Buy new:
-48% $28.85$28.85
$3.99 delivery November 4 - 7
Ships from: Starselling Sold by: Starselling
Save with Used - Good
$9.18$9.18
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: gatecitybooks
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Black Athena Revisited (Series;[jossey-Bass Education) Paperback – April 29, 1996
Purchase options and add-ons
In this collection of twenty essays, leading scholars in a broad range of disciplines confront the claims made by Martin Bernal in Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. In that work, Bernal proposed a radical reinterpretation of the roots of classical civilization, contending that ancient Greek culture derived from Egypt and Phoenicia and that European scholars have been biased against the notion of Egyptian and Phoenician influence on Western civilization. The contributors to this volume argue that Bernal's claims are exaggerated and in many cases unjustified.
Topics covered include race and physical anthropology; the question of an Egyptian invasion of Greece; the origins of Greek language, philosophy, and science; and racism and anti-Semitism in classical scholarship. In the conclusion to the volume, the editors propose an entirely new scholarly framework for understanding the relationship between the cultures of the ancient Near East and Greece and the origins of Western civilization.
The contributors are: John Baines, professor of Egyptology, University of Oxford Kathryn A. Bard, assistant professor of archaeology, Boston University C. Loring Brace, professor of anthropology and curator of biological anthropology in the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan John E. Coleman, professor of classics, Cornell University Edith Hall, lecturer in classics, University of Reading, England Jay H. Jasanoff, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Linguistics, Cornell University Richard Jenkyns, fellow and tutor, Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, and university lecturer in classics, University of Oxford Mary R. Lefkowitz, Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities, Wellesley College Mario Liverani, professor of ancient near eastern history, Universita di Roma, 'La Sapienza' Sarah P. Morris, professor of classics, University of California at Los Angeles Robert E. Norton, associate professor of German, Vassar College Alan Nussbaum, associate professor of classics, Cornell University David O'Connor, professor of Egyptology and curator in charge of the Egyptian section of the University Museum, University of Pennsylvania Robert Palter, Dana Professor Emeritus of the History of Science, Trinity College, Connecticut Guy MacLean Rogers, associate professor of Greek and Latin and history, Wellesley College Frank M. Snowden, Jr., professor of classics emeritus, Howard University Lawrence A. Tritle, associate professor of history, Loyola Marymount University Emily T. Vermeule, Samuel E. Zemurray, Jr., and Doris Zemurray Stone-Radcliffe Professor Emerita, Harvard University Frank J. Yurco, Egyptologist, Field Museum of Natural History and the University of Chicago
- Print length544 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherThe University of North Carolina Press
- Publication dateApril 29, 1996
- Dimensions6.12 x 1.22 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100807822469
- ISBN-13978-0807845554
- Lexile measure1500L
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From Library Journal
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
Jasper Griffin, "New York Review of Books"
"A thorough treatment . . . . Bernal can certainly not claim that his work has been unnoticed by academia.
Jasper Griffin, "New York Review of Books""
Essential for scholars in this field.
Library Journal"
Review
About the Author
Guy MacLean Rogers, professor of Greek and Latin and history at Wellesley College, is author of The Sacred Identity of Ephesos: Foundation Myths of a Roman City.
Product details
- ASIN : 0807845558
- Publisher : The University of North Carolina Press; 2nd ed. edition (April 29, 1996)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 544 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0807822469
- ISBN-13 : 978-0807845554
- Lexile measure : 1500L
- Item Weight : 1.95 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.12 x 1.22 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #867,329 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #918 in Ancient Greek History (Books)
- #23,007 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What is revealed is the various ways in which Bernal gets things wrong. He trusts in the historicity of myth in a simple-minded way that no current student of mythology would. He is uncritical of the writings of ancient authors who to some degree appear to support his case. He is highly selective of the evidence. For example, his treatment of nineteenth century classical studies points to authors who appeared to have racial motivations while ignoring others, such as Grote, who clearly did not.
One, to my mind, particularly revealing article is offered by Jay Jasanoff and Alan Nussbaum, trained linguists, where Bernal's linguistic evidence is evaluated. This might be one of the more important articles simply because comparative linguistics is such a technical and seemingly arcane discipline to the uninitiated (such as me), that Bernal's seeming mastery of it in support of the claim that some 25% of Greek words had Egyptian origins might be thought to be a particularly impressive component of the overall argument. What Jasanoff and Nussbaum discover, however, is that Bernal ignores the long established standards of evidence in these fields in favor of a quite superficial "looks alike" method for finding the massive linguistic influence on the Greeks. The authors meticulously go through a wide selection of Bernal's etymologies and debunk them all.
Perhaps the most unfortunate part of the book is a section of three articles on the subject of race: "unfortunate" because Bernal and other afrocentrists have reintroduced a scientifically worthless but historically invidious concept into academic discussions in their claim that the Egyptians were "blacks" (Bernal is a bit more timid here than other afrocentrists, simply saying that certain Egyptians could "usefully be thought of" as blacks). The authors of all three articles insist on rejecting this introduction of race into the issue. To my mind one of the most interesting articles was written by a team of anthropologists headed by C. Loring Brace. Brace brings scientific techniques to bear on the question, particularly comparative anatomy. The discussion reveals two things: 1. that indeed the concept of race has no basis in scientific fact, and has been replaced by the notions of "klines" (variations of anatomy selected by environmental conditions) and "clusters" (variations due simply to the locality of a reproductive population), and 2. that evidence Brace and his team developed shows that the ancient Egyptians cannot be considered (even "usefully") as either "blacks" or "whites" in the modern senses of those terms.
