Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe Hardcover – April 14, 2009
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Hardcover
"Please retry" | $49.00 | — | $11.29 |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, CD, MP3 Audio
"Please retry" | $11.35 | $7.49 |
Every now and then a simple yet radical idea shakes the very foundations of knowledge. The startling discovery that the world was not flat challenged and ultimately changed the way people perceived themselves and their relationship with the world. For most humans of the 15th century, the notion of Earth as ball of rock was nonsense. The whole of Western, natural philosophy is undergoing a sea change again, increasingly being forced upon us by the experimental findings of quantum theory, and at the same time, towards doubt and uncertainty in the physical explanations of the universe’s genesis and structure. Biocentrism completes this shift in worldview, turning the planet upside down again with the revolutionary view that life creates the universe instead of the other way around.
In this paradigm, life is not an accidental byproduct of the laws of physics. Biocentrism takes the reader on a seemingly improbable but ultimately inescapable journey through a foreign universeour ownfrom the viewpoints of an acclaimed biologist and a leading astronomer. Switching perspective from physics to biology unlocks the cages in which Western science has unwittingly managed to confine itself. Biocentrism will shatter the reader’s ideas of lifetime and space, and even death. At the same time it will release us from the dull worldview of life being merely the activity of an admixture of carbon and a few other elements; it suggests the exhilarating possibility that life is fundamentally immortal.
The 21st century is predicted to be the Century of Biology, a shift from the previous century dominated by physics. It seems fitting, then, to begin the century by turning the universe outside-in and unifying the foundations of science with a simple idea discovered by one of the leading life-scientists of our age. Biocentrism awakens in readers a new sense of possibility, and is full of so many shocking new perspectives that the reader will never see reality the same way again.
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBenBella Books
- Publication dateApril 14, 2009
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-101933771690
- ISBN-13978-1933771694
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Back Cover
"Like A Brief History of Time, it is indeed stimulating and brings biology into the whole.... The book will appeal to an audience of many different disciplines because it is a new way of looking at the old problem of our existence. Most importantly, it makes you think." ―E. Donnall Thomas, 1990 Nobel Prize winner in Physiology and Medicine
"It is genuinely an exciting piece of work.... The idea that consciousness creates reality has quantum support ... and also coheres with some of the things biology and neuroscience are telling us about the structures of our being. Just as we now know that the sun doesn't really move but we do (we are the active agents), so [it is] suggesting that we are the entities that give meaning to the particular configuration of all possible outcomes we call reality." ―Ronald Green, director of Dartmouth College's Ethics Institute
"Robert Lanza, a world-renowned scientist who has spanned many fields from drug delivery to stem cells to preventing animal extinction, and clearly one of the most brilliant minds of our times, has done it again. `A New Theory of the Universe' takes into account all the knowledge we have gained over the last few centuries ... placing in perspective our biologic limitations that have impeded our understanding of greater truths surrounding our existence and the universe around us. This new theory is certain to revolutionize our concepts of the laws of nature for centuries to come." ―Anthony Atala, internationally recognized scientist and director of the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine
About the Author
Robert Lanza was taken under the wing of scientific giants such as psychologist B.F. Skinner, immunologist Jonas Salk, and heart transplant pioneer Christiaan Barnard. His mentors described him as a genius,’ a renegade thinker,’ even likening him to Einstein himself.” US News & World Report cover story
Robert Lanza has been exploring the frontiers of science for more than four decades, and is considered one of the leading scientists in the world. He is currently Chief Scientific Officer at Advanced Cell Technology, and Adjunct Professor at Wake Forest University School of Medicine. He has several hundred publications and inventions, and 20 scientific books, among them, Principles of Tissue Engineering, which is recognized as the definitive reference in the field. Others include One World: The Health & Survival of the Human Species in the 21st Century (with a foreword by President Jimmy Carter), and the Handbook of Stem Cells and Essentials of Stem Cell Biology, which are considered the definitive references in stem cell research.
