Buy new:
$19.00$19.00
FREE delivery:
Tuesday, Oct 24
Ships from: Otto's Bookstore Sold by: Otto's Bookstore
Buy used: $9.98
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Bleeding Edge Hardcover – September 17, 2013
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$5.95
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $29.99 | $7.95 |
- Kindle
$13.99 Read with our Free App -
Audiobook
$5.95 $5.95 with discounted Audible membership - Hardcover
$19.0054 Used from $1.57 22 New from $17.88 7 Collectible from $17.95 - Paperback
$14.7945 Used from $3.18 9 New from $12.84 3 Collectible from $34.95 - Audio CD
$12.793 Used from $7.95 1 New from $29.99
Purchase options and add-ons
"Exemplary...dazzling and ludicrous." - Jonathan Lethem, The New York Times Book Review
It is 2001 in New York City, in the lull between the collapse of the dot-com boom and the terrible events of September 11th.
Maxine Tarnow runs a fine little fraud investigation business on the Upper West Side. All is ticking over nice and normal, until she starts looking into the finances of a computer-security firm and its billionaire geek CEO. She soon finds herself mixed up with a drug runner in an art deco motorboat, a professional nose obsessed with Hitler’s aftershave, a neoliberal enforcer with footwear issues, and an array of bloggers, hackers, code monkeys, and entrepreneurs, some of whom begin to show up mysteriously dead. Foul play, of course.
Will perpetrators be revealed, forget about brought to justice? Will Maxine have to take the handgun out of her purse? Will Jerry Seinfeld make an unscheduled guest appearance? Will accounts secular and karmic be brought into balance?
Hey. Who wants to know?
- Print length477 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Press
- Publication dateSeptember 17, 2013
- Dimensions6.3 x 4.6 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-101594204233
- ISBN-13978-1594204234
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
From Booklist
From Bookforum
Review
“Brilliantly written… a joy to read…Full of verbal sass and pizzazz, as well as conspiracies within conspiracies, Bleeding Edge is totally gonzo, totally wonderful. It really is good to have Thomas Pynchon around, doing what he does best.” —Michael Dirda, The Washington Post
“A precious freak of a novel, glinting rich and strange, like a black pearl from an oyster unfathomable by any other diver into our eternal souls. If not here at the end of history, when? If not Pynchon, who? Reading Bleeding Edge, tearing up at the beauty of its sadness or the punches of its hilarity, you may realize it as the 9/11 novel you never knew you needed… a necessary novel and one that literary history has been waiting for, ever since it went to bed early on innocent Sept. 10 with a copy of The Corrections and stayed up well past midnight reading Franzen into the wee hours of his novel’s publication day.” —Slate.com
“Are you ready for Thomas (Screaming Comes Across the Sky) Pynchon on the subject of September 11, 2001?... Exemplary… dazzling and ludicrous… Our reward for surrendering expectations that a novel should gather in clarity, rather than disperse into molecules, isn’t anomie but delight. Pynchon himself’s a good companion, full of real affection for his people and places, even as he lampoons them for suffering the postmodern condition of being only partly real.” —Jonathan Lethem, New York Times Book Review
“Surely now Pynchon must be in line for the Nobel Prize?... Thomas Pynchon, America’s greatest novelist, has written the greatest novel about the most significant events in his country’s 21st century history. It is unequivocally a masterpiece.” —The Scotsman (UK)
“The book’s real accomplishment is to claim the last decade as Pynchon territory, a continuation of the same tensions — between freedom and captivity, momentum and entropy, meaning and chaos — through which he has framed the last half-century… As usual, Pynchon doesn’t provide answers but teases us with the hint of closure, leaving us ultimately unsure whether the signals add up to a master plot or merely a series of sinister and unfortunate events. The overall effect is one of amused frustration, of dying to find that one extra piece of information that will help make sense of this overwhelming and vaguely threatening world. It feels a lot like life.” —Wired magazine
“The New York of late 2001 was a Pynchon novel waiting to happen, in which the failures of ‘late capitalist’ speculation, in the form of the recently deflated tech bubble, meet 9/11 to form the 21st century’s Year Zero.” —New York Observer
“Pynchon's prose is irresistible. It's playful and bustling — cheesy puns rub elbows with Big Ideas. A-” —Entertainment Weekly
“Brilliant and wonderful… Bleeding Edge chronicles the birth of the now — our terrorism-obsessed, NSA-everywhere, smartphone Panopticon zeitgeist — in the crash of the towers. It connects the dots, the packets, the pixels. We are all part of this story. We are all characters in Pynchon’s mad world. Bleeding Edge is a novel about geeks, the Internet, New York and 9/11. It is funny, sad, paranoid and lyrical. It was difficult to put down. I want to read it again.” —Salon.com
“Bleeding Edge takes the messy, funny, and sad all-at-once world we live in and reflects it back to us in a way that I can only call consoling—somebody else out there gets it. No matter how crazy things became in this book, I felt safe as long as I was inside its pages. So of course as soon as I finished it, I started over again.” —Malcolm Jones, Daily Beast/Newsweek
“The ingeniously whimsical, accessible story of a New York City fraud investigator who becomes entangled with some very sketchy characters as she tries to get to the bottom of a case involving a tech billionaire.” —O: The Oprah Magazine
“Showstopping…The future that [Pynchon] so precociously, disturbingly foresaw long ago now surges around us. With Bleeding Edge, he shows that he has mastered the move from the shock of the new to the shock of the now, while cushioning the blow.” —Leisl Schillinger, Barnes & Noble
“Bleeding Edge is vintage Pynchon, a louche yarn of rollicking doomism. Pynchon is the master of technology-as-metaphor. In previous books—particularly “V.” and “Gravity’s Rainbow”—there is a persistent, shadowy suggestion of an unseen system, mechanisms that underlie the perceived reality of events. And these mechanisms are often manifest in the vagaries of things like rocket science and radio broadcasting tools. In those old books, however, the obscure schema was cast as an almost magical or mystical force, but as Bleeding Edge appears, we have the real thing.”—Seattle Times
“Fabulously entertaining … Bleeding Edge is stuffed with gorgeous passages that sing their longing for all we’ve lost, in trashing the land and ourselves. But such writing is also a stirring call to arms, making clear that the history we’ll make depends on what and how we remember. As Pynchon has been reminding us for 50 years, there’s always more than one way to tell that story.”—Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
“Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge is a masterpiece of post- and pre-9/11 paranoia.”—Las Vegas Weekly
"A hilarious, shrewd, and disquieting metaphysical mystery." —Booklist (STARRED)
"No one, but no one, rivals Pynchon’s range of language, his elasticity of syntax, his signature mix of dirty jokes, dread and shining decency… Bleeding Edge is a chamber symphony in P major, so generous of invention it sometimes sprawls, yet so sharp it ultimately pierces.” —Publishers Weekly
"A much-anticipated return, and it’s trademark stuff: a blend of existential angst, goofy humor and broad-sweeping bad vibes." —Kirkus Reviews (STARRED)
"Truly your most important reading for the fall... darkly hilarious." —Library Journal
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
It’s the first day of spring 2001, and Maxine Tarnow, though some still have her in their system as Loeffler, is walking her boys to school. Yes maybe they’re past the age where they need an escort, maybe Maxine doesn’t want to let go just yet, it’s only a couple blocks, it’s on her way to work, she enjoys it, so?
This morning, all up and down the streets, what looks like every Callery Pear tree on the Upper West Side has popped overnight into clusters of white pear blossoms. As Maxine watches, sunlight finds its way past rooflines and water tanks to the end of the block and into one particular tree, which all at once is filled with light.
“Mom?” Ziggy in the usual hurry. “Yo.”
“Guys, check it out, that tree?”
Otis takes a minute to look. “Awesome, Mom.”
“Doesn’t suck,” Zig agrees. The boys keep going, Maxine regards the tree half a minute more before catching up. At the corner, by reflex, she drifts into a pick so as to stay between them and any driver whose idea of sport is to come around the corner and run you over.
Sunlight reflected from east-facing apartment windows has begun to show up in blurry patterns on the fronts of buildings across the street. Two-part buses, new on the routes, creep the crosstown blocks like giant insects. Steel shutters are being rolled up, early trucks are double-parking, guys are out with hoses cleaning off their piece of sidewalk. Unsheltered people sleep in doorways, scavengers with huge plastic sacks full of empty beer and soda cans head for the markets to cash them in, work crews wait in front of buildings for the super to show up. Runners are bouncing up and down at the curb waiting for lights to change. Cops are in coffee shops dealing with bagel deficiencies. Kids, parents, and nannies wheeled and afoot are heading in all different directions for schools in the neighborhood. Half the kids seem to be on new Razor scooters, so to the list of things to keep alert for add ambush by rolling aluminum.
