| Print List Price: | $19.00 |
| Kindle Price: | $11.99 Save $7.01 (37%) |
| Sold by: | Macmillan Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Bad Science: Quacks, Hacks, and Big Pharma Flacks Kindle Edition
Have you ever wondered how one day the media can assert that alcohol is bad for us and the next unashamedly run a story touting the benefits of daily alcohol consumption? Or how a drug that is pulled off the market for causing heart attacks ever got approved in the first place? How can average readers, who aren't medical doctors or Ph.D.s in biochemistry, tell what they should be paying attention to and what's, well, just more bullshit?
Ben Goldacre has made a point of exposing quack doctors and nutritionists, bogus credentialing programs, and biased scientific studies. He has also taken the media to task for its willingness to throw facts and proof out the window. But he's not here just to tell you what's wrong. Goldacre is here to teach you how to evaluate placebo effects, double-blind studies, and sample sizes, so that you can recognize bad science when you see it. You're about to feel a whole lot better.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication dateOctober 12, 2010
- File size2307 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics Is Fueling Our Modern PlaguesMD Blaser, Martin J.Kindle Edition
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book very readable, cleverly told, and worth reading. They say it's informative, authoritative, and offers practical guidance on adding scientific merit. Readers also appreciate the humor, saying it's a good mixture of wit and anger.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book very readable, quick-reading, and an excellent teaching tool that speaks clearly to beginners and experts. They say it's cleverly told and really worth reading. Readers also mention the author is fair in his arguments.
"...In my opinion, the author is utterly fair in his arguments. But he is not always nice. (Is there a reason why he should be?)..." Read more
"Nice read" Read more
"Great read, logical, to the point, and brings up loads of valid information...." Read more
"This is one of the best books I have ever read...." Read more
Customers find the book informative, authoritative, and interesting. They say it offers practical guidance on adding scientific merit. Readers also mention the book is invaluable to both science nerds and non-science folks. They say it discusses areas in which science tends to fall short and empowers ordinary people of reasonable intelligence to think like scientists.
"...sweeping our culture, and more importantly, empowers ordinary people of reasonable intelligence to think like scientists and protect themselves from..." Read more
"Great read, logical, to the point, and brings up loads of valid information...." Read more
"...I like that the author had a healthy skepticism about alternative medicine, healthcare for profit, politics, and media representation...." Read more
"...Skepticism is fine, even healthy to a point. It's foolish to swallow everything you hear...." Read more
Customers find the humor in the book clear and laugh-out-loud funny. They say the book is entertaining yet informative, and the tone is never condescending.
"...of sleights and manipulations that can occur, not to mention handful of hearty laughs...." Read more
"...The writing style is fair. As a medical educator, I find myself regularly emphasizing the type of information discussed in this book...." Read more
"Overall a very good and amusing book...." Read more
"...His assesments of the ways of the world of medical science are witty and cleverly told so as to make them intersting to a layperson like me...." Read more
Reviews with images
Good - Basic - Informative
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In fact, I believe Bad Science should be a mandatory part of all high school science curricula, or at the very least, required reading for all medical students (who in my experience are as vulnerable to pseudoscience as other people). Heck, whoever you are, if you haven't read this book, you need to.
Ben Goldacre is a brainy muckraker who, with acerbic wit and unassailable accuracy, attacks anti-scientific BS and clearly explains how it cloaks itself in a scientific aura, and how it's wrong. The beautiful thing is, you don't have to be a scientist or even a particularly scientifically literate person to understand. Anybody with a brain can detect BS if given the proper tools.
Goldacre's targets cover the spectrum from "quacks, hacks" to "big pharma flacks". He lays bare the alternative realities in which live detox treatments, ear candling, anti-aging cosmetics, homeopathy, diet experts, antioxidants, pharmaceutical companies with large advertising budgets, vaccine opponents, and most frightening of all, people who oppose antiretroviral therapy for AIDS and argue that HIV does not cause this disease.
In my opinion, the author is utterly fair in his arguments. But he is not always nice. (Is there a reason why he should be?) Ben Goldacre is my new hero, slaying dragons of ignorance and going head-to-head in intellectual combat with some of the most hysterically irrational elements in society today.
Along the way as you read this entertaining book, you'll learn what you need to know about clinical trials, about the power and limitations of statistics, and about how to think critically, to become a little Ben Goldacre yourself.
My favorite quote from the book is one of the best science quotes of all time:
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Ben, if you haven't already, read Denise Minger's book Death by Food Pyramid. She's another that looks at the evidence and presents a very well-documented case for diet change first. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
I am a medical student and I am aware that people take advantage of patients in all realms of health. However, I didn't know exactly how, or in how many ways. Or within each way, how many nuances can be identified when one understands them. Goldacre dissects many of the most pertinent and fascinating issues, all the time teaching YOU how to do the same. Not to mention doing so with a sense of humor. I have come away from this book with a hightened sense of awareness of sleights and manipulations that can occur, not to mention handful of hearty laughs. I have had several fascinating conversations with friends, family, acquaintances, and colleagues because of this book-- if anything, you can extract value in that way. Must read!!
WHAT I LIKED: If you like homeopathy, listen to nutritionists, or are an anti-vaxxer, this book will chafe at you a bit. I like that the author had a healthy skepticism about alternative medicine, healthcare for profit, politics, and media representation. Some of the information was a bit on the technical side, but it was all very interesting.
WHAT I DIDN’T LIKE: While he tried to maintain some levity, the author seemed borderline angry about the subject matter. And I was hoping for fewer statistics and more critiquing of alternative medicine. The book wasn’t what I expected.
Top reviews from other countries
Il procède par types, couvrante des remèdes comme le homéopathie, ou, il lance un défis au fabricante de démontré en labo son efficacité. Il traite de fumisterie, en nous expliquant que les fabricantes devais l'attaquer en justice, mais cinq ans après toujours pas de dépôt de plainte. Pourquoi? Par ce que il faudrait démontre en labo que ça marche. Quelque chose qu’ il ne peut pas faire car il ne marche que en tant de placebo.
Puis, il nous monte la manipulation des statistiques, ses stats qui sont destiné aux docteurs aux hôpitaux et nous. Une fois finies avec ce chapitre vous ne regarderais pus jamais un stat pareil. EG. lidl nous dit dans son pub, meilleur chaînes de magasins 5 ans en succession. On prend cette info pour acquis car il est a la télé. Et, on se pose pas la question, voté par qui? Leurs employées?
Il parle des stats qui montre un efficacité des certaines médocs avec un tôt de efficacité hors normes. Il s’averre que ses stats sont vrai mais, ont étais réaliser avant 1980, le labo oublie ce détail et, bien sur depuis l’efficacité de ce produit a étais trouver d’être inefficace bien que toujours sur la marché.
On fais un tour en Afrique ou un charlot Allemande a provoquer la mort des milliers des gens qui ont étais convaincu par lui d’abandonner leurs traitement classique pour des traitement a base d’herbes qu’il vendait a prix fort.
L’individu a quand même dupé le gouvernent de l’Afrique de sud qui a l’autorisé son utilisation dans la traitement de cancer.
Il y a trop de sujets a couvrir, mais j’espère vous avoir mis l’ eau a la bouche.





