Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats 1st Edition

by Matt Grossmann (Author), David A. Hopkins (Author)

30 ratings

ISBN-13: 978-0190626600

ISBN-10: 0190626607

Why is ISBN important?

Share <Embed>

Other Sellers

from

Other Sellers

See all 4 versions

Used: Good | Details

Sold by Beyond Compare Store

Fulfilled by Amazon

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

FREE delivery Friday, December 24. Order within 23 hrs 31 mins

Or fastest delivery Thursday, December 23

Arrives before Christmas

Only 10 left in stock (more on the way).

Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.

FREE delivery Friday, December 24. Order within 23 hrs 31 mins

Or fastest delivery Thursday, December 23

Arrives before Christmas

Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.

Why do Republican politicians promise to rein in government, only to face repeated rebellions from Republican voters and media critics for betraying their principles? Why do Democratic politicians propose an array of different policies to match the diversity of their supporters, only to become
mired in stark demographic divisions over issue priorities? In short, why do the two parties act so differently-whether in the electorate, on the campaign trail, or in public office?

Asymmetric Politics offers a comprehensive explanation: The Republican Party is the vehicle of an ideological movement while the Democratic Party is a coalition of social groups. Republican leaders prize conservatism and attract support by pledging loyalty to broad values. Democratic leaders instead
seek concrete government action, appealing to voters' group identities and interests by endorsing specific policies.

This fresh and comprehensive investigation reveals how Democrats and Republicans think differently about politics, rely on distinct sources of information, argue past one another, and pursue divergent goals in government. It provides a rigorous new understanding of contemporary polarization and
governing dysfunction while demonstrating how longstanding features of American politics and public policy reflect our asymmetric party system.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Lee Drutman
127
Hardcover
26 offers from $14.26
Lilliana Mason
130
Paperback
29 offers from $12.43
Sidney Tarrow
Paperback
12 offers from $29.99
Marty Cohen
20
Paperback
47 offers from $3.79
Ken Kollman
Paperback
11 offers from $29.50
Alan I. Abramowitz
40
Hardcover
51 offers from $4.91

What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Lee Drutman
127
Hardcover
26 offers from $14.26
Lilliana Mason
130
Paperback
29 offers from $12.43
Sidney Tarrow
Paperback
12 offers from $29.99
Marty Cohen
20
Paperback
47 offers from $3.79
Ken Kollman
Paperback
11 offers from $29.50
Matthew Levendusky
9
Paperback
18 offers from $9.99

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Not many books change how you think about American politics. This one will. Grossmann and Hopkins' research decisively shows that the two parties are not the same-and once you understand the ways in which they're different, American politics begins to make a lot more sense." --Ezra Klein, Editor-in-Chief, Vox

"In this detailed and well-argued book, Grossmann and Hopkins present formidable evidence against a still-too-common depiction of American parties, which views their 'polarization' as a consequence of their equivalent march away from some imagined middle. Asymmetric Politics encourages a badly-needed re-examination of the very distinctive internal workings and strategic choices of Democrats and Republicans." --Paul Pierson, John Gross Professor of Political Science, University of California at Berkeley, and co-author of Winner-Take-All Politics

"This deeply clarifying book not only helps us gain a better grasp of our polarized politics, it also helps to show how the methods of political science can help bridge the gap between the theory and practice of American political life-bringing the former down to earth and lifting the latter toward a more coherent understanding of itself. It is required reading in this confusing time." --Yuval Levin, editor, National Affairs

About the Author

Matt Grossmann is Director of the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research and Associate Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University.

David A. Hopkins is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Boston College.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Oxford University Press; 1st edition (September 7, 2016)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 416 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0190626607
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0190626600
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.3 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 9.1 x 0.9 x 6.1 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #244,485 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #50 in Political Ideologies
- #131 in Political Parties (Books)
- #305 in Democracy (Books)

Customer Reviews:
30 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Matt Grossmann
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
Matt Grossmann is Director of the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University and Senior Fellow at the Niskanen Center. A regular contributor to FiveThirtyEight, he has published analysis in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico and hosts the Science of Politics podcast. He is the author of Red State Blues (2019), Asymmetric Politics (with David A. Hopkins, 2016), Artists of the Possible (2014), and The Not-So-Special Interests (2012).
See more on the author's page
David A. Hopkins
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.
David A. Hopkins is an associate professor of political science at Boston College, where he has taught since 2010. His research focuses on American political parties, elections, and voters.
Professor Hopkins is the author of Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2017); Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats (with Matt Grossmann; Oxford University Press, 2016); and Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics, 15th edition (with Nelson W. Polsby, Aaron Wildavsky, and Steven E. Schier; Rowman & Littlefield, 2020).
Professor Hopkins writes frequently about American politics for popular audiences. His analysis has appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Vox, and other publications, and he blogs regularly about current events at honestgraft.com. He received his A.B. from Harvard University and his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.
See more on the author's page

Customer reviews

5 star		60%
4 star		12%
3 star		18%
2 star		5%
1 star		4%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Gregory Thomas Bogosian

Good insights. But conclusion is overly pessimistic.

Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2019

Verified Purchase

Summary: The two major political parties in the United States, the Democrats and the Republicans, are not mirror images. The democrats are a coalition of discreet social groups that each demand specific domestic policies. The republicans are a vehicle for the Conservative movement. So, they face different incentives. Americans favor liberal policies, but conservative principles. So the incentive for the Democrats is to play up their specific policies, and downplay the principles behind those polices. The Republicans, as the conservative party, face the opposite incentive, the incentive to play up their principles, but downplay what those principles imply in practice. The result is that the Democrats meet broad support for each of their policies, but face a backlash when they try to implement too many of them. The Republicans meet broad support for their rhetoric, but face a backlash when they try to translate that rhetoric into actual legislation.
Pros: The evidence is extensively documented. This thesis explains how the Democrats and Republicans have both survived. It shows that those who argue that the Democrats are too far left to survive and those who argue that the Republicans are too far right to survive are both wrong.
Cons: The conclusion is pretty weak. Grossman argues that there is an aporia in American public opinion that makes any attempt at resolving political polarization through institutional change futile. This way of thinking only makes sense if you ignore the research that public opinion shifts in response to the elites (See Democracy for Realists). I personally suspect that changing the electoral system would lead to different elites taking power in America, and therefore lead to different public opinion in America. In short, good insights, good documentation of data and evidence. But this book is too pessimistic.

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

Brett

The Best Basic Political Ideology Book

Reviewed in the United States on September 18, 2017

Verified Purchase

Honestly, this is one of the best instructional aides for any political science class. I highly recommend this book, even for adults disinterested in politics or for a light read. The fundamental breakdowns of both ideologies and their brief evolution in the United States is very well developed and explained simply. As the title suggests, both parties are not diametrical opponents of each other and is a common misconception. This book achieves clarifying this misconception.

8 people found this helpful

Helpful

Amazon Customer

Excellent book on American politics

Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2016

Verified Purchase

This is one of the most interesting books on politics I have read in awhile. Its central thesis that the Republican party is primarily characterized by ideology (e.g., small/limited government, emphasis on individual freedom, robust national defense, traditional moral values, etc) whereas the Democrat party is better characterized as a collection of special interest groups (e.g., organized labor, environmentalists, feminists, minority group interests, etc.) is documented with a significant amount of data. The authors also make the case that many Americans are symbolically in favor of small/limited government while at the same time supportive of many government programs advocated by liberals. Although a non-ideological Republican Donald Trump was just elected president (thanks to our antiquated and unfair electoral college system) he clearly appealed to the conservative ideological concerns held by traditional Republicans as well as many white blue collar Americans. I believe that this book deserves much broader reading than is suggested by the limited number of reviews. It especially provides important food for thought for Democrats as their party now struggles to to find meaning in the face of significant electoral defeats.

31 people found this helpful

Helpful

Chris Prussing

Ow! Truth really does hurt!

Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2016

Verified Purchase

Holy cow, was this an agonizing read. I felt as if I was re-living the political tempests of the past 50 years in all their disappointment and ugliness. And now here we are, with a minority of voters having elected Donald Trump to office. If you want insights as to how this could have happened, Asymmetric Politics gives you a container load - if you can take it without grinding your back teeth to powder. Anyone wondering, "Well, now what do we do?" could very likely benefit from Asymmetric Politics to gain a clearer understanding of the situation ... daunting as that understanding might be. Like being handed a flashlight and discovering the path that has lead you to the brink of a 10-story hole in the floor, and you can't go backward.

36 people found this helpful

Helpful

bell

dull but insightful

Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2018

Verified Purchase

Great Ideas, but it is dry and repetitive. The Authors write like they are submiting their writing to a journal, so it is a little dull, but they do have some insights.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Don Anderson

Five Stars

Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2017

Verified Purchase

My kind of read as a struggling citizen.

3 people found this helpful

Helpful

Dr. Denny

Five Stars

Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2017