- Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Other Sellers on Amazon
$21.82
Sold by:
BankofBooks
$18.77
Sold by:
SuperBookDeals---
Have one to sell?
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Blaming the Brain: The Truth About Drugs and Mental Health Paperback – February 1, 2002
by
Elliot Valenstein
(Author)
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length304 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherFree Press
-
Publication dateFebruary 1, 2002
-
Dimensions6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-100743237870
-
ISBN-13978-0743237871
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
The War of the Soups and the Sparks: The Discovery of Neurotransmitters and the Dispute Over How Nerves CommunicateElliot ValensteinHardcoverOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug TreatmentJ. MoncrieffPaperbackIn Stock.
Great and Desperate Cures: The Rise and Decline of Psychosurgery and Other Radical Treatments for Mental IllnessPaperbackIn Stock.
Pill Head: The Secret Life of a Painkiller AddictPaperbackOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in AmericaPaperbackIn Stock.
The Emperor's New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant MythPaperbackIn Stock.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Unbroken BrainPaperbackIn Stock.
Handbook of Clinical Psychopharmacology for TherapistsJohn D. PrestonHardcoverOnly 2 left in stock - order soon.
Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective (Substance Abuse)Katherine van WormerPaperbackIn Stock.
Collaborative Consultation in the Schools: Effective Practices for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems, Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version -- Access Card PackageThomas KampwirthPrinted Access CodeIn Stock.
Career Counseling: A Holistic ApproachHardcoverOnly 9 left in stock - order soon.
Collaborative Therapy with Multi-Stressed Families, Second Edition (The Guilford Family Therapy Series)PaperbackOnly 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Special offers and product promotions
Editorial Reviews
Review
Andrew Herxheimer "Emberitus Fellow, United Kingdom Cochrane Centre This book does something long overdue: It puts psychotropic drugs into historical and scientific perspective without being too technical. It should help prescribers and patients work together and use these drugs more carefully.
David Healy, M.D., Ph.D. "Author of "The Antidepressant Era" Valenstein shows how the current theories of depression and schizophrenia arose, makes the case for them seem more persuasive than their original proponents did, but then in devastating fashion shows where their problems lie. More importantly, he goes on to show why we continue to hold such beliefs that do no good for patients, that are no longer believed by neuroscientists and that hamper the development of more effective treatments...
Jerome Kagan, Ph.D. "Author of "Nature of the Child" and Professor of Psychology, Harvard University Once again, Elliot Valenstein challenges contemporary dogma -- this time by combining a lively, informative history of the growth of psychopharmacology with a critique of its deepest assumptions. The controversy this book will surely provoke reflects the significance of its arguments. Those who are friendly to or suspicious of the claim that all mental illness is primarily a biochemical disorder will profit from this bold, clearly written book.
Joseph LeDoux, Ph.D. "Author of "The Emotional Brain" Valenstein swings a heavy bat at the conceptual basis of biological psychiatry. The book will surely shock psychiatric patients and will lead to soul searching amongst psychiatrists. Biological psychiatry will come out of the controversy that's sure to emerge either badly wounded or much stronger, but will never be the same.
Michael S. Gazziniga, Ph.D. "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College Elliot Valenstein has provided us with a fast-moving and eye-opening account of why the brain story is but a part of the puzzle of mental illness. He has to be right.
David Healy, M.D., Ph.D. "Author of "The Antidepressant Era" Valenstein shows how the current theories of depression and schizophrenia arose, makes the case for them seem more persuasive than their original proponents did, but then in devastating fashion shows where their problems lie. More importantly, he goes on to show why we continue to hold such beliefs that do no good for patients, that are no longer believed by neuroscientists and that hamper the development of more effective treatments...
