Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television Paperback – March 1, 1978
| Jerry Mander (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
A total departure from previous writing about television, this book is the first ever to advocate that the medium is not reformable. Its problems are inherent in the technology itself and are so dangerous -- to personal health and sanity, to the environment, and to democratic processes -- that TV ought to be eliminated forever.
Weaving personal experiences through meticulous research, the author ranges widely over aspects of television that have rarely been examined and never before joined together, allowing an entirely new, frightening image to emerge. The idea that all technologies are "neutral," benign instruments that can be used well or badly, is thrown open to profound doubt. Speaking of TV reform is, in the words of the author, "as absurd as speaking of the reform of a technology such as guns."
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMarch 1, 1978
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.85 x 8.25 inches
- ISBN-100688082742
- ISBN-13978-0688082741
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Jerry Mander holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Economics, spent 15 years in the advertising business, including five as president and partner of Freeman, Mander & Gossage, San Francisco, one of the most celebrated agencies in the country. After quitting commercial advertising, he achieved national fame for his public service campaigns, leading the Wall Street Journal to call him "the Ralph Nader of adevertising." In 1972 he founded the country's first non-profit ad agency, taking leave of that in 1974. Mander is co-author of The Great International Paper Airplane Book.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : William Morrow Paperbacks; Reprint edition (March 1, 1978)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0688082742
- ISBN-13 : 978-0688082741
- Item Weight : 12.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.85 x 8.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #209,678 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #164 in TV History & Criticism
- #915 in Communication & Media Studies
- #1,229 in Christian Bible Study Guides (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Getting rid of a technology in which we've been so immersed for decades, is like breaking a heroin addiction or some other attachment; the chemistry of the brain requires satisfaction of the habit, or else one can go crazy without a support group and a sense of attachment to a Higher Entity.
I'll always feel a need to get a huge chuckle out of watching SNL or Monty Python; will feel the excitement of venturing into outer space while contemplating the new challenges of dealing with beings in other parts of the universe, as presented in the "Star Trek" pantheon of episodes, and the human/otherworldly sentient beings conundrums which may and will arise due to different religio/cultural/evolutionary paths taken.
But I strive to get out and enjoy the forests, taking walks and paying attention to the life forms and landscape, driving by the ocean and smell the sea air, observe insects, watch documentaries on science, history, culture, social events, and participate in the thrill of traveling to new places to meet and interact with people in far away lands. Being a Baha'i allows me the opportunity to both appreciate technology and how to keep that subservient to the Creator---The Great Spirit as expressed in other cultures---and therefore feel at least some semblance of balance.
An Endless Debate with Terrible Consequences.
From Kenneth Ellman, ke@kennethellman.com, Box 18, Newton, New Jersey 07860.
I have owned this book for many years and recently reading it again am reminded of the pervasive and dramatic effect of the technology of projected images using electronics. This of course is relatively recent technology and the effects upon human beings of such continuous use is not fully appreciated. This Mander book was and remains an excellent introduction to exploring the various commentary and ideas as to how television has impacted our civilization.
You do not have to agree with his conclusions to appreciate that the questions raised are significant and worthy of continuing study and investigation.
I like many believe that the use of Television to convey information is both deficient and injurious to those exposed to it. Whether for entertainment or academic pursuits Television does not interact with the human eye and brain as does the printed word or personal interaction with your fellow human beings. Yet Television serves for some as a significant substitute for reading and personal communication. Printed photographic images however displayed may explain, in part, this difference. For reasons not yet fully examined the human brain does not appear to process or retain the information conveyed by television in the same manner such is conveyed by the written word on paper or stone or such other solid material or in person with another individual. It is this neurological distinction more that the content of the message, the information, that I think is responsible for the different response of the Brain and Eye.
But my experience and beliefs are not sufficient to explore this question as the use and application of Television varies from transmitting images of space exploration to the teaching of academic classes over electronic medium such as the Internet, to that of mundane entertainment broadcasts in the hope that money can be made from advertisers during the watching by you and me.
If television is capable of definition it must be as the invention of electronics being used in a manner similar to images created by solid material such as paper or stone or wood, etc., or painting or engraving on varied materials or such other method that does not require energy to maintain after creation. Yet this definition also fails as what is projected electronically as images is also permanently retained in the form of video, CD or other storage devices. It is true that electronic storage is useless without energy to open it and other storage methods such as paper or stone, etc. require no energy just accessibility and eyesight or tactile sensation for Braille.
But the fundamental question is the effect upon the human brain of this technology and the social choices made to use it to convey information in a manner so different from the printed work. An observation can be made that reading letters and symbols into words and ideas as a language and communication assimilated by the user is participatory, under the control of the reader and retained differently by the brain from the projection of images through electronic means such as television. Television is not normally participatory or controlled by the user in the same manner. Reading is normally visual except for the blind where it become tactile. Electronic television is auditory and visual with images moving in a manner our brain is not likely to ever encounter in reality and impacts memory very differently. It is memory and retention that is most extraordinarily affected by electronic television and the reason why remembrance of information from viewing television is very different when compared and tested to that of reading the printed language.
When we read we take the representations of the letters and words and create in our mind thoughts which allow us to access the information of language. When we observe electronic television images the information is not normally conveyed by the printed word. Yet television can also simply convey the letters and words of language without sound or movement other than that controlled by the user. So is there a difference to the brain and eye in reading a book on a computer or electronic screen? Electronic Television in fictional representations of fast moving images is normally designed to be sensed as if actually occurring. The Eye and Brain see the images and hear the associated sounds as if information happening in reality yet at the same time the mind knows or should know, you are not there.
There are many questions that our experience with images and sounds conveyed by television should be examined and determined for the well being of our civilization. Ask yourself if this particular invention, television, and the way it is used, has not significantly effected our behavior and intellectual activity? Ask yourself if before you die would you regret the time your mind spent watching television rather than other pursuits? So many hours, lifetimes, for what?
So in this review I state that Jerry Mander in his Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television raises issues that should be addressed as to the effect of this technology upon us and what we can do to learn more how it interacts with our Neurology. It is an older book but remains very relevant to our contemporary experience. You should also read Endangered Minds by Jane M. Healy and the very many medical, scientific and psychological studies on television and human Neurology and intellectual functioning, including testing scores. When we read we take the representations of the letters and words and create in our mind thoughts which allow us to access the information of language. When we observe electronic television images it is significantly different from acquiring information from reading or in person communication with our fellow man. I am interested in this subject and solicit any communications regarding the Neurological and Psychological effect of television and electronic imaging.
Kenneth Ellman, ke@kennethellman.com, Box 18, Newton, New Jersey 07860
It would seem that the author’s main point of contention with late-20th-century life is that it is not natural enough and that we have become too artificial in all areas of life. Having purposefully moved from the city to a rural area myself (for many of the reasons laid out in this book), I do think that the author’s perspective is a bit skewed by constantly being immersed in elite, urban society. Even in developed countries, a good portion of people are more “connected” to the Earth and they don’t have the luxury of sitting around the television. With the rise of cable and then the Internet, the influential power of the television has quickly become a lot less monolithic as well.
All-in-all, I find this book to be the godless, anti-Western, pseudo-mystical, and Marxist commentary that has, ironically, been propagated by mass media and authoritarians since before the surge of television. I agree with the author’s premises of finding meaning in life by simple and natural means, and I agree that much has been lost in our quickly-changing world. I just don’t agree on why I should be motivated to make moves to be more naturalistic.









