Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy Hardcover – April 3, 2007
- Print length640 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateApril 3, 2007
- Grade level11 and up
- Reading age13 years and up
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100465002609
- ISBN-13978-0465002603
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; 3rd edition (April 3, 2007)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 640 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0465002609
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465002603
- Reading age : 13 years and up
- Grade level : 11 and up
- Item Weight : 2.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.75 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #378,344 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,412 in Economics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Videos for this product
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The more the government tries to rationalize the economy, the worse it makes the economy. What they think ought to happen seldom happens. Thomas Sowell gives the best arguments for a hands off the economy approach to government. I think he is correct. Let the market make the decisions. It has worked since 1776, but somehow that isn't good enough for a lot of people. People always think they are smarter than the market, or the market is somehow evil. But people are not smarter than the market, they do not have more knowledge, and the market is not evil or unfair. Only people and governments can be evil or unfair. A free market is neither.
In my book The Super Summary of World History (Revised) I argue that Marxism and socialism think that free market results are evil because some prosper greatly and others suffer. Marx argues from a position of economic determinism that once capitalism is dead a wonderful new world will replace it. Capitalism caused evil because, Marx thought, everything flows from the economic system - literally. If the economic system changed so would the people. Thus, Marxism would change human nature, and with Marx's new economic system man would become a new person that would be free from capitalist's greed and fear. I say human nature does not change its basics and Marx was a dreamer. I believe Sowell would agree.
Socialism does not go as far as Marx; however, I think socialism still relies on the death of capitalism to build a new world. Once the evil of capitalism is gone a new world will bloom because people will have more equality. Socialism aims at achieving equality by equalizing results. Not equalizing effort mind you, just results. The theory is that society exists before the person is born and every person is born into society which has schools, roads, businesses, money supplies and whatnot which all contribute to a person's success or failure; thus, ever failure is a failure of the group, and every success is a success of the group. Anyone who fails must be brought up to the group average as his failure is the failure of all and the responsibility of all. Also, one's success is the success of all; thus, the successful person owes society a large amount of his money and property to bring him down to the average of all the rest. I think this is both unfair and unwise. The failure or success of one is not the failure or success of all, and equality does not stem from demanding equal results no matter what the effort or insight.
Basic Economics makes hash out of the Marxist and socialist theories. Knowledge is not something given out by society in neat little schoolbook packages. The knowledge is there for all to acquire most times, but key insights are not. Only by giving those with insight great rewards can we advance as a nation and a world. If the rewards are the same for everyone why take any risks? The risk takers often fail, and in fact they fail more often than they succeed. Only great rewards can justify taking great risks. Also, if all are rewarded the same, then how can we tell if one idea is better than another? Only the flow of money tells us what is a really good idea vs a poor one. To change successfully takes risks and insight, and to measure whether the change is good or bad takes an empirical way to measure the value of a product or service. The flow of money is that empirical measurement of value. This all flows easily from T. Sowell's insights.
I love the book.
AD2
The first four sections on microeconomics are the best. I wish everyone in America would read that part of the book as Economics 101. And he only displays a hint of ideology in those sections. He simply explains how businesses in a competitive market produces and allocates products so efficiently that a central organizing force isn't needed. It isn't ideological to show how this works, since most of the American economy actually works this way. Even many who have taken college economic courses don't seem to understand how real private markets work. Sowell explains it all here.
The last three sections are a discussion of macroeconomics, and the book becomes more ideological at this point. It is also less convincing. These sections are also well written, but they aren't equal to the brilliant treatise of the microeconomics sections.
For those who believe that the free enterprise system is over-rated, this is the one book for you to read to understand your ideological opponents. If you can refute the arguments made in this book, you will have succeeded in making a significant contribution to economic thought. Unlike many books you can find today in the bookstore, this is no straw man of free enterprise proponents.
Teens should have to pass this Economics test before they are issued a driver's license; forget the driving test ordeal. Every homeschooled kid probably has this book as their Eco. book in the 6th grade around the dining room table.
Knowing the basics of Eco. as put forth in this clearly written and enjoyable book will set anyone apart from the herd.
City officials should be well versed in this basic knowledge especially zoning boards where bottom feeding politicians, bored housewives, and retired New Dealers are too often found.
A very readable book essential to the American way of life. Even a couple of post graduate degrees did not dim my enjoyment of the book. Perhaps I knew the economic principle but not like Tom Sowell laid it out for me. Get the book, read it, and buy copies for people you care about.