Jerome Kagan, Ph.D. "Author of "Nature of the Child" and Professor of Psychology, Harvard University Once again, Elliot Valenstein challenges contemporary dogma -- this time by combining a lively, informative history of the growth of psychopharmacology with a critique of its deepest assumptions. The controversy this book will surely provoke reflects the significance of its arguments. Those who are friendly to or suspicious of the claim that all mental illness is primarily a biochemical disorder will profit from this bold, clearly written book.
Joseph LeDoux, Ph.D. "Author of "The Emotional Brain" Valenstein swings a heavy bat at the conceptual basis of biological psychiatry. The book will surely shock psychiatric patients and will lead to soul searching amongst psychiatrists. Biological psychiatry will come out of the controversy that's sure to emerge either badly wounded or much stronger, but will never be the same.
Michael S. Gazziniga, Ph.D. "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Dartmouth College Elliot Valenstein has provided us with a fast-moving and eye-opening account of why the brain story is but a part of the puzzle of mental illness. He has to be right.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Yo-Yo Ma: Beginner's Mind
Hear an icon's life story, timeless music, and message. Listen free
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; Original ed. edition (February 1, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0743237870
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743237871
- Item Weight : 1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,488,512 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
31 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2014
Verified Purchase
This is a pioneer work. Today most of what Valenstein writes about the dubious empirical basis for most of medication-psychiatry, is widely known - and disputed only by those who regard the "chemical imbalance"-model as heavenly dogma. But it was he, along with D. Healy, who built the foundations of the liberation movement and paved the way for later critics like R.Whitaker and I.Kirsch. When the "chemical imbalance" -paradigm is finally laid to rest, a statue of Valenstein should be erected at the main square of American psychiatry.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2016
Verified Purchase
After Great and Desperate Cures, the story of the rise and fall of psycho-surgery and various shock treatments, written earlier, in fact, the second part of the same story. Blaming The Brain is the story of the rise of drug treatment, and the bogus chemical imbalance theory that accompanied it. Although not the book that Great and Desperate Cures was, definitely 5-star material in my book, still a very worthwhile and informative read. Great and Desperate Cures represents, for one thing, a necessary corrective to a few of the shortcomings of Jack El-Hai's relatively, for lack of a better term, straight forward biography of Walter Freeman, The Lobotomist. Blaming The Brain, while falling prey to a few of the errors of conventional psychiatry, is conscious enough to see through those errors at the same time. Blaming The Brain was published, in the main, before the advent of atypical neuroleptics, however it was also revised in reference to them. This is one of those books that people should read. It exposes many of the myths associated with psychiatric treatment, and stemming from the profession's relationship with the pharmaceutical industry, for the myths that they actually are. While not wholly on the side of psychotherapy, it shows up some of the biases of bio-psychiatry for the biases that they are, and with them, exposes some of the bad science behind it.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 26, 2014
Verified Purchase
AMAZING BOOK, VERY CLARIFYING, HARD TO FIND AND I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT, IS A JEWEL
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2015
Verified Purchase
Thought provoking and challenging opf conventional wisdom and theory
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2014
Verified Purchase
Classic book. Wish there were more like it.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2007
Verified Purchase
AWESOME! What everyone should know about medication, drug companies, and how the prescribing game really works.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2012
Verified Purchase
I won't waste a lot of my time writing a review, as it looks like anyone with a 'negative' review gets voted down (i.e. Review Not Helpful) rather quickly. First off I'll admit - I'm a skeptic. I believe that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. My personal heroes are James Randi, Penn & Teller, and Carl Sagan.