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Press; 1st edition (September 17, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 477 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594204233
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594204234
- Item Weight : 1.72 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.3 x 4.6 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #718,174 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #910 in Lawyers & Criminals Humor
- #4,839 in Fiction Satire
- #29,983 in Literary Fiction (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Thomas Pynchon was born in 1937. His books include The Crying of Lot 49, Gravity's Rainbow, Vineland, and Mason & Dixon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Sorting Things Out (On Pynchon's Bleeding Edge)
September 14, 2013
It's here. Nine months after an Internet rumor that gestated into details ever more elusive and a glimpse of the first couple of paragraphs, Penguin Press has delivered Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge, a historical romance about 9/11, the dot com bust, and New York City. Four hundred and seventy-seven pages spanning the period from March, 2001, to February, 2002, it's a Pynchon novel about a time and place most of his readers will have lived through. Yet, the events seem as far away as Malta in 1919 or Peenemunde in the 1940's. That's what Pynchon does best: show us how our memories are made to cast shadows on the fleeting and evanescent present.
And Bleeding Edge is almost certainly about the present, the here and now. Pynchon's use of the present tense throughout the novel, except for the frequent flashbacks, is reminiscent of the opening of Gravity's Rainbow--hallucinatory and ominous. The present tense turns some parts into one of those interactive text-based games from the late 1970's--unadorned and urgent. Other parts of the book read like a film treatment, a gentle nudge to some bold director. If Paul Thomas Anderson's Inherent Vice (2014) is half as popular as I expect, filmmakers take notice of Bleeding Edge. Let me suggest Mary Herron for the job. Maxine Tarnow (nee Loeffler and to be portrayed, IMHO, by Catherine Keener), Pynchon's fraud investigating heroine off the licensure grid, is as interesting as Betty Paige or Valerie Solanas and could take on Patrick Bateman, a prototypical yuppie similar to the ones encountered in Bleeding Edge, although with more homicidal tendencies.
But the present tense is not just a gimmick. Although set twelve years ago, the narrative is about the unfolding of 9/11, a portal into a new world as uncertain as the many links and urls that Maxine follows in her quest within the Deep Web. Pynchon describes the Web as the eternal present, time flattened, measured, if at all, by clicks. After 9/11, Heidi, Maxine's Rhoda, says that everyone has been infantilized, and Maxine feels the regressive force of that tragedy on a New York City street, where she feels in a time warp. Maxine finds comfort in recognizing her surroundings as what had to be "the present" and "the normal." The present of the Bleeding Edge may be shell shock or the desire to set to zero the delta-t's Pynchon wrote earnestly about once.
Quests for Pynchon have always been about sorting things out. Maxine searches for answers both before and after 9/11. The tease is whether the quest changes with the attacks. For those who poo-poo conspiracies and paranoia, the fall of the towers may have been a wake-up call. Or it may have been a random event not connected to broader plots or schemes. We are reminded early on about another 9/11, in Chile, 1973, when the CIA assassinated Allende. While the connectedness of all history into plot is presented in bold operatic style in Gravity's Rainbow, the tensions are given a more human scale in Bleeding Edge. How to make sense of things? Does the explanation for the Event explain everything? Or is it just one of the many mysteries, mundane and quotidian?
Maxwell's Demon is a metaphor that appears in The Crying of Lot 49 explicitly, but also pervades all of Pynchon's work. Imagine a box filled with particles of gas moving at different speeds. Partition the box and place a trap door on the partition. Maxwell's Demon stands guard at the door, letting particles of certain speed go through while slower particles stay behind. Eventually the particles are sorted out into high speed, high temperature ones and low speed, low temperature ones. The entropy in the box has decreased without any work on the part of the Demon except for the mental work of sorting. Magically, the Demon defies the Second Law of Thermodynamics by allowing less disorder with no expenditure of energy.
