- Explore more great deals on thousands of titles in our Deals in Books store.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al-Qaeda
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Wiley Architecture, Construction, & Design Sale
Save up to 40% on select architecture, construction, and design guides during August. Learn more.
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Special Offers and Product Promotions
"His witty and unmerciful intellectual attack on the doomsayers, who have been arguing for the past 50 years that rapid proliferation is just around the corner, that we stand on the brink of a new nuclear age, or that it is a few minutes to midnight, is a refreshing one."--Survival
"The narrative is liberally seasoned with striking facts and a dash of wry humour."--Times Literary Supplement
"This is both a well written book and an important scholarly contribution...Policy makers and their staffs could benefit from this piece." --Choice
"With his rare combination of wit and meticulous scholarship, John Mueller diagnoses that America is paralyzed by atomaphobia and prescribes a fifteen-chapter treatment to help us recognize that we have blown reasonable concerns about weapons of mass destruction and terrorism out of proportion and that many of our policy responses actually make things worse. Atomic Obsession is recommended bed-time reading for nervous Nellies both inside and outside of government."--Michael C. Desch, Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, and author of Power and Military Effectiveness
"John Mueller's argument will almost certainly change your interpretation of some significant events of the past half-century, and likely of some expected in the next. It did with mine."--Thomas C. Schelling, 2005 Nobel Prize Laureate in Economics, and author of Arms and Influence
"With clear-eyed logic and characteristic wit, John Mueller provides an antidote for the fear-mongering delusions that have shaped nuclear weapons policy for over fifty years. Atomic Obsession casts a skeptical eye on the nuclear mythology purveyed by hawks, doves, realists, and alarmists alike, and shows why nuclear weapons deserve a minor role in national security policymaking and virtually no role in our nightmares. It is the most reassuring book ever written about nuclear weapons, and one of the most enjoyable to read."--Stephen M. Walt, Professor of International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, and author of Taming American Power
"How much should we worry about nuclear terrorism? How far should we go to stop Iran (or North Korea) from acquiring nuclear weapons? In this fascinating and provocative book, John Mueller addresses such questions. Policymakers, scholars, students--indeed all Americans who are concerned about threats and the allocation of scarce resources--must read this volume, ponder its conclusions, and debate what now needs to be done."--Melvyn P. Leffler, Professor of History, University of Virginia, and author of For the Soul of Mankind
"...the book will certainly make you think. Added bonus: It's immensely fun to read." -- Stephen M. Walt, ForeignPolicy.com
"Mueller's achievement deserves admiration even by those inclined to resist his central thesis. The book is meticulously researched and punctuated with a dry wit that seems the perfect riposte to the pomposity of security experts who have so far tyrannized debate. Although by no means the last word on nuclear weapons, Mueller deserves praise for having the guts to shout that the atomic emperor has no clothes... the book should nevertheless be packaged up and sent to Presidents Barack Obama and Nicolas Sarkozy and Prime Minister Gordon Brown with a simple message: 'Please calm down.'" --Arms Control Today
"There is much to agree with in the book. Mueller performs an important service in puncturing some of the inflated rhetoric about nuclear weapons...Mueller provides
an unusual and fruitful perspective on nuclear history." --Science Magazine
"...this book is lively and provocative and a useful corrective to much of the mainstream consensus."--Foreign Affairs
About the Author
John Mueller is the Woody Hayes Chair of National Security Studies and Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University. He is the author of Overblown and The Remnants of War, winner of the Joseph P. Lepgold Prize for the best book on international relations in 2004, awarded by Georgetown University.
Top Customer Reviews
He develops his analysis in three parts. Part 1 looks at the actual effect of nuclear weapons and, along the way, points out that the casual lumping of chemical and biological weapons with nuclear ones into a category of "weapons of mass destruction" is something of a hysterical overreaction; conventional weapons (bullets, bombs) are far more effective at killing than chemical or biological weapons, and thus it doesn't really make sense to classify the latter with nuclear weapons. He's very persuasive on this point. As for nuclear weapons, they're bad, but Mueller explains why the detonation of one or even two atomic bombs wouldn't destroy the country. In short, we shouldn't overestimate the damage that a nuclear weapon would cause.
