Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Bleeding Blue and Gray: Civil War Surgery and the Evolution of American Medicine Hardcover – Deckle Edge, April 19, 2005
At the outset of the war, the use of ether and chloroform remained crude, and they were often unavailable in the hellish conditions at the front lines. As a result, many surgical procedures were performed without anesthesia in the compromised setting of a battleground or a field hospital. This meant that “clinical concerns were often of less consequence,” writes Rutkow, “than the swiftness of the surgeon’s knife.”
Also, in the 1860s, the existence of pathogenic microorganisms was still unknown–many still blamed “malodorous gasses” for deadly outbreaks of respiratory influenza. As the great Civil War surgeon William Williams Keen wrote, “we used undisinfected instruments from undisinfected plush-lined cases, and still worse, used marine sponges which had been used in prior pus cases and had been only washed in tap water.”
Besides the substandard quality of wartime medical supplies and techniques, the combatants’ utter lack of preparation greatly impaired treatment. In 1861, the Union’s medical corps, mostly ill-qualified and poorly trained, even lacked an ambulance system. Fortunately, some of these difficulties were ameliorated by the work of numerous relief agencies, especially the United States Sanitary Commission, led by Frederick Law Olmsted, and tens of thousands of volunteers, among them Louisa May Alcott and Walt Whitman.
From the soldiers who endured the ravages of combat to the government officials who directed the war machine, from the good Samaritans who organized aid commissions to the nurses who cared for the wounded, Bleeding Blue and Graypresents a story of suffering, politics, character, and, ultimately, healing.
- Print length416 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House
- Publication dateApril 19, 2005
- Dimensions6.6 x 1.3 x 9.4 inches
- ISBN-100375503153
- ISBN-13978-0375503153
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Similar books based on genre
Products related to this item
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Basically doctors were divided between allopaths and homeopaths. The orthodox view of medicine at 1860 was typified by Benjamin Rush who taught bleeding, blistering, and purging for every imaginable ailment. So when in 1862, William Goodell was knocked unconscious by an exploding artillery shell, and his doctor observed that Goodell could not speak and ordered that ice be placed on Goodell's head and that his neck was opened to remove blood. Vomiting was induced. Blisters were created "on his legs and behind his ears to allow 'poisonous' fluids to ooze from the body." Homeopathy was the non-orthodox view of medicine at that time. These doctors prescribed herbs, roots, and the like to cure every ailment. The regimental doctor was often the person best qualified from the town where the regiment had been formed even though he may not have had any real qualifications at all.
Ambulances... if you study EMS, you'll find that ambulance service began during the Civil War. For the most part, casualties had faced the prospect of being a liability to the army and the injuries they suffered were their own bad fortune. Perhaps their fellow soldiers would return to the battlefield... if they had been victorious. At the First Battle of Bull Run, the Union has very few two-wheeled ambulances and was forced to leave their fate in the hands of the Confederates... who had fewer resources of their own and so the wounded were hospitalized all the way back to Richmond.
Nurses, because they were women at a time when women had few rights, were largely ineffective. One of the orders from Washington put nurses at the whim of doctors. This created a situation which serves as a source for a lot of off-color jokes about nurses. Nurses were not the highly trained respected persons that they are today.
Most of Dr Rutkow's book is about the political battles which changed policies. Frederick Law Olmstead is a major figure in Rutkow's book as is the Sanitary Commission. Edwin Stanton dueled and juggled with these and the likes of William Hammond and others. Interestingly, Rutkow leaves Abraham Lincoln above most of these political battles.
During the Civil War, amputations were common due to the fact that the doctors had an anesthetic (since the 1840's) and knew that gangrene would spread unless amputated. So why amputate? Why hurry patients to hospitals? Why change ventilation? Why change linens? The answer to these questions lies in the work of previous doctors. In another book I read the story about a head physician in Vienna in 1848 who managed two maternity wards. In one the mortality of the mothers was five times that in the other. The head physician tackled the problem by wondering whether one ward was too crowded, was birth position a problem, etc. In a way, it was stroke of luck that a male doctor also lost his life with the same symptoms as the women in the first ward. The head doctor determined that "cadervic material" had found its way from a mortuary to the maternity ward.
It was such testing that led to the reforms of the medical system during the Civil War. Hospitals became more open aired and sanitary. Proper nutrition was emphasized. Linens were clean. Doctors and nurses began to develop a "shared practice experience" along with some certification of qualification. And ambulances began to be deployed in sufficient number to remove the wounded from the battlefield to the hospitals.
The Civil War occurred in the waning years of medicine before the scientific era. My one criticism of Dr Rutkow's book is that he does not do much to explain some of the efforts to control infection in the time before the discovery of bacteria.
Top reviews from other countries
For far better reviews than mine, use Google


