
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-7% $23.23$23.23
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: MRT BOOKS
Save with Used - Good
$9.99$9.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Dream Books Co.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not Hardcover – February 5, 2008
Purchase options and add-ons
You recognize when you know something for certain, right? You "know" the sky is blue, or that the traffic light had turned green, or where you were on the morning of September 11, 2001--you know these things, well, because you just do.
In On Being Certain, neurologist Robert Burton challenges the notions of how we think about what we know. He shows that the feeling of certainty we have when we "know" something comes from sources beyond our control and knowledge. In fact, certainty is a mental sensation, rather than evidence of fact. Because this "feeling of knowing" seems like confirmation of knowledge, we tend to think of it as a product of reason. But an increasing body of evidence suggests that feelings such as certainty stem from primitive areas of the brain, and are independent of active, conscious reflection and reasoning. The feeling of knowing happens to us; we cannot make it happen.
Bringing together cutting edge neuroscience, experimental data, and fascinating anecdotes, Robert Burton explores the inconsistent and sometimes paradoxical relationship between our thoughts and what we actually know. Provocative and groundbreaking, On Being Certain, will challenge what you know (or think you know) about the mind, knowledge, and reason.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSt. Martin's Press
- Publication dateFebruary 5, 2008
- Dimensions6.15 x 0.99 x 8.13 inches
- ISBN-100312359209
- ISBN-13978-0312359201
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In his brilliant new book, Burton systematically and convincingly shows that certainty is a mental state, a feeling like anger or pride that can help guide us, but that doesn't dependably reflect objective truth… In the polarizing atmosphere of the 2008 election, On Being Certain ought to be required reading for every candidate -- and for every citizen.”--ForbesLife
“What do we do when we recognize that a false certainty feels the same as certainty about the sky being blue? A lesser guide might get bogged down in nail-biting doubts about the limits of knowledge. Yet Burton not only makes clear the fascinating beauty of this tangled terrain, he also brings us out the other side with a clearer sense of how to navigate. It's a lovely piece of work; I'm all but certain you'll like it. “--David Dobbs, author of Reef Madness; Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral
“Burton has a great talent for combining wit and insight in a way both palatable and profound.”--Johanna Shapiro PhD, professor of Family Medicine at UC Irvine School of Medicine
“A new way of looking at knowledge that merits close reading by scientists and general readers alike.”--Kirkus
“This could be one of the most important books of the year. With so much riding on ‘certainty,’ and so little known about how people actually reach a state of certainty about anything, some plain speaking from a knowledgeable neuroscientist is called for. If Gladwell's Blink was fascinating but largely anecdotal, Burton's book drills down to the real science behind snap judgments and other decision-making.”-- Howard Rheingold, futurist and author of Smart Mobs
“A fascinating read. Burton’s engaging prose takes us into the deepest corners of our subconscious, making us question our most solid contentions. Nobody who reads this book will walk away from it and say ‘I know this for sure’ ever again.”--Sylvia Pagán Westphal, science reporter, The Wall Street Journal
“Burton provides a compelling and though-provoking case that we should be more skeptical about our beliefs. Along the way, he also provides a novel perspective on many lines of research that should be of interest to readers who are looking for a broad introduction to the cognitive sciences.”--Seed Magazine
From the Back Cover
You recognize when you know something for certain, right? You "know" the sky is blue, or that the traffic light had turned green, or where you were on the morning of September 11, 2001--you know these things, well, because you just do.
In On Being Certain, neurologist Robert Burton challenges the notions of how we think about what we know. He shows that the feeling of certainty we have when we "know" something comes from sources beyond our control and knowledge. In fact, certainty is a mental sensation, rather than evidence of fact. Because this "feeling of knowing" seems like confirmation of knowledge, we tend to think of it as a product of reason. But an increasing body of evidence suggests that feelings such as certainty stem from primitive areas of the brain, and are independent of active, conscious reflection and reasoning. The feeling of knowing happens to us; we cannot make it happen.
Bringing together cutting edge neuroscience, experimental data, and fascinating anecdotes, Robert Burton explores the inconsistent and sometimes paradoxical relationship between our thoughts and what we actually know. Provocative and groundbreaking, On Being Certain, will challenge what you know (or think you know) about the mind, knowledge, and reason.
