Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
87% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


From the Bodies of the Gods: Psychoactive Plants and the Cults of the Dead Paperback – Illustrated, May 16, 2012
Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$8.99 Read with Our Free App - Paperback
$7.00
Enhance your purchase
• Explores ancient practices of producing sacred hallucinogenic foods and oils from the bodies of the dead for ritual consumption and religious anointing
• Explains how these practices are deeply embedded in the symbolism, theology, and sacraments of modern religion, specifically Christianity and the Eucharist
• Documents the rites of Cults of the Dead from the prehistoric Minoans on Crete to the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, and Hebrews to early and medieval Christian sects such as the Cathars
Long before the beginnings of civilization, humans have been sacrificed and their flesh used to produce sacred foods and oils for use in religious rites. Originating with the sacred harvest of hallucinogenic mushrooms from the corpses of shamans and other holy men, these acts of ritual cannibalism and visionary intoxication are part of the history of all cultures, including Judeo-Christian ones, and provided a way to commune with the dead. These practices continued openly into the Dark Ages, when they were suppressed and adapted into the worship of saintly bones--or continued in secret by a few “heretical” sects, such as the Cathars and the Knights Templar. While little known today, these rites remain deeply embedded in the symbolism, theology, and sacraments of modern religion and bring a much more literal meaning to the church’s “Holy Communion” or symbolic consumption of the body and blood of Christ.
Documenting the sacrificial, cannibalistic, and psychoactive sacramental practices associated with the Cult of the Dead from the prehistoric Minoans on Crete to the ancient Egyptians and Hebrews and onward to early and medieval Christian sects, Earl Lee shows how these religious rites influenced the development of Western religion. In particular, he reveals how Christianity originated with Jesus’s effort to restore the sacred rites of Moses, including the Marzeah, or Feast for the Dead. Examining the connections between these rites and the mysterious funeral of Father Sauniere in Rennes-le-Château, the author explains why the prehistoric Cult of the Dead has held such power over Western civilization, so much so that its echoes are still heard today in our literature, film, and arts.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPark Street Press
- Publication dateMay 16, 2012
- Dimensions6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101594774587
- ISBN-13978-1594774584
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“An insightful analysis on early funeral rites and ethnomycology . . . deepens our body of learning about the origins of the Christian faith and humanity’s entheogenic history.” ― Rob Dickins, editor of the Psychedelic Press UK
“These were ideas intensely debated by seminarians after the disclosures of the Dead Sea Scrolls. . . . As this book demonstrates, many passages in the Holy Scriptures are incomprehensible as anything but blatant descriptions of the Christian cult of the dead traceable back to the earliest religious rites of prehistory and prevalent throughout antiquity and medieval Catholicism.” ― Carl A. P. Ruck, professor of Classical Studies, Boston University, and author of Mushrooms, Myths,
“After this learned exploration of how necrophilia, hallucinogens, body fluids, human sacrifice, and ancestor worship powerfully influenced the major religions like Judaism and Christianity, it will be hard to view those venerable faiths and institutions in the standard, conventional way. During his stunning intellectual romp, Lee also provides fascinating, even ‘heretical,’ insights into such personages, places, and practices as the Roman catacombs, Last Supper, Eucharist; Neolithic, Hebrew, Greek, and Egyptian burial rites; Horus, the Virgin Mary, Moses, Jesus, the Knights Templar, veneration of saintly relics and the Holy Grail, Minoan mead-making, Dominicans, corpse-painting, psychedelic mushroom-growing, anointing, witch-hunting, Prometheus, and goddess worship.” ― Sanford Berman, award-winning librarian and author of Prejudices and Antipathies
“...the book is a trove to delve into and it’ll be interesting to see what further scholarship it gives rise too.” ― Psychedelic Press UK, July 2012
From the Back Cover
“From time to time, a book comes along that stops you in your tracks and stuns your mind. From the Bodies of the Gods is such a book. It will--and should--provoke intense discussion about some of the most fundamental underpinnings of Western religions.”
--Larry Dossey, M.D., author of Healing Words, Reinventing Medicine, and The Power of Premonitions
“An insightful analysis on early funeral rites and ethnomycology . . . deepens our body of learning about the origins of the Christian faith and humanity’s entheogenic history.”
--Rob Dickins, editor of the Psychedelic Press UK
Long before the beginnings of civilization, humans have been sacrificed and their flesh used to produce sacred foods and oils for use in religious rites. Originating with the sacred harvest of hallucinogenic mushrooms from the corpses of shamans and other holy men, these acts of ritual cannibalism and visionary intoxication are part of the history of all cultures, including Judeo-Christian ones, and provided a way to commune with the dead. These practices continued openly into the Dark Ages, when they were suppressed and adapted into the worship of saintly bones--or continued in secret by a few “heretical” sects, such as the Cathars and the Knights Templar. While little known today, these rites remain deeply embedded in the symbolism, theology, and sacraments of modern religion and bring a much more literal meaning to the church’s “Holy Communion” or symbolic consumption of the body and blood of Christ.
Documenting the sacrificial, cannibalistic, and psychoactive sacramental practices associated with the Cult of the Dead from the prehistoric Minoans on Crete to the ancient Egyptians and Hebrews and onward to early and medieval Christian sects, Earl Lee shows how these religious rites influenced the development of Western religion. In particular, he reveals how Christianity originated with Jesus’s effort to restore the sacred rites of Moses, including the Marzeah, or Feast for the Dead. Examining the connections between these rites and the mysterious funeral of Father Saunière in Rennes-le-Château, the author explains why the prehistoric Cult of the Dead has held such power over Western civilization, so much so that its echoes are still heard today in our literature, film, and arts.
EARL LEE is a professor at Pittsburg State University and the author of several books, including Raptured, Drakulya, and Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity. He lives in Pittsburg, Kansas.
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Hebrew and Christian Ointments
Many other religions, in addition to the Egyptian religion, used fats and fluids taken from corpses. The fluids were used to make an unguent (salve or balm) that could be applied to the lips of the dead (but there is no reason to believe that it was limited to the dead and dying). According to famed Egyptologist Sir J. Gardner Wilkinson, the Egyptians applied the balm to the lips of the dead by “moistening the ring finger of the left hand with various sweet ointments” and then applying the balm (v.3, 420). Very likely, this ointment also contained spikenard, which is mentioned several times in both the Old and New Testaments.
Among the Hebrews a special “Oil of Gladness” was used to anoint the dead in a “last unction.” Wilkinson notes that this kind of anointing was common “in Egypt, no less than Judaea” (v.3, 363). Early on in their history, the Hebrews almost certainly added bodily fluids to their holy oils--following the Egyptian practice--but they probably stopped using bodily fluids early in the post-exile period (586 BCE-210 CE) when the old Mosaic/Egyptian rites fell out of favor. But in the post-exile period their “Oil of Gladness” probably still contained a powerful mixture of drugs, including cannabis, which in Genesis is called “Kaneh-Bosem” according to the official recipe. These special oils would be considered vital to the dying believer by providing physical comfort and perhaps a vision that would guide him or her in the next world.
The Hebrew priests were very specific about the oil’s ingredients and its use in rites. By the time the Book of Exodus was compiled, the use of some “special” holy ointments was already being limited to the priesthood. This can be gleaned from Exodus 30:31-33.
And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, “This shall be an holy anointing oil unto me throughout your generations. Upon the flesh of man shall it not be poured, neither shall ye make any like it, according to the composition thereof: it is holy, and it shall be holy unto you. Whosoever compoundeth any like it, or whosoever putteth any of it upon a stranger, he shall be cut off from his people.”