Dr. Lanza received his B.A. and M.D. degrees from the University of Pennsylvania, where he was both a University Scholar and Benjamin Franklin Scholar. He was also a Fulbright Scholar, and was part of the team that cloned the world’s first human embryo, as well as the first to clone an endangered species, to demonstrate that nuclear transfer could reverse the aging process, and to generate stem cells using a method that does not require the destruction of human embryos. Dr. Lanza was awarded the 2005 Rave Award for Medicine by Wired magazine, and received the 2006 All Star” Award for Biotechnology by Mass High Tech.
Dr. Lanza and his research have been featured in almost every media outlet in the world, including all the major television networks, CNN, Time, Newsweek, People magazine, as well as the front pages of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today, among others. Lanza has worked with some of the greatest thinkers of our time, including Nobel Laureates Gerald Edelman and Rodney Porter. Lanza worked closely with B.F. Skinner at Harvard University. Lanza and Skinner (the Father of Modern Behaviorism”) published a number of scientific papers together. He has also worked with Jonas Salk (discoverer of the polio vaccine) and heart transplant pioneer Christiaan Barnard.
Bob Berman
this is a fascinating guy” David Letterman
fasten your seatbelts and hold on tight” Astronomy magazine
Bob Berman is the most widely read astronomer in the world. Author of more than one thousand published articles, in publications such as Discover and Astronomy magazine, where he is a monthly columnist, he is also astronomy editor of The Old Farmer’s Almanac and the author of four books. He is adjunct professor of astronomy at Marymount College, and writes and produces a weekly show on Northeast Public Radio, aired during NPR’s Weekend Edition.
Product details
- Publisher : BenBella Books; 41961st edition (April 14, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1933771690
- ISBN-13 : 978-1933771694
- Item Weight : 14.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #461,998 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #94 in Physics of Time (Books)
- #716 in Consciousness & Thought Philosophy
- #1,506 in New Thought
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Robert Berman, known as Bob Berman, is an American astronomer, author, and science popularizer. He runs Overlook Observatory at his home in Woodstock, New York, USA. He was an adjunct professor of astronomy at the liberal arts college, Marymount Manhattan College, from 1996 to 2000 and has appeared on CBS This Morning, the Today Show, and the Late Show with David Letterman.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by Benjamin Thomas (Bob Berman - IdeaFestival 2009 Uploaded by Edward) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.

Robert Lanza is an American scientist and author whose research spans the range of natural science, from biology to theoretical physics. TIME magazine recognized him as one of the “100 Most Influential People in the World,” and Prospect magazine named him one of the "Top 50 World Thinkers.”
He has hundreds of scientific publications and over 30 books, including definitive references in the fields of stem cells, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. He is a former Fulbright Scholar, and studied with polio-pioneer Jonas Salk and Nobel laureates Gerald Edelman (known for his work on the biological basis of consciousness) and Rodney Porter. He also worked closely (and co-authored papers in Science on self-awareness and symbolic communication) with noted Harvard psychologist BF Skinner. Dr. Lanza received his undergraduate and medical degrees from the University of Pennsylvania, where he was both a University Scholar and Benjamin Franklin Scholar.
Lanza was part of the team that cloned the world’s first human embryo, the first endangered species, and published the first-ever reports of pluripotent stem cell use in humans.
Lanza and his colleagues were also the first to demonstrate that nuclear transplantation could be used to reverse the aging process and to generate immune-compatible tissues, including the first organ tissue-engineered from cloned cells. One of his early achievements was his demonstration that techniques used in preimplantation genetic diagnosis could be used to generate human embryonic stem cells without embryonic destruction.
He and colleagues have also succeeded in differentiating human pluripotent stem cells into retinal cells, and has shown that they provide long-term benefit in animal models of vision loss. Using this technology some forms of blindness may be curable, including macular degeneration and Stargardt disease, a currently untreatable form eye disease that causes blindness in teenagers and young adults. Lanza's company received FDA approval to carry out clinical trials in the US using them to treat degenerative eye diseases, as well approval for the first human pluripotent stem cell trial in Europe. The first patients reported improved vision in the eyes treated with the cells, which The Guardian said "represents a huge scientific achievement."
Dr. Lanza and his colleagues published the first-ever report of human pluripotent stem cells transplanted into human patients. The patients who received the stem cell transplants say their lives have been transformed by the experimental procedure--they report that they can use their computers, thread a needle, or even go to the mall or airport on their own.
Lanza has also been a major player in the scientific revolution that has led to the documentation that nuclear transfer/transcription factors can restore developmental potential in a differentiated cell. One of his successes was showing that it is feasible to generate functional oxygen-carrying red blood cells from human pluripotent stem cells. The blood cells were comparable to normal transfusable blood and could serve as a potentially inexhaustible source of "universal" blood. His team also discovered how to generate functional hemangioblasts - a population of "ambulance" cells - from hES cells. In animals, these cells quickly repaired vascular damage, cutting the death rate after a heart attack in half and restoring the blood flow to ischemic limbs that might otherwise have to be amputated.
Lanza and a team lead by Kwang-Soo Kim at Harvard University have also reported a safe method for generating induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Human iPS cells were created from skin cells by direct delivery of proteins, thus eliminating the harmful risks associated with genetic manipulation. The Editors of the prestigious journal Nature selected Lanza and Kim's paper on protein reprogramming as one of five "Research Highlights." Discover magazine stated, "Lanza's single-minded quest to usher in this new age has paid dividends in scientific insights and groundbreaking discoveries." Fortune magazine called him "the standard-bearer for stem cell research.”
Dr. Lanza has received numerous awards, including being named one of TIME Magazine's "100 Most Influential People in the World"; the 2013 Il Leone di San Marco award in Medicine (The Italian Heritage and Culture Committee, along with Regis Philbin [in Entertainment]); including an NIH Director's Award (2010) for "Translating Basic Science Discoveries into New and Better Treatments"; the 2010 'Movers and Shakers' Who Will Shape Biotech Over the Next 20 Years (BioWorld)(along with Craig Venter and President Barack Obama); the 2007 100 Most Inspiring People in the Life-Sciences Industry (PharmaVOICE, "For his discoveries 'behind the medicines making a significant impact on the pipelines of today and of the future'"; the 2007 Outstanding Contribution in Contemporary Biology Award (Brown University, "For his groundbreaking research and contributions in stem cell science and biology"; the 2006 All-Star Award for Biotechnology (MA High Tech, for "pushing stem cells' future"); the 2005 Rave Award for Medicine (Wired magazine, "For eye-opening work on embryonic stem cells"); and Lanza is listed in Who's Who in America, Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in Medicine and Healthcare, Who's Who in Science and Engineering; Who's Who in American Education, and Who's Who in Technology, among others.
Dr. Lanza and his research have been featured in almost every media outlet in the world, including CNN, TIME, Newsweek, People, as well as the front pages of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, among others (his work has also been the cover story of US News & World Report, Wired magazine, and Scientific American).
In 2007, Lanza published a feature article, "A New Theory of the Universe" in The American Scholar, a leading intellectual journal which has previously published works by Albert Einstein, Margaret Mead, and Carl Sagan, among others. His theory places biology above the other sciences in an attempt to solve one of nature's biggest puzzles, the theory of everything that other disciplines have been pursuing for the last century. This new view has become known as Biocentrism. In biocentrism, space and time are forms of animal sense perception, rather than external physical objects. Understanding this more fully yields answers to several major puzzles of mainstream science, and offers a new way of understanding everything from the microworld (for instance, the reason for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the double-slit experiment) to the forces, constants, and laws that shape the universe. Nobel laureate E. Donnall Thomas stated "Any short statement does not do justice to such a scholarly work. The work is a scholarly consideration of science and philosophy that brings biology into the central role in unifying the whole."
You can read more about Dr. Robert Lanza's work at:
http://www.robertlanza.com/
http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/
https://beyondbiocentrism.com
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Lanza then turns to the question of consciousness, and what looks to be reality. He (page 36) writes: "Some may imagine that there are two worlds, one out there and a separate one being cognized inside the skull. But the two worlds model is a myth. Nothing is perceived except the perceptions themselves, and nothing exists outside of consciousness. Only one visual reality is extant, and there it is. Right there. The outside world is, therefore, located within the brain or mind. Of course, this is so astounding for many people, even if it is obvious to those who study the brain, that it becomes possible to over-think the issue and come up with attempted refutations."
Lanza (page 38) notes Benjamin Libet`s famous timing experiment, where "unconscious, unfelt, brain electrical activity occrred a full half second before there was any conscious sense of decision-making by the subject," and then Lanza misinterprets the results (in my view) by clinging to the classical notion of cause-and-effect. Lanza (page 39) writes: "What, then, do we make of all this? First, that we are truly free to enjoy the unfolding of life, including our own lives, unencumbered by the acquired, often guilt-ridden sense of control, and the obsessive need to avoid messing up. We can relax, because we`ll automatically perform anyway. " In other words, we are free because we are not free! And this tacit support for a one-sided cause-and-effect comes even as Lanza later claims that time is an illusion and while he is found rejecting an irreversible and on-flowing continuum of events (where cause precedes effect)! Clearly, if cause-and-effect is declared real enough to interpret Libet`s findings, then time must also be real enough.
Nevertheless, Lanza does come to a correct conclusion in regard to Libet`s experiments. He (page 39) writes: "Modern knowledge of the brain shows that what appears out there is actually occurring within our own minds... Our external and internal perceptions are inextricably intertwined. They are different sides of the same coin and cannot be separated."
Without saying it, Lanza is found endorsing a type of idealism (the belief that mind is fundamental), seemingly as extreme as George Berkeley`s idealism. It is this idealism that Lanza calls "biocentrism,"and it is the wellspring of life.
Lanza turns to quantum mechanics to support his view of idealism. He (page 49) writes: "When studying subatomic particles, the observer appears to alter and determine what is perceived. The presence and methodology of the experimenter is hopelessly entangled with whatever he is attempting to observe and what results he gets. An electron turns out to be both a particle and a wave, but how, and more importantly, where such a particle will be located remains dependent upon the very act of observation."
Lanza explains the fine tuning of universal constants. He (page 90) writes: "If the universe is in a non-determined state until forced to resolve by an observer, and this non-determined state included the determination of the various fundamental constants, then the resolution would necessarily fall in such a way that allows for an observer, and therefore the constants would have to resolve in such a way as to allow life. Biocentrism therefore supports and builds upon John Wheeler`s conclusions about where quantum theory leads, and provides a solution to the anthropic problem that is unique and more reasonable than any alternative."
After treating quantum theory and relativity theory, Lanza (page 106) asserts that time is an illusion: "That time is a fixed arrow is a human construction. That we live on the edge of all time is a fantasy. That there is an irreversible, on-flowing continuum of events linked to galaxies and suns and the Earth is an even greater fantasy. Space and time are forms of animal understanding - period. We carry them around with us like turtles with shells."
To say that time is not well understood is one thing, but to assert that time is therefore an illusion seems unfounded to me. When forced to summarize his conclusion, he (page 111) backtracks from the bolder statements and writes only that: "Time does not have a real existence outside of animal-sense perception. It is the process by which we perceive changes in the universe." I could add that time is real because mind and change are real.
Lanza treats space the same way he treats time. He (pages 112-113) writes: "... Space and time are neither physical nor fundamentally real. They are conceptual, which means that space and time are of a uniquely subjective nature. They are modes of interpretation and understanding. They are part of the mental logic of the animal organism, the software that molds sensations into multidimensional objects."
