- Explore more great deals on thousands of titles in our Deals in Books store.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error Hardcover – Bargain Price, June 8, 2010
|New from||Used from|
Featured resources for clinical rotations
Explore these titles for clinical rotations. Learn more
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Special offers and product promotions
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. In the spirit of Blink and Predictably Irrational (but with a large helping of erudition), journalist Schulz casts a fresh and irreverent eye upon the profound meanings behind our most ordinary behaviors—in this instance, how we make mistakes, how we behave when we find we have been wrong, and how our errors change us. [I]t is ultimately wrongness, not rightness, that can teach us who we are, she asserts. Schulz writes with such lucidity and wit that her philosophical enquiry becomes a page-turner. She deftly incorporates Wittgenstein, Descartes, and Freud, along with an array of contemporary social scientists and even a spin with Shakespeare and Keats. There's heavy stuff here, but no heavy-handedness. Being wrong encompasses the cataclysmic (economic collapse) and the commonplace (leaving a laptop in front of the window before the storm). Being wrong may lead to fun (playing with and understanding optical illusions) or futility (the Millerite expectation of the Rapture in 1844). Being wrong can be transformative, and Schultz writes, I encourage us to see error as a gift in itself, a rich and irreplaceable source of humor, art, illumination, individuality, and change—an apt description of her engrossing study. (June)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Here’s a fascinating counterpoint to the notion that making a mistake somehow diminishes you as a person. We shouldn’t fear error, the author says; rather, we should embrace it because it’s our capacity for making mistakes that makes us who we are. (“To err is human” isn’t just an empty cliché.) Schulz explores the nature of error: are big mistakes fundamentally different from small mistakes, or are they all essentially the same? How much does peer pressure, or crowd response, affect our capacity to blunder? How and why do we remember relatively insignificant mistakes for the rest of our lives, long after they have ceased to be relevant to anything? And what role does “error-blindness”—our inability to know when we are in the process of making a mistake—play in our daily lives? Schulz writes in a lively style, asks lots of compelling questions, and uses plenty of examples to illustrate her points. Put this one in the same general category as Gladwell’s Blink (2005), LeGault’s Think! (2006), and Shore’s Blunder (2008): user-friendly, entertaining looks at the way our minds work. --David Pitt
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
Schultz borrows from ancient, Enlightenment and modern philosophers to develop a healthy relationship with accepting our own fallibility.
A challenging but pleasant read. I highly recommend "Being Wrong" to everyone but especially those that find themselves in any position of leadership. Although this is not a management / leadership book, it makes a compelling case for people in positions of authority to be more open and less entrenched in their positions.
If anything "Being Wrong" has made me more humble about my own sense of righteousness.
This is not just an academic excercise. I was struck by the usefulness of these ideas in my own life. We are often unaware of our own beliefs, prejudices and motivations. How much more often, then, are we mistaken about others? Can we ever really know other people? Does our inherently narrow view allow for absolute comprehension of others, or complex situations (think politics)? Do we allow for the possibilities of goodness and transformation in those we have dismissed?
This book is long, and packed with first rate thinking and research. But it's also entertaining, readable and enjoyable. I read it fairly slowly, over a couple of months, because there is so much to digest.