The word “stranger” could mean “outsider,” though this passage came to be interpreted by the priests as meaning that anyone who is not a priest of Yahweh must not be anointed with this special oil. In any case, this passage in Exodus demands that any unauthorized person should be punished for making the oil or putting it on anybody. To most of us, in any case, the punishment seems extreme, unless the sacred oil is more than just oil. Obviously, it must contain some very special ingredients.
The sacred oil, heavily spiked with cannabis, could benefit a dying person by relieving his physical suffering. And when hallucinogens are added to the oil, the anointing could also provide a powerful vision of the afterlife. Apart from these practical benefits, the act of anointing would be a pointless ritual of little real physical benefit to the dying, aside from whatever psychological consolation it might provide to the dying believer. The anointing would be of no value at all to someone who was already dead, unless the oil was necessary for the process of “germination”--as the Egyptians understood this.
We also know that, like the Hebrews, the early Christians had a similar anointing practice, probably derived from early Hebrew and Egyptian recipes. The powerful supernatural qualities of this Christian ointment were endorsed by an early Christian apologist, Minucius Felix (150?-270? BCE), who claimed that the Christians of his time anointed their dead and dying with a special salve-like unguent.
The same holy balm was almost certainly applied to the lips of the living--that is, to people who were being initiated into the most holy and secret beliefs of the Christian cult. This practice was common to both the pagans and the Christians. Furthermore, we know that the practice of anointing the lips with a supernatural unguent persisted in the Christian church for several centuries, at least to the time of the emperor Constantine. A contemporary of Constantine, Julius Firmicus, describes applying an unguent to the lips of Christians, while comparing it to a similar balm used by the pagans. According to Firmicus, “the balm used by the pagans is no better than grease,” while the balm used by Christians is made with “an immortal composition.”
After praising the supernatural qualities of the Christian ointment, Firmicus quickly follows this claim with the rather odd statement,
This ointment frees the decaying limbs of mankind from the snares of death, so that when the first man is buried, straightway from the same person another man may be born in happier case. And to explain this more manifestly, we must unfold the mysteries of the Sacred Scriptures.
This passage perhaps hints at what I have already suggested about how Christians transmitted the sacred flesh of Jesus from one generation to the next. Unlike the Egyptians, who were using decaying fluids taken from the dead in their sacred ointments, the Christians were doing something else. Many people today might read the passage as simply a metaphorical description of the deceased being born into eternal life. But because this idea of death as a doorway to heaven was commonly held at the time by many pagans, including the Egyptians, it would hardly need to be explained, much less described, as one of the great “mysteries of the Sacred Scriptures.”
Product details
- Publisher : Park Street Press; Illustrated edition (May 16, 2012)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594774587
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594774584
- Item Weight : 0.035 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,730,222 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,908 in Occultism
- #9,894 in Ancient Civilizations
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Earl Lee was a co-author/consultant on the SciFi novel: The Hour of Lead.
He has been interested in Intellectual Freedom issues for many years. He wrote the foreword to The Jungle: The Uncensored Original Edition (See Sharp Press) and his essay on textbook censorship can be found in the bestselling anthology: You Are Still Being Lied To.
He has also written several popular parodies, including "The Screwletter Tapes" and the novel Raptured: The Final Daze of the Late, Great Planet Earth (a parody of Tim LaHaye's evangelical End-of-the-World novel, Left Behind). His work includes fiction, drama and poetry. Samples can be found at Goodreads and on his blogg "Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity"
Earl Lee was born in Illinois (near Chicago) in 1954 and is currently a faculty member at Pittsburg State University. He was recently promoted to the honorary rank of University Professor.
Lee has attended Lyon College in Batesville, Arkansas (B.A. in Literature); the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (M.A. in English); Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin (teaching certification); and the University of Wisconsin--Madison (M.A.L.I.S).
