Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris Paperback – September 30, 2010
This month's Book With Buzz: "Little Fires Everywhere" by Celeste Ng
From the bestselling author of Everything I Never Told You, a riveting novel that traces the intertwined fates of the picture - perfect Richardson family and the enigmatic mother and daughter who upend their lives. See more
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Long neglected by English-speaking scholars and Perec devotees for the author's other, more flamboyant endeavors, An Attempt... has remained a kind of secret treasure for those interested in Oulipo- and Situationist-inspired tracts of Paris. Marvelously simple and deceptively well-designed, Perec's slim volume presents itself as an artifact of the street, ushering the reader into a spontaneous phenomenology of words, conventional symbols, numbers, fleeting slogans, trajectories, colors, and, as he more technically describes them, means of locomotion, means of carrying, means of traction, degrees of determination or motivation, and body positions. --Erik Morse, bookforum.com, Sept. 24, 2010
Top customer reviews
Perec refers to the movie as The Lousy Gatsby, perhaps reflecting his own low opinion of the movie, but one wonders, had he already seen it? This Virilio sighting takes place on Saturday, October 19, but what the translator doesn’t make clear is that, although the notorious Mia Farrow-Robert Redford star vehicle had made its debut in the spring in America, it opened in Paris only three days before Virilio is spotted hurrying to see something Perec refers to as lousy. Hmm, portrait of Virilio as crowd-following trendoid? We all know people who have to see movies on opening week, even those with middling word-of-mouth. On paper Jack Clayton’s Gatsby looked like a sure thing, with Redford’s unstoppable golden boy appeal, paired with Mia Farrow’s still potent haunted poor little rich girl act. But when the movie came out, French people approved only of the look of the divine Lois Chiles as Jordan, and the approved American harpy slut routines of New American Cinema favorite Karen Black as Myrtle.
But these speculations are necessarily far removed from the chess problem Perec sets for us. What would you see if your gaze was confined to one of the busiest intersections on earth, one with dozens of buses every half hour, and car-loads of Japanese tourists snapping cameras at signposts? It’s like that Tati movie where you see through a see-through apartment building, into the mime-like silent lives of the tenants and visitors, but Perec cheats so much the payoff suffers. And were Japanese camerabugs and English schoolboys the only foreigners walking the Place de St. Sulpice that weekend? Perhaps so, otherwise he might have mentioned a few, here and there. A general exhaustion pervades the piece. He’s tired frequently. Perhaps the onset of the illness that did him in far too early? He’s just sitting there in cafes writing down snatches of “in the distance, two boys with red anoraks” and “a bird settles atop a lamppost,” together with snippets of the old color-chase game the Situationalists used to play, following a snarl of green paper blowing through the wind tunnel caused by the appearance of so many silent, snapping Japanese people staring aimlessly at French sights. The puzzle of mass tourism persists, decades after the horror nostalgia of Hiroshima Mon Amour, but here the Japanese are staring back on one’s own Place.
Makes you feel a bit like you are with the author, sitting on a chair in a bar, observing.
I tried to estimate the hours he observed each day, and the minutes (880 min!), and then combined it in a graph relating all the words he wrote during each sitting. He did get tired by Day 3...
This short journal gives us a glimpse of how much life takes place through various periods in a day over 3 days.
-- Stone: the curbs, a fountain, a church, buildings…
-- Trees (leafy, many yellowing)
-- A rather big chunk of sky (maybe one-sixth of my field of vision)
-- A cloud of pigeons that suddenly swoops down on the central plaza, between the church and fountain
-- Vehicles (their inventory remains to be made)
-- Human beings
-- Some sort of basset hound
-- Bread (baguette)
-- Lettuce (curly endive?) partially emerging from a shopping bag
Journal entries from a man sitting in a Parisian square, at various cafes at various times over a three-day period beginning Friday, October 18, 1974. The church is the Eglise Saint-Sulpice; the fountain and buildings are among the most distinguished in Paris; but Georges Perec has no desire to add to the amount that others have written about them. "My intention," he tells us in a brief preface, "was to describe the rest instead: that which is generally not taken note of, that which is not noticed, that which has no importance: what happens when nothing happens other than the weather, people, cars, and clouds."
Reading this through last night (the tiny 50-page book can easily be read in an hour), I was most conscious of the objectivity of it all. The observations are punctuated by notes about passing buses ("An 86 passes by. An 87 passes by. A 63 passes by"), the number of taxis waiting at the rank, the deliveries to nearby stores. It seemed dry, but curiously fascinating, the polar opposite of normal travel writing, yet indelibly etching a precise portrait of a particular place and time.
Writing out the passage above this morning, though, I am struck by something else: how human it is. Try as Perec might to remain objective, life sneaks in. And once in, it will not leave. That "rather big chunk of sky" (thanks to Mark Lowenthal for his no-nonsense translation) occupies maybe one-sixth of HIS field of vision. Even now, at the top of only the second page, the author has become a person, not just a camera. The cloud of pigeons are living things in unpredictable action. The human beings are still anonymous for now, but that baguette represents a whole way of life, and the maybe-curly-endive emerging from the shopping bag could be material for an entire short story. Even so, what a wonderful surprise to see this entry on page 14: "A 96 passes by, stops before the bus stop (Saint-Sulpice section); off it steps Geneviève Serreau, who takes rue des Canettes; I get her attention by knocking on the windowpane, and she comes over to say hello."
A lot has to do, though, with layout. Print each observation as a single line, and it stirs the imagination. Put them all together in a single paragraph, and you get a montage, LIFE flashing in neon, rather than an object for quiet contemplation: "I again saw buses, taxis, cars, tourist buses, trucks and vans, bikes, mopeds, Vespas, motorcycles, a postal delivery tricycle, a motorcycle-school vehicle, a driving-school car, elegant women, aging beaus, old couples, groups of children, people with bags, satchels, suitcases, dogs, pipes, umbrellas, potbellies, old skins, old schmucks, young schmucks, idlers, deliverymen, scowlers, windbags. I also saw Jean-Paul Aron, and the proprietor of the Trois Canettes restaurant, whom I had already seen this morning."
Perec was a member of the Oulipo group (Organization for Potential Literature), which sought to discipline writing though artificially imposed constraints -- most famously in Perec's LA DISPARITION (translated by Gilbert Adair as A VOID), a 300-page novel entirely eliminating the letter "e". But the beauty of constraint comes, not from the demonstration of what you cannot do, but from the glorious emergence of what you CAN. In his self-imposed objectivity, Perec attempts an exhaustive catalogue of the everyday objects in a Paris square. But everywhere, life sneaks in; the impersonal has become personal again, magnificently so.
Or has it? Look at this another way, from the top of one of the towers of the church, say. Here is this 38-year-old-man sitting alone at a cafe table, nursing a beer or a gentian, watching the world go by. He sees some people he knows, yes; he even greets a few of them; but they pass on by, leaving him to his task. Is there not something lonely in his detachment, as though looking through the window at a party to which he has not been invited? Perhaps I am making this up. But it is hard not to recall that this first-generation Frenchman is in fact a Holocaust orphan of Czech Jewish ancestry. Would I be wrong to see in his meticulous anatomizing of the Parisian cityscape something of the same search for identity that characterizes the work of his slightly younger contemporary, also a Jewish orphan, Patrick Modiano?