Sorting things out is what folks in Pynchon novels do whether it is Oedipa uncovering the layers of America long hidden, Mason & Dixon drawing their line, Prairie Wheeler figuring out the Sixties, the Webb Children negotiating different vectors of capitalism, Doc discovering where all the sex, drugs and rock& roll went. Bleeding Edge is no different. We follow Maxine, a forensic accountant, as she examines balance sheets, web sites, financial records, in order to detect fraud and thereby find the truth. Conspiracies permeate the novel both before and after the Event, and when it occurs, it is depicted quietly but powerfully. Bleeding edge technology is one that is so untried and untested that no one knows where it might take us. Characters in Pynchon's historic romance walk the bleeding edge to an uncertain and perhaps unreachable future. They are, like the readers who take them in and define them, caught in a present sorting out the enveloping experiences.
All of which might suggest that the book has no resolutions and leaves the reader hanging. That would be a mistake. At least this reader found the process of sorting things out envigorating and moving. As readers we are not trapped in an eternal present, and Maxine and her host of comrades are moving inexorably to where we are now.
The novel begins and ends with the maternal act of tending after children. But Maxine's maternalism shifts through the novel. The conclusion is not so much about children flying the nest as about parents' guarding at a distance. One thinks about the mantra "Keep cool, but care" from V. In Bleeding Edge, that shibboleth might be "Keep distant, but help," a lesson somewhat more affirmative, more active than the earlier renunciation. Towards the end of the novel, Maxine expresses her concerns about her sons to her father: "I don't want to see them turn into their classmates, cynical smart-mouthed little bastards--but what if Ziggy and Otis start caring too much, Pop, this world, it could destroy them so easily." And as she wondered, I thought back to an earlier scene in which Maxine watches the firefighters clean up the rubble at "Ground Zero" and wonder what drives them to work as selflessly as they do. Is it possible for someone to care too much?
The novel begins with a great joke at Pynchon's expense. He describes the philosophy of a fictional Otto Kugelblitz, an errant student of Freud. Kugelblitz posits four stages for human development: the solipsism of youth, the sexual hysteria of adolescence and young adulthood, the paranoia of middle life, and the dementia of late life. These four stages culminate in death, the only form of sanity. Is Pynchon mapping his own trajectory? The truth is Pynchon in his novels seems to go through all four stages at the same time: the solipsism of the narrative voice, the erotic fetishes and urges of his characters, the ever-present and overplayed paranoia, and the demented propensities for bad puns and critical jabs. Singling up the four stages is the search for meaning and the realization that the mental quest pales before actual human contact, emotion, and connection.
Gravity's Rainbow ended in fragments as the grand paranoid schemes gave way to counterforces. The five novels after Gravity's Rainbow present different responses to the ubiquitous and oppressive System: family in Vineland, work and engagement in Mason & Dixon, social participation in Against the Day, clarity of purpose in Inherent Vice, and now simple, pure love and caring in Bleeding Edge. We have the joy to see how Pynchon tries to sort things out through the various worlds that he lovingly and carefully projects for us. Polymath as Pynchon is called, there is no pretense to have all or any answers, but his imagination has shown us possibilities that transcend labels like post-modern, or realist, or minimalist, or even historical romance.
`Now, everybody--'
.
"An artist who has only talent feels to the end of his life the impulse to work it out; he is goaded by ambition; he feels that life is always short of perfection, and he is impelled to attain to the highest. But genius has already given us his highest possible work; he is content; he scorns the world and petty ambition, and goes home as Shakespeare did, or promenades, smiling and jesting, on the Boulevard des Italiens in Paris, like Joachim Rossini." (translation by Charles Godfrey Leland)
###
I found Bleeding Edge remarkable at first reading for a number of reasons. It catches what it's like to live in New York City---not so much in a realistic as in a somewhat exaggerated satirical way. The way people talk and act in the book is perhaps an idealized version, that is, how New Yorkers like to think of themselves, so it may appeal to us more than it apparently does to some who live elsewhere. But it isn't a false picture, and I don't believe that it is the result of Pynchon's trying to impress anyone or be clever. (Anyway, what is this animus against cleverness that you notice in a number of reviews?) Have you had the experience of getting to be friends with people, then when you first visit their home discovering that they have many of the same books on their shelves as you do? I think most New Yorkers will have something like that experience of an overlap of their own knowledge with what Pynchon knows about his city.
