Manent's 'Beyond Radical Secularism' is a profound book. In its own powerful way it asks the question: What values are at the core of modern France? By extension, that same question should be asked of all modern Western nations. For Manent the question is framed within the reality of France's encounter with radical Islamic terrorism. His book was first published there after the January 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack, but before the terrorist carnage in Paris that took place during November 2015. This English translation (by Ralph C. Hancock) was published in July 2016.
Manent contrasts the cultural views of "an average Western and the average Muslim" (p. 13). For Westerners, Manent claims that "we" view the primary role of society to be the guarantor of individual rights, while Muslim society "is first of all the whole set of morals and customs" (p. 13). The central problem is, of course, how peaceful reconciliation can be achieved. How can the individual rights of Muslims be respected in a nation that has effectively banished religion and spirituality from the public sphere? How can we reconcile the West's respect for basic human rights, especially basic women's rights, with a culture that holds contrary values? How far can the bounds of multiculturalism be stretched while retaining meaningful social cohesion?
One suspects that the prototypical Western nation has been hollowed out of any objective moral standards or spirituality ("spiritual evisceration" is Manent's term - p. 68), and therefore lacks the community-forming mechanisms necessary for the retention of core beliefs, common convictions, and, ultimately, true social cohesion. In a world where the overwhelming emphasis is upon our subjective rights, materialism, and personal well-being, "we" have become what Tocqueville feared. "We" are held together by the most tenuous bonds, having largely shunted aside the "common beliefs" … the culture, convictions, customs, and morality ... of our ancestors. Tocqueville wrote, "… without such common belief no society can prosper; say, rather, no society can exist; for without such ideas there still may be men, but there is no social body …" (DA).
One thing should appear obvious: Smugly assuming "we" are "on the right side of history" is not working. Manent characterizes a current prevalent and naive viewpoint: "Humanity is irresistibly carried along by the movement of modernization, and modern humanity, humanity understood as having finally reached adulthood, is a humanity that has left religion behind" (p. 10). He writes of "modern humanity" as incredulous that any religion could be the source of personal animation in the enlightened 21st Century. This secular posture leaves modern humanity smugly "waiting only for the slower ones to kindly join him" (p. 61).
Sometimes the greatest measure of a book's worthiness is the quality of the questions it forces us to ask ourselves, the humility that comes with the realization that good answers are very hard to come by, but also the sense of urgency it creates for the crucial undertaking. In the Preface Manent writes, "Eventually, as Machiavelli said, some 'extrinsic accident' such as war or revolution forces the members of a nation to 'recognize themselves' and to take up again the frayed reins of common life" (p. 3). Now should be one of those times.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$23.80
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
BLISSENCELLC
Sold by:
BLISSENCELLC
(25 ratings)
100% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$27.15
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
mediaHand
Sold by:
mediaHand
(9055 ratings)
85% positive over last 12 months
85% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Beyond Radical Secularism: How France and the Christian West Should Respond to the Islamic Challenge Hardcover – July 20, 2016
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length160 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherSt. Augustines Press
-
Publication dateJuly 20, 2016
-
Dimensions6 x 0.7 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-101587310740
-
ISBN-13978-1587310744
An Amazon Book with Buzz: "Antoni: Let's Do Dinner" by Antoni Porowski
Let’s Do Dinner is an invitation into Antoni’s easy kitchen Learn more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : St. Augustines Press; 1st edition (July 20, 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 160 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1587310740
- ISBN-13 : 978-1587310744
- Item Weight : 13.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.7 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,229,902 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #867 in Islamic Social Studies
- #882 in Radical Political Thought
- #2,195 in History of Religion & Politics
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
10 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on September 1, 2016
Verified Purchase
32 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2016
Verified Purchase
This book or essay, in the French sense, while directed specifically to the trends, history and problems of France, has many applications to the problems of Western countries of today. Typically French in its style and methodology, this book takes out the faux indignation of the left and dares to address historically grounded concerns in a passionless, rational manner. If you wish to challenge your views regardless of where they are, this brief essay is for you.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2017
Verified Purchase
When either the author, the translator, or both, appears more interested in bludgeoning the reader with their considerable vocabulary more than they desire producing accessible content, the opportunity to convince the reader is lost in a sea of polysyllabic words. Unfortunately the book suffers from a twin failure in both substance, and style. I can disagree and debate the substance but not the style.