Somehow this book popped up on my 'recommended' list for Amazon, and I was intrigued, so I decided to purchase it and see what the author had to say. I tried to read this with an open mind, but right from the introduction I could tell the author was extremely biased against modern medicine and psychiatry. Further, the author blatantly misquotes items. For an example, on page 2, the author states "...most psychiatric residents no longer receive any instruction in intensive psychotherapy, and many complete their training without meeting regularly with a single patient in psychotherapy sessions", and has referenced "The American Journal of Psychiatry" 1990;147:428-430 in an effort to substantiate his statement. However, if you actually read that article, it was a survey of 143 psychiatry programs in which 60% did not require that any patients be seen more than once a week. While 60% is technically 'most' in that it is greater than 50%, using the term 'most' is misleading. The author also confused the fact that because a program doesn't 'require' a patient to be seen more than once a week doesn't mean that resident doctors can't/don't see any patients more than once a week. Furthermore, the second part of his statement is completely false. There are no accredited psychiatry residency programs in the United States that can or would allow a resident doctor to complete his training without training and experience helping patients through psychotherapy. This kind of blatant misrepresentation of legitimate journal articles puts this book into the realm of pseudo-science like homeopathy, healing touch, crystal energy, etc, in which scientific terms are erroneously used in order to try and make flim-flam sound like a legitimate item.
I spent 4 weeks in a dual diagnosis mental illness and drug/alcohol addiction center. This was as a learning experience, I was not an addict or mentally ill, but I lived in the center and attended all therapies just like the other patients. It was a remarkable experience to see how the patients improved (with respect to their mental illnesses) as the doctors added/removed prescriptions to find the right balance for each patient.
Further to those that disagree that drugs have anything to do with mental illness, you do realize that in order to accept science, you must accept the fact that we are a biochemical machine? If you think that drugs cannot help with mental illness, then logically you must assume that your mental condition cannot be affected by any drugs. Have you seen the emotional swings of people on Ecstasy, meth, alcohol, etc? Have you ever seen someone in the hospital that is delirious because of the high corticosteroid doses required to save their life?
Well, I told myself that I wouldn't waste a lot of time writing, but I feel that I have more experience and knowledge than the average lay person, and it is my duty to humanity to try and debunk pseudo-science. If by writing this review I can help just one person avoid making a bad choice about mental health (caused by reading this book) then my time was worth it.
Somehow this book popped up on my 'recommended' list for Amazon, and I was intrigued, so I decided to purchase it and see what the author had to say. I tried to read this with an open mind, but right from the introduction I could tell the author was extremely biased against modern medicine and psychiatry. Further, the author blatantly misquotes items. For an example, on page 2, the author states "...most psychiatric residents no longer receive any instruction in intensive psychotherapy, and many complete their training without meeting regularly with a single patient in psychotherapy sessions", and has referenced "The American Journal of Psychiatry" 1990;147:428-430 in an effort to substantiate his statement. However, if you actually read that article, it was a survey of 143 psychiatry programs in which 60% did not require that any patients be seen more than once a week. While 60% is technically 'most' in that it is greater than 50%, using the term 'most' is misleading. The author also confused the fact that because a program doesn't 'require' a patient to be seen more than once a week doesn't mean that resident doctors can't/don't see any patients more than once a week. Furthermore, the second part of his statement is completely false. There are no accredited psychiatry residency programs in the United States that can or would allow a resident doctor to complete his training without training and experience helping patients through psychotherapy. This kind of blatant misrepresentation of legitimate journal articles puts this book into the realm of pseudo-science like homeopathy, healing touch, crystal energy, etc, in which scientific terms are erroneously used in order to try and make flim-flam sound like a legitimate item.
I spent 4 weeks in a dual diagnosis mental illness and drug/alcohol addiction center. This was as a learning experience, I was not an addict or mentally ill, but I lived in the center and attended all therapies just like the other patients. It was a remarkable experience to see how the patients improved (with respect to their mental illnesses) as the doctors added/removed prescriptions to find the right balance for each patient.
Further to those that disagree that drugs have anything to do with mental illness, you do realize that in order to accept science, you must accept the fact that we are a biochemical machine? If you think that drugs cannot help with mental illness, then logically you must assume that your mental condition cannot be affected by any drugs. Have you seen the emotional swings of people on Ecstasy, meth, alcohol, etc? Have you ever seen someone in the hospital that is delirious because of the high corticosteroid doses required to save their life?
