Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War (A Nation Divided: Studies in the Civil War Era) 35242nd Edition
|
Charles B. Dew
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
There is a newer edition of this item:
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
This Great Struggle: America's Civil WarPaperback
For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil WarPaperback
The Hard Hand of WarPaperback
Fighting Means Killing: Civil War Soldiers and the Nature of CombatJonathan M. SteplykPaperback
The Making of a Racist: A Southerner Reflects on Family, History, and the Slave TradePaperback
The American War: A History of the Civil War EraPaperback
Customers who bought this item also bought
For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil WarPaperback
This Great Struggle: America's Civil WarPaperback
This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War (Vintage Civil War Library)Paperback
Fighting Means Killing: Civil War Soldiers and the Nature of CombatJonathan M. SteplykPaperback
Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander (Civil War America)Paperback
Pocahontas and the Powhatan Dilemma: The American Portraits SeriesPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
This incisive history should dispel the pernicious notion that the Confederacy fought the Civil War to advance the constitutional principle of states' rights and only coincidentally to preserve slavery.
(The New York Times Book Review)Dew has produced an eye-opening study....So much for states' rights as the engine of secession.
(James McPherson The New York Review of Books)Charles B. Dew offers a penetrating and incisive evaluation of secessionist ideology, with a clear eye to the priority of race over issues of constitutional rights. The principal source on which the book is built certainly appears neglected to me, and the source is worthy of exploitation: we have an opportunity here to see what Southerners said to each other and not what they said primarily to the North or to the world.
(Mark E. Neely Jr., Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties and Southern Rights: Political Prisoners and the Myth of Confederate Constitutionalism)With stunning clarity, Apostles of Disunion reminds us that race and slavery were at the center of the march toward secession. This small but powerful book should be required reading for all students of the Civil War.
(Dwight T. Pitcaithley, Chief Historian, National Park Service)Drawing on the records of secession commissioners, Charles B. Dew has provided a stunning analysis of the South’s decision to leave the United States, which brought on the Civil War. This is an important study, meticulously researched and convincingly argued. Especially now, when heated debates about the display of the Confederate flag and the historical meaning of Civil War reenactment strain the social fabric of the nation, this book is a must-read.
(James Oliver Horton, author of The Landmarks of African American History)About the Author
Charles B. Dew, W. Van Alan Clark Third Century Professor in the Social Sciences at Williams College, is the author of Bond of Iron: Master and Slave at Buffalo Forge and Ironmaker to the Confederacy: Joseph R. Anderson and the Tredegar Iron Works.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : University of Virginia Press; 35242nd edition (March 18, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 144 pages
- ISBN-10 : 081392104X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0813921044
- Item Weight : 7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 0.5 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#356,850 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #335 in Military History (Books)
- #983 in United States History (Books)
- #1,567 in U.S. Civil War History
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
My one complaint: I would like to read more of the original tracts versus his synopsis of the writings and speeches. Although he does produce a few in full in the appendix.
In so far as he demonstrates that support of slavery was a popular argument, and that the argument could be made to all of the states that ended up seceding, Apostles presents good history. However, the book feels overly reductionist. Dew does address the claim that many prominent figures (such as CSA VP Alexander Stephens) made that the war was about states rights, but he does so dismissively by pointing out that these figures made reference to slavery as a motivation in 1860 or 1861. What he does not seem to address is the fact that states rights is addressed in virtually all of the speeches that he reproduces in the book alongside slavery. Of course, some might argue that states rights to decide the slavery question is the same as slavery itself, but it really doesn't even consider the possibility that the commissioners might be arguing to different constituencies, some of whom would be more swayed by states rights as a principle, and other more by the call to slavery. Because he only sets out to prove that slavery was mentioned by all of the delegations trying to sell secession to the southern states, Dew does not convincingly make the case that slavery was the only primary cause of the war. Such as case is made by other historians of course, but Dew is not one of them.
Rather, Dew is simply pulling out racially charged language present throughout the writings of the time, and draws a sweeping conclusion about a complex event in history. It is valuable scholarship in isolation, but is not particularly usefully for really understanding the war, and certainly does not merit respect as a monography on the topic when it is merely an overly stretched article with a single point.
The result was a study into the letters and speeches of the secession commissioners from the first states that seceded to the remaining slave owning states in the attempt to form a new nation. Dew’s analysis of those documents revealed what was said about the reasons for secession by leading figures of the South and the secession commissioners. The study served as the reason he wrote Apostles of Disunion where he presented both the primary documents he examined and his conclusions. The result is a concise assessment of the secession commissioners themselves and their beliefs, what they wrote and said concerning the issue of secession both privately and publicly, the reactions to their words by their audiences, and the conclusions Dew drew from his research.
Instead of trying to speak for the commissioners, Dew chose to let their words and actions speak for themselves. He detailed the personal history of each commissioner as well as the context of the situation in the various states the commissioners spoke in. This gave the words of these commissioners a setting in which they could be understood for what they were instead of just words on paper. Dew drew attention to the rhetoric of slavery and race which were prominently mentioned multiple times in each address to the secession conventions. This was a sharp contrast to long held views by some that the war was not about slavery or race, but that of state’s rights, economic differences, or constitutional arguments. Dew pointed out that while the commissioners did bring up those points, they did not place the emphasis on those points while they spoke at length about slavery and race.
He also described the reactions to the commissioner’s addresses from both individuals and newspapers which also focused on the issues of race and slavery stated by the commissioners, and not on any other issue. Dew’s major drawback is that he did not explore the conventions or the makeup of the delegates beyond that of a cursory examination. In many cases the commissioner’s speeches were merely exhortations to openly receptive audiences while others failed to sway their audiences into outright secession although in some instances the speeches may have caused some delegates to finally side with secession.
The result is a slim tome in which Dew was able to show that the fear of slavery’s elimination as well as racial equality was the primary cause of the war because that was what those commissioners focused on in those speeches. In doing so Dew was able to fill in a gap in the historiography of the months prior to the war by limiting the book’s topic to that of the secession commissioners and their own words which speak for themselves as to why secession was desired by many in the South.

