Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $5.14 shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
& FREE Shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth Hardcover – September 1, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- The myth that Republicans are fiscal geniuses and champions of free enterprise.
- The right's self-proclaimed monopoly on "family values."
- The conservative smearing of liberals as unpatriotic and anti-American.
- And of course, the "compassionate conservatism" of George W. Bush. (It depends on the meaning of “compassionate.”)
Big Lies confronts right-wing slander and bias with a long-awaited, badly-needed counterpunch to the deceptions that have plagued American politics for a generation.
- Print length245 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherThomas Dunne Books
- Publication dateSeptember 1, 2003
- Dimensions6.38 x 1 x 9.58 inches
- ISBN-100312315600
- ISBN-13978-0312315603
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"Cleverly smart... Readers of all political persuasions who care about the quality, as well as the decibel level, of civic debate ought to hope that Conason's book circulates more efficiently across ideological lines than those previous books that scorn civility of any sort." --The Washington Post
"A rigorous and devastating portrait of the last three Republican administrations.... [Conason] shows where the worlds of crony capitalism and terrorism cross and, for the Bush family, they come together most vividly in Saudi Arabia, via Iran-contra. And Conason debunks the myth that Bill Clinton was more concerned with Monica Lewinsky than he was with Osama bin Laden. Don't take my word for it -- look to Conason's book." --Chicago Sun-Times
"Big Lies is a valuable and convincing book about a president and a political movement that are eating away at the roots of our democracy." --The Boston Phoenix
"Big Lies...takes up where Eric Alterman's What Liberal Media? left off... More raw meat for the lions of the Left and Right to devour." --Booklist
"Conason flushes the hypocrisy out of conservative rants and jibes at liberals.... Here he takes on the most egregious examples of conservative demagoguery, playing their cards right back at them." --Kirkus Reviews
"This book should be right at the top of every rational American's short list of necessary readings. It is a thorough, bracing refutation of the US right's entire mythology -- a book that (especially if read before or after Sidney Blumenthal's The Clinton Wars) will arm you well for winning combat with the Big Liars and their semi-multitude of dittoheads." --Mark Crispin Miller, author of The Bush Dyslexicon
"Big Lies is must reading for anyone who wants to understand America today. It's an amazing tour through the wonderland of right-wing mendacity that blinds Americans to the ugly truth about what's happening to our country."
-Paul Krugman, New York Times columnist and author of The Accidental Theorist
"As Joe Conason so effectively points out in Big Lies, there is no 'vast right-wing conspiracy' -- it's all right out there in plain sight. Conason has such a good eye for the hypocrisy and follies of the American right, he can even make you laugh a little while you wince. This is a comprehensive, well-researched indictment of a bunch of nasty people who really deserve it. It is also a thorough exposé of a bunch of big lies, from 'the liberal media' to 'compassionate conservatism."
-Molly Ivins, bestselling author of Bushwhacked and Shrub
"The media is a prism of political life as never before. So how far can we believe what we are told? Not a lot, says Joe Conason in Big Lies, and the case for prosecution is coolly documented with precision and wit. An important book for American Democracy."
-Harold Evans, editor and author of The American Century
"Bothered by Bias? Sickened by Slander? Joe Conason's Big Lies is the perfect antidote. From Rush to Bush, Conason strips away false fronts to reveal the corporate agenda behind 'conservative' propaganda. Big Lies is essential reading in these politically troubled times."
-Arianna Huffington, bestselling author of Pigs at the Trough
"Every page of Big Lies is a revelation. With incisiveness and verve, Joe Conason supplies the intellectual ammunition to rescue liberalism and liberals from years of Republican distortion, spin, and shameless lies. Along the way, Conason delivers one of the most devastating indictments of right-wing rhetorical tricks and dishonest media techniques in print."
- David Brock, bestselling author of Blinded by the Right
From the Inside Flap
- Elitist liberals control the media.
- George W. Bush is a compassionate conservative.
- Republicans know how to run the economy.
- Democrats are spendthrifts who bust budgets.
- Bill Clinton is the root of all evil.
- Tough right-wingers never coddle terrorists.
Joe Conason, whose investigation of the conservative witchhunt of Bill Clinton became a major national bestseller, takes on the most common arguments, myths, and fallacies propounded by the right - and exposes them as the smear tactics they really are.
A powerful rebuttal to books like Bias or Slander, Big Lies is essential reading in an era of right-wing bullying and political conformity.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Thomas Dunne Books; First Edition (September 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 245 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0312315600
- ISBN-13 : 978-0312315603
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.38 x 1 x 9.58 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,127,130 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #602 in Propaganda & Political Psychology
- #1,433 in Political Parties (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Joe Conason (born January 25, 1954) is an American journalist, author and liberal political commentator. He is the founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo, a daily political newsletter and website that features breaking news as well as commentary and analysis from influential progressive thinkers. Since 2006, he has served as editor of The Investigative Fund, a nonprofit journalism center.
