OR
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now Kindle Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$5.95
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 4 million more titles $9.99 to buy -
Audiobook
$5.95 $5.95 with discounted Audible membership - Hardcover
$17.1063 Used from $2.46 15 New from $9.25 1 Collectible from $27.00 - Paperback
$11.6961 Used from $3.06 36 New from $9.51
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
AS SEEN IN THE NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY THE SOCIAL DILEMMA
A WIRED "ALL-TIME FAVORITE BOOK"
A FINANCIAL TIMES BEST BOOK
"THE CONSCIENCE OF SILICON VALLEY"- GQ
“Profound . . . Lanier shows the tactical value of appealing to the conscience of the individual. In the face of his earnest argument, I felt a piercing shame about my own presence on Facebook. I heeded his plea and deleted my account.”
- Franklin Foer, The New York Times Book Review
“Mixes prophetic wisdom with a simple practicality . . . Essential reading.”
- The New York Times (Summer Reading Preview)
You might have trouble imagining life without your social media accounts, but virtual reality pioneer Jaron Lanier insists that we’re better off without them. In Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, Lanier, who participates in no social media, offers powerful and personal reasons for all of us to leave these dangerous online platforms.
Lanier’s reasons for freeing ourselves from social media’s poisonous grip include its tendency to bring out the worst in us, to make politics terrifying, to trick us with illusions of popularity and success, to twist our relationship with the truth, to disconnect us from other people even as we are more “connected” than ever, to rob us of our free will with relentless targeted ads. How can we remain autonomous in a world where we are under continual surveillance and are constantly being prodded by algorithms run by some of the richest corporations in history that have no way of making money other than being paid to manipulate our behavior? How could the benefits of social media possibly outweigh the catastrophic losses to our personal dignity, happiness, and freedom? Lanier remains a tech optimist, so while demonstrating the evil that rules social media business models today, he also envisions a humanistic setting for social networking that can direct us toward a richer and fuller way of living and connecting with our world.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHenry Holt and Co.
- Publication dateMay 29, 2018
- File size3651 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
A WIRED "All-Time Favorite Book"
A Financial Times Best Book of 2018
“Profound . . . Lanier shows the tactical value of appealing to the conscience of the individual. In the face of his earnest argument, I felt a piercing shame about my own presence on Facebook. I heeded his plea and deleted my account.”
―Franklin Foer, The New York Times Book Review
“Mixes prophetic wisdom with a simple practicality . . . Essential reading.”
―The New York Times (Summer Reading Preview)
“The title says it all . . . Lanier advocates untethering from social media, which fosters addiction and anomie and generally makes us feel worse and more fearful about each other and the world . . . The experiment could be a useful one, though it will darken the hearts of the dark lords―a winning argument all its own.” ―Kirkus Reviews
“Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now is not anti-tech or even anti-phone. It is one of the most optimistic books about the Internet I’ve ever read because it dares to hope for better. Profoundly skeptical of the business model that undergirds social media, Lanier demonstrates the ways in which our social media accounts make us not consumer but product, our every connection monitored by unseen third parties who harvest our data, monetize our communication, and curate and manipulate our behavior. Another online life is possible, but first we have to destroy the one we’re trapped in. The great news is you don’t have to take to the streets―you don’t even have to leave your room. You can do it all by pressing one little key . . . A blisteringly good, urgent, essential read.” ―Zadie Smith, author of Feel Free
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B079DTVVG8
- Publisher : Henry Holt and Co. (May 29, 2018)
- Publication date : May 29, 2018
- Language : English
- File size : 3651 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 147 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #47,989 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Jaron Lanier is known as the father of virtual reality technology and has worked on the interface between computer science and medicine, physics, and neuroscience. He lives in Berkeley, California.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I was frustrated with the author's insistence in refusing to impute (what I regard as merited) moral culpability on Silicon Valley techies for what the book itself exposes as positively evil. I don't think his optimism is warranted at all. His is a desperate, self-abandoning faith of a troubled ascetic amid an endlessly protracted dark night of the soul. His optimism would be almost endearing if it were not so absurd at points (like when he laments over AOC's use of BUMMER, not realizing that she and other opportunistic populists like her, on both the left and the right, are the very incarnations of BUMMER).
I am far too cynical and pessimistic to see any silver lining to this situation. What the author calls "BUMMER" has irreparably destroyed the promise, potential and hope of humanity as a whole. The trajectory and evolution of human civilization has been hopelessly derailed.
We are all in hell now. There's no exit. Godot is never coming. The only hope remaining is the giant solar flare that will wipe out the grid.
This book reminded me of my Sunday school discussions regarding the inclusion of Ecclesiastes in the Biblical canon. This book reminded me why such a book made it into the canon. Regarding social media and the resultant chaos, "Vanity of vanities; all is vanity. Better is the end of a thing than the beginning thereof" (Eccl. 1:2, 7:8).
Having said all that, I liked the book and the author. Even if the situation is hopelessly helpless, I want to see it for what it is, even if I end up like King Lear at having had and lost some infinite thing, crying out in hapless despair, "Never, never, never, never, never." To borrow an image from Tool, I want my "third eye" torn open, even if what I see is the face of hell.
Anyways, to end in a more positive note, I hope more books like this are written. Thanks to the author and publishers.
-------
"The bird is freed " LOL - The billionaire who faked Autism and whose family got rich from blood diamonds just bought Twitter. This only substantiates this reviewer's opinion on social media. I won't be the only one wishing for the big solar flare when Twitter becomes Parlor 2.0.