Well, I told myself that I wouldn't waste a lot of time writing, but I feel that I have more experience and knowledge than the average lay person, and it is my duty to humanity to try and debunk pseudo-science. If by writing this review I can help just one person avoid making a bad choice about mental health (caused by reading this book) then my time was worth it.
31 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
jackie forsyth
5.0 out of 5 stars
Perfect
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 3, 2019Verified Purchase
Perfect
Timothy Wilson
5.0 out of 5 stars
myth of chemical cure drugs make problems worse psychiatrist very harmful to publichy
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 9, 2013Verified Purchase
valenstein clearly demonstrates that psychotrophic drugs have drug induced effects like alcohol drugs of addiction with severe damaging effects on the brain a self profilling prohecy inducing brain damage . people have better outcomes if no drugs
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars
Super book
Reviewed in Canada on March 25, 2018Verified Purchase
Excellent
Amazonカスタマー
5.0 out of 5 stars
原著をおすすめ
Reviewed in Japan on March 6, 2013Verified Purchase
エリオット S.ヴァレンスタイン著、『
精神疾患は脳の病気か?―向精神薬の科学と虚構
』の原著です。用語などに妙な翻訳があったため、確認の意味で購入しました。日本語版では disorder (障害) を disease (疾患) として訳したり、disease (疾患) を illness (病気) として訳したりしているようです。
・illness:病気
自覚症状を伴う不健康状態。精神的なものは一般的に mental illness (精神病) と呼ばれます。
・disease:疾患、疾病
illness の原因を示す語。医学的には病名と症状がはっきりしている具体的な病気に使います。
・disorder:障害
医学的には mental illness (精神病) ではなく mental disorder (精神障害) を使います。
原因は、精神科医が使う『 DSM‐IV‐TR 精神疾患の診断・統計マニュアル 』だと思います。本家米国版『 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Text Revision 』の前文では、disease ではなく disorder という言葉を使うと断っており、また、「どのような定義によっても精神障害の概念に正確な境界線を引くことができないことを認めなければならない」と disorder の概念の曖昧さを認めています。拡大解釈に警告がなされていますが、日本語版ではDSM‐IV以降、「Mental Disorder (精神障害)」が「精神疾患」に訳し変えられたため、不都合が生じています。
本書は言葉の定義にも触れているため、一貫して「障害」と訳さないと辻褄が合わなくなり、他の用語にも影響を及ぼして妙な意訳になるようです。「精神疾患」を「精神障害」に、「精神障害」では意味が通らない時は「精神病」に訳し直せば原文に近づくと思いますが、英語が問題ないなら原著のほうをおすすめいたします。
・illness:病気
自覚症状を伴う不健康状態。精神的なものは一般的に mental illness (精神病) と呼ばれます。
・disease:疾患、疾病
illness の原因を示す語。医学的には病名と症状がはっきりしている具体的な病気に使います。
・disorder:障害
医学的には mental illness (精神病) ではなく mental disorder (精神障害) を使います。
原因は、精神科医が使う『 DSM‐IV‐TR 精神疾患の診断・統計マニュアル 』だと思います。本家米国版『 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Text Revision 』の前文では、disease ではなく disorder という言葉を使うと断っており、また、「どのような定義によっても精神障害の概念に正確な境界線を引くことができないことを認めなければならない」と disorder の概念の曖昧さを認めています。拡大解釈に警告がなされていますが、日本語版ではDSM‐IV以降、「Mental Disorder (精神障害)」が「精神疾患」に訳し変えられたため、不都合が生じています。
本書は言葉の定義にも触れているため、一貫して「障害」と訳さないと辻褄が合わなくなり、他の用語にも影響を及ぼして妙な意訳になるようです。「精神疾患」を「精神障害」に、「精神障害」では意味が通らない時は「精神病」に訳し直せば原文に近づくと思いますが、英語が問題ないなら原著のほうをおすすめいたします。
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1


