STREAM ANYTIME with Prime Video from $14.99

$7.99

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime & FREE Returns

FREE delivery: Friday, March 12 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon. Details

Fastest delivery: Tuesday, March 9
Order within 7 hrs and 7 mins Details

In Stock.

Ships from	Amazon.com
Sold by	Amazon.com

Details

Ships from

Amazon.com

Sold by

Amazon.com

Add a gift receipt for easy returns

Other Sellers on Amazon

$3.89
+ $3.99 shipping

Sold by: the_nps_store

$5.99
+ $3.99 shipping

Sold by: artsmusic

$9.99
& FREE Shipping on eligible orders. Details

Sold by: discountedmediaoutlet

Have one to sell?

Sell on Amazon

Blade Runner 2049 (Blu-ray) (BD)

Ryan Gosling (Actor), Harrison Ford (Actor), Denis Villeneuve (Director), Rated:

Format: Blu-ray

16,234 ratings

List Price:	$14.97
Price:	$7.99 Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime & FREE Returns Return this item for free Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges Learn more about free returns. How to return the item? Go to your orders and start the return Select the return method Ship it!
You Save:	$6.98 (47%)

Additional Blu-ray options

Edition

Discs

Price

New from

Used from

Blu-ray
January 16, 2018

"Please retry"

Standard Edition

$7.99

$3.89

$2.99

Blu-ray
January 16, 2018

"Please retry"

—

$19.99

$19.98

$33.57

Blu-ray
July 1, 2019

"Please retry"

—

$9.71

$14.57

Watch Instantly with

Rent

Buy

Blade Runner 2049

$3.99

$14.99

Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.

Frequently bought together

Total price: $47.94

Buy the selected items together

This item:Blade Runner 2049 (Blu-ray) (BD) by Hampton Francher Blu-ray $7.99
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.00. Details
Blade Runner: The Final Cut (4K Ultra HD) [Blu-ray] by Ridley Scott Blu-ray $24.99
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.00. Details
Interstellar (4K UHD + Blu-ray + Digital) by Jessica Chastain Blu-ray $14.96
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.00. Details

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Ridley Scott
14,109
Blu-ray
$24.99
Jessica Chastain
69,280
Blu-ray
$14.96
Tom Hardy
22,745
Blu-ray
$24.99
Emma Thomas
15,214
Blu-ray
$8.99
Various
621
Blu-ray
$15.49
Douglas Rain
8,126
Blu-ray
$24.99

Customers who bought this item also bought

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Ridley Scott
14,109
Blu-ray
$24.99
Tom Hardy
22,745
Blu-ray
$24.99
Jessica Chastain
69,280
Blu-ray
$14.96
George MacKay
72,868
Blu-ray
in Military & War
$13.29
Emma Thomas
15,214
Blu-ray
$8.99
Douglas Rain
8,126
Blu-ray
$24.99

Special offers and product promotions

Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account

From the manufacturer

Blade Runner 2049

Three decades after the events of the first film, a new blade runner, LAPD Officer K, unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what’s left of society into chaos. K’s discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard, a former LAPD blade runner who has been missing for 30 years.

Editorial Reviews

Blade Runner 2049 (Blu-ray) (BD)

Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a longburied secret that has the potential to plunge what’s left of society into chaos. K’s discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has been missing for 30 years.

]]>

Product details

Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
MPAA rating : s_medR R (Restricted)
Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 8.32 Ounces
Director : Denis Villeneuve, Denis Villenueve
Media Format : NTSC, Subtitled
Run time : 2 hours and 43 minutes
Release date : January 16, 2018
Actors : Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright
Subtitles: : Spanish, English, French
Producers : Ridley Scott, Andrew A. Kosove, Broderick Johnson, Tim Gamble, Bud Yorkin
Language : English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 5.1)
Studio : WarnerBrothers
ASIN : B075DHS7JK
Writers : Hampton Francher, Michael J. Green
Number of discs : 1

Best Sellers Rank: #767 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #15 in Science Fiction Blu-ray Discs
- #122 in Action & Adventure Blu-ray Discs

Customer Reviews:
16,234 ratings

Customer reviews

5 star		71%
4 star		15%
3 star		8%
2 star		3%
1 star		3%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Kindle Customer

A must have for true sci-fi fans

Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2018

Verified Purchase

I may not be the world's biggest Blade Runner fan, but I count myself in the top 25. In the 80s, I drove around with an audio recording of the film and could quote entire scenes. I am talking about a time that pre-dates VHS.

