Buy new:
$8.99$8.99
$3.99
delivery:
Sep 1 - 5
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
Talented Online
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $1.25
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Mess in Iraq Paperback – September 14, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
The Best War Ever is about a war that was devised in fantasy and lost in delusion. It highlights the futility of lying to oneself and others in matters of life and death. And it offers lessons to the current generation so that, at least in our time, this never happens again.
As the team of Rampton and Stauber show in their first new book since President Bush's reelection, the White House seems to have fooled no one as much as itself in the march toward a needless (from a security perspective) war in Iraq. As the authors argue, one of the most tragic consequences of the Bush administration's reliance on propaganda is its disdain for realistic planning in matters of war. Repeatedly, when faced with predictions of problems, U.S. policymakers dismissed the warnings of Iraq experts, choosing instead to promulgate its version of the war through conservative media outlets and PR campaigns. The result has been too few troops on the ground to maintain security; failure to anticipate the insurgency; and oblivious disregard, even contempt, for critics in either party who attempted to assess the human and economic costs of the war.
Even now that withdrawal seems imminent, however, the administration and its allies continue their cover-ups: downplaying civilian deaths and military injuries; employing marketing buzzwords like "victory" repeatedly to shore up public opinion; and botched attempts, through third-party PR firms, at creating phony news.
The Bush administration entered Iraq believing that its moral, technological, and military superiority would ensure victory abroad, and that its mastery of the politics would win support at home. Instead, it found a morass of problems that do not lend themselves to moralistic, technological, or propaganda-based solutions.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherTarcher
- Publication dateSeptember 14, 2006
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions5.54 x 0.71 x 8.18 inches
- ISBN-101585425095
- ISBN-13978-1585425099
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Tarcher; First Edition (September 14, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1585425095
- ISBN-13 : 978-1585425099
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.54 x 0.71 x 8.18 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,256,967 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,805 in Censorship & Politics
- #51,760 in International & World Politics (Books)
- #556,639 in History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book details the PR campaign ($300 million over a 5 year period) launched before the war. It takes a particularly cynical mind to conduct surveys with a focus on "casualty aversion" in order to analyze how a war can be 'sold' to the people, but those surveys were conducted with the conclusion that Americans would swallow the Iraq war without too much squawking if they believed the war would "ultimately succeed." Experts on the pre-war Future of Iraq Project urged the administration to consider back up plans in case it didn't go smoothly and even predicted looting and the emergence of insurgency. This team was replaced, and the invasion of Iraq sailed ahead with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz predicting that Iraq could "finance its own reconstruction." Fat chance of that happening. By late 2003, the occupation was costing America 1 billion a week, and by the end of 2005, 5.9 billion a month!
The book also examines specific linguistic choices made by the speechmakers and the media spokespeople in order to present a united, positive front on the subject of Iraq, and hand-in-hand with the word choices is the "bloodless" approach to the war--the suppression of photos, the lack of coverage of the horrendous wounds some of our soldiers are coming home with--plus the lack of coverage of the deaths of Iraqis.
There's a lot of 'old' material here--the Valerie Plame outing, the smear campaign against Wilson, the forged documents detailing the purchase of uranium oxide, etc. But in spite of the fact some of this is old news, the authors plug the material into the book to illustrate an overall pattern of the media burying stories and retractions while hyping rumours of supposed weapons findings in Iraq. The Iraq Survey Group (ISG) for example, with their "big impact" project and a generous budget of 300 million hunted for WMD in Iraq but couldn't discover anything. But no matter--because the lack of weapons led to a U.S. intelligence theory that Saddam deliberately acted suspicious to 'dupe' America. The twists and turns of the propaganda used for this war would be hilarious if it were fictional--but it's not--it's real--and people are dying because of it.
One of the best sections of the book covers the arguments that led to the war, and includes quotes from those who predicted invading Iraq would be a piece of cake ("I really do believe we will be greeted as liberators"- Cheney). New arguments have been created for remaining in Iraq, and once again by putting this all in print, the authors illustrate an insidious pattern of shifting propaganda. The authors successfully debunk all the arguments for the war--including the flypaper theory, and instead argue that it's time for damage control. The book includes scrupulous footnotes and an index--displacedhuman
That fact almost makes them look prescient but the fact remains that the was plenty of evidence around contradicting the White House line for those willing to listen to it.
