Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Buy Used
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: .
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Battle for God: Responding to the Challenge of Neotheism Paperback – November 1, 2001

4.0 out of 5 stars 7 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
$9.24 $0.19

Wiley Summer Savings Event.
Wiley Summer Savings Event.
Save up to 40% during Wiley's Summer Savings Event. Learn more.
click to open popover

Editorial Reviews


A must read book forAnyone concerned about the changing views of God within evangelical Christianity. (Paul Virtue Get to the Pointe 2004-06-03)

From the Back Cover

What does God know?
When does God know what He knows?
What can God do about it?

God’s understanding, power, and wisdom are at issue in the first consequential theological debate of the twenty-first century. Neotheism, also known by such names as the “openness of God” theology, argues for a limited Creator and Sustainer. He can only guess what the free-willed human beings will do. Sometimes He guesses wrong and must undo the damage.

The Battle for God reminds us how far such a view of God diverges from the traditional understanding of God described in the Bible and also the Triune Being confessed by church fathers through the Reformation. Norman L. Geisler, H. Wayne House, and Max Herrera describe nothing less than a contest to set the course for all of Christian faith, with vast ramifications for the future understanding of God’s essential attributes—His omniscience, omnipotence, eternality, simplicity, and sovereignty.

Here is a clear and unambiguous refutation of arguments in recent writings by the three central neotheists: Greg Boyd, Clark Pinnock, and John Sanders. But more than simply a negative attack on those who propose to redefine God, the authors present a systematic confession of the attributes—what they mean, why we can take confidence as Christians in the God they describe, and why the battle for God is well worth fighting.


The latest book club pick from Oprah
"The Underground Railroad" by Colson Whitehead is a magnificent novel chronicling a young slave's adventures as she makes a desperate bid for freedom in the antebellum South. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Kregel Academic & Professional (November 1, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0825427355
  • ISBN-13: 978-0825427350
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.6 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,933,170 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
This is an extremely disappointing book. It is something of a comic rehash of traditional-fundamentalist theology. It lumps very diverse perspectives together through the use of non-contexual quotations and treats the proponents of Open Theism with disdain. It lacks both academic respectability and basic Christian charity.
A number of criticisms might be leveled at the book on the immediate surface:
1. It renames Open Theism with Neo-Theism. This has the effect of disallowing academic opponents the privilege of defining themselves. This is a subversive and cruel attempt to malign the perspective before it is discussed. Apart from a brief introductory discussion and direct quotations, the authors refuse to use the lable Open Theism. It seems they need a little more openness if they are going to honest participants of theological dialogue.
2. They identify Open Theism as a development of Process Theology. However, Open Theists have repeatedly denied such a connection and have even offered critiques of Process Theology that are superior to those offered in this book. In short, Process Theology teaches that God needs the world. Open Theism does not have a God that is dependent upon the world nor does their God need the world in any way. The God of Open Theism has a more intimate connection with the world than that of Geisler, House and Herrera. Particularly in that Open Theism posits that God works in partnership with his creation and not simply in a relationship of absolute dictatorial dominence. This of course is the appeal of Open Theism, its democratic rather than autocratic or despotic relationship between the Creator and the creature.
Read more ›
Comment 16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
What God knows and when he knows it has become a very hot topic in Christian circles today. It seems to be a common question regarding how much God knows about the future. Does He make things happen? Does He merely know about future events? Or does God, as neotheism so states, limit Himself by not knowing the future, meaning that the future really is up in the air and is contigent on the decisions made by humans?
As it can be obviously seen, this is a pretty big issue because how we view God is vital. In fact, the Bible very clearly says it can be very dangerous to have a wrong view of God. Geisler, House, and Herrera show how neotheism is the "new kid" on the block as neotheist theologians have combined aspects of panentheism, or process theology, with traditional theism. It has implications on the way we worship as well as how we view and interpret the scripture. The book takes a look at certain key qualities about God, including His omniscience, eternality, immutability, and sovereignty, and compares the traditional Christian view with the neoorthodox view. Actually, The Battle for God serves as an overview of the attributes of God, so a study in who God is can't be all bad!
I like the way that the authors treat this issue with as much simplicity as possible, attempting to show through biblical evidence and historical Christian quotes that neotheism is problematic for the evangelical Christian. It should be pointed out that, in the limited number of pages of a paperback text, the quotes from church fathers are pieced together, so the danger of the context being destroyed is certainly possible, especially since the average reader won't look them up. However, I saw nothing that appeared to be unusual with the people being quoted.
Read more ›
Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Norman Geisler (see also his earlier book, Creating God in the Image of Man?) and H. Wayne House (Charts on Open Theism and Orthodoxy) wrote this book in 2001 to oppose "Neotheism"/Open Theism books such as The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God, God of the Possible: A Biblical Introduction to the Open View of God, The God Who Risks: A Theology of Divine Providence, Most Moved Mover: A Theology of God's Openness (Didsbury Lectures), etc. Geisler resigned from the Evangelical Theological Society in 2003, after it did not expel Clark Pinnock, who advocates the "Open" position.

They state that Gregory Boyd "offers ridiculousness as a criterion for determining what (in the Bible) is figurative. But this is not an objective criterion." (Pg. 71) They charge that Boyd states that we cannot know what God's wisdom is like; "However, this is self-defeating because in order to make this assertion, Boyd must know that God's wisdom is like." (Pg.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse