Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How Paperback – August 31, 2016
|New from||Used from|
The Amazon Book Review
Discover what to read next through the Amazon Book Review. Learn more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
"Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How is Kaczynski’s well-reasoned, cohesive composition about how revolutionary groups should approach our mercurial future….. I recommend that you read this compelling perspective on how we can frame our struggles in a technological society."
-- The Tech, MIT's oldest and largest newspaper
"His work, despite his deeds, deserves a place alongside Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, and 1984, by George Orwell."
-- Dr. Keith Ablow, Fox News
"He is clearly a Luddite, but simply saying this does not dismiss his argument... As difficult as it is for me to acknowledge, I saw some merit in the reasoning in [Kaczynski's writing]."
-- Bill Joy, founder of Sun Microsystems
"He has provided a critical vision that we've been missing out on."
-- Prof. Ben Brucato, UMass-Amherst, USA
"...a rational mind is on display in this book."
-- Prof. Steve Fuller, University of Warwick, UK
"There is nothing in [ISAIF] that looks at all like the work of a madman. The language is clear, precise and calm. The argument is subtle and carefully developed, lacking anything even faintly resembling the wild claims or irrational speculation that a lunatic might produce."
--James Q. Wilson, Ph.D., former president of the American Political Science Association
"In this thoughtful book, Dr Kaczynski provides a blueprint for the radical anti-technology movement. If you want to stop AI before it's too late, this may be your best bet."
-- Dylan Evans, Ph.D., author of "The Utopia Experiment"
"Kaczynski's second book, Anti-Tech Revolution, is a true milestone in thinking about technology. It is a well-researched, well-written, and thoroughly-documented work dedicated to undermining the technological system before its worst consequences become reality. Nothing else like it exists. All those concerned with the future of humanity and the planet would do well to study it carefully."
-- Prof. David Skrbina, University of Michigan, Dearborn, USA
From the Author
Selected Quotations from
Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How
by Theodore John Kaczynski
Technology Can Not Be Controlled
- "The development of societies will forever remain beyond rational human control." (p 31)
- "(H)umans' capacity to control the development of their societies not only hasfailed to progress, but has actually retrogressed." (p 12)
- "If the development of the technological world system is allowed to proceed to its logical conclusion, then in all probability the Earth will be left a dead planet." (p 55)
- "We have to conclude that humans will become obsolete." (p 71)
- "Natural selection favors self-propagating systems that pursue their own short-term advantage with little or no regard for long-term consequences." (p 44)
- "Through a process of natural selection, the world comes to be dominated by organizations that make maximum possible use of all available resources to augment their own power without regard to long-term consequences." (p 57)
- "[There exists] a process common to all technologically-advanced civilizations that consistently leads them to self-destruction." (p 55)
- "The only way to get off the road to disaster that we are now on would be through a total collapse of organized society and therefore a descent into chaos." (p 33)
- "Desperate competition among the global self-prop systems will tear the world-system apart.... The chances of survival will approach zero. A catastrophic breakdown has tobe expected sooner or later." (p 48-49)
- "Anti-tech revolutionaries can't be satisfied with extracting concessions from the power-structure; they have to bring it down altogether." (p 144)
- "The goal a revolutionary movement sets itself must be nothing less than the total collapse of the technological system." (p 161)
- "A revolutionary organization should seek not to be liked, but to be respected, and it should have no aversion to being hated and feared." (p 155)
- "If the technological system were eliminated now a great deal could still be saved." (p 68)
- TJK coins the term "Technianity" -- a religious belief in technological progress leading to a technological utopia such as the Singularity. (p74)
- "The notion of a future society governed in accord with a mathematical control system, rationally chosen and designed, can be dismissed as science fiction." (p 189)
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
Unlike his previous work, Technological Slavery: The Collected Writings of Theodore J. Kaczynski, the present work is more extensively researched, more extensively referenced, and more extensively updated to be generally and specificially topical. It is difficult to find factual errors in this book in which the chapters are methodically organized,mostly in sections.