The book also represents a very interesting development in Pynchon's style. Jonathan Lethem in his warmly positive review, in the New York Times Book Review, noticed the youthfulness of the narrative and made the claim (mistaken, in my opinion) that except for the historical detail, this could have been written by Pynchon forty years ago. This did allow him to indulge a lovely conceit to end his review, that Pynchon is a very promising young author. I think, however, that Lethem was wrong to say that the book resists having a "late style"; it is an atypical late style, certainly, but the density and the ease of the performance strikes me as something no one could achieve without decades of experience of both writing and living. I was reminded of seeing Sonny Rollins a few years ago (I think he was in his late seventies at the time) take a solo of twenty or thirty choruses. It seems that it is possible for some artists to lose all resistance to creativity when they reach this point.
A number of the thoughtful reviews here compare the book to earlier books by Pynchon. With all due respect, I noted that there seems to be little agreement as to which of the earlier books Bleeding Edge is supposed to be better or worse than. What this says to me is that trying to place this book in relation to the others may be even more beside the point than it is with most authors. There are certain mannerisms that you find in all Thomas Pynchon's books (a love of lists, silly songs, cutesy names and spelling---"sez," for example; more positively, his musical images are never embarrassing to a musician, unlike those of many word people).
But one of the things that make Pynchon stand out is how different each book is from all the others, in part because he often writes *as if* in a genre. While he will devote varying levels of energy to the maintenance of a genre, it appears that some readers are misled, for the complaints about this book and Pynchon's writing in general often stem from readers bringing expectations to the books that are not satisfied. Bleeding Edge is not a detective novel any more than Mason & Dixon is a historical novel. Other complaints are based on what I believe is a mistaken idea of why you read a novel at all. As my reference to Sonny Rollins implied, Pynchon's writing can be thought of as a kind of verbal jazz. (You don't listen to Rollins to be philosophically challenged or to become more knowledgable or more wise, do you?) In the course of reading, you might learn a lot, you might be led to think deeply; but that is not why you do it.
I sincerely regret having to spell it out so baldly, but it seems that quite a few readers just don't get this: If you demand that a book end with the plot tied up neatly, you are bound to be disappointed, because one of Pynchon's themes is that this is impossible; it is a corollary of his theme that you can't know anything for sure. In Bleeding Edge, a governing image is the computer game DeepArcher (a kind of weird Second Life), in which it is impossible to retrace your steps---like life, right? but also, more frighteningly, like our contemporary mediated consciousness, which looks more and more like universal amnesia. Pynchon's books are also like life in that they never have neat endings (the plots often dissolve), but they all have *satisfying* endings.
As to whether this is a "9/11 novel," you shouldn't dismiss the idea because the destruction of the World Trade Center plays a relatively minor role in the story. If you don't live in NYC, you may have a media-distorted sense of how the tragedy felt in the City. I think the book captures how quickly the whole thing retreated into the background---not forgotten, and with many lingering effects, but not present in a way that was so susceptible to manipulation outside the City. (Giuliani may have been "America's mayor," but you won't find too many people in the City who would like to see him come back.) New York and New Yorkers absorb major disruptions (the way some skyscrapers have absorbed the impact of an airplane), and the book gets this exactly right.
All of the foregoing is quite superficial. But a book like Bleeding Edge needs more time than we are perhaps used to allowing for to have its full impact. Without any desire to make comparisons, I would point out that you can find people writing on Amazon that they just don't get Jane Austen or Henry James; that Joyce or Shakespeare are overrated (Joyce perhaps thought Shakespeare was overrated; Shaw certainly did); reading Mark Twain's autobiography, I discover that he found Middlemarch boring and Sherlock Holmes sheer claptrap. So don't be put off by the naysayers. They may have a right to their opinions, but you might find you disagree if you give yourself the chance.
Pynchon is not a spoon-feeder. You need to stay awake and make connections yourself, which is what he clearly does. If you're like that, you will find him great company.
Top reviews from other countries
Auch die Nachbeben der frischgeplatzten Internetblase eröffnen ein weites Feld für ihre Profession, als ein alter Bekannter bei ihr auftaucht, ein kleiner Filmemacher, der gerade eine Werbedoku für eine Computersicherheitsfirma namens hashslingrz dreht und der dort auf Dinge gestoßen ist, die ihm sehr merkwürdig vorkommen. Kaum hat sich Maxine der Sache angenommen, entdeckt sie zahlreiche sehr große und sehr gut versteckte Geldflüsse, unter anderem auch auf Konten im mittleren Osten. Ihre Nachforschungen bleiben den Betroffenen allerdings nicht verborgen, und Maxines Bekanntenkreis erweitert sich recht schnell, vor allem um Menschen, mit denen man eigentlich lieber keinen Umgang hat. Verängstigte Angestellte, finstere Agenten, selbst ein Pärchen von russischen Slapstick-Mobstern namens Misha und Grisha bevölkern die Szene. Es ist ein reges Kommen und Gehen, wobei manche, die gehen, dann nicht mehr gehen können. Wenn Thomas Pynchon sich nicht meistens lustige Namen hätte einfallen lassen, wäre es manchmal schwierig gewesen, die Übersicht zu behalten. Und ganz nebenbei erfahren wir auch noch eine Menge über die jüdische Shopping- und Eating-Szene New Yorks, denn dieser Aspekt von Maxines Leben kommt auch nicht zu kurz.
Es ist schon faszinierend zu lesen, wie Maxine der immer schmerzhafter werdende Spagat zwischen Beruf und Familie gelingt, und wie sie es zwischendurch dann auch noch schafft, mit Hilfe ihrer Entreprenerd-Freunde in die tiefsten, gefährlichen Tiefen des Internets abzutauchen, dorthin, wo die wirklichen Geheimnisse der Welt hinter Serien von Firewalls verborgen sind. Die Zusammenhänge, die dabei aufgedeckt (bzw. vom Autor listig ins Spiel gebracht) werden und die in den Angriff auf das WTC münden, werden der nicht kleinen Gemeinde von Truthers Freude machen. Das kann man gut finden, muss man aber nicht.
Meine Schwierigkeiten hatte ich auch mit den zahlreichen Dei ex machina, die Maxine bei ihren Nachforschungen vorangebracht haben, sowie manchen anderen Ungereimtheiten der Story, darunter Maxines sehr seltsamen Verhaltensweisen im Zusammenhang mit dem anderen Geschlecht, welche ich hier nicht weiter ausführen möchte, um mich nicht der Spoilerei schuldig zu machen.
Dennoch kann man nur staunen, wie sich ein Autor in diesem fortgeschrittenen Alter noch in einem Milieu bewegt, das man normalerweise eigentlich wesentlich jüngeren Generationen zuordnet. Zumindest einen auf ewig im Neuland befindlichen Laien wie mich hat das sehr beeindruckt. (Vielleicht wird man aber auch zwangsläufig zum Netzexperten, wenn man sich so vom Meatspace zurückzieht wie Thomas Pynchon.) Eine wandelnde Filmdatenbank ist er auch, und zwar von solchen, die es gibt (erkennbar am nachgestellten Entstehungsjahr), und solchen die es - leider - nicht gibt (z. B. mit Anthony Hopkins als Mikhail Baryschnikoff - das wäre was gewesen: Hannibal in Tights). Das ganze natürlich illuminiert von Pynchons brillantem kulturellen und politischen Referenzfeuerwerk, das man entweder bestaunen oder, wenn man richtig gut Bescheid weiß, verstehen und genießen kann.
Bleeding Edge ist über weite Strecken ein typischer Pnchon der leichteren Sorte. Eine gradlinige, durchgehend auf einen Hauptcharakter fokusierte Handlung, das gab es bisher einzig in The Crying of Lot 49. Viel Jargon, eine dialoglastige, entsprechend rasch dahinfliegende Handlung, das erinnert an den hervorragenden Roman V. Lange scheint sich Bleeding Edge vor allem um die Nachwehen des Platzens der DotCom Blase zu drehen, und hier hat der Roman seine besten, wenn auch belanglosesten Momente.
Im Zentrum stehen die Ermittlungen der Datenanalystin Maxine. Die spürt Unregelmäßigkeiten bei Firmen nach, die auf Risikokapital angewiesen ist und entdeckt unter anderen ungewöhnliche Geldflüsse über das Hawala-Netzwerk sowie Leerverkäufe der Aktien zweier Airlines. Befreundet ist sie mit einer verschwörungstheoretisch angehauchten linken Bürgerrechtlerin und einem Online-Videopionier, der den beiden Aufnahmen von etwas zu spielt, was wie Training für einen Terroranschlag auf Flugzeuge aussieht. In den Kater nach einer wilden Party, die die DotCom Goldgräberstimmung reproduzieren sollte, platzen die Anschläge vom 11. September. Fortan werden verschiedene Verschwörungstheorien gewälzt, Spuren verfolgt, die ins Leere laufen, tot Geglaubte wandeln in den Straßen und manche Menschen scheinen über Nacht Jahrzehnte gealtert. Schließlich scheinen in den Türmen ermordete als Avatare in einem schwer zugänglichen Bereich des Deep Web wieder aufzutauchen, dessen Betreiberfirma Maxine zu Anfang des Romans wegen Unregelmäßigkeiten beauftragt hatte.
