Kindle
$9.99
Available instantly
Kindle Price: $9.99

Save $3.00 (23%)

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Buy for others

Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group.
Learn more

Buying and sending eBooks to others

  1. Select quantity
  2. Buy and send eBooks
  3. Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the authors

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Bonfire of the Humanities: Rescuing the Classics in an Impoverished Age Kindle Edition

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 31 ratings

With humor, lucidity, and unflinching rigor, the acclaimed authors of Who Killed Homer? and Plagues of the Mind unsparingly document the degeneration of a central, if beleaguered, discipline—classics—and reveal the root causes of its decline. Hanson, Heath, and Thornton point to academics themselves—their careerist ambitions, incessant self-promotion, and overspecialized scholarship, among other things—as the progenitors of the crisis, and call for a return to “academic populism,” an approach characterized by accessible, unspecialized writing, selfless commitment to students and teaching, and respect for the legacy of freedom and democracy that the ancients bequeathed to the West.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

It has become quite common over the past 20 years for various groups of humanists to cry like prophets in the wilderness over the demise of the classics both in small liberal arts colleges and large state universities. Hanson and Heath (coauthors of Who Killed Homer? and professors of classics at, respectively, Cal State, Fresno, and Santa Clara University), along with Cal State classicist Thornton, contend that these arguments generally fail to strike at the heart of the problem which is, they say, that contemporary academics are hypocrites who decry racial discrimination, sexism and democratic capitalism from the vantage point of well-paid, tenured positions. These professors whom they deride as "Savonarolas... ideologues of the multicultural and postmodern Left" also purportedly contribute to the death of the classics by writing jargon-filled articles and books about ancient Greece and Rome that are inaccessible to a broader audience. In addition, such academics refuse to teach undergraduates, exploiting instead graduate teaching assistants who do not have the wealth of research to share with these younger students. The authors, who define their own enterprise as "academic populism," address this elitism and hypocrisy in a series of scathing essays and book reviews, which, unfortunately, suffer from many of the same problems of which they accuse their opponents (for instance, those they criticize, such as philosopher Martha Nussbaum and classicist Judith Hallett and thus these critiques themselves are more likely to be read by scholars than by a general audience). At best, the authors engage in defensive, whining, self-righteous diatribes in an effort to show how misguided their opponents are. At worst, Hanson, Heath and Thornton use this book to vilify those whom they perceive to have wronged them.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

In this collection of new and previously published essays, classicists Hanson (California State Univ., Fresno), John Heath (Santa Clara Univ.), and Bruce S. Thornton (California State Univ., Fresno) prove that the old saying "academic politics are so poisonous only because there is so little at stake" is true. Railing against what they perceive as rampant careerism among modern-day exponents of "fashionable" theories such as postmodernism, feminism, and multiculturalism, Hanson and Heath return to the question that they posed in their earlier work, Who Killed Homer?: The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom, and provide the same answer, i.e., "They did." While the authors might compare their work to broader criticisms of the academy such as Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind (LJ 5/1/87) and Dinesh D'Souza's Illiberal Education (LJ 3/15/91), this work is so steeped in the academic infighting specific to the field of classical studies that it is unlikely to find much of an audience beyond those already involved in the conflict. Recommended only for academic collections supporting advanced teaching and research in classics. Scott Walter, Washington State Univ., Pullman
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00KFTZON4
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Intercollegiate Studies Institute (May 27, 2014)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 27, 2014
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 2235 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 450 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 31 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
31 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on October 29, 2017
This book charts a pattern that faculty in English and Modern Foreign Languages have also experienced. In the late 60’s the attitude was formed that the historical method had run its course and that there was very little left to learn. This caused a panic in those who (unlike Wittgenstein, e.g.) were not prepared to take down their tents, return home and pursue other honest labor. The creature comforts of tenure, modest teaching loads, generous leaves and lucrative grants were too attractive to be abandoned. Fortunately, there were other opportunities ready at hand. The French Nietzscheans offered capital-T Theory, a form of epistemic nihilism and will-to-power essentialism that provided the opportunity to not just pursue greener professional pastures but also argue that the previous environs were fallow and uninhabitable.

Many within the Classics professoriate followed this lead, placing professional opportunity above public need. The result was a decline in Classics enrollments, a reduction in faculty, the near-abandonment of the study of Greek and a widening of the gap between the senior faculty of privilege and the contingent faculty teaching multiple sections of introductory courses. The new ‘research’ was of little interest to the general public and the tradition of ‘outreach’ in the form of translations such as Richmond Lattimore’s and books for general readers by such figures as Gilbert Highet receded into the past as the senior professoriate distanced itself from taxpayers, tuition payers and the general public.

Since the careers of the privileged members of the professoriate hung in the balance the internecine skirmishes which always characterized the academy (Johnson discusses them in his Preface to Shakespeare, long before there was even an English professoriate per se) multiplied in both number and intensity.

Hanson, Heath and Thornton speak for the ‘old ways’: an emphasis on conscientious teaching, the practice of historical/empirical/philological research, and an understanding of the historical role of Greek and Roman thought, particularly Greek, which involves the giving of proper credit but not the donning of rose-tinted spectacles. Their central method here is to examine collections of essays which advocate the ‘new ways’ and underscore the predictable and dubious assumptions which undergird them. These ‘theories’ are often questionable in the extreme; their progenitors have earned far more plaudits from the unquestioning humanists than from their disciplinary colleagues. Foucault has been characterized as doing ‘history without facts’ by a distinguished historian; Rorty went to Stanford’s Comp Lit department, not its Philosophy department. Lacan is invisible within the modern psychological sciences and Derrida is now largely seen as a passing fad who has not displaced Aristotle, Plato, Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Wittgenstein, et al.