He has lived in Illinois (Rockford, New Milford, DeKalb); Arkansas (Little Rock, Jacksonville, Fayetteville, Strawberry, Calamine); Tennessee (Memphis); Michigan (Pontiac) ; Wisconsin (Appleton, Ashwaubenon, De Pere, Madison, Rice Lake); Oklahoma (Enid), and Kansas. He has also been spotted wandering in the vicinity of Eureka Springs, Ark., and Nashville.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
First, he credits old, busted research by Budge and Frazier. In scholarship, old is not better. New is better, because it has absorbed and argued for and against the old, built upon it. Look at it this way--would you rather your physician rely upon medical knowledge as it stood in 1890? No. You would reject that as limited, outmoded. You would want your physician to have a good handle on all the medical knowledge that has accrued since then. Same with scholarship. This is not to say that all old scholarship is out-of-the-box rejected, but anyone citing Frazier and Budge nowadays automatically undermines their scholarly credibility, IMO. So there was that.
But okay, I thought maybe this author is writing this in his retirement and is a little off the ball but can still provide some interesting stuff. Instead, more old and busted scholarship was provided and it turned out, did not even offer the proof the author indicated. For instance, from p. 24 of the book "The sacred oils used in the Hebrew christening rites were not ordinary. Typically several drugs were added to them, including hallucinogenic plants and a large amount of cannabis (Godbey 1930, p. 222)." Well, gee, I had to check that out, because I would like to see something other than a website or a post on an entheogen forum about cannabis in the sacred oils, much less other hallucinogens. So I went to JSTOR and got the article in question: Allen H. Godbey, "Incense and Poison Ordeals in the Ancient Orient," The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures Vol. 46, No. 4 (Jul., 1930), pp. 217-238. A rather elderly article in terms of scholarship that would not normally be cited, but okay. I read the entire article. It was a mishmash unsubstantiated statements and breezy imperialist attitudes about peoples other than Northern Europeans, who are not susceptible to the intoxicating smokes and vapors that Muslims, "Negroes," and so on are narcotized by. I am not making this up. But as an example of the sort of "scholarship" we are talking here, Godbey cites Ezekiel 8:11 as proof that the priests the Temple of Jerusalem were inhaling incense that got them high and caused them to see things, but you can go read that bit yourself. What the priests saw were the images they themselves had painted on the walls of the Temple (in the custom of Babylon), and that was what Ezekiel was criticizing--the importation of Babylonian temple practices into the Temple system (they even supplanted the old Judaic solar calendar with the lunar Babylonian calendar). So Ezekiel was not angry that the priests were becoming intoxicated from the incense; there is no such thing going on. This example shows how faulty Godbey is. I hate to say it, but it is of a piece with how faulty Lee is.
I decided to reread the page Lee cites as proof of his assertation that the sacred ointments were jacked up with hallucinogens, p. 222. But there is nothing on that page about such a thing. And no, the page numbers have not changed. The article I read was a scan from the original periodical. So in other words, this was just a big fat nothing in terms of evidence.
Then there is the tired cannabis in the sacred oil baloney, and I'm sorry, but that's just what it is. To argue that "kaneh bosem" is equal to "cannabis" is a folk etymology. These words are not related linguistically. The phrase is used elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible to mean "sweet cane." There is argument about what sweet cane is, but we cannot say it must be marijuana, which does not look like cane. There is also a completely different word in the Hebrew Bible that means marijuana. This entire argument has never gained any traction amongst bona fide linguists or Biblical scholars, and that lack of traction has nothing whatsoever to do with any imagined stuffiness of those scholars or their wish to "preserve" the sacredness of the Bible. They have no such wish, which anyone who has read any amount of Biblical and linguistic scholarship would know. But let's just put that aside and ask the very most obvious question (IMO) about this issue. The sacred oil in the Temple was used primarily to anoint stuff, not people--the tools of the service, the altar, the props. Why would they put pot in such an oil? But okay, they did anoint the heads of the priests. So how were the priests made high by having some oil that according to this theory had pot in it? While cannabis oil preparations have been used to treat some skin problems, I sure have not found any research that shows that THC goes through the skin and affects the nervous system of human beings. So why would they do this? It doesn't make much sense. Also, remember that the altar closest to the Holy of Holies was the incense altar, not the one where animal sacrifices were made. So why, if pot was so important, was it not a part of the incense? Surely then it would have indeed have had a psychoactive effect. And yet, it is absent. The very basis of the pot in the sacred oil idea is faulty and doesn't even have to get as far as scholarship, which further knocks the props out of the linguistic argument. Personally, I would also wonder why it is that we have so narrowed our view of spirituality that we are certain that the ONLY way people of those times could have experienced visions and wonders was because they were high. This position is a denial of the reality of spiritual experience and unfortunately fits very well with our materialism-dominated worldview. This is not to say at all the people haven't used plants for spiritual purposes. Rather, it is to say that people do not HAVE to use plants to have profound visions and spiritual experiences.
After looking at these several sections and seeing exactly the poor scholarship, lack of evidence, and a lot of repetition, I feel little inclination to read any farther. I decided to then see what else Lee had written and what he taught at Pittsburg State University, which is in Kansas, btw. I could not find that he teaches anything, nor does he have a doctorate. He is a librarian. I have known librarians who were powerful scholars, but this is not an example.This is the work of someone who is not familiar with how to conduct scholarship. He did write "Kiss My Left Behind," which I suspect I would enjoy much more than this work.
Mr. Lee - a piece of heartfelt device - if you're going to base your whole book on the idea that Psilocybin (and/or Amanita) can grow in decaying human bodies, then back up your premise with even one piece of evidence that these mushrooms can indeed grow in this media. As much as your premise fascinated me, reading your book was like trying to talk to a friend at tea with an elephant between you. It can be done but it's very distracting.
If you ever go to a second edition, re-write it - a lot! As I said, you've got some interesting ideas but they got lost in the unsubstantiated woo-woo. The whole topic of sealing up the dead bodies is fascinating but you need to delve into the reasons behind more carefully.
Keenly aware that he can only scratch the surface of his topic, the author wants the book to "lay the foundation for understanding how the ancient cult of the dead...contributed to the beginnings of Christian religion" (5). Indeed, Lee would happily see others clear a broader pathway as he hopes to simply "lay a trail of crumbs for others to follow" (6).
Readers seeking revelation in contemporary Christianity will find an antidogmatic scholar keenly aware of the distance between fact and faith coupled with a spirit willing to decrease this distance, to bring subject and practice closer through the researches of an enlightened mind.
Above all, the book serves two purposes: to provide "a clear explanation, albeit an unusual one, for the complex burial rites of the Egyptians, Greeks, earliest Hebrews, and early Christians"(6); and, to create "essentially a prologue to many other lines of inquiry" (6).
The work succeeds on both counts, providing well-documented interesting information refined from chat piles abandoned by less inquisitive researchers.
Knowledge of both testaments of the Bible and some Egyptology is helpful but not essential: Lee repeats cogent points (for example, he consistently and continually presents the argument that it is valuable to see Jesus not as a radical bent on creating a new religion, but instead as a reformer insistent on following the rites and religion of Moses), rendering them accessible to readers who may find in his words the inspiration to follow his trail of crumbs to other lines of inquiry or--in more postmodern parlance--to take his deconstructed elements and build upon the foundation of his research.
While the arguments and research are fascinating, the book could benefit from more sympathetic editing (see how often he uses the word "church" on pages 51-2, an example of repetition at the level of word choice that I find distracting if not deadening)and--in the best of all possible worlds--a timeline to emphasize the historicity of the presentation.
Nitpicking aside, those of us fascinated by tales of things such as mushrooms growing from corpses or bodily fluids recycled into ointments and unguents for religious practices or of rebellious religious leaders speaking from their heart--and, when defeated, horrifically punished--will take pleasure from reading this book. Certainly, this pleasure will augment our understanding of our present human condition.
Top reviews from other countries