Lanza (page 181) writes: "Sights, tactile experience, odors - all these sensations are experienced inside the mind alone. None are out there except by the convention of language. Everything we observe is the direct interaction of energy and mind. Anything that we do not observe directly exists only as potential - or more mathematically speaking - as a haze of probability."
The danger is to over prescribe Lanza`s brand of idealism, while ignoring more generalized varieties like Hegel`s idealism, or the monistic idealism described in Amit Goswami's "The Self-Aware Universe." The danger is to get caught up in word games, e.g., asserting that time and space are illusions because they are in the mind and while claiming the primacy of mind that underwrites idealism thereby partly contradicting the assertion. One can start with idealism and then immediately fall into a solipsism that asserts that the only real mind out there is my own; all others being illusions with time and space. The distinction between "materialism" and "idealism" is equally troubling because ultimately mere definitions are secondary to what is intended and what is self-evident. It may be productive to skirt this distinction, and merge Lanza's idealism with a A.N. Whitehead`s panpsychism. Good references would be Christen de Quincey`s "Radical Nature," and Henry P. Stapp`s "Mindful Universe."
Lanza`s book is not a rigorous scientific treatment, but the science he refers to is rigorous. Neither is his book a comprehensive philosophical development. Rather, Lanza has a colloquial style that is typical of good popular books, and his book can be understood by non-experts. This is a very important book for the right audience.
I love and respect science. All the tremendous, beneficial and downright fascinating discoveries we have made on behalf of mankind! I trust deeply upon my Christian faith and understanding of Scriptures to make overall sense of everything I take in. I probably should pay more attention to both faith and science. This book provided a wonderful incentive to do just that.
“Biocentrism” made the most recent discoveries of quantum physics accessible to a person who never had to take a single physics course to graduate high school, college or post-graduate studies. Fascinating evidence that nothing truly “exists” in the absence of a conscious observer, except as waves of probability.
Lanza writes with honesty and in places, surprising humor. He gives us glimpses of the parts of his own consciousness a Christ-believer such as I might call “soul” – as when he tells of the loss of two loved ones, and how he relates his thoughts and experience of these losses to his theory of biocentrism.
Lanza and Berman consistently eschew “religion,” preferring to insist on scientific method, undergirded by secular philosophy, as the keys to understanding ultimate reality (make no mistake, this is about ultimate reality). This is a respectful treatment of the epistemological gap between empiricism and faith, from the empiricist’s viewpoint. Lanza even provides us with a plausible scientific basis for belief in an afterlife, though he encourages us to realize it’s his own speculation. I think of the authors as looking across that narrow but very distinct chasm between what St. Augustine called the “city of man” and the “city of God.” And longing for what’s on the other side.
Lanza peers into the realm of what science does not know. He admits that quarks, seemingly pure energy and the smallest, most indivisible particles we’re aware of, have observable features suggesting that even they may have a knowable structure of sub-parts. He says “… one must consider the endless ongoing attempts at creating GUTs- grand unified theories… without much success except as a way of financially facilitating the careers of theoreticians and grad students. Nor have they even “felt right.”
At least in this book, that step (not a leap!) across the narrow chasm is not taken. To what extent is that because the authors felt pressure to hold to a certain decorum in order to not completely lose standing among their scientific peers, or is it truly the state of their soul? I find myself cheering for them to play Nicodemus, the Pharisee who was so intrigued with Jesus that he waited until night so he could visit him, undetected. Nicodemus, the apostle John tells us, helped to embalm the crucified Christ’s body.
Most intriguing to me in this book, were the connections I found between the discoveries of quantum physics over the last 20-30 years regarding the prerequisite of an observer in order that matter “materialize” from probability waves of energy, and the Judaeo-Christian Bible’s description of the things we can know about God.