When I speak of style, I mean the book is almost impossible to follow without the aid of a dictionary. Mr. Manent or Mr. Hancock’s translation combine to produce frequent incomprehensible sentences that had me diving for the dictionary just to understand the author’s intent. After a while, when the reader is bludgeoned so often with words like autochthony, indeterminacy, immanence, and communitarianism, to name a few, you must stop searching for the dictionary. Too many trips impacts the flow of the argument. Say it in simple French or in the English translation! It became a literary marathon whereby my only goal was to complete the course and rest at the finish line.
When I speak of substance, the spine of Mr. Manent’s argument is that radical secularism has created a moral and social void in western countries that has reduced or eliminated French and European national identity. In the absence of a shared moral or societal norm caused by secularism, Islam, for a great many immigrants provides that spiritual and social fabric that the west has abandoned. It’s an interesting premise and worthy of debate. Unfortunately, Mr. Manent’s prescription for removing the French Muslims from their western isolation is both trivial and incongruent with Islam and Shiria Law. Mr. Manent like many western intellectuals, believes that the West has agency over the French Muslims. What we fail to comprehend is that Islam is both a religion and a form of government. Mr. Manent posits that the radical fringes of Islam can be persuaded into embracing a European style separation of Church and State which is foundational to all western nations but is contradictory to Sharia Law. He builds his shaky foundation on the belief that the radical elements not only can be instructed how to embrace the separation of church and state but also embrace freedom of thought, speech, and of course, drawings. We need to look no farther than the Charlie Hebdo shootings to disprove this position.
There is an existential threat to western society that we must address or lose what is means to be members of our own countries. Mr. Manent is correct in asserting that it is not cultural hegemony to strive for a shared collection of values, mores and customs that define and unite people. We need this more than ever but we also need the disenfranchised to want to be members of said society even if it means embracing values such as free speech and separation of church and state.
If this book were translated with the intention of reaching a broader audience, it would be a commendable addition to the topic being discussed.
Overall, I feel Mr. Manent’s strategy for enfranchising the Muslims of France and greater Europe is one that should be debated. Whether this version of Mr. Manent’s book will be read and understood by many people, unfortunately is not up for debate.
When I speak of style, I mean the book is almost impossible to follow without the aid of a dictionary. Mr. Manent or Mr. Hancock’s translation combine to produce frequent incomprehensible sentences that had me diving for the dictionary just to understand the author’s intent. After a while, when the reader is bludgeoned so often with words like autochthony, indeterminacy, immanence, and communitarianism, to name a few, you must stop searching for the dictionary. Too many trips impacts the flow of the argument. Say it in simple French or in the English translation! It became a literary marathon whereby my only goal was to complete the course and rest at the finish line.
When I speak of substance, the spine of Mr. Manent’s argument is that radical secularism has created a moral and social void in western countries that has reduced or eliminated French and European national identity. In the absence of a shared moral or societal norm caused by secularism, Islam, for a great many immigrants provides that spiritual and social fabric that the west has abandoned. It’s an interesting premise and worthy of debate. Unfortunately, Mr. Manent’s prescription for removing the French Muslims from their western isolation is both trivial and incongruent with Islam and Shiria Law. Mr. Manent like many western intellectuals, believes that the West has agency over the French Muslims. What we fail to comprehend is that Islam is both a religion and a form of government. Mr. Manent posits that the radical fringes of Islam can be persuaded into embracing a European style separation of Church and State which is foundational to all western nations but is contradictory to Sharia Law. He builds his shaky foundation on the belief that the radical elements not only can be instructed how to embrace the separation of church and state but also embrace freedom of thought, speech, and of course, drawings. We need to look no farther than the Charlie Hebdo shootings to disprove this position.
There is an existential threat to western society that we must address or lose what is means to be members of our own countries. Mr. Manent is correct in asserting that it is not cultural hegemony to strive for a shared collection of values, mores and customs that define and unite people. We need this more than ever but we also need the disenfranchised to want to be members of said society even if it means embracing values such as free speech and separation of church and state.
If this book were translated with the intention of reaching a broader audience, it would be a commendable addition to the topic being discussed.
Overall, I feel Mr. Manent’s strategy for enfranchising the Muslims of France and greater Europe is one that should be debated. Whether this version of Mr. Manent’s book will be read and understood by many people, unfortunately is not up for debate.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2016
Verified Purchase
good book
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
ian
5.0 out of 5 stars
cream of the cream
Reviewed in Germany on September 6, 2018Verified Purchase
Fantastic book. Short but essential for everyone only mildly interested in chaos that is Western Europe today. Written with utmost respect for all involved. I especially like one sentence in a book and you do not need an interpretation: "Europeans never covered their faces except the hangmen". Read, learn, absorb and try to stay serene.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse








