Buy new:
$21.99$21.99
FREE delivery: Thursday, Jan 5 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: A Quiet Village Media and More
Save with Used - Good
$5.99$5.99
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 4 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Zoom Books Company
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.58 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Blow Up [DVD]
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
| Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
|
DVD
October 21, 2014 "Please retry" | — | 1 | $11.98 | $8.05 |
Watch Instantly with
| Rent | Buy |
Enhance your purchase
| Genre | Drama, Romance |
| Format | Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Dubbed, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC |
| Contributor | Michelangelo Antonioni, Julio Cortzar, David Hemmings, Peter Bowles, Jane Birkin, John Castle, Edward Bond, Tonino Guerra, Claude Chagrin, Susan Brodrick, Gillian Hills, Veruschka von Lehndorff, Jeff Beck, Vanessa Redgrave, Julian Chagrin, Sarah Miles See more |
| Language | English, French |
| Runtime | 1 hour and 51 minutes |
Frequently bought together
![Blow Up [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/513P-EsZfeL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product Description
Product Description
Taking photographs of a couple making love proves deadly when the photographer enlarges the image and discovers murder. The film and pictures are stolen from his studio and the body vanishes. In this elegant balance of deciet and trickery, the photographer must question the reality of what he has actually seen.
Amazon.com
This 1966 masterpiece by Michelangelo Antonioni (The Passenger) is set in the heady atmosphere of Swinging London, and stars David Hemmings as an unsmiling fashion photographer hooked on ephemeral meaning attached to anything: art, sex, work, relationships, drugs, events. When a real mystery falls into his lap, he probes the evidence for some reliable truth, but finds it hard to reckon with. Vanessa Redgrave plays an enigmatic woman whose desperation to cover something up only seems like one more phenomenon in Hemmings's disinterested purview. This is one of the key films of the decade, and still an unsettling and lasting experience. --Tom Keogh
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 1.85:1
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
- Product Dimensions : 7.75 x 5.75 x 0.53 inches; 0.01 Ounces
- Director : Michelangelo Antonioni
- Media Format : Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Dubbed, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
- Run time : 1 hour and 51 minutes
- Release date : February 17, 2004
- Actors : David Hemmings, Vanessa Redgrave, Sarah Miles, John Castle, Jane Birkin
- Dubbed: : French
- Subtitles: : English, French, Spanish
- Language : English (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono), Unqualified (DTS ES 6.1), French (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono)
- Studio : Warner Home Video
- ASIN : B0000WN0ZK
- Writers : Edward Bond, Julio Cortzar, Michelangelo Antonioni, Tonino Guerra
- Number of discs : 1
- Best Sellers Rank: #110,430 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #4,274 in Romance (Movies & TV)
- #6,217 in Mystery & Thrillers (Movies & TV)
- #19,349 in Drama DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
If Blowup looks and feels different from the four Antonioni films that preceded it, one reason may be that Antonioni used an English editor, Frank Clarke (uncredited). The pace of the movie is far faster than what a viewer of L'Eclisse or La Notte would expect.
In many scenes there are sudden, apparently pointless cuts. These are inserted to give the movie a more nervous look than we expect from Antonioni. Perhaps, knowing he was making his first mystery, Antonioni planned this new style with his editor.
There are other mannerisms, not unique to this film, that are always interesting. The camera follows a receding car for some distance, then slows down and lets the car get further away.
A burst of music will suddenly be heard, and just as suddenly fade away. In the studio this seems to signify the photographer's preoccupation with the photos, causing him to forget the music.
-- Critics and the public are correct in viewing Antonioni as a dark pessimist about human nature. He sees us as sadly unequipped for the challenges of reality, relationships, moral judgment, etc. The theme of the movie is how easily the photographer is distracted from the serious business at hand, i.e. the apparent murder captured by his camera. He is no match for the reality before him, and drifts from one diversion to the next. The wonderful scene of the Yardbirds playing to a catatonic audience, and our hero coming away with the worthless trophy, sums up the director's view of him.
But the key scene of the movie is when the photographer, suspecting the murder, leaves his studio without his camera, finds the body in the park, can't photograph it, and returns to the studio to find that all the prints and negatives of the event have been stolen in his absence. One false step and everything is lost. The record of the reality, and perhaps the reality itself.
Antonioni invited the debate about whether anything at all happened -- the murder, the photographs, the scene in the park, etc. -- by having the imaginary tennis ball at the end of the film begin to make plocking noises, and by having the photographer disappear. Why Antonioni called this moment his "signature" is a mystery to me. Possibly to bring more people into the theaters.