Top reviews from other countries
Jaron Lanier wants to encourage you right now. Ten Arguments For Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now (which I'll abbreviate to Ten Arguments, thank you very much!) is Lanier's 4th book. As one of Virtual Reality's prime movers, Lanier is perhaps silicon valley's most respected Jeremiah. Based on his tech credentials, you might guess that Lanier champions social media. He doesn't. Ten Arguments is his attempt to get everyone to shed it.
Before opening the book, its front cover immediately entices with a visual metaphor. There's a scene of outstanding beauty - the reflection of an azure sky in the foreground, with snow-capped mountains in the distance - rudely interrupted by a chat bubble. It feels like a statement that any interaction with nature needs some commentary mediated by social media, even if that interaction materialises in the form of a pretty picture on a book cover. A statement about the pervasiveness of social media then, and the fact that it's everywhere, even on the cover of a book which is about discouraging you from using social media. Very meta.
Lanier proceeds to make a forceful case through 10 arguments. Lanier is always sweet and likeable, both in writing and videos, though he's sometimes indulgent. Ten Arguments is notably less self-indulgent than his previous works. If his renowned sesquipedalian* prose has irked you before, you'll be pleased to know that he's relatively plain and direct in his writing here. Besides the odd** acronym, the prose in Ten Arguments isn't as circuitous as it's been in Lanier's previous works. The arguments are:
1. You are losing your free will
2. Quitting social media is the most finely targeted way to resist the insanity of our times
3. Social media is making you into an asshole
4. Social media is undermining truth
5. Social media is making what you say meaningless
6. Social media is destroying your capacity for empathy
7. Social media is making you unhappy
8. Social media doesn't want you to have economic dignity
9. Social media is making politics impossible
10. Social media hates your soul
Lanier's arguments often incorporate what he groups as BUMMERs. I won't spoil the acronym here. But he includes Google, Facebook and to a lesser extent Twitter within that group of BUMMERs, alongside a few others. All of the arguments are targeted at BUMMERs.
Many of the arguments feel as though they were written for an audience of citizens, rather than individuals. The risk an activity poses to society might not dissuade individuals from contributing to a particular activity, and in this book, it sometimes feels as though Lanier has confused the societal drawbacks of using social media with personal ones. This is isn't a serious flaw, but Ten Arguments For Us All Deleting Social Media Accounts Right Now probably would've been a more accurate title.
Speaking of the arguments, some of them are stronger than others. Let's look at a weaker argument first: I found the suggestions raised in Argument 8 - "Social Media Doesn't Want You To Have Economic Dignity" problematic. Lanier suggests that we directly monetise services like search and social media, and that within that system, users earn money on the basis of their contributions, provided those contributions are popular. So, sort of like a subscription model, but with a reciprocal financial component for subscribers.
I find this problematic because once you're monetising on the basis of subscription, you've changed the revenue model. In our current system, BUMMERs offer services for free to attract people. People are attracted to those services and provide data by using them. Data is then the crude oil which is refined and then sold on to advertisers, and that's how BUMMERs make their money.
In Lanier's proposed subscription model, the popularity of your posts wouldn't increase revenue unless your posts resulted in more people adopting subscriptions for the given services, so I'm not sure why BUMMERs would feel inclined to pay users for their contributions. It wouldn't make financial sense for them to. Remember, according to this suggestion, we've stripped away the whole ad-revenue model, and so in theory, popularity (which is really only useful as "engagement") doesn't matter any more. Subscriptions do.
Furthermore, Lanier partially concludes the argument with "It just isn't right to tell people they are no longer valuable to society when the biggest companies exist only because of data that comes from those same people". I'm an economic layperson, so take everything I've just said with a huge grain of salt - but I have a slight problem with this too. Yes, the companies only exist because of the data that comes from those same people, but as Lanier alludes to throughout the book, the monetary value these companies accrue comes from their ability to use that data to modify behaviour and provide services to advertisers. I'm on board with the underlying sentiment, and the overall sense that we should try to create a fairer way to redistribute the spoils of mass data mining, but this argument in particular wasn't a very strong one for me.
Okay, now the stronger arguments: "You are losing your free will", "Social media is destroying your capacity for empathy" and "Social media hates your soul arguments" were all persuasive and passionate. If you only read one argument in the entire book, I recommend that it's the one on free will, as that's the most gripping argument for both citizens and individuals.
Arguments aside, there are more things that the book could've covered, and there aren't many compelling solutions to accompany the plea to delete social media accounts. When I've spoken to people about my own experience deleting social media accounts, they tend to ask me questions like "How'd you keep up with events?" and "Don't you miss out on things?" or "How'd you stay up to date?". In fact, if you speak to people about social media, and you'll soon discover that most people aren't in love with it. They dislike it, and often want to it quit too. It isn't hard to persuade people that social media is deleterious. It is however, very hard to persuade people that social media is not indispensable. On that basis, Lanier was a little remiss to not explore these common objections and queries a little further. So, prospective reader, you should know that Ten Arguments is more of a polemic than it is a primer. For practical guidance on actually getting by with substantially less / no social media at all, I highly recommend Catherine Price's How to Break Up with Your Phone.
Back to Ten Arguments. In the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Russia's alleged tampering of the recent US presidential election, revenge porn, tribalism and tax avoidance, this book is important. It is a civic duty to examine your (yes, YOU!) relationship with social media given our present zeitgeist, and that's precisely what Ten Arguments forces you to do. With that in mind, think of Ten Arguments as an examining body, and take an opportunity to examine your relationship with these "indispensable" services, and the impact of your relationship on society, by reading this book.
4*
*I'm aware of the irony here
**I'm aware of the double entendre here









