moments of detailed, original, philosophy (the Body Without Organs being a shining display), they are just, well, mixed in with a whole lot of other stuff that maybe the book could have done without.
Don't get me wrong- some of the ideas are profound. A-O articulates the difference between desire as production and desire as aquisition. Since Plato, desire has been conceptualized as lack or need. The authors present desire as production beyond the dialectic of desire as lack (I create because I want to, not because I have to). Also, the authors propose the various ways desire is colonized, decoded, territorialized, deterritorialized in capitalist societies. I found this helpful in considering ways that many of us "buy into" the American dream, the obsession with health and wellness, the pursuit of happiness, and various ways of "meeting our needs."
But overall, the work lacks very few connections with experience. I believe that if the ideas were translated into experience, it might be more productive (pun itentional). And I am a fan of Deleuze's other works including Nietzsche and Philosophy and Difference and Repetition. In the latter, Deleuze has an excellent example of "swimming into a wave" to describe the process of learning. I think it's too bad that A-O lacks such beautiful, experiential sections. As for the latter sections of A-O in which the authors describe schizoanalysis, I am very skeptical. Resistance? Not really. I've seen schizophrenics bashing their heads against a mirror.
If you are looking for an adventure down the rabbit hole (full of word-play, obscure references, neoligisms, etc.), this is your book. If you are looking for philosophy that provides excellent insights on human experiences and living in the 20th/21st century, may I recommend Delueze's earlier work, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Gadamer, Foucault, and Levinas.
This book will change the way you think about the world - and agree or not with its thesis or commentaries, any book that does that deserves five full stars.
Here is the quote that began to shift my conception of what psychoanalysis is:
"The real is not impossible; on the contrary, within the real everything is possible, everything becomes possible. Desire does not express a molar lack within the subject; rather, the molar organization deprives desire of its objective being"(37).
Top reviews from other countries
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on April 11, 2021