Restricted to having only eight books at a time in his seven foot by twelve foot prison cell, Kaczynski has been able to gather resources while in prison and through the help of several people outside the prison, conduct research on the “historical analysis explaining the futility of social control and the catastrophic influence of technological growth on the human social and planetary ecological systems.” As an historical document alone, students in a college/university history class would benefit from the vast references and discussion of two aspects of the book: (1) the comparative analysis of the success and failure of revolutions and their leaders throughout history and (2) the growth of technology and its implications on society. The book can be used as an “application text” to guide the understanding and methodology needed to solve current and future challenges facing society and the complex ecology of our planet. Students of ecology, environmental sciences, and the physical sciences would be most interested in the thought-provoking Appendix Four: The Long-Term Outcome of Geo-Engineering, as it pertains to current modifications to our earth via fracking, storage of high pressure wastewater underground, and more. Social scientists would find the ideas of how societies develop and change advanced by Kaczynski useful as a template for creative and thoughtful fodder for analyzing societal change. Philosophers and those humans who like to think, would be interested in the almost-engineering-like method that Kaczynski uses to develop his philosophical arguments, starting with a solid foundation and building layer upon layer of complexities upon it. Perhaps one of the uses of this book will also be to help identify, anticipate, predict, and ameliorate challenges to our society and the earth.
Not easy to read, but as Kaczynski notes in the Preface, “This book, therefore, is not a book to read; it is a book to be studied with the same care one would use in studying, for example, a textbook of engineering.” I found that I have returned to many parts of the book, re-reading and studying the detailed arguments and strategies in order to dissect each statement and fully comprehend each chapter.
It may not be likely that Kaczynski’s present work from prison will change the world short or long-term as did Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail for the civil rights movement, nor as did Paul the Apostle’s “prison gospels” for the Christian movement, but as an academic, it is gratifying to see that there is a strategy now in place for anti-tech revolutionists to use that does not involve violence as the first or last resort.
The book is full of essentially indisputable facts. Kaczynski's reasoning is hard to argue with. Often, though, he contradicts himself in subtle ways. For instance, he frames revolution as something that rationality can make better, even though he admits in other places that rationality rarely has a causal effect on the structure and character of complex systems (which mass movements are). He also tends to start with exaggerated premises. These are the only two weaknesses, however, and I strongly recommend the book to anyone concerned about wild nature, the effects of technology, and similar things.
It is difficult to review this work without considering Kaczynski's past actions, i.e. the fact that he is a confessed multiple-murderer serving eight life sentences due to a fanatical dedication to his ideology, an ideology which is the focus of this book.
Some would say that even reviewing this work lends unwarranted legitimacy to an immoral/insane/monstrous person, and they may have a point. I tend toward separating ideas from their bearers, but there very well may come a point at which a person's heinous actions delegitimize entirely their motivations for said actions, philosophically-speaking at least. I don't know if that's the case, and furthermore I don't know how to figure out if that's the case apart from reading multiple philosophical tomes on the subject. Because I was asked by the publisher to do this review, I'm going to do my best to parse the message from its messenger, and explain where I think the latter detracts from the former.
I can say to begin with that I don't believe Kaczynski to be insane. His writings -- both this and his original Manifesto -- are far too lucid, and the nature of his crimes involves entirely too much time and space for contemplation to be written off as fits of mania. When other people dedicate their lives wholly to an ideal from a very young age, even behaving in morally questionable ways to achieve it, they get our admiration; perhaps its only when we disagree with their ideals that we call them "crazy."
To call him a sociopath may be closer to the mark, in the same sense that Hitler was undoubtedly a sociopath: both brilliant men in their own ways but with little ability to connect with anybody on a human level. In this sense one could maybe call Kaczynski "undersocialized" in allusion to his manifesto's discussion of the term "oversocialization." His known early life and academic career bear out the hypothesis that he was unable to relate to other humans, and that he therefore never developed the crucial ability to empathize with them.
Is being a sociopath enough to discredit one's ideas entirely? I'm not sure. Our society certainly seems to reward sociopaths in certain sectors (business, politics, entertainment), so it doesn't feel fair to condemn one solely on the basis of his academic sociopathy. But that's not to say you shouldn't weigh his sociopathy when considering his ideas, which is precisely what I intend to do in the remainder of this review.
From the outset this book feels like a less passionate version of Derrick Jensen's compelling Endgame, and later on in its strategic discussion becomes a cross between Endgame and Gene Sharp's influential From Dictatorship to Democracy. It begins as a logical, mostly convincing argument about why our technological society is doomed, but then devolves into vague "guidelines" that feel relatively punchless in the face of such daunting odds.
