Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
The Bestseller Code: Anatomy of the Blockbuster Novel Hardcover – September 20, 2016
| Jodie Archer (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Matthew L. Jockers (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
“Non-formulaic, eye-opening, deeply-researched ― and really worth your time.”― GQ
Jodie Archer and Matthew L. Jockers' The Bestseller Code: Anatomy of the Blockbuster Novel is a big idea book that explains their text-mining research through a groundbreaking look at the New York Times bestseller list. It explores the relationship between creativity and analytics, picking bestsellers via algorithm with a high degree of accuracy. We know that technology has transformed the worlds of finance, medicine, and sports; now it's making its mark on books.
Ask most people about massive success in the world of fiction, and you’ll typically hear that it’s a game of hazy crystal balls. The sales figures of E. L. James or Dan Brown seem to be freakish―random occurrences in an unknowable market. But what if there were an algorithm that could reveal a secret DNA of bestsellers, regardless of their genre? What if it knew, just from analyzing the words alone, not just why genre writers like John Grisham and Danielle Steel belong on the lists, but also that authors such as Junot Diaz, Jodi Picoult, and Donna Tartt had telltale signs of success all over their pages?
The algorithm exists; the code has been cracked; and the results bring fresh new insights into how fiction works and why we read. The Bestseller Code offers a new theory for why Fifty Shades of Grey sold so well. It sheds light on the current craze for dark heroines. It reveals which themes tend to sell best. And all with fascinating supporting data taken from a five-year study of twenty thousand novels. Then there is the hunt for "the one"―the paradigmatic example of bestselling writing according to a computer's analysis of thousands of points of data. The result is surprising, a bit ironic, and delightfully unorthodox.
At heart, The Bestseller Code is a celebration of books for readers and writers―a compelling investigation into how successful writing works, and a fresh take on our intellectual and emotional response to stories.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSt. Martin's Press
- Publication dateSeptember 20, 2016
- Dimensions5.76 x 0.95 x 8.53 inches
- ISBN-101250088275
- ISBN-13978-1250088277
"Don't Forget Dexter! (Dexter T. Rexter)" by Lindsey Ward for $7.03
Introducing Dexter T. Rexter, the toughest, coolest dinosaur ever. At least he likes to think so.| Learn more
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Non-formulaic, eye-opening, deeply-researched ― and really worth your time."― GQ
"A thought-provoking and interesting book." ― The Financial Times
"Reveals the diverse directions in which popular fiction may be taken. . . the bestseller-ometer may find its most noble application as a democratizing force" ― The Atlantic
"[T]his is a delightful book to read. I would recommend it as both an entertaining and educational read for anybody interested in the business of books." ―Digital Book World Daily
"This interesting little tome shares some of the Bookputer’s insights with us, just in case we want to become author-millionaires too. And who doesn’t? . . . Fascinating." ― The Times Review
"Aspiring novelists who thumb through this volume will find plenty to think about. . . [T]his book actually represents an opportunity for literary scholars." ― Public Books
"Archer is not some Silicon Valley whizz-kid looking to reduce the novel to 0s and 1s, nor is she a pretentious academic coming over the hills to sling around jargon about middlebrow novels. . . [She] is smart, savvy and full of ideas." ―The Times of London
"A laboratory is a more compelling setting than a church." ― The Wall Street Journal, which named The Bestseller Code one of the most-anticipated books of Fall 2016
"[The] claims are eye-grabbing. . . [and] also highly plausible." ―The Spectator
"Archer and Jockers “are ‘literature-friendly’ and want good books to succeed."―Wired
"When a story captures the imagination of millions, that's magic. Can you qualify magic? Archer and Jockers just may have done so." ―Sylvia Day, New York Times bestselling author
"The Bestseller Code excited me, scared me, and generally blew my mind. Archer and Jockers have built a reading robot that can teach readers, writers, and publishers a great deal about how popular fiction works. This is a pioneering work in a new science of storytelling." ―Jonathan Gottschall, author of The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human.
"Archer and Jockers take an astonishing insight into the DNA of bestsellers and turn it into a gripping page-turner about how we read. Truly remarkable!" ―Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, co-author of Big Data and professor at Oxford
"May revolutionize the publishing industry." ―The Guardian
"The Bestseller Code is an intriguing read and its analysis of what makes a plot tick and how readers are grabbed is compelling."―Literary Review
About the Author
Matthew L. Jockers was the co-founder of Stanford University’s Literary Lab in Silicon Valley. His digital humanities work has been profiled in the New York Times, LA Review of Books, and more. He is Associate Professor of English at the University of Nebraska in Lincoln and co-author of The Bestseller Code.
Product details
- Publisher : St. Martin's Press; 1st edition (September 20, 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1250088275
- ISBN-13 : 978-1250088277
- Item Weight : 12.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.76 x 0.95 x 8.53 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #479,691 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #477 in General Books & Reading
- #1,296 in Communication Skills
- #1,579 in Fiction Writing Reference (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Matthew L. Jockers is a distinguished research scientist at Apple. Previously, he was Dean of Arts and Sciences and Professor of English and Data Analytics at Washington State University. Jockers’s research is focused on computational approaches to the study of literature. His books include Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History (University of Illinois, 2013), Text Analysis Using R for Students of Literature (Springer, 2014), and, with Jodie Archer, The Bestseller Code (St. Martins 2016). For more information, see www.matthewjockers.net

Jodie Archer PhD was born in Yorkshire, England and holds BA and MA degrees in English from the University of Cambridge as well as a PhD from Stanford in English. She has worked in books for almost twenty years, including top books jobs at Penguin and Apple. Jodie has studied with the international University of Metaphysical Science and is awning her PhD from that university, based in Arizona.
