Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
The Birthing of the New Testament: The Intertextual Development of the New Testament Writings (New Testament Monographs) Paperback – June 6, 2006
by
Thomas L. Brodie
(Author)
-
Print length688 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherSheffield Phoenix Press Ltd
-
Publication dateJune 6, 2006
-
Dimensions6.14 x 1.38 x 9.21 inches
-
ISBN-101905048661
-
ISBN-13978-1905048663
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers also viewed these products
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Interlinear Hebrew Greek English Bible-PR-FL/OE/KJ Large Pring Volume 1Jay Patrick Sr. GreenHardcover
The New Melchizedek Bible, Volume 3, Book 1: The Books of Elijah, from Proverbs to JeremiahThe New Melchizedek Theology Law LibraryPaperback
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Sheffield Phoenix Press Ltd (June 6, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 688 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1905048661
- ISBN-13 : 978-1905048663
- Item Weight : 2.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 1.38 x 9.21 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,787,298 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #10,017 in New Testament Bible Study (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5 out of 5
4 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2017
Verified Purchase
Very difficult, very important, shut up, read, then re-read, and learn this. It is scholarly, quite dense, but it HAS TO BE. This is stellar scholarship, and not taught in any church. This is the meat, the reason scholarship is necessary, and the reason why we need to REBEL about being dumbed down by our churches. They are robbing us of the ability to learn for ourselves, and find truth using our own brains. Brodie is the perrrrrfect cure for that. This is medicine for the soul and mind. I actually have come away with a greater appreciation for the actual genius of the early Gospel authors, not what the churches teach us about them. It's a HUGE book, and very much well worth the money...
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2011
This is a landmark book in biblical studies, not so much because of its Proto-Luke hypothesis as because of its first 9 chapters that present and justify the author's methodology. These chapters are clearly and effectively argued, and they are extremely important because they undermine key parts of the paradigm subscribed to by most biblical scholars. Much of this has been argued elsewhere of course, but this is to my knowledge the most comprehensive and effectively argued attack on the idea of oral tradition that has yet been published anywhere, and it should be read by anyone who is inclined to take that idea seriously.
These nine chapters offer an account of the incredible variety of ways that people in the ancient world created new works of literature by copying old ones; they refute the idea that the Old Testament or New Testament were unique exceptions to this pattern; they create and defend a series of criteria that scholars can use to determine when one literary work is dependent on another; they provide a brief history explaining how the process of creating literary works worked in the ancient world; they refute the idea that the New Testament authors could have been so isolated that each could somehow write in complete ignorance of the others' works; and they reach a well-substantiated conclusion that much of the New Testament - even including the epistles of Paul -- was produced by a single far-flung community rather than by isolated individuals.
The remainder of the book presents Brodie's application of his methodology at some length, including his Proto-Luke hypothesis. I personally found this rather more of a mixed bag than the first nine chapters. In particular, Proto-Luke seems little different from Q or oral tradition insofar as it amounts to an attempt to explain by appealing to an unknown quantity for which there is actually no hard evidence. Nevertheless, this does not reflect negatively at all on Brodie's presentation of his methodology. The very fact of "authorial complexity" which he so forcefully defends in the first part of the book means that no criteria no matter how well thought out and applied will reliably tip the hand of an author who was not inclined to tip his hand.
The book is very long and is written largely by a scholar for scholars; nevertheless I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning more about the foundations of biblical scholarship, especially with regard to the Gospels or attempts to find "the historical Jesus." At the very least, read the first nine chapters. Those chapters alone are worth the cost of the book. Regardless of whether you agree with everything you read there, when you're done you will be less inclined to blindly accept statements by other biblical scholars that are presented as fact, but are actually highly questionable.
These nine chapters offer an account of the incredible variety of ways that people in the ancient world created new works of literature by copying old ones; they refute the idea that the Old Testament or New Testament were unique exceptions to this pattern; they create and defend a series of criteria that scholars can use to determine when one literary work is dependent on another; they provide a brief history explaining how the process of creating literary works worked in the ancient world; they refute the idea that the New Testament authors could have been so isolated that each could somehow write in complete ignorance of the others' works; and they reach a well-substantiated conclusion that much of the New Testament - even including the epistles of Paul -- was produced by a single far-flung community rather than by isolated individuals.
The remainder of the book presents Brodie's application of his methodology at some length, including his Proto-Luke hypothesis. I personally found this rather more of a mixed bag than the first nine chapters. In particular, Proto-Luke seems little different from Q or oral tradition insofar as it amounts to an attempt to explain by appealing to an unknown quantity for which there is actually no hard evidence. Nevertheless, this does not reflect negatively at all on Brodie's presentation of his methodology. The very fact of "authorial complexity" which he so forcefully defends in the first part of the book means that no criteria no matter how well thought out and applied will reliably tip the hand of an author who was not inclined to tip his hand.
The book is very long and is written largely by a scholar for scholars; nevertheless I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning more about the foundations of biblical scholarship, especially with regard to the Gospels or attempts to find "the historical Jesus." At the very least, read the first nine chapters. Those chapters alone are worth the cost of the book. Regardless of whether you agree with everything you read there, when you're done you will be less inclined to blindly accept statements by other biblical scholars that are presented as fact, but are actually highly questionable.
34 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 2013
"The founder of the name (Christians) was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea, in the reign of Tiberias."
Tacitus: Annals: 15:44
It is his conclusions about the Jesus of history and of the Four Gospels that is the issue. Not his brilliance in several esoteric fields of literary analysis.
Father Clifford Stevens
Boys Town, Nebraska
Tacitus: Annals: 15:44
It is his conclusions about the Jesus of history and of the Four Gospels that is the issue. Not his brilliance in several esoteric fields of literary analysis.
Father Clifford Stevens
Boys Town, Nebraska
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
ADL
3.0 out of 5 stars
a wealth of information
Reviewed in France on January 30, 2021Verified Purchase
Very interesting book about the birthing of the New Testament, how the evangelists took verses and stories from the Old Testament to build new ones.
Some parallels are very strong but some feel forced too.
The problem with this book is that Brodie see long parallels between Luke / Acts and few books of the OT like 1-2 kings and few others.
He doesn’t mention the prophets and the psalms and i don’t think that Mark, Luke or Matthew wrote their gospels front to back with just one source like Brodie try to explain.
I would rather say that they use many sources and they mix it together. And the most important sources are the prophets and the psalms.
Overall, the book is interesting and i recommand despite its flaws.
Some parallels are very strong but some feel forced too.
The problem with this book is that Brodie see long parallels between Luke / Acts and few books of the OT like 1-2 kings and few others.
He doesn’t mention the prophets and the psalms and i don’t think that Mark, Luke or Matthew wrote their gospels front to back with just one source like Brodie try to explain.
I would rather say that they use many sources and they mix it together. And the most important sources are the prophets and the psalms.
Overall, the book is interesting and i recommand despite its flaws.
3.0 out of 5 stars
a wealth of information
Reviewed in France on January 30, 2021
Very interesting book about the birthing of the New Testament, how the evangelists took verses and stories from the Old Testament to build new ones.Reviewed in France on January 30, 2021
Some parallels are very strong but some feel forced too.
The problem with this book is that Brodie see long parallels between Luke / Acts and few books of the OT like 1-2 kings and few others.
He doesn’t mention the prophets and the psalms and i don’t think that Mark, Luke or Matthew wrote their gospels front to back with just one source like Brodie try to explain.
I would rather say that they use many sources and they mix it together. And the most important sources are the prophets and the psalms.
Overall, the book is interesting and i recommand despite its flaws.
Images in this review
Get everything you need
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1