The scene in the park is a classic of form and color and movement. Nothing like it has been done before or since. If you turn the volume up on your TV during this scene, you will realize that the trees and bushes, being blown by the wind, are definite conspirators in what is happening to the man and woman. Similarly, in the final scene, the sky has turned grey and the trees and bushes seem to mock the photographer who has returned to the scene of his greatest failure.
I had to watch the movie 50 times before I realized that the killer behind the fence is the grassy knoll assassin in Dallas. The movie was made three years after the Kennedy assassination.
The scenes in the studio, discovering the truth hidden in the photos, have been much imitated. They are wonderful, breathless, dramatic.
Today the question of reality seems far less pertinent than the shallowness of the photographer [who may also be the artist, according to some] and his inability to confront the real in an adult, responsible way. But it can be argued that if human perception is so skewed by selfish concerns and shallow desires, the human race never really perceives a real world at all. Only the next pleasure, the next gratification, the next need or project. The human world we see around us, colored by war, famine, violence, and the colossal indifference of man to his fellow man, may be a world built by creatures who do not have a reality. Only a stubborn need to be safe, to be blind. Possibly this is the sense of those last troubling images.
Incidentally, I saw the movie four or five times in the theater, and I saw no scenes that have been deleted, as the reviewer above claims. As far as I can remember, the movie is completely intact in this DVD.
This film divides people tremendously online with some praising it to the skies and offering their own takes on the oblique meaning of what has just transpired and others basically calling it boring, arty, pretentious trash. It was a gigantic hit in its day far beyond any previous Antonioni film, even L'Avventura, and became a cultural sensation, something which you simply had to see. This however was because of its photographer with two models orgy scene (very tame by today's standards but so shocking in 1967 that it is credited for being the final blow to the Production Code). It was also set in Swinging London at it's high water mark, but only uses the setting by inference and never really explores the phenomenon beyond a small concert and a pot party.
The concert is of great interest to many because it is of the Yardbirds in a rare transitional moment with both Jeff Beck and Jimmy Page. But that is one of the things he got entirely wrong. He wanted the Who originally because he was fascinated by their guitar smashing climaxes. So after not getting the Velvet Underground or The In Crowd he got the Yardbirds and had them do the guitar smashing, which was never part of their act. He also gets the crowd all wrong, not in looks but in how they behave. One of his themes is ennui and how modern society has evolved to alienate people (very 60's) and so the crowd is silent and immobile when a real crowd of Yardbirds fans would have been full of life, dancing and shouting all over the place. Here he has changed reality to suit his own themes.
Also very Sixties is the lack of an explanation or clear idea of what has transpired. Pop Songs, books and films were full of imagery which was left up to the audience to guess its meaning with the artists seeming to have some inner connection with the Universe that the merely mortal audience could only guess at. it's like the Doors, "Weird scenes inside the gold mines". I don't even mind that so much as the fact that Antonioni doesn't really play fair with the audience. Yes, a great deal of reality is our own construct, especially our own role as a hero or victim. But some of the elements here clearly do not add up. The blown-up photos clearly show a man with a gun, not a blur or smudge that could be. I know people debate whether he really saw a body or not but in the language of cinema he clearly does without any indication of a dream or hallucination. The same with his studio being robbed and the blow-ups being taken. Many aspects of this story can be seen as the results of interpretation and assumption but if these are then Thomas, the photographer, has become truly deranged.
Despite that I really love the film for its cinematography, its use of color, the whole flow of events from one unexpected thing to another, for its early depiction of an unlikable central character and its glimpses of the London of 1966. Try it if you like, it's a worthwhile experience, but don't try to figure it out.
Top reviews from other countries
the sound and the pictures is very good.
Inserita all'interno di una cornice estetica immersa nel mondo della moda della swinging London della seconda meta` degli anni 60, la storia del film ha per protagoniste le avventure di un talentuoso fotografo (David Hemmings) alle prese con un inatteso rebus da risolvere.....
Attraverso uno stile narrativo personalissimo e una composizione del suono e delle immagini che non lascia nulla al caso, il genio artistico di Michelangelo Antonioni rende BLOW-UP una delle creazioni piu`belle, affascinanti e misteriose della storia del Cinema (la scena in cui Mark scansiona gli ingrandimenti delle fotografie ha una forza evocativa devastante..)...Grazie alla sua capacita`di sapere bucare lo schermo e stimolare la mente di chi guarda come solo poche pellicole sono in grado di fare, BLOW-UP e`molto piu`di un film....UNA VERA E PROPRIA OPERA D'ARTE.