To say that I was excited about the 2049 sequel would be a huge understatement. I was excited to see the new film. I was equally ready to rip it to shreds if it did not do justice to the original.

I consider myself a student of film having watched movies for sheer enjoyment/entertainment, art or both, for many, many years.

This may be threading on thin ice, but I read an article, a few years ago, that advanced the notion that the average US movie viewer was not capable of understanding the higher concepts of irony, characters that were not black and white (purely good or purely evil), or conflicting concepts in a film. That was the author's reasoning for why films such as the Dutch masterpiece, The Vanishing, was produced in the US with a completely different ending...because American audiences could not handle the original ending.

The Broadway production of Agnes of God was a masterpiece and won Amanda Plummer a Tony. The motion picture was a piece of celluloid crap.

Several of Ridley Scott's films have been re-edited due to the fact that he tried new ideas and it did not go over well at advanced screenings.

I feel that the negative audience reaction to Blade Runner 2049 was due to the fact that Director Denis Villeneuve didn't "blow enough shit up."

Can an American movie viewer not sit through a film as long as 2049 and not enjoy it for its artistic value and not base it on the body count? Yes and No. The fans who watched the film, understood it and have written 4 and 5 stars reviews appear to have gotten it.

The disgruntled 1-star critics apparently have not.

Blade Runner 2049 is art!

A masterpiece? It's very close.

Visually stunning.

True to the original.

Denis is very proud of this film and should be.

The real irony is that there were hints, in 2049, of a Replicant rebellion. Would Blade Runner 3 have been made into a film with a high body count? Possibly. But the world will never know due to the arm chair critics who shot down Blade Runner 2049 out of pure ignorance and helped discourage film goers from seeing one of 2017's best movies. In spite of high anticipation, Blade Runner 2049 will barely break even at the box office.

On the bright side, there are other ways to see this Sci-Fi classic. If you decide to give it a shot, keep an open mind. Look at it for its entertainment value but also for its artistic merit.

You will not be disappointed.

404 people found this helpful

Helpful

J El Matador

Even the director admitted this movie sucked

Reviewed in the United States on October 28, 2018

Verified Purchase

I wish I had read reviews before I wasted my day off on this movie. It was 3 hours long and most of it was incoherent and incomplete. they brought some interesting ideas to the table that touched on what Westworld, The Matrix and Ex Machina have been experimenting with but it just felt like they never really went anywhere with anything and just decided to end the movie after awhile. I don't even remember the ending. I'm beyond disappointed but it is what it is. Its a shame that actors with the star power of Gosling and Ford wasted their time and mines with this filth.

78 people found this helpful

Helpful

Bob P

Is There An Academy Award Category For Slowest Movie?????

Reviewed in the United States on July 23, 2019

Verified Purchase

They talked slo-o-o-o-ow. They walked slo-o-o-o-ow. They stared slo-o-o-o-ow. The story line moved extremely slo-o-o-o-ow. Even the background music was slo-o-o-o-ow. Two hours and forty three minutes went by extremely slo-o-o-o-ow. The only resemblance to the original Blade Runner were the first two words of the title. There were scenes that had no value or any contribution to the story except to make it slo-o-o-o-ow. I think that near the end, the scene with the giant naked girl with blue hair was there to try to wake up all the guys that were dozing off so they would be awake to shut the tv off in 15 minutes. Sorry I didn't shut it off a lot sooner.

55 people found this helpful

Helpful

Charles Bayne

Terrible.

Reviewed in the United States on November 2, 2018

Verified Purchase

After watching the original Blade Runner many times, I had high expectations for this one. But it is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Ryan Gosling has to be the original "Dead man walking". The camera had a fixation on his face, tho, many times holding on his expressionless face for half a minute or more. It had as much of a connection to the original as a turtle would have to a T-Rex.
A total waste of time and money.

