
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-24% $35.11$35.11
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$28.61$28.61
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Baci Sales
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
Asymmetric Politics offers a comprehensive explanation: The Republican Party is the vehicle of an ideological movement while the Democratic Party is a coalition of social groups. Republican leaders prize conservatism and attract support by pledging loyalty to broad values. Democratic leaders instead seek concrete government action, appealing to voters' group identities and interests by endorsing specific policies.
This fresh and comprehensive investigation reveals how Democrats and Republicans think differently about politics, rely on distinct sources of information, argue past one another, and pursue divergent goals in government. It provides a rigorous new understanding of contemporary polarization and governing dysfunction while demonstrating how longstanding features of American politics and public policy reflect our asymmetric party system.
- ISBN-100190626607
- ISBN-13978-0190626600
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 7, 2016
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.1 x 0.6 x 6.1 inches
- Print length416 pages
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Review
"In this detailed and well-argued book, Grossmann and Hopkins present formidable evidence against a still-too-common depiction of American parties, which views their 'polarization' as a consequence of their equivalent march away from some imagined middle. Asymmetric Politics encourages a badly-needed re-examination of the very distinctive internal workings and strategic choices of Democrats and Republicans." --Paul Pierson, John Gross Professor of Political Science, University of California at Berkeley, and co-author of Winner-Take-All Politics
"This deeply clarifying book not only helps us gain a better grasp of our polarized politics, it also helps to show how the methods of political science can help bridge the gap between the theory and practice of American political life-bringing the former down to earth and lifting the latter toward a more coherent understanding of itself. It is required reading in this confusing time." --Yuval Levin, editor, National Affairs
Book Description
About the Author
David A. Hopkins is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Boston College.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (September 7, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0190626607
- ISBN-13 : 978-0190626600
- Item Weight : 1.28 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.1 x 0.6 x 6.1 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,021,717 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #776 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,472 in Democracy (Books)
- #2,275 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

David A. Hopkins is an associate professor of political science at Boston College, where he has taught since 2010. His research focuses on American political parties, elections, and voters.
Professor Hopkins is the author of Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2017); Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats (with Matt Grossmann; Oxford University Press, 2016); and Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics, 16th edition (with Nelson W. Polsby, Aaron Wildavsky, and Steven E. Schier; Rowman & Littlefield, 2024).
Professor Hopkins writes frequently about American politics for popular audiences. His analysis has appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Vox, and other publications, and he blogs regularly about current events at his website Honest Graft. He received his A.B. from Harvard University and his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.

Matt Grossmann is Director of the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University and Senior Fellow at the Niskanen Center. A regular contributor to FiveThirtyEight, he has published analysis in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico and hosts the Science of Politics podcast. He is the author of Red State Blues (2019), Asymmetric Politics (with David A. Hopkins, 2016), Artists of the Possible (2014), and The Not-So-Special Interests (2012).
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I also appreciate that the book taught me about kludgeocracy - I hadn't heard of that concept before but it seems to be a pretty good explainer for why the gears of Congress grind to a halt so often.
Where the book falls flat for me is in not better anticipating or foreseeing how much the Republican party has changed under Trump's influence (in the years since the book was written) - looking back now the history feels a bit stale and quaint - like reading a computer manual for Windows 95. The authors had picked up on the pattern of evolution in the Republican party (which is still recognizable thru Trump until today). But they seem to balk at acknowledging the weightiness of its impact on American democracy.
Coming to the last chapter I was briefly hopeful the authors might offer some insight for a way out of this mess we all feel as American citizens. But it was a bit of a letdown. While I think their analysis helped them be clear-eyed about the dim prospects of a cure at that time, and prescriptions they could reasonably offer, it also felt at the end they tried to be both-sided in assigning blame for the situation. This undercuts the book's message though - I wish they instead dug deeper to understand the driving forces for the acceleration aspect of the polarization - why it keeps getting increasingly worse. It feels like trying to understand a tornado - what is the energy the vortex is feeding off of and how can we as a people intervene to break the cycle, given the asymmetric nature of each political party? In the end I'm thankful for what insight the authors did offer still - it's pretty solidly grounded.
Pros: The evidence is extensively documented. This thesis explains how the Democrats and Republicans have both survived. It shows that those who argue that the Democrats are too far left to survive and those who argue that the Republicans are too far right to survive are both wrong.
Cons: The conclusion is pretty weak. Grossman argues that there is an aporia in American public opinion that makes any attempt at resolving political polarization through institutional change futile. This way of thinking only makes sense if you ignore the research that public opinion shifts in response to the elites (See Democracy for Realists). I personally suspect that changing the electoral system would lead to different elites taking power in America, and therefore lead to different public opinion in America. In short, good insights, good documentation of data and evidence. But this book is too pessimistic.