Es ist nicht ohne Risiko, wenn einer, dessen zentraler literarischer Modus die Beschreibung der Welt aus dem Blick sich überlappender Paranoii ist, sich an so ein zeitgenössisches Thema macht. Immerhin, Pynchon war nie ein Autor, geschlossene Verschwörungstheorien zu entwerfen, sondern einer, der Unsicherheit an allen Ecken streut. Auch Bleeding Edge lässt zwar hier und da Truther-Perspektiven anklingen, thematisiert aber zugleich intensiv den antisemitischen Charakter fast aller Verschwörungstheorien rund um 9/11 – damit ist der Roman was Ideologiekritik betrifft fast allen literarischen Bearbeitungen des Themas über. Auf der anderen Seite fühlt es sich doch ein wenig falsch an, einen relativ typischen Pynchon, der letztlich jede Lösung von „unglaublicher Zufall“ über „Al-Quaida“ bis hin zu „jeder steckt mit jedem unter einer Decke“ zulässt, ausgerechnet an 9/11 aufzuhängen. Zumal die Erklärung, dass im Islamismus irgendwie der globale Süden, die Abgehängten, gegen den Westen und den Kapitalismus zurückschlügen, durchaus stehen bleibt.
Gewiss, ein Roman ist ein Roman ist ein Roman und in erster Linie ob seiner ästhetischen Gestaltung zu bewerten. Doch wie in einem Roman über eine historische Persönlichkeit die Übereinstimmungen und Abweichungen von der verbürgten Biografie, die darauf entworfenen Perspektiven usw. zur ästhetischen Gestaltung gehören, gehört auch die Diskussion von 9/11 zur ästhetischen Gestaltung von Bleeding Edge. Und da wird einfach deutlich, dass man einen so einschneidenden Massenmord nicht zur bloßen Chiffre machen kann, die grenzenloses Spiel erlaubt.
Der Roman untersucht wiederum in überzeugender, magisch-realistischer Verschiebung, wir die USA nach den Anschlägen eine andere wird. Nicht daran wächst, sondern zugleich älter und kindischer wird. Aber das zentrale Moment des Schocks, die Gründe, die die Frage nach dieser Veränderung überhaupt erst zu stellen erlauben würden, bleiben außen vor, weil 9/11 in einer Weise in die Sphäre des Beliebigen entrückt wird, wie es sich Pynchon – der auf ein ähnliches Problem ja durchaus schon einmal gestoßen ist – mit dem Nationalsozialismus in Gravitys Rainbow nicht erlaubt hat.
Damit soll nicht gesagt sein, dass Bleeding Edge bei der Behandlung von 9/11 den nötige Ernst vermissen lässt, der den Anschlägen gebührt. Es ist vielmehr so, dass dieser 9/11-Roman gewissermaßen 9/11 selbst vermissen lässt. Der Anschlag wirkt wie ein bedeutendes Ereignis, das aber ebenso gut auch hätte ein anderes sein können, an dem viel Dialoggeplänkel und die DotCom Handlung aufgehängt sind. Immerhin, dass Pynchon den Terror ausgerechnet nutzt, um Maxine mit ihrem geschiedenen Ehemann wieder zusammenzuführen, ist eine Wendung, die man vom pre-9/11-Pynchon kaum hätte erwarten dürfen.