The contributions to this volume are uniformly erudite, well-argued, and well-informed by the latest understandings in the various fields represented. And this is a much needed book. There has been a disturbing propensity in academe as of late to inject politics into research of various forms. This has had the general character of first defining a view that is understood as somehow politically or socially beneficial or expedient from some perspective or another, and then searching for any sort of evidence or argument, however fanciful it might be, to support the view. At times these efforts are coupled by the postmodernist view that all so-called "knowledge" is historically contextualized and a product of social interests, so that any view is acceptable so long as it is embedded in a set of the "correct" political and social motivations. Although it is true that all seekers of truths are to some extent a product of their times, this extreme view has the most unfortunate effects. In the case of Bernal and afrocentrists a couple of such effects pointed out by the authors of this volume are first that their views, quite ironically, validate once again the concept of race, a concept so long used as the basis of oppression in this country, and second rather than eschewing eurocentrism it in fact reinvigorates it by the suggestion that the only way that the achievements of any culture can attain legitimate value and be worthy of study is if they can be shown to have influenced European culture. Given the tenuous threads of argument in afrocentrist writings that attempt to connect subSaharan African culture to the Greeks, threads that I believe are bound to snap if they haven't already, the consequent devaluation of African culture is the inevitable implication.
Top reviews from other countries
As for "race" - this was not as important in the past as it is now. However, no, the people of Egypt did not consider themselves Nubian (what would be called "black" today) and the obsession with Egypt diverts attention from other civilisations in Africa that actually were "black".
Although more scholarly and less speculative than Black Athena, Black Athena Revisited may not (as it claims) provide all the information to understand the influences on Greek classical culture. Rather, it aims to correct what it sees as the errors and excesses of Black Athena through a detailed critique of Bernal's arguments. It consists of an introduction, 18 articles and a conclusion from some 20 main contributors. When published, over half of these were leading scholars in their own fields, including Egyptology, Linguistics, Classics, History, Archaeology and Anthropology. Most are American or British; Egyptian scholars are absent from Black Athena Revisited and mentioned rarely in it or Black Athena.
Its range of expertise is a major strength and a slight weakness. Articles commissioned for this book or reprinted reviews of Black Athena are more relevant than those not specifically related to Bernal's arguments. They are grouped into seven subject categories that tackle all his main themes, but are of unequal weight and collectively lack the consistency of a single author.
Most articles are of a high standard. The Egyptological review by Frank Yurko is balanced and fair to Bernal's ideas but criticises them as too speculative. Two linguists show the flaws in his inexpert handling of language evidence. Emily Vermule's study of Black Athena's Greek archaeology and historiography notes something it fails to mention: that most academics in the field already accepted some Egyptian and Semitic influence on archaic Greece. She argues that Bernal greatly exaggerates their effect on classical Greece. Not all articles reach this standard: a self-congratulatory Near East section and two rather irrelevant articles, by Norton and Liverani in the Historiography category rate dishonourable mentions, but the weakest category is the three articles on Race.
These three, parts of other articles and much of Mary Lefkowitz's introduction deal with Race, Afrocentrism or both. Kathryn Bard's short article never mention Bernal, Loring Brace's over-long one rarely does: both are inconclusive and add little. Frank Snowden vigorously attacks him as an Afrocentrist who calls ancient Egyptians black. Bernal is ambiguous or inconsistent on these issues: he did not class himself as an Afrocentrist, but approved the aims of many Afrocentrist writers, if not all their conclusions. He also suggested that some (not all) ancient Egyptians might be described as black, based on US tests that classified those with minimal African ancestry as black. I cannot see that he ever explicitly said that the racial affinities of ancient Egyptians were very different than those of modern Egyptians, or that any such a difference was central to Greece's Afroasiatic roots. Most of the articles limit themselves to criticism of Bernal's theories on classical Greek roots; those aimed more against Afrocentrism generally than his core arguments add little to the discussion.
The writers of Black Athena Revisited collectively have a depth of knowledge in their subjects that Bernal cannot match. Their analyses seem credible and largely free of accusations of malpractice or prejudice that mar his writing. Most maverick theorists are ignored by academics: Bernal's showmanship gave Black Athena a wide, uncritical audience unaware of the considered responses to it in academic journals. This, rather than the merit of his ideas, required an accessible response. Black Athena Revisited summarises and collects the counter-arguments in one place for those without the means or time to search specialist publications, but who wish to hear all the arguments on Greek origins. It is four-star in content, if only three-star in presentation.
Bernal argued that, though his ideas were unprovable, they should be judged on their competitive plausibility and not considered as crankiness if they generated testable hypotheses. Black Athena Revisited reviews the most prominent of his many ideas, points out his errors and presents more plausible alternatives. Where it tests his hypotheses, they are generally found wanting. Both books cover a period that is remote, only partly understood and probably largely unknowable; although Bernal continued to promote his ideas vigorously after Black Athena Revisited, it and the first two volumes of Black Athena are enough for anyone to form their own conclusion on an issue where no consensus seems possible.






