Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq Paperback – June 15, 2010
From the planning of aggression in 2002 through years of hostile military occupation, the United States systematically violated the United Nations Charter, the Geneva Conventions and virtually every principle of international law and order.
America's crimes against the people of Iraq were shielded from public scrutiny by what senior U.S. military officers called the "quiet, disguised, media-free approach" developed in Central America in the 1980s. The echo chamber of the Western corporate media fleshed out the Pentagon's propaganda to create a virtual Iraq in the minds of the public, feeding a political discourse that bore no relation to the real war it was waging, the country it was destroying or the lives of its inhabitants.
In an easily readable and flowing narrative, Nicolas Davies has carefully taken apart the wall of propaganda surrounding one of history's most significant military disasters and most serious international crimes: non-existent WMDs; the equally fictitious "centuries-old sectarian blood feud" in Iraq; and the secrecy of the dirty war waged by American-led death squads. Unlike other writers, Davies has firmly placed each aspect of the war within a coherent context of illegal aggression, hostile military occupation and popular resistance, to uncover the brutal reality of a war that has probably killed at least a million people.
"A clear, intelligent and accurate description of how we are involved in aggression in Iraq. Congratulations!" - Benjamin B. Ferencz, former Chief Prosecutor, U.S. War Crimes Tribunal, Nuremberg.
"If the Iraq occupation lasts another 50 years, it's doubtful a better account of it will be produced than this one." - David Swanson, Author of Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union.
- Print length440 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherNimble Pluribus
- Publication dateJune 15, 2010
- Dimensions6 x 0.89 x 9 inches
- ISBN-10193484098X
- ISBN-13978-1934840986
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Nimble Pluribus (June 15, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 440 pages
- ISBN-10 : 193484098X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1934840986
- Item Weight : 1.29 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.89 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,917,848 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #830 in Iraq History (Books)
- #1,859 in Foreign & International Law
- #1,976 in Iraq War History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author offers highly detailed very specific FACTS with precise sources for everything he writes. As I write this, I see one (1) curious one star review to the effect that the book is "Hardly objective or unbiased" - but has "Some good stuff here." But, alas, this "critic" fails to cite even one error! He also fails to give us even one example of what he considers "good stuff." Sarcastic remarks do NOT constitute an useful review. I have doubts that J. BAILEY has actually read the book. I've finished a first "cover to cover" read on Kindle and will study it again. This book is a "must" for those seeking a better understanding of the corrupt hypocritical cabal of "leaders" who brought us into an invasion of Iraq based on fraud, lies and deceit. This travesty, of biblical proportions, not only ruined our economy (the final price tag will be trillions) but resulted in the needless injury, death of over a million. A democracy only works when citizens are told the truth. This includes soldiers. Particularly troubling is the fact, even several years into the war, that the majority of soldiers "serving" in Iraq STILL believed that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9-11! Give me a break! George Orwell must be rolling over in his grave in reaction to how Dick, George and Rummy misused the English language. Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it. It's disgraceful how the media covers Iraq. One of the worst sources of "news" is Fox News. But to be fair and balanced, other US media, albeit less bad, unfortunately are little better.
What is rarely mentioned in the imperialist terror reigned on Iraq is that just prior to the US attack, the last two diplomats to depart Iraq were from Russia and Cuba, two former close allies who also had good ties with Iraq. The Russian military has just embarked on a $650 billion dollar rearmements programme. The Cuban military is known for its tenacious fighting when armed with weapons comparable to its opponent. Take the Angolan war as an example. Cuba took over the fighting from the MPLA Government troops and using Soviet weapons and proceeded to destroy the South African military (no mean feat!!!) and its proxy fighters from the CIA, and British mercenaries who were formerly from the British military. That is good form, good form indeed. The Cubans have long been taught to fly Soviet Migs which the Iraqi airforce was incapable of doing. The point is this: had the Russians and Cubans (possibly with some French military assistance) fought alonsgside Iraqi troops and had the Russians and French provided Iraq with missiles and attack helicopters and aircraft the Cubans would have done most of the fighting and killing of the imperialist invaders. The US military would soon have realised that they could not defeat such a fighting force. There for everybody to see Cuba, armed with heavy Russian and French weaponry, would have defeated the US and its imperialist cronies whoever they were. With Soviet/Russian military advisors the Cubans would have, in conjunction with Iraqi and Russian assistance easily have defeated Cheney-Wolfowitz Rumsfeld and the other neo fascists of the US. One only needs to look at Cuba's dominance of the fighting sports at Olympic level to realise this. Fighting is in their blood, just give them the comparable weaponry and watch. The possibility of this happening may even have been discussed among the Cubans and Russians as they had already defeated Jonas Savimbi and his US-British-South African fighters during the bloody Angolan war. This war involved vicious weaponry and the US and Britain the two leaders against Iraq, were heavily involved in Angola. Cuba in effect defeated all three of the imperialist aggressors in Angola. Unfortunately this war and its outcome is never mentioned by the authors and is never even discussed by so called "anti war activists." Yet just as in Angola the Cuban-Russian nexus combined with local Iraqi units would have destroyed the nonsense "Iraq Liberation" and "Operation Freedom" invasion and left The US and Britain isolated throughout much of the world. It is quite ironic too that Iran next in line for attack, developed even closer ties with Cuba after the attack on Iraq. Iran is not stupid: it knows that Cuba is pound for pound the best fighting country on earth. Period. What other small country could fend off US aggression just 90 kilometers away and endless economic sabotage and warfare against it??? How many other countries could defeat, almost single handedly, Savimbi-US-South African-British mercenaries in a prolonged bloody war in Angola, also a large oil exporting country???