44 people found this helpful

Helpful

Hrafnkell Haraldsson

A Faithful Sequel to Bladerunner

Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2018

Verified Purchase

I really enjoyed this film, regardless of what critics might have thought. It "feels" like the original film; it perfectly recaptures the feel of the original, both visually and musically. The cinematography (Oscar for Best Cinematography) is a work of art. Other than the improved CGI you would never know decades had passed. I've seldom been so impressed by a sequel.

The way they went about creating a material culture that fit naturally on the older world was brilliant (there are some videos online by Adam Savage of MythBusters that go into detail on the subject). It all seems very organic and natural. You can readily believe that the world of 2049 is a continuation of the world created in the 1982 original.

The acting is, of course, superb. Jared Leto, Harrison Ford and Ryan Gosling all do a wonderful job (and I am not a big Ryan Gosling fan), as did Ana De Armas, whom I had never seen before. There is even an appearance of Mackenzie Davis (Mindy Park in The Martian) as Mariette. She was so good I did not recognize her at first. Former wrestler Dave Bautista is great in a lamentably short appearance.

Safe to say, if you liked the original Bladerunner you will like Bladerunner 2049 unless you don't like sequels on principle. My 14-year-old thought the original took too long to develop a discernible story (and as in that film, 2049 doesn't hand you anything - there is a lot you'll have to figure out on your own) but he's from the video game generation so I'll give him a pass.

Five stars. If ever a film was made for Blu-Ray it is Bladerunner 2049 with its artistic neo-noir Sci-Fi vibe. And I can only wish there were more films like this coming out of Hollywood.

32 people found this helpful

Helpful

J. Gunther

Tremendous

Reviewed in the United States on November 11, 2017

I saw BR2049 the first night it was screened and 2 more times after that. Tremendous film. Had my complete attention, even during the 3rd viewing. It never felt 164 minutes long. There are others here who have summarized the story well so I won’t bother except to say that it is a great study of what it is to be human and poses questions about how we define the terms ‘living’ and ‘alive’, much like the original did. Are replicants alive or is that exclusive to organic beings? If you’re a fan of the first one you are doing yourself a disservice if you don’t see this one.

591 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

The13thMan

Watching this in 3D was like watching the original Blade Runner for the first time

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 2, 2018

Verified Purchase

The original Blade Runner of course was visionary and still stands as an absolute classic in so many ways. The atmosphere of that film is so thick that you believe every second. This sequel tries to emulate that and comes close to succeeding despite being longer and less action-packed. The music for me is probably what does it, it's the pulse of the film and instantly places the film in the same world as the original.

I had a strange experience with this film. I watched the film in 2D first and thought it was OK, a bit overlong maybe. But watching it a second time in 3D I was amazed to be sucked in to the film's world the way I was. It isn't even that strong a conversion, with many scenes shot in such a way that the 3D struggles to make much of an impact. But simply having depth and volume to people and objects, having flying cars actually flying out in a 3D space, well that makes all the difference and delivers the immersion that a 2D viewing just can't.

I haven't had such a transformative experience in a long time and it's 3D I have to thank for that. Watching movies like this in 3D is like living in the future, after doing that you just can't go back to 2D without feeling a great sense of loss.

22 people found this helpful

Stephen

Don't let the original Blade Runner put you off...

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 26, 2018

Verified Purchase

I'm writing this as someone who loves Science Fiction but didn't really enjoy the original Blade Runner... I know that it's almost criminal to insult the first film, but whilst I remember liking the start, I ended up getting really bored and uninterested in the last act. However, this version by Denis Villeneuve is incredible. The acting is amazing, stand-out performances from Ryan Gosling (as always) and Ana de Armas, with the rest of the cast also doing a great job. The special effects are what you would expect in this day and age and the story is really intriguing and entertaining... what more could you want from a movie!

25 people found this helpful

C. C. Brown

An acquired taste

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 8, 2020

Verified Purchase

I am not what you will call an avid fan of the original Blade Runner, but I really did like that film. A lot of that was down to the performance of Hauer, but it was a good story with a great cast overall. This one though just lost me. I found it way to slow and dragged out, with a storyline that never seemed to achieve the point it was setting out to make. Gosling is ok, but his character was just so damn dull and just seemed to spend most of his time moping around. My other gripe is the fact the film puts Ford and Leto front and centre on the advertising posters and blu ray/DVD covers, yet they barely even appear in the film. Ford fairs better than Leto for screen time, but considering the film is 2 hours and 43 mins long and it took 1 hour and 45 mins for him to even show up, kinda tells you how "click baity" the advertising was for this movie. Leto must have only got about 15 mins of screen time at most. At least Dave Bautista was not heavily advertised, or else anyone watching for him could have left after the first 10 mins or so.