Is there a place for the honest scientist to consider Lanza’s perception that the best “theories of everything” have not felt right? In a biocentric universe, consciousness is everything and “feelings” are indeed a component of consciousness. Even the most rigorously empirical scientist must allow that at the end of the data analysis, it is her “feelings” about those empirical findings that lead her into the next set of questions, the next area of inquiry.
As a person of faith, I read with interest the details of the double-slit experiment and the simultaneously opposite behavior of entangled photons even when miles apart. I could not stop my mind from going to the Nicene Creed and its teachings on the nature of the triune God. Or to the first chapter of John’s gospel, which spoke of Christ’s ultimate nature 1900 or so years before mankind’s capacity to study quantum physics:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind… the true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world.”
Lanza’s Biocentrism would seem to require an omniscient, omnipresent and eternal observer. On the other side of the narrow gap between empiricism and theism, which can be negotiated with a rational step as well as with Kierkegaard’s desperate leap, we call that observer, “God.” It is consistent with Biocentrism that the distance to cross, is a matter of what each person perceives it to be.
I left Lanza and Berman’s work wondering if the more we learn from today’s quantum physics, and the more we acquaint ourselves with the millenniums-old Judaeo-Christian teachings on God, the easier that step to take.
Top reviews from other countries
‘Creates’ the world or objects being observed seems to me like wanting to have your cake and eat it. Sure the experience of the universe only happens in the brain (for arguments sake, although why only in the brain?) - viz the tree falling in the forest actually makes no sound - it’s the sense organ of a conscious being that creates the sound but interpreting the vibrations. But there must be something there creating the vibrations in the case of sound or reflections in the case of the moon being observed for the sense organ to pick it up. The text seems to ride rough shod over cause and effect. If I create the moon by observing it - what are all the other people in the world seeing? Or am I the only person in the world? Fascinating book but far too many holes in the train of logic for me.
It is unfortunate that Lanza appears to take the line that physicists are not the folk to further knowledge in any way whatsoever in the area of consciousness. Yet he fails to say how he would further such knowledge or how he thinks it may be furthered. If the autobiographical sections were removed from this book, the remainder might read somewhat like the introduction to a proposal for work but with no consideration of the work that is required and/or how it may be approached. It does not address the issue of its own subheading “How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe”.
The warning is there before the book is opened. Lanza adds ‘MD’ after his name on the cover. Most authoritative works for popular consumption are not graced with the author’s graffiti on the cover. Respect for opinions need to be earned not demanded.
Despite the various issues outlined above, the work was interesting in so far as the subject matter gels with some other lines of interest that I am pursuing currently. I will therefore persevere and take a look at some of Lanza’s more recent work. There is indeed one glimmer of hope in the book. Lanza insists that physics is not the way to progress the understanding of consciousness. He seems to find it necessary to criticise not only ‘physics’ generally but also physicists. His aim appears to be to promote the idea that biology should take over from the point that physics has reached (This is arguably similar to events at the start of the twentieth century when physics took over from chemistry as the leading area of advancement). Then, at the very end, he concedes “It may take a multidisciplinary approach to achieve tangible results…”. Indeed, I could not agree more. However, this book does nothing to move towards that. It appears to try to drive wedges between the sciences and offers absolutely no suggestion as to how his “biocentrism” or the presumably larger field of “biology” can or will (given appropriate research) assist in the aim of understanding consciousness. It may be that it will need scientists more willing to build on what exists, rather than criticising it, to make progress.
The authors' understanding of the implications of biocentrism for Buddhist practitioners is apochryphal, or, at least, wildly inaccurate but this is a trivial complaint given the weight of insight and passion displayed in the rest of the text.
The other small rankle that I have is Dr. Lanza's frequent equation of the mind and the brain, with little or no acknowledgement of the fact that the brain is composed of those quantum objects that he states do not inherently exist.
However, I would wholeheartedly reccommend this book to anyone with a desire to find an elegant solution to the eccentric behaviour of the universe.
Get this book and read it. It's worth the money, and your time.