ROBERT BURTON, M.D. graduated from Yale University and University of California at San Francisco medical school, where he also completed his neurology residency. At age 33, he was appointed chief of the Division of Neurology at Mt. Zion-UCSF Hospital, where he subsequently became Associate Chief of the Department of Neurosciences. His non-neurology writing career includes three critically acclaimed novels. He lives in Sausalito, California. Visit his website at http://www.rburton.com/
“What do we do when we recognize that a false certainty feels the same as certainty about the sky being blue? A lesser guide might get bogged down in nail-biting doubts about the limits of knowledge. Yet Burton not only makes clear the fascinating beauty of this tangled terrain, he also brings us out the other side with a clearer sense of how to navigate. It's a lovely piece of work; I'm all but certain you'll like it. “
--David Dobbs, author of Reef Madness; Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral
“Burton has a great talent for combining wit and insight in a way both palatable and profound.”
--Johanna Shapiro PhD, professor of Family Medicine at UC Irvine School of Medicine
“A new way of looking at knowledge that merits close reading by scientists and general readers alike.”
--Kirkus
“This could be one of the most important books of the year. With so much riding on ‘certainty,’ and so little known about how people actually reach a state of certainty about anything, some plain speaking from a knowledgeable neuroscientist is called for. If Gladwell's Blink was fascinating but largely anecdotal, Burton's book drills down to the real science behind snap judgments and other decision-making.”
-- Howard Rheingold, futurist and author of Smart Mobs
“A fascinating read. Burton’s engaging prose takes us into the deepest corners of our subconscious, making us question our most solid contentions. Nobody who reads this book will walk away from it and say ‘I know this for sure’ ever again.”
--Sylvia Pagán Westphal, science reporter, The Wall Street Journal
“Burton provides a compelling and though-provoking case that we should be more skeptical about our beliefs. Along the way, he also provides a novel perspective on many lines of research that should be of interest to readers who are looking for a broad introduction to the cognitive sciences.”
--Seed Magazine
About the Author
ROBERT BURTON, M.D. graduated from Yale University and University of California at San Francisco medical school, where he also completed his neurology residency. At age 33, he was appointed chief of the Division of Neurology at Mt. Zion-UCSF Hospital, where he subsequently became Associate Chief of the Department of Neurosciences. His non-neurology writing career includes three critically acclaimed novels. He lives in Sausalito, California.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
1The Feeling of KnowingI AM STUCK IN AN OBLIGATORY NEIGHBORHOOD COCKTAIL party during the first week of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. A middle-aged, pin-striped lawyer announces that he'd love to be in the front lines when the troops reach Baghdad. "Door-to-door fighting," he says, puffing up his chest. He says he's certain he could shoot an Iraqi soldier, although he's never been in a conflict bigger than a schoolyard brawl."I don't know," I say. "I'd have trouble shooting some young kid who was being forced to fight.""Not me. We're down to dog-eat-dog."He nods at his frowning wife, who's anti-invasion. "All's fair in love and war." Then back to me. "You're not one of those peacenik softies, are you?""It wouldn't bother you to kill someone?""Not a bit.""You're sure?""Absolutely."He's a neighbor and I can't escape. So I tell him one of my father's favorite self-mocking stories.During the 1930s and '40s, my father had a pharmacy in one of the tougher areas of San Francisco. He kept a small revolver hidden beneath the back cash register. One night, a man approached, pulled out a knife, and demanded all the money in the register. My father reached under the counter, grabbed his gun, and aimed it at the robber."Drop it," the robber said, his knife at my father's throat. "You're not going to shoot me, but I will kill you."For a moment it was a Hollywood standoff, mano a mano. Then my father put down his gun, emptied out the register, and handed over the money."What's your point?" the lawyer asks. "Your father should have shot him.""Just the obvious," I say. "You don't always know what you're going to do until you're in the moment.""Sure you do. I know with absolute certainty that I'd shoot anyone who was threatening me.""No chance of any hesitation?""None at all. I know myself. I know what I would do. End of discussion."