I can understand how some people will like it, but likewise I think it is easy to understand why some feel let down.

The film could probably have done with being a lot shorter as well, as a lot of the storyline elements just felt like padding to add to the runtime rather than being necessary plot elements.

I think another way the original benefits over this is the fact that the "bad guys" in this one had no redeeming features, where as in the original, Roy Batty was actually a highly sympathetic character at times, and you kinda felt bad for him. This one kinda felt like the old cliched "evil corporation does something evil" type of story.
3D was good though.

3 people found this helpful

Paul M

Easily the best film of 2017

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 19, 2018

Verified Purchase

Easily the best film of 2017, Blade Runner 2049 looks stunning, and is a worthy sequel to the original film. Some people say they find it slow, all a matter of taste I suppose, I didn't find it too slow or too long, I was completely engrossed for the whole film, it didn't feel like 2 hours 45, in fact I would have been happy if it had lasted even longer. Of course, I grew up with '70s films so I'm used to films being a bit slower, but these days I find it a delightful surprise when a film takes it time and doesn't find it necessary to rush through things because the audience may have a short attention span. Clearly a labour of love for the film-makers, it's a film made by Blade Runner fans for Blade Runner fans (a viewer will definitely get more out of the film if they are familiar with the original - but then, why bother watching a sequel if you haven't already seen and liked the original anyway?). An arthouse film on a grand scale, I adore this film, best film I've seen in years.

3 people found this helpful

Kiran_mk2

A visual tour de force and intreguing story

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 16, 2019

Verified Purchase

This film seemed like it was a cynical cash-grab. After the disappointlment that was Prometheus, when it was announced that Riddly Scott would revisit Blade Runner for a sequel it felt like a film that had no need to be made. Then the early reviews started coming in and at once it became a must-see for me. It is a very complex film and for me better than the original. To me, Blade Runner - while being a milestone in visuals and style and playing with important philosphical points - does not have any particularly instresting main characters. Deckard is pretty flat. His relationship with Rachel seems to come out of nowhere and the plot/story is almost underwhelming - the most interesting characters are Pris and Batty who don't have that much screentime. Now, in Blade Runner 2049 the visuals are much more grand and 'smooth' (no doubt due to improved SFX) but the story and characters are more involved. K and Joi and their relationship seems much more interesting than Deckard and Rachel and the supporting characters pique your interest but are perhaps underused (especially Jared Leto's industrialist). It's not perfect - there are scenes that go on too long - even allowing for time to take in the beauty of the cinematography, the plot has a few holes (for example - it seems like both the 'good guys' and the antagonist are trying to achieve the same goal - thinking that this will achieve both their aims. But over all I was transfixed for the entire running time. The soundtrack too is excallent, drawing reference to, but never copying, the iconic original. The mournful Sea Wall being a stand out.

On disc the film looks great. To be upfront I don't have a 4K tv yet so I can't comment directly on the UHD picture quality. I'm a bit disappointed there is no Dolby Vision layer, but any HDR presentation of this film should look amazing. The Blu Ray is very good (watched in 1080p with DTS-MA sound). The extras include some excellant 'world building' shorts focusing on the Black Out that is mentioned in the film and expands Jared Leto and Dave Bautista's characters. Sadly there is no commentary track or evidence of the extra scenes that lead early cuts of the film to top 3 hours of run time. An Ultra Violet code completes the package - but note that as of this review (February 2019) it has been announced that the UV system will be shutting down in the Summer. Also the film is distributed by Sony Pictures in the UK and Warner Brothers in the US so the UV rights from this film will not transfer to any US-based accounts such as VUDU that you may have.

Overall this is a far better film than a 35-year later sequel has any right to be. It's not for those who want fast action and easy to follow or spoon-fed plots, but for those who appreciate deliberate, character-building, beautiful films and who aren't afraid of science fiction, give it a whirl.

One person found this helpful