BONFIRE OF THE HUMANITIES is particularly valuable because it names names and recounts actual battles; this provides the general reader with a deep sense of the self-interested ugliness which has characterized many of the events.

A note in passing: the identity politics that forms the basis for the race/class/gender obsessions of the current Humanities professoriate is often lamented because of the explicit politicization which it entails. An interesting take on this is Stephen Hicks’s EXPLAINING POSTMODERNISM, whose first edition appeared 3 years after the BONFIRE OF THE HUMANITIES. Hicks argues that capital-T Theory is implicitly political, in that it represents a desire for the socialism which history has failed to produce. Since socialism as experienced under modern dictators and bloodstained elites cannot stand up to historical facts and the empirical method the French Nietzscheans and their ephebes launched an attack on the Enlightenment itself, an attack which would, in effect, deflate its truth claims by denying the existence of facts, the possibility of ‘meaning’, the precision of language, and so on. This book sketches an overarching explanation and Hanson, Heath and Thornton provide a sense of how this all plays out on the ground when salaries, promotions, titles and workloads are on the chopping block. The greatest victims, of course, are our culture, our public discourse and our system of higher education, particularly as it impacts previously-marginalized students.

Highly recommended.
14 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2018
Post modernist philosophy has harmed humanities departments in universities in the west ...brilliant book
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 15, 2001
Classics as an academic discipline, or classical philology, or simply classical studies, as it is also called, is the study of the ancient Greek and Latin languages, the civilizations which spoke these languages, their ideas and philosophies and all the other creations which they left behind in their writings and monuments. Ever since the Renaissance, when Western man first began to look backwards over the gulf of time which came to be known as the Middle Ages, the classical civilizations were seen as a flowering of man's intellectual and creative and ethical and inquiring spirit, a fruition which held meaning for modern man, one worthy of close study and emulation as the source of a better way of fulfilling man's natural role in the world and in the societies he created. Therefore for a long time throughout Europe, and in America too, studying the classics was at the core of an education based in the humanities, those liberal studies which, as their name suggests, free man from the constraints of narrow thinking and open his mind to all that has gone before, of which he is a product, teaching him not what to think, but how to think.
No longer is such the case, and although the decline in teaching and study of the humanities is a general one, classics, a demanding discipline at best, is particularly hard hit, and what was once seen as the revealer of a noble ethic toward which we should aspire is dead or dying, say the authors here in Bonfire of the Humanities, a collection of essays and reviews by three classicists who protest the decline of their profession in the face of an onslaught coming both from outside and from within the profession itself.
The evolution of the university, once a refuge for those who sought objective truths, which then were believed to exist, into a mega-business where careerism and self-promotion are the criteria of excellence, provides the framework in which this decline proceeds. A renewed emphasis on teaching, on revitalizing studies at the undergraduate level, is suggested as one solution to the problem of indifference now projected to aspiring students by a professorial elite, although this reviewer hastens to add that indifference and bad teaching are not new creatures, as one occasionally may infer from the authors, but were certainly alive and well back in the fifties. Within this corporate structure, as society changed over the last thirty years, classics came to be seen as a privileged, white, all-male enclave busily perpetuating the repression and victimization not only of women, but also of every other kind of ethnic and minority group imaginable, and doing so in the name of teaching Western civilization, a concept which is not only no better than any number of other cultural paradigms, but perhaps with its oppressive tactics, not even as good as most, and perhaps more worthy of elimination from the curriculum than of emulation. Thus perhaps following the adage about knowing one's enemy, some with this new and jaundiced view of the classics actually entered the field to become classicists themselves, creating a schism of outlook and purpose within the discipline, where they continue to pursue vigorously a predetermined political agenda which dominates their outlook and pervades their work, the irony being that these self-appointed spokespersons for the downtrodden and oppressed, these radical-chic saviours of those who have been victimized by the classics and by Western civilization, are the most avid practitioners of the careerism and self-promotion afforded by the corporate-like university, where, the authors say, the student is avoided and forgotten. This type is well known to this reviewer from the area of social services, which was invaded in the late sixties by hordes of reformers, characterized by shallow educations, and with overriding political agendas, and although it is difficult to imagine any classicist with a shallow education, perhaps such shallowness can come about when the stream of thinking is filled in by the sediments of excessive ego and politicization. Add to this mixture, say our authors, the new literary theories which have become not only trendy but also the stairways to elevation within the university, where research now is a euphemism for the same old thing said over in new and more obfuscating jargon, and we have completed the final recipe for the decline and fall.
The book's personal revelations are humorous in the context of the academic world, but sad too when one realizes how such behavior reflects the pettiness and disingenuousness of some of its members, who think, as the modern theorists hold, that there is no objective truth, that our texts and values are meaningless, or mean only what we want them to mean, and that therefore perjury cannot be committed or intellectual dishonesty exist. Beleaguered from without and sprinkled within with enough loonieness, a quality which Professor Hanson seems to use in despair when thinking of one of his esteemed colleagues, classics as a discipline seems bombarded by nuts as they fall from the nut tree.
This book deserves a wider readership than probably it will attain, for the problems described are broad and general in scope, not confined even to just the humanities, but reflective of major changes in our society at large and what its concept now is of the university and what it expects from that institution.
122 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2018
Make sense of the current social climate
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on October 6, 2017
This is worth purchasing for its Introduction alone.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 5, 2023
But the problem is that the people who SHOULD see this book will never do so. The opponent is not interested in a rational debate, they're not going to say, "Oops, my position has been debunked I should take a step back and reexamine my beliefs."
They are just going to carry on as they always have, relying on their position of power, and their ability to indoctrinate children to secure themselves against their detractors.
They will not stop, because they believe they are right, and everyone else is wrong.

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?