Lesen sollte man Bleeding Edge dennoch. Erstens weil Thomas Pynchon auch mit einem durchwachsenen Roman noch besser ist als viele Zeitgenossen. Zweitens weil die hier entfaltete Kritik durchaus etwas ist, dem sich selbst nachzuspüren lohnt. Und für, weil wirklich fasziniert wie tief der mittlerweile immerhin über 70jährige Autor in die junge Computerkultur der späten Neunziger einzusteigen vermag. Ob Pynchon sich nun all die Details, von Pokémon und ihre Transformationsstufen, heißen Games seinerzeit wie Deus Ex usw angelesen hat oder selbst gespielt – im Gegensatz zu den popkulturellen Verweisen, die der gefeierte Bret Easton Ellis streut, und die selbst meine Oma aus der Gala hätte haben können, baut Pynchon das Universum glaubhaft auf. Wobei er natürlich auch hier (zum Glück) alles andere als naturalistisch vorgeht. Sein Internet wird immer mehr zum realen, begehbaren Ort, und gerade durch diese Überhöhung zur Metapher. Darin, aber auch nur darin, sind Vergleiche mit Cyberpunk-Romanen wie Gibsons Neuromancer angemessen.
Anyway, Bleeding Edge. Well as some other the reviews have suggested, this is Pynchon with a coherent (more or less) plot that doesn't go racing off after red herrings for 20 pages. It is funny, in that Pynchonesque way, clever, literate but not always high brow. It is also, brilliantly, about America after 9/11. Although the event occurs roughly 3/4 of the way through the book, and is never directly described (another brilliant Pynchon observation, most of the people in the book who see it, see it through the medium of the television, just like most of the world.), a sinister, lurking, never quite seen or described menace haunts the book, brilliantly given vague shape by the odd, possibly dangerous, parallel world of the deep internet.
If you've read Pynchon before you'll love it. If you've never read Pynchon try it, this is what good writing looks like. No I'll re-phrase that, this is what fantastically good writing looks like. For example, look at the way he brilliantly captures different modes of New York speak and accent, through phrasing and spelling alone. And note how brilliantly he captures the odd, non sequential ways in which conversations actually occurs; because he is so famously reclusive, Pynchon, I would guess, spends time people watching and people listening.
To sum up, Bleeding Edge is bleeding superb, almost certainly the best English language novel published in 2013.
PS. If Pynchon were awarded the Nobel Prize would he turn up to receive it?
The book begins with Maxine walking her sons to school and this domestic setting remains a constant throughout the novel - despite the Russian mobsters, dotcom billionaires, political internet activists, drug smugglers, professional smell experts, codewriters, cop fanciers and other freaks who populate the investigator's working life. (I really liked this aspect of the book - I also really loved Vineland for the father-daughter relationship, though I know it's not most people's favourite Pynchon book.)
The text is absolutely full of jokes - one of my favourites is an invented series of very US-style true-life-story films mentioned in passing: Anthony Hopkins starring in the Mikhael Baryshnikov Story, Leo di Caprio in the Fatty Arbuckle story, etc. Lots of the jokes are popular culture-based - personally I feel that a seventy-six-year-old recluse who knows as much about disco as this, let alone ALL of the other gags which require detailed knowledge of the NOW - should be getting five stars just for KNOWING about the present.
And the aspects of the book about computing are fascinating - I'd never really known what the Deep Web was before, and I found a surprising level of interest about code matters! (It actually began to remind me a little of a William Gibson book, in the sense of seeing the present / near future written down in such an enthusiastic, living way.)
The best recommendation I can give is this: people expect Pynchon to be complex, full of jokes that require specialist knowledge, and proffering a confusing cast of characters - this book is all of these things, and yet every evening I looked forward to picking it back up, and sometimes couldn't resist reading a bit in the day as well. It's got a really good, gripping story, and you 'care about the characters', for what that's worth - in other words, 'old-fashioned readability' in a thoroughly modern novel.
When the Olympix of Hip are finally in place he is going to have to be awarded a whole series of backdated gold is Thomas ..
What do we find here? A novel about The Internet and 9-11... well these are current themes in Western Consciousness... He seriously questions the official versh but never says anything definite ... who indeed could?
On the Internet he is definitely a fan it seems ... who indeed could not be?
The novel has all the quasi Talmudic/Rabbinic erudition of earlier long works but maybe not the zip and Chi; but we did say late seventies so fair dues; personally I wanted to see what he had done here but would rather re-read the older long pieces which always veer back to Namibia 1905 the sound of the sjambok the shady allure of Südwest ...Ha the old days ...
Should you read this book? ...der! It's Pynchon; which means almost always better than most crimes committed to keyboard anywhere in the known universe ... Now where is this sjambok ?