One of the country's most popular political columnists, his articles have appeared in dozens of publications around the world including the New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Yorker, The New Republic, The Nation, The Guardian, Salon, The Village Voice and Harpers.
Conason authored two New York Times best selling books, The Hunting of the President and Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth. His newest book, Man of the World, focuses on the post-presidency of Bill Clinton. A winner of the New York Press Club's Byline Award, Conason has covered every American presidential election since 1980.
He and his family live in New York City.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In the introduction, the author makes the case that almost all good things enjoyed in this society (overtime pay, safe working conditions, minimum wage, unemployment insurance, consumer protection, public education, clean food and air, Social Security and universal suffrage, among others) have been brought about by liberals against strong conservative opposition. Conason states that the demonization of liberals has been a conscious strategy by right-wing strategists like Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, enabled by an infrastructure of foundations and think tanks financed by wealthy paranoics like Richard Mellon Scaife.
Organized into ten chapters, each addresses a lie told loudly and repeatedly by right-wing extremists:
(1) liberals are elitists while conservatives care about the common people -- this is a joke when one considers how the pseudopopulist Right cravenly caters to corporate interests at the expense of employees and consumers
(2) liberals control the media -- the media is increasingly controlled by corporate owners and while reporters may be liberal, the editors and publishers are overwhelmingly conservative
(3) conservatives are more patriotic than liberals -- it's appalling to hear chickenhawks (aka draft dodgers) like Bush, Cheney, DeLay, Gingrich, Limbaugh, Lott, Rove, etc. criticize the patriotism of Democrats, who actually outpace conservatives as veterans. Also, with Republicans in control of everything, soldiers are still on food stamps and being asked to pay for their costs in Iraq! The Right uses the American flag like a prop; as Johnson said, "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel". Furthermore, some conservatives still revere the treasonous attempted secession of the South and conservative organizations like America First served as cover for German and Japanese agents during WWII. Most recently, William Safire and George Nethercutt have both said that freeing Iraq is worth one or two body bags a day -- sound patriotic?
(4) conservatives are better economists -- by any economic indicator -- GDP, inflation, job creation, deficit reduction -- Democratic presidents have done better than GOP leaders. The savings and loan debacle occurred under Reagan, who ran up a $3 trillion national debt, and W has squandered the surplus given to him by Clinton. Since the Gingrich Revolution, pork has risen exponentially, with GOP districts currently receiving about $612 million more than Democratic districts. oink
(5) liberals are concerned with political correctness but not individual liberty -- unless you count freedom from surveillance and theocratic rule, freedom of information, etc.
(6) conservatives support family values -- there's enough sanctimonious hypocrisy to go around here, yet at least liberals tend to be tolerant of others, while conservatives deride others even when they share the same problems
(7) liberals exploit minorities -- there's a reason minorities don't vote for the GOP, and you need look no further than the horrid "jokes" told by Reagan, Bush and others, as well as the policies informed by those attitudes
(8) conservatives are champions of free enterprise -- unless you consider crony capitalism and corporate welfare free enterprise. Even Alan Greenspan, a revered economic conservative, recently stated that he was wrong about market regulation. PS -- Why did the Bush administration repeal sanctions against offshore US companies?
(9) Bush is a compassionate conservative -- only if by "compassionate" you mean willing to end Head Start and after-school programs, gut environmental laws, tax families while ending dividend and estate taxes, and reduce public health spending.
(10) conservatives are tougher on terrorism -- where is Saddam? Where is Osama? Why was Bush hiding in Air Force One on 9/11 rather than leading his country? Why is the administration obstructing all efforts to examine the events and conditions that led to 9/11? Why did Ashcroft reduce spending on terrorism measures when he got into the Justice Department? How could Reagan trade arms for hostages in Iran, bungle Lebanon and lift sanctions from Pinochet's Chile? Why did Poppy Bush train Osama bin Laden and give Saddam Hussein anthrax, botulinum and nerve gas? Why did Dubya violate closed air space on 9/11 to hasten bin Laden family members and Saudis out of the country before they could be questioned by the FBI? How could his administration ignore warnings by outgoing Clinton officials that al-Qaeda was a major threat?
Conason uses facts, and quotes to refute the agitprop. He repeatedly and convincingly targets Anne Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. Also, this is the most complete account I've seen of George W. Bush's execrable tour of duty in the Texas National Guard. (Indeed, none of Barbara's four sons served in the Vietnam conflict, which suggests that the Bush twins won't be headed over to Iraq anytime soon either.)
Conason delivers a lot of information and it's well organized, so this would be an awesome little item to tuck under your arm as you head off to join your family for the holidays -- there's bound to be a relative or two who swallow all the manure spread about by BushCo.
To paraphrase Francis Bacon, it is the inquiry, knowledge and belief of truth that is the sovereign good of human nature. Cravenness abounds in conservatism at the moment. It's up to the American people, assisted by thoughtful research like this, to find the truth. It will set us free.