MY MIND REELS with seemingly impossible questions. What kind of knowledge is "I know myself and what I would do"? Is it a conscious decision based upon deep self-contemplation or is it a "gut feeling"? But what is a gut feeling--an unconscious decision, a mood or emotion, an ill-defined but clearly recognizable mental state, or a combination of all these ingredients? If we are tounderstand how we know what we know, we first need some ground rules, including a general classification of mental states that create our sense of knowledge about our knowledge.For simplicity, I have chosen to lump together the closely allied feelings of certainty, rightness, conviction, and correctness under the all-inclusive term, the feeling of knowing. Whether or not these are separate sensations or merely shades or degrees of a common feeling isn't important. What they do share is a common quality: Each is a form of metaknowledge--knowledge about our knowledge--that qualifies or colors our thoughts, imbuing them with a sense of rightness or wrongness. When focusing on the phenomenology (how these sensations feel), I've chosen to use the term the feeling of knowing (in italics). However, when talking about the underlying science, I'll use knowing (in italics). Later I will expand this category to include feelings of familiarity and realness--qualities that enhance our sense of correctness.
EVERYONE IS FAMILIAR with the most commonly recognized feeling of knowing. When asked a question, you feel strongly that you know an answer that you cannot immediately recall. Psychologists refer to this hard-to-describe but easily recognizable feeling as a tip-of-the-tongue sensation. The frequent accompanying comment as you scan your mental Rolodex for the forgotten name or phone number: "I know it, but I just can't think of it." In this example, you are aware of knowing something, without knowing what this sense of knowing refers to.Anyone who's been frustrated with a difficult math problem has appreciated the delicious moment of relief when an incomprehensible equation suddenly makes sense. We "see the light." This aha is a notification from a subterranean portion of ourmind, an involuntary all-clear signal that we have grasped the heart of a problem. It isn't just that we can solve the problem; we also "know" that we understand it.Most feelings of knowing are far less dramatic. We don't ordinarily sense them as spontaneous emotions or moods like love or happiness; rather they feel like thoughts--elements of a correct line of reasoning. We learn to add 2 + 2. Our teacher tells us that 4 is the correct answer. Yes, we hear a portion of our mind say. Something within us tells us that we "know" that our answer is correct. At this simplest level of understanding, there are two components to our understanding--the knowledge that 2 + 2 = 4, and the judgment or assessment of this understanding. We know that our understanding that 2 + 2 = 4 is itself correct.The feeling of knowing is also commonly recognized by its absence. Most of us are all too familiar with the frustration of being able to operate a computer without having any "sense" of how the computer really works. Or learning physics despite having no "feeling" for the rightness of what you've learned. I can fix a frayed electrical cord, yet am puzzled by the very essence of electricity. I can pick up iron filings with a magnet without having the slightest sense of what magnetism "is."At a deeper level, most of us have agonized over those sickening "crises of faith" when firmly held personal beliefs are suddenly stripped of a visceral sense of correctness, rightness, or meaning. Our most considered beliefs suddenly don't "feel right." Similarly, most of us have been shocked to hear that a close friend or relative has died unexpectedly, and yet we "feel" that he is still alive. Such upsetting news often takes time to "sink in." This disbelief associated with hearing about a death is an example of the sometimes complete disassociation between intellectual and felt knowledge.To begin our discussion of the feeling of knowing, read the following excerpt at normal speed. Don't skim, give up halfway through, or skip to the explanation. Because this experience can't be duplicated once you know the explanation, take a moment to ask yourself how you feel about the paragraph. After reading the clarifying word, reread the paragraph. As you do so, please pay close attention to the shifts in your mental state and your feeling about the paragraph.A newspaper is better than a magazine. A seashore is a better place than the street. At first it is better to run than to walk. You may have to try several times. It takes some skill, but it is easy to learn. Even young children can enjoy it. Once successful, complications are minimal. Birds seldom get too close. Rain, however, soaks in very fast. Too many people doing the same thing can also cause problems. One needs lots of room. If there are no complications, it can be very peaceful. A rock will serve as an anchor. If things break loose from it, however, you will not get a second chance.Is this paragraph comprehensible or meaningless? Feel your mind sort through potential explanations. Now watch what happens with the presentation of a single word: kite. As you reread the paragraph, feel the prior discomfort of something amiss shifting to a pleasing sense of rightness. Everything fits; every sentence works and has meaning. Reread the paragraph again; it is impossible to regain the sense of not understanding. In an instant, without due conscious deliberation, the paragraph has been irreversibly infused with a feeling of knowing.Try to imagine other interpretations for the paragraph. SupposeI tell you that this is a collaborative poem written by a third-grade class, or a collage of strung-together fortune cookie quotes. Your mind balks. The presence of this feeling of knowing makes contemplating alternatives physically difficult.Each of us probably read the paragraph somewhat differently, but certain features seem universal. After seeing the word kite, we quickly go back and reread the paragraph, testing the sentences against this new piece of information. At some point, we are convinced. But when and how?The kite paragraph raises several questions central to our understanding of how we "know" something. Though each will be discussed at greater length in subsequent chapters, here's a sneak preview.
• Did you consciously "decide" that kite was the correct explanation for the paragraph, or did this decision occur involuntarily, outside of conscious awareness?
• What brain mechanism(s) created the shift from not knowing to knowing?
• When did this shift take place? (Did you know that the explanation was correct before, during, or after you reread the paragraph?)
• After rereading the paragraph, are you able to consciously separate out the feeling of knowing that kite is the correct answer from a reasoned understanding that the answer is correct?
• Are you sure that kite is the correct answer? If so, how do you know?ON BEING CERTAIN. Copyright © 2008 by Robert A. Burton, M.D. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information, address St. Martin's Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010.
Product details
- Publisher : St. Martin's Press; First Edition (February 5, 2008)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0312359209
- ISBN-13 : 978-0312359201
- Item Weight : 13.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.15 x 0.99 x 8.13 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #591,163 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,563 in Cognitive Psychology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book insightful and well-written. They describe it as an interesting read with a thoughtful case. The author is good at explaining difficult concepts in plain English without dumbing them down. Readers appreciate the narrative, approachable writing style. However, opinions differ on the credibility of the book's main thesis and emotional nature of certainty. Some find the book provides strong evidence for the emotional nature of certainty, while others feel there are too many anecdotal examples and personal stories that make the case hard to follow.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers enjoy the book's insights and find it informative. They appreciate the powerful ideas and broad implications of the thesis. The author does a great job of pulling together diverse topics that support his main point. The conclusions seem intellectually sound and interesting.
"...be true are NOT founded on reason or objectivity, but on a complex neurological process that works itself out largely outside our conscious awareness..." Read more
"...The second half of the book is a solid analysis of the factual content laid out in the first half, and provides some startling insights into what it..." Read more
"...In all, the book offers some fascinating insights as to how our brains and minds work and an astute reader can learn much from it." Read more
"...Burton uses very creative analogies, practical examples, and reader-friendly illustrations to convey the intricacies of what he is describing, and..." Read more
Customers find the book engaging and thought-provoking. They say it's well worth reading and provides powerful insights into how the brain functions and perceives the world. The personal tone at times makes the book enjoyable for readers.
"...Is the content interesting and well-supported? Yes, there are interesting ideas and (perhaps more importantly) the bringing together of ideas I'd..." Read more
"...knowledge that we have with regard to brain function and perception to good end...." Read more
"...(Strangers to Ourselves), I found Burton's book On Being Certain a riveting read...." Read more
"...Really, this is a quite interesting book with an interesting case that simply takes the author too many pages to make...." Read more
Customers find the book's content clear and easy to understand. They appreciate the author's clear explanations in plain English without dumbing down the material. The basic thesis is good, and the writing style is narrative and contemplative. Reader-friendly illustrations and practical examples help convey the concepts clearly. Overall, readers describe the book as an engaging read that is great for discussion with others interested in psychology, logic, or philosophy.
"...His writing is narrative, approachable and contemplative...." Read more
"...Is it well-written? Yes, this is a very fluently written book. Is the content interesting and well-supported?..." Read more
"...In his defense, the book was written for a more general audience and some background that might have been omitted might justify his positions...." Read more
"...problem, from a literary standpoit, is that the author takes a very long time to get to his point, beginning many chapters with something like: "I..." Read more
Customers have different views on the book's credibility. Some find it convincing, arguing that certainty is unintentional and the brain generates it. Others feel the examples are too numerous, the storytelling is less compelling, and the story-telling lacks ah-ha moments.
"...as he painstakingly builds a case about how and why the brain generates certainty...." Read more
"...too long to tell his stories, and I have found the story-telling to be a little less compelling that i would have liked." Read more
"...the heart of this book is that the feelings of knowing, correctness, conviction, and certainty aren't deliberate conclusions and conscious choices...." Read more
"...A lot of personal stories. Not too many ah ha moments." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2009Dr. Burton's book is one of the most extraordinary and valuable I've read. The depth and breadth of commentary it has generated by other readers is testament that you cannot read this book without having strong reactions, both intellectual and emotional.
Dr. Burton, as alleged by other reviewers, neither "attacks science" nor argues that his is the last word on the neurobiology of certainty. Indeed, his postulation of a "hidden layer" (similar to Freud's "subconscious") and its machinations, while "believable," is still part of the great unknown of neuroscience.
This is a book that invites the reader to challenge the author and him/herself about our judgments and beliefs. Some things, as the color of the sky, can be known with a high level of certainty; others, as whether an embryo is human, and when, not only cannot be known with objective, rational certainty, but may not be knowable in the sense that they can be proved using scientific methods. Although most of the judgments and values that become part of our "hard-wiring" (whether genetic or acquired) fall into the category of the unknown, unknowable, not-yet-known, or just plain inaccurate, we nevertheless "know" them to be true. Prayer cured my cancer. Politicians cannot be trusted. Organic foods are healthier. God wants me to kill infidels. Businesspeople are crooks. Your mother hates me.
The essence of the argument: 1 - beliefs that we "just know" to be true are based (Burton persuasively argues but cannot yet prove, based on the current state of scientific knowledge) on a mental sensory function (NOT emotion) that the brain's "hidden layer" uses to determine when it has enough information to reach a conclusion; 2 - that however ardently we defend these conclusions to ourselves or others, these things we know to be true are NOT founded on reason or objectivity, but on a complex neurological process that works itself out largely outside our conscious awareness; and 3 - these things that we "just know" to be true persist even in the face of compelling contrary evidence. Our faulty memories are just the tip of the iceberg.
Dr. Burton is a clinical neurologist, not a research scientist, and clearly a student of philosophy. His writing is narrative, approachable and contemplative. This book, he reveals late in the text, started out as a personal journal of discovery, and the final product reflects a disciplined intellect wrestling with a highly-personal and weighty question: how can I trust what I believe to be true? In light of how little we truly know about what Nobel laureate Gerald Edelman calls "the most complicated material object in the known universe," Dr. Barton's essay is a compelling contribution to our understanding of ourselves and our fellow, fallible mortals.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2009When I judge a non-fiction book, I look for three things:
Is it well-written? Yes, this is a very fluently written book.
Is the content interesting and well-supported? Yes, there are interesting ideas and (perhaps more importantly) the bringing together of ideas I'd read about elsewhere and examining the light and shadows they shed on one another.
And finally, does the book change the way I view the world in some substantial way? In this case, I'll have to say, yes, sort of. In other words, the author has put into more concise terms ideas and notions I'd picked up other places (Steven Pinker, among others), and drawn a couple conclusions I hadn't reached, but with which I basically agree.
Based on the answers to these three questions, I'd like to give this book 4 1/2 stars because the change to my world view was more a matter of bringing some stuff into focus than a matter of opening a new window. However, it's closer to 5 stars than 4, so I'm going with 5.
I found it was very important to read the early part of the book carefully, even though it was largely setting up the arguments of the second half. In that part of the book, we meet people who experience a disconnect between what they "know to be true" and what logic and empirical observation tells them. For instance, the woman who can see that her heart is beating yet believes she is dead. And the man who knows and understands and accepts all the evidence of evolution, but chooses to be a creationist because he believes that to be true. And the man who agrees that the evidence is that the furniture in his room is the same as it ever was, but lacks the ability to know it is the same, and so believes it must be different. Some of these examples go by very quickly, and then are referred to later.
The second half of the book is a solid analysis of the factual content laid out in the first half, and provides some startling insights into what it means to be certain of something (and also, what it does not mean). I suspect that this book will gradually change how I experience certainty in my own life, but I also suspect that will take some time. It's entirely possible that I will think this is a fully 5-star book a year from now, or that I will wish I had given it only 4 stars. All I know is that I am not certain how that will play out.
In the meantime, it's a good book with lots of food for thought in it. Recommended as a fairly light non-fiction read.
Top reviews from other countries
-
javierReviewed in Spain on September 4, 20243.0 out of 5 stars Contenido algo anticuado
Ha habido numerosos avances en la investigación acerca de la metacognición que no los recoge el libro. Está bien, pero desfasado.