Whenever I pick up a book that is criticizing the trend of our society or political system, it's always with the hope that finally, this time, the author will provide some simple, actionable solutions that can immediately address the issue at hand. I am almost invariably disappointed with the denouements of these books, as they often dissipate into vague platitudes, unfeasible strategies, or in the worst cases an unforgivable omission of any such discussion. Unfortunately that trend of disappointment continues here.
Given the issues I discussed above with the difficulty of Kaczynski presenting himself as an "expert" on any topic given his past actions, the book begins on a troubling note in the preface itself, where not only does the first footnote cite "many letters (I've received)" as the source for his statement, indicating a troubling lack of academic rigor, but he then proceeds to grandiosity in the 2nd paragraph of p.2, where he writes:
. . . I feel safe in saying that virtually all people -- even people of exceptional intelligence -- who merely read this book once or twice at an ordinary pace will miss many of its most important points. This book, therefore, is not a book to be read; it is a book to be studied with the same care that one would use in studying, for example, a textbook of engineering.
Okay then, Mr. If-I-do-say-so-myself. . .
Luckily the first chapter, describing how we will never be able to control or predict the development of an advanced society, largely avoids further evidence of these issues. Kaczynski uses clear, precise prose with a somewhat staccato rhythm. His historical examples of the inherent difficulty in controlling complex systems do not feel controversial, though they do feel random and somewhat tedious by the end of the chapter.
Chapter 2, "Why the Technological System Will Destroy Itself" (And Everything Else), also appears logical and presents little with which to argue. In his discussion of self-propagating systems and natural selection, his analogy between biological systems and social systems seems tenuous as there's little to indicate that we have in any critical sense been able to replicate the seamless functioning of an organic system. Also, it does feel like Kaczynski dedicates an inordinate amount of space to technology-based immortality, which intuitively feels like an utter fantasy.
Overall, however, his point stands, and we get what appears to be the first formulation of his thesis on p. 68, when he says that instead of waiting for the system to destroy itself, "if the technological system were eliminated now a great deal could still be saved. The longer the system is allowed to continue. . . the worse will be the outcome. . ."
One quibble I have is with Kaczynski's introduction of the concept of "Technianity," which simply sounds clumsy. If you're talking about the religion of technology, it's not only analogous to Christianity (the only religion that ends in "-ianity") but rather to all religions and dogmas, which are commonly referred to as "-isms." It seems like it would both be more precise and aesthetically sound to call this concept either "Technism" or "Technologism."
But in any case, after almost half the book I was on board with Kaczynski's thesis and intrigued to see his proposals. Chapter 3, however, which lays out the postulates and rules for transforming society, begins on a relatively ominous note. First of all, Mao's epigraph discusses a "principal contradiction," which seems itself to contradict Kaczynski's entire first chapter dedicated to the inherent complexity and insolubility of system-level problems. Next, the chapter's very first paragraph, with its prescription of "success," recalls the principal issue anyone might have when approaching this book: given his past actions, how credible can Mr. Kaczynski really expect us to find him as a determiner and prescriber of a political movement's success? His past actions don't grant him much benefit of any doubt.
The chapter itself is fairly innocuous, as Kaczynski's "postulates" on the nature of radical political movements are sound and the "rules" based on these postulates are logical. A minor organizational issue I had would be solved by simply shifting the explanation of the postulates to precede the rules in order to provide a more intuitive transition.
The bulk of the chapter, however, is dedicated to tedious and over-explanatory examples of these postulates and rules in action, focusing chiefly on the Irish independence movement and the Bolshevik revolution. These are frankly unnecessary, and they divert the momentum of Kaczynski's argument.
The end of this chapter is where Kaczynski really began to lose me, as he engages in needlessly harsh attacks on other thinkers in the field, beginning with Chellis Glendinning and Arne Naess. He then proceeds to refer to basically the entire group of writers -- including Ivan Illich and John Zerzan -- as "useless." This is not merely unprofessional; Kaczynski's arrogance and belligerence undermine the merits of his arguments and put his readers on the defensive (and in my case, more intent on finding holes). Furthermore, his lack of civility immediately reminds readers of his past crimes, which one would think he would want to avoid.
