| Digital List Price: | $12.99 |
| Kindle Price: | $9.99 Save $3.00 (23%) |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Bonfire of the Humanities: Rescuing the Classics in an Impoverished Age Kindle Edition
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIntercollegiate Studies Institute