Conason's book is meticulously researched and annotated - and unlike his counterparts screaming like crazed harpies on the right, he actually uses reliable sources. One of the methods practiced by the conservative media is to allow one of their individual mouthpieces to put out a lie or half-truth, then everybody else in their camp begins to quote it as a source (usually well-aware of its initial inaccuracy), over and over, until its repeated enough that people actually begin to believe it. Another neat little trick is to answer the question they WISHED they had been asked rather than the one that was actually posed. Our President has become very adept at this - as his recent `press conference' will attest. Those members of the press who notice the shell game eventually give up, and the miscreant story makes its way into the `fact' column. There are notable exceptions in the press - thank heavens - such as Mr. Conason, who are determined to get the truth out there for people to read.
Those of you who might believe the line about the `liberal media' should ask yourselves a couple of probing questions. If the media is so liberally biased, you would expect that the coverage of a small story like, say, the 2000 US Presidential elections, would have been slanted so that there were more stories concerning Gore that were positive, and more stories about Bush that were negative. The facts show just the opposite. Conservatives hammer the oft-quoted statistics that show that `most reporters say they vote Democratic' - well guess what: the reporters don't control the content of the papers for which they write, the editors and publishers do - and the editors and publishers are mostly `conservatives' (a word that they actually misapply to themselves, as Conason so clearly illustrates), and the endorsements of the top newspapers in the US have become increasingly conservative over the past few elections. Why is this? It's certainly not a reflection of public opinion - endorsing and electing right-wing candidates is more in the interest of the ultra-wealthy who actually CONTROL the press. They're perfectly happy to get the tax cuts that benefit the top 1% of Americans and pay little more than lip service to those who actually WORK for a living.
It's desperately important, of course, for liberals to read this book - the information contained here is invaluable in this election year. But I would suggest that those in the middle and working class who consider themselves to be conservatives, who think that the Republicans have the best ideas about managing ANYTHING, read it as well - they might begin to get an inkling of how this shell game works. Boy, are they going to get mad - and rightfully so. No one likes to be fooled, especially about things that are as important as the economy, the environment and human rights - not to mention the WAR whose purpose seems to change as each individual card in the rickety assemblage falls out.
PLEASE read this book. Conason clearly and methodically addresses the questions I've mentioned and many others. Americans need to understand HOW the information they receive through the mass media is distorted - and WHY and BY WHOM and IN WHOSE BEST INTERESTS. Also, check out John W. Dean's WORSE THAN WATERGATE, Richard A. Clark's AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, Al Franken's LIES AND THE LYING LIARS WHO TELL THEM, Michael Moore's DUDE WHERE'S MY COUNTRY, and Craig Unger's HOUSE OF BUSH - HOUSE OF SAUD. My favorite bumper sticker that I've seen lately doesn't even mention a candidate: THE MEDIA IS ONLY AS LIBERAL AS THE CONSERVATIVE CORPORATIONS WHO CONTROL IT.
Top reviews from other countries
Well, I, for one, was quite convinced. He points out that whilst the Right-wing constantly complain about a liberal media bias that:
1) All forms of the media jumped all over the Bill Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. They engendered and continued the painful and unnecessary scandal.
2) Right-Wing authors' books are widespread and they have platforms to express their views all over the US.
3) The Fox News Network is currently the largest network in the US. On top of that, networks such as MBC show not "liberal" but conservative bias.
On top of that he deals with the usual economic issues: "supply-side" economics vs Tax and Spend etc. Public spending, defecits and the like feature prominently in the book. Indeed some of the figures and arguments might be overwhelming for the casual reader. It is worth, perhaps, searching wikipedia for certain economic terms and the history of such economics whilst reading this book.
The author brings in the various other usual suspects in the right-wing vs. liberal debate: religion, military service etc. He methodically presents the "Lies" and then counters them with what he sees as the truth.
His book is a serious effort and, therefore, may end up seeming a little dry compared with the works of Al Franken and Michael Moore. He would probably be taken somewhat more seriously in the US than either Al Franken (who is denounced as a mere comedian and ridiculed for his Air America radio show) and Michael Moore (who is somewhat hated by the right-wing for Bowling for Columbine c.f. [...] I found the flow sometimes not quite fluid enough for steady reading and lacking a bit of structure jumping from pundits to economics to religion then back to economics. I think he could definately have worked on his structure a bit more for a more interesting read.
It's important to note that our cousins across the pond will accept this in different ways. Those on the right-wing will stubbornly refuse to accept any of it. They tend to be unable to handle criticism of Reagan (especially after his recent death) or the Republican party. This book will generally be acceptable to those who are "impartial" observers or somewhat liberal/left-wing. It's easier for British to read this without blowing our tops, generally being able to argue coherently and accept a plurality of opinion in politics.
It's definately worth reading this book if you're interested in contemporary American politics. If you want books dealing with similar topics, then "Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot" and "Lies and the Lying Liars who tell them" are good and humourous choices.
it might have helped in the american election