Reviewed in Italy 🇮🇹 on September 13, 2022
Inserita all'interno di una cornice estetica immersa nel mondo della moda della swinging London della seconda meta` degli anni 60, la storia del film ha per protagoniste le avventure di un talentuoso fotografo (David Hemmings) alle prese con un inatteso rebus da risolvere.....
Attraverso uno stile narrativo personalissimo e una composizione del suono e delle immagini che non lascia nulla al caso, il genio artistico di Michelangelo Antonioni rende BLOW-UP una delle creazioni piu`belle, affascinanti e misteriose della storia del Cinema (la scena in cui Mark scansiona gli ingrandimenti delle fotografie ha una forza evocativa devastante..)...Grazie alla sua capacita`di sapere bucare lo schermo e stimolare la mente di chi guarda come solo poche pellicole sono in grado di fare, BLOW-UP e`molto piu`di un film....UNA VERA E PROPRIA OPERA D'ARTE.
Dann macht er in eines Tages in einem Park Fotos von einem Paar, das er nicht um Erlaubnis gefragt hat. Die Frau besucht ihn noch am selben Tag und verlangt die Fotos.
Die Tatsache, dass er vielleicht einen Mord fotografiert hat, kommt ihm erst in den Sinn, als er die Negative genauer studiert und durch immer weitere Vergrößerungen Details aufdeckt, die ihm schließlich helfen, das Puzzle zusammen zusetzten.
◉ Blowup bedeutet auf Deutsch: vergrößern (z.B. von Negativen oder Fotos)
◉ Der Film vermittelt ein weit hergeholtes, zugeknöpftes und zugleich vibrierend aufregendes Bild der zeitgenössischen Gesellschaft.
Er manifestiert einen quietschend Wechsel des Stils von Regisseur Michelangelo Antonioni (Kamera: kein geringerer als Carlo Di Palma (1925 - 2004)
Sein vielleicht bekanntestes Werk ist das 1966 in England gedrehte "Blow up". David Hemmings (1941-2003) verkörpert hier einen jungen und gefragten Londoner Mode und Szenefotografen namens Thomas der seinen Job mit Hingabe aber auch bereits einer gehörigen Portion Zynismus ausübt.
Eines Tages fotografiert er ein junges Liebespaar auf einer Wiese. Beim entwickeln und vergrößern der Fotos entdeckt er plötzlich dass aus dem benachbarten Waldstück mit einer Pistole auf die beiden angelegt wird. Auch erscheint bald der weibliche teil des Paares(Vanessa Readgrave) und verlangt die Herausgabe der Fotos.Das animiert Thomas erst recht dazu der Sache nachzugehen.
Wer nun allerdings eine Kriminalaffaire erwartet sieht sich getäuscht. Der - mutmaßliche - Mordanschlag ist nur einer von vielen inhaltlichen Aspekten.
Antonioni zeigt außerdem Thomas in Gesprächen mit Kumpels, Kollegen, jungen weiblichen Modellen oder auch einem Lieferanten mit einer eigentümlichen Sendung. Als krönenden Abschluß - Achtung Spoiler ! - sieht man eine größere Gruppe junger Menschen die miteinander Tennis
"spielen"- simultan, ohne Schläger und Bälle !
Mit dem Mordanschlag hat das natürlich alles nichts zu tun, scheinbar wahllos reiht Antonioni diese Ereignisse aneinander. Vielleicht wollt er damit zeigen dass Thomas in Wahrheit schon anbgestumpft ist und erst ein mögliches Verbrechen ihn inspirieren kann.
Aber diese Deutung wird keineswegs nahegelegt. Vielmehr setzt Antonioni in hohem Maße auf den aufgeschlossenen und sehr geduldigen Zuschauer der bereit ist
sich den Film im Kopf selbst zusammen zu setzten - was damals auch Filmemacher wie Alexander Kluge oder Jean Luc Godard versuchten, was sich aber in der mit Massenware überfluteten heutigen Filmwelt wohl so niemand mehr trauen würde.
Was damals für viele sicher einen Reiz ausübte erschiene heute wahrscheinlich absurd.
Immerhin kann man den Film heute zweifach als Dokument ansehen. Zum einen für das "swinging London " der 60er und für eine andere Art filmischen Erzählens.
PS. : Habe den Film nun zweimal gesehen. Das reicht - fürs erste..

![La Notte (The Criterion Collection) [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71jeTF175AL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
![Blow-Up (The Criterion Collection) [DVD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71vzXLjlSkL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)

![Blow-Up [DVD] [1966]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/418ck7ni1WL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)