As this book, The Best War Ever, points out the Iraq war was a product of several failures. The failure of the Media, the Congress, the Administration and the Intelligence community. It was also a product of purposeful disinformation and inertia.
By now we have all heard how ties between Al Qaeda and Iraq were fabricated and reports of WMD were exaggerated and cherry picked to make the best case for war. Well, this book delves into that and more. According to T.B.W.E. the Administration may have been fooled by their own disinformation. Apparently in the late nineties some shadowy department of the Defense or State Departments hired an advertising agency to disseminate disinformation.
Not being versed in subterfuge and underhanded dealings, they hired a man named Chalabi to form a government in exile and thus the Iraqi National Congress was born. Of course we had all heard of the INC and it was thought by many to be a movement of disaffected Iraqi patriots. In fact it became a movement of cash from the US into Chalabi's coffers. At first Chalabi seemed to be the real thing and was the darling of the CIA but as more and more of his statements proved untrue and the information given by defectors he provided was discredited he fell from their favor. Yet, he remained a favorite of the Administration, not because of the truthfulness of what he said but because it helped to move along their agenda.
T.B.W.E. also points to the failure of the media to scrutinize the rational for going to war. In fact they cite The Administrations self proclaimed enemy, the liberal New York Times for being their biggest ally for laying out the case for going to war. The includes Judith Miller the NY times reporter who was getting almost all of her scoops from the aforementioned Chalabi.
Lastly the Administration virtually shamed the congress into allowing them to have their way with Iraq by intimating and insinuating that it was unpatriotic to question the Commander in Chief in a time of war and in fact they still are trying that tactic but with less and less success.
T.B.W.E. is a well written, easily read book on the Iraq fiasco. True there are many of these books out now each of which has the ability to make you mad at the the malfeasance that has transpired. Having read at least a half dozen of these books, each has its own little niche of information, which the others didn't cover and so did T.B.W.E.
I had no idea that Chalabi and Miller has been so instrumental in fomenting the war or that ninety percent of the news articles and opinions leading up to the war were pro-war.
These and many other circumstances covered in this book and others, converged to make the war seem necessary, when in fact the evidence was all around that it wasn't.
Top reviews from other countries
The opening section of the book picks up from the point their earlier work Weapons of Mass Deception concluded. It covers the activity at the UN including Colin Powell's "give war a chance" spiel. Powell's presentation only seemed to be accepted in the media because, well you know, Powell's a nice guy, he's not Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld: he doesn't tell lies. In effect his PR persona triumphed over the reality of his claims, which were, to quote Powell's initial reaction to the script: "Bulls--t!".
Also covered are the Plame affair in which senior administration figures destroyed Valerie Plame's career in order to punish her husband for debunking the nonsense spoken about Iraqi attempts to purchase Niger Uranium. The case of the "journalist" Judith Miller, who was involved in the administrations outing of Plame's as a C.I.A. agent, is also brought to light. Her links to Ahmed Chalabi and her dissemination of his propaganda in The New York Times both before and after the war with regard to Weapons of Mass Destruction are breathtaking. There is an interesting section where the authors (partially) list the amount of times that Fox News and others reported the finding of WMD with certainty, when in fact nothing was ever found. Shortly after the fall of Baghdad surveys found that 34% of Americans believed that WMD had been found, and a preposterous 22% believed they had been used (though not so preposterous in the unlikely event that they meant depleted uranium). The later efforts of the Bush administration and their media supporters to re-write the history of the conflict are also examined and filed under fantasy.
Despite the cartoons that grace the front of all of Stauber and Rampton's books they are serious, comprehensively sourced works of debunking. In the case of the Bush Administration, the war in Iraq as well as the mainstream media's failings and collusions in the covering of the later stages of the lead up to that war and the war itself. It is disappointing that this book, unlike their other works, never had a British edition when it was published in 2006 and I had to buy it second hand from the U.S. Definitely a work of enlightenment, and well worth getting your hands on if you prefer reality to myths.