Jodie's website is www.jodiearcher.com. Please visit her there.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- There's no surprise “the Code” (also called “the Model” or the “Bestseller-ometer”) works so well. Success was built in since historic bestsellers are already known, so when they are programmed into the model it “predicts” they’ll sell well. What The Code can’t do is predict the success of an unpublished novel.
- Science is peer-reviewable and this bestseller-ometer hasn’t been peer reviewed. To do that a double-blind test would have to be made by independent investigators to determine if the model produced the claimed results. It would not.
- The authors claim to have analyzed 5 thousand novels published in the last 30 years. First of all, they probably didn’t. Second, predicting future results from past performance is fraught (see Enron and Lucent stock prices). Modern literary tastes differ significantly from those of the past and you are not planning to sell your novel into a 1980s readership or to a Borders store.
- In your heart, Dear Reader, do you honestly believe that when 5 thousand novels were “DNA deconstructed” by the bestseller-ometer, that it could produce the lists on pages 70-71? There is only one way that could have happened and that is for the model to pick up key words like “Jodi Picault,” “David Baldacci,” “Nora Roberts,” “Stephen King,” and “Paulo Coelho” as part of its analytic filtering. Again, hindsight is difficult to overrate.
- Consider these supposedly surprising conclusions revealed by the model. A bestseller must have a dominant theme comprising roughly a third of its word count. And that topic must appeal to millions of readers. And it must have “human closeness.” And, my favorite revelation, conflict drives novels. Who knew?
- If you aren’t put off by the book’s inane claims by page 88, consider the graph of the “measured beats” (a key modeling predictor) in Fifty Shades. You may or may not notice that the vertical axis on the chart is not labeled. That is because “measured beat” is a vague concept, not a scientifically measureable variable. In fact the wavy line on the chart is just a freehand depiction of something, maybe tension, which, by the way, the model can discern infallibly.
- Knowing what you now know about this freehand line derived from Fifty Shades how amazed are you by the authors’ claim that it precisely overlays the freehand line representing the rising and falling of tension in DaVinci Code? Are you awestruck that those two wavy lines are the only two which are exactly alike among the 5 thousand books over 30 years whose DNA were deconstructed by the model? Recall what they say about something too good to be true.
- Do you sincerely believe that a word cloud identification model can determine whether the book has a killer hook in the first 40 pages? What would a hook look like in a word cloud?
This book is junk science and it relies on a scientifically illiterate readership (and St. Martin’s Press’s promotional budget) for any success. If the authors’ research had taken them back further than thirty years they might have data-mined the inspiration for their bestseller-ometer, P.T. Barnam’s quote, “A sucker is born every minute.”
I will admit I love data and how concrete it is. As a creative who straddles the line between that and the analytical, this truly scratched my itch. I'm currently working on a book that will be finished in mere days. After reading this book (in one setting of an afternoon), I took my notes and takeaways and revisited what I'd written.
Mistakes that I'd never have seen blared at me. Not the normal mistakes of grammar or developmental issues--no mistakes that would have sent my book into the abyss of Meh. With a few tweaks here and there, my manuscript now gets me excited. I was able to change my perception of my writing to provide the entertainment ride it should be.
I will not attempt to tell you what I did, because I believe this books should be experienced in the customization of your own needs as a writer. I will say that I found the graphs they provided on pacing, the tips on theme and their examination of "The Girl" books and how 50 Shades and Da Vinci Code could be twins to be very illuminating.
This book may not be for you if you do not enjoy the value of data, have the ability to grasp the data and then conceptualize it into how it pertains to you or believe that a computer can read a book and then tell you how to make yours better. But, if you are adventurous enough to challenge your view of how to approach your next book, this one might be for you.
I love learning new things about writing and myself. This book allowed me to do that.
For example, the authors will talk about how titles should or shouldn't use "The," cite their data, and basically conclude that there are plenty of examples of both. Or that some data shows that a noun/adjective between "The" and the "Object" is bad, except when it's good. Not to mention all the examples that fit neither.
Personally, I think the entire methodology is deeply suspect. It's a sort of after-the-fact statistical overfitting. Both of the authors are from the literature / editorial side of the business, which would be fine if that's the kind of material they were presenting. But they attempt to get into statistical analysis. Two English major types! I assure you, they have no idea what they are doing. It's a bit like asking a fisherman for his Michelin 3-star recipes. Just because they know one aspect of food doesn't mean they know another. If they had an actual statistics expert look at this, I think they would either have been dissuaded from publication or it would be greatly improved. But that didn't happen and instead you get pseudo-statistical gobbledygook.
And then of course there's this issue: none of their "analysis" has anything to do with quality, usefulness, meaning, or beauty. If your sole goal in life is to figure out how to generate total crap that sells -- longshot that this would truly help even with that but I guess possible -- then maybe you can find something in here to get yourself published in some bare minimum way, especially if you're a first time author, don't read much, and have absolutely no idea what makes a good book, and don't really care.
Oh, and it's not particularly well organized.
For me, as I look back on it, I truly can't think of a single takeaway or useful bit of information that I gleaned from the entire book. Not a single sentence, idea, or suggestion stands out. The only reason I'm not giving them one star is due to their enthusiasm and, I think, sincere intentions.
Top reviews from other countries
I have a serious problem with the way they have looked at the data. I find they have "backfitted" somewhat. For example, if you see that Stephen King has had dozens of bestsellers over the years and then match up the next Stephen King with the Bestseller data then it will obviously give the new one a high chance of success.
Also there wasn't enough time spent on looking at frontlist sales/ backlist sales, distribution, marketing spend, social media hype etc. "Robert Galbraith" was doing absolutely nothing out of the ordinary until it was revealed as JK Rowling (hence why the reveal was made).