With regards to the content of his closing argument in this chapter, Kaczynski's goal is to "(bring) about the collapse of the technological system," but this goal appears to violate his very first rule in that it is anything but "simple." It's also not readily apparent how this would be "irreversible," in violation of Rule III.
The first two pages of the last chapter -- where Kaczynski writes among other things, "No specific route to victory for an anti-tech movement can be laid out in advance." -- deflated any hope I had of the book offering real, practicable solutions. The first three guidelines for revolutionary movements are: "build its own internal sources of power," "build power in relation to its social environment," and "do what it can to undermine people's faith in the technological system." For those keeping track, none of these are "clear, concrete, simple" objectives, thus violating his 1st rule.
Two pages later Kaczynski makes the unfortunate choice of pointing to Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and jihadist suicide bombers as examples of those with the necessary dedication to a movement. I can't imagine many people wanting to be included in such company, and its at best a dubious association to conjure for somebody already on questionable moral ground.
Throughout the rest of the chapter, which again gets bogged down in justification of theory by way of over-explanation of history, Kaczynski skates around addressing certain points which seem far more relevant to the discussion, and the omission of which makes his argument feel incomplete. For example, on p. 153 he mentions and dismisses the concern over nuclear winter as something in which "serious students of this matter do not believe." He offers no evidence for this claim besides a lone, unelaborated book citation.
A few pages later he reluctantly recommends undemocratic hierarchy as a method of political organization while only acknowledging in passing the danger of this method and not giving any specifics at all as to how this hierarchy should be organized to prevent abuse/corruption of power. Frankly, this feels not only misdirected but lazy, and one can't help but feel that he should have devoted much more energy to these points than he did to the history of Ireland and Russia, or to the fantasy of immortality. By this point my confusion over his reliance on these exhaustive historical examples had been resolved, as it became clear that he was substituting these historical events for any proof of the legitimacy of his theory. As someone who spent the first half of his life in academia's hard sciences, he should have had a better grasp on academic and scientific rigor.
Finally, a big hole in Kaczynski's argument was the absence of any discussion of capitalism as one of the root problems of global society. I was pleased to see that he addressed it in one of his appendices, but I feel that it should have been a much larger part of chapter 2's discussion. His argument that capitalism is "subordinate" to technology is not entirely convincing despite his lone example of Soviet communism. Furthermore, arguing communism as the only alternative to capitalism is facile, and he certainly must understand that lone communist/socialist countries (e.g. Cuba, N. Korea) attempting to exist in an overwhelmingly capitalist global system can never survive.
I would be curious, for instance, to see what Kaczynski thinks of E.F. Shumacher's Small Is Beautiful, which discusses economics as the global driving force, superior even to technology. He lays out some interesting -- and in my inexpert opinion, much more concrete than Kazcynski's -- steps for how we can transform our capitalist economy into one that harnesses technology for the good of humans on a small scale. Given Kaczynski's opinion of the rest of his ideological cohort, he would probably scoff at Schumacher as "utterly naive" (p.121) and "useless" (p. 124). . .
In conclusion, Kaczynski presents a compelling argument on the need for anti-technological revolution, but he fails to convincingly explain (especially vis-a-vis capitalism and more general economical factors) why it is the most pressing need. Also, while childishly criticizing others for their lack of concrete solutions, he simultaneously fails to provide his own beyond a framework laid out in more concrete terms by Derrick Jensen and Gene Sharp. In fact, with his last two chapters I can't escape the impression that Kaczynski is neither as ground-breaking nor as brilliant as he believes himself to be in the arena of global revolution. He would do well to accept outside counsel in this regard.
I’ve read “The Unabomber Manifesto” for one of my classes and found it interesting, so when I was offered a free copy of this book in exchange for a review, I thought, “Why not?” Although controversial, Kaczynski did a lot of research for this book, but my rating is due to being mostly confused and not really enjoying this book as a result. The main idea I took away from this book is that he thinks technology is evil and we must rid ourselves of it, instead of becoming like the techies who want to upload their consciousness into machines and live forever or become cyborgs. One quote that stood out to me though was, “There's no free lunch when it comes to meeting our energy needs.” Not really sure about the rest of his arguments though, as this book was hard to read and comprehend for me.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Theodore John Kaczynski's Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How is a tightly reasoned treatise on...Read more
If you're familiar with Kaczynski's previous work, the title of this book should tell...Read more