Naomi Klein's masterful work Shock Doctrine documents in exhaustive detail what is wrong with the free trade theory and practice that is being enforced around the globe. This work, though much smaller and simpler in scale, essentially confirms what Klein says, that the IMF and WTO and World Bank are not the helpers of the developing world, but their enslavers. Klein, however, personalizes her accusations, blaming the Chicago Boys (ie disciples of Milton Friedman's Chicago School of economics) and presents it as almost a grand conspiracy. Chang sees less bad intent and more misunderstanding behind the disastrously wrong prescription being given to the world for how to prosper.
The writing style is clear and simple, and no one should have much trouble following Chang's line of reasoning. He makes good use of a few simple metaphors to prove his point. His image of his son, and his need for sheltering and support until he can get an education and grow up to be a productive member of society is memorable--the point being that urging under-developed countries to compete on a level playing field with mature manufacturing countries is just as silly as sending his 8 year old off to work would be. The comparison is telling because just as the non-productive years of a child's life is what enables him to become well-educated, so too there are children whose future is foreclosed by their need to work from childhood. Developing countries are in just that position.
The main weakness that I see in this book is a certain thinness in the factual support. Very large conclusions are often apparently supported by a handful of examples. His native Korea was as poor as Mozambique just a generation ago, and look what it's done. Therefore, don't rule out Mozambique as a future world power. But are there other similar examples? European travelers thought Japanese were lazy 100 years ago. Ok, but the evidence is one or two small anecdotes. Was that really the general view? Was it really a widespread belief that Germans were inefficient and corrupt?
Also, most who oppose things like NAFTA in this country do so because it is hurting our own economy. Is there really much concern in the US for the consequences for the poor countries? One can only assume that free trade must be beneficial for *someone* and if it isn't the poor countries, it would probably be...us. So the idea that we're doing this for our own benefit may not sit well with American protectionists.
But an enlightening read, and very accessible.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
—
| $10.99 | — |
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders Sponsored | Try Prime for unlimited fast, free shipping
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Reviews with images
Top reviews from other countries
CJ
Cannot review as bought for another as a gift at their request.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on January 15, 2023
I. Cummings-knight
Good pop economics book. But be warned it isn't light reading!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on October 27, 2013