In Part 2, he turns his attention to history and suggests that nuclear weapons have played very little role in international politics and diplomacy, apart from wasting colossal resources and talent.Read more ›
The strongest points of the book are the scientific, the evaluation of the actual damage the atomic bomb. In terms of quantitative terms he is right on the money. His evaluation of the kinds of damage an actual terrorist attack would do to the country is also pretty sober and should be required reading for those seized in panic.
His evaluation of the actual difficulties involved for either a rogue nation or a terrorist organization is also pretty good. In particular his 20 tasks that a terrorist has to accomplish in order to deliver the bomb is first rate and I certainly hope our foes ignore his cost benefit analysis on some of these issues.
The book gets weaker when it deals with certain historical and political situations. He tends toward historical revisionism in dealing with Japan and WW II and this points on the fallacy of panic over nuclear war and the soviet threat during the cold war comes chiefly through hindsight, yet he fails to notes the failures in hindsight of those who assured us that the Soviets were strong and here to stay.
His ignorance of the Soviet Unions involvement "Nuclear Freeze" movement is horrifying. Yet his information on Chemical and biological war in history are again must reads, as he soberly takes a look at them in their historical context. He gives both Reagan and Cheney some of their due and he does correctly state that rouge nations will often use the "nuclear" threat to get financial and political advantage, yet he also totally discounts the religious motivation that makes some actors less than rational today.Read more ›
I often agree with Mueller's arguments, as in Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them, an excellent debunking of the terrorist threat and the Global War on Terror.
But in this case I think Mueller's case is just that -- a one-sided argument against nuclear alarmism that goes too far. I spent the 1980s as a peace educator and organizer, and at that time I was certainly a nuclear alarmist. The U.S. and U.S.S.R. were building massive nuclear arsenals big enough to destroy the world many times over, and the U.S. was working toward a first-strike capability, including the Star Wars program. The nuclear superpowers were on a constant state of alert, with B-52s in the air at all times. Arguing that the hair-trigger situation that existed during the Cold War was nothing to be alarmed about strains credulity. On this point Robert Jervis's 1989 book The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon is much stronger than Mueller in arguing that MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) was a fact, not a policy, and that despite periodic brinksmanship and nuclear accidents, World War III was not as likely as many of us thought at the time.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
This academic's ideas about atomic alarism and nuclear disarmament are eminently logical and make a strong case for mostly the opposite of what the U.S. Read morePublished 12 months ago by Alan Hull
A refreshing change from the fear-mongering we see so much. Mueller examines the all the aspects of various nuclear threats with something not often seen anymore, reason and... Read morePublished 23 months ago by SEAN MEADE
Other reviewers commented that this read like an academic book, but I couldn't disagree more. It is part history and part international politics, but it blends these elements... Read morePublished on April 21, 2013 by Tethys
And on that count, he is absolutely correct. We humans have lots of things we can choose to worry about. Read morePublished on August 14, 2012 by Penfist
The author's work is well documented. I found his premise compelling and I feel more comfortable with my knowledge of nuclear weapons. Read morePublished on March 10, 2012 by WBF
Very good read. Makes you rethink what terrorists are actually capable of...not much. I would highly recommend this book. For the price you can't go wrong.Published on March 6, 2012 by John O.
Author John Mueller is very erudite and well read. He has done his homework very well and presents a lot of compelling facts and figures. Read morePublished on December 16, 2010 by Judith Johnson
It will take some time--unless you are a political scholar--to get through this dense and dare we say explosive treatise on why we should not worry about nukes. Read morePublished on October 26, 2010 by Kristin J. Johnson
Atomic Obsession poses the question, "Are nuclear weapons as awful as we think they are?"
Author Mueller takes a nonconformist view on the matter and at times can be... Read more