The_price_of_bottled_waterReviewed in the United Kingdom on October 5, 20215.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book deserves to be more widely known
Very good book by a neurologist, on the sensation of certainty. I think I'll have to re-read in 6 months time to absorb all the messages, because contains main interesting insights and ideas.
-
Kindle-KundeReviewed in Germany on April 27, 20125.0 out of 5 stars Ich bin sicher: ein empfehlenswertes Buch
Robert Burton geht in seinem Buch einer nur scheinbar banalen Frage nach: Wie wissen wir was wir wissen oder besser: das wir etwas wissen? Ausgehend von der mentalen Befindlichkeit die jeder kennt, wenn etwas ihm Bekanntes ins Bewusstsein gerät, geht Burton dem Phänomen nach.
Seine Überlegungen macht er an einleuchtenden Beispielen fest. Dabei wird klar: das Gefühl etwas zu wissen ist etwas, das von spezifischen Hirnregionen erzeugt wird. Es unterliegt keiner bewussten Kontrolle und ist deshalb etwas, dass wir nicht selbst erzeugen können oder einfach wieder verschwinden lassen können.
Diese emotionale Einfärbung von Bewusstseinsinhalten (bekannt/ unbekannt, wissen/nicht wissen) ist elementarer Bestandteil unser Erfahrungswelt und wird vom Bewusstsein benötigt um über die eigenen Gedanken Klarheit zu erlangen, wie andere elementare Gefühle (Angst, Schmerz, Wut), ausgelöst über die Sinnesorgane durch äußere Faktoren, es ermöglichen, auf die Umwelt zu reagieren bzw. den Körper zu kontrollieren.
Wie viele mentale bzw. sensorische Erlebnisse ist auch das Gefühl "Ich weiß es" für Fehler anfällig. Wer wäre sich einer Sache, einer Erinnerung nicht schon einmal absolut sicher gewesen, um dann durch die objektiven Fakten widerlegt zu werden.
Was solche schönen Erkenntnisse wie: - "I am sure" is a mental sensation, not a testable conclusion - für Folgen für unser Denken, die Art wie wir Entscheidungen treffen hat, aber auch wie sie im Zusammenhang mit Glauben und Rationalität stehen, wird von Burton sauber hergeleitet.
Die Erkenntnis, dass der überwältigende Teil unsere Impulse, Überlegungen, Handlungen und Entscheidungen unbewusst verläuft und nur ein geringer Anteil das Bewusstsein erreicht, leitet Burton wunderbar aus den vorliegenden wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen ab.
Warum das sinnvoll für uns ist, aber auch welche Fallstricke in unserem Denken und Erleben das hat wird nach und nach erläutert. Das Entscheidungen die wir durch Intuition oder "aus dem Bauch heraus" treffen nichts Geheimnisvolles oder gar esoterisches anhaftet und auch keiner besonderen Art von Intelligenz oder anders gearteten Arbeitsweise des Gehirns erfordern, beschreibt der Neurologe anschaulich und überzeugend.
Ein gut verständlich geschriebenes Buch, das klar strukturiert dem emotionalen Erleben unseres Denkens auf den Grund geht. Durchaus humorvoll, mit überzeugenden Beispielen versehen ist Burtons Buch ein außerordentlich lesbares Sachbuch das aus der Masse populärwissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen herausragt.
Eric LawtonReviewed in Canada on November 1, 20085.0 out of 5 stars Certainty is chemistry
This book was full of 'ah ha' moments. Things which, once thought about, are surprising and important, but which in some ways are so obvious that they literally go without saying. So it is that being certain about something (or doubtful, for that matter) is akin to an emotional response to a belief - which in the end is a matter of brain chemistry. Although we sometimes become certain of something because we have weighed all the evidence, it can also be so just because we believed it for a long time, or heard from someone we trusted at the time or even just because we have a chemical imbalance in the brain (the lunatic who believes she is Napoleon). This is a scientific investigation of the nature of certainty, taking in neuroscience, evolution and literature. The book itself is literate and easily readable, although I found myself stopping and thinking every few sentences because of the implications and associations of each paragraph. This book is well worth reading two or three times.
SreenithiReviewed in India on January 9, 20221.0 out of 5 stars Not worth for the price
Price is very much high for the low quality book. Not worth it
Price is very much high for the low quality book. Not worth it1.0 out of 5 stars Not worth for the price
Sreenithi
Reviewed in India on January 9, 2022
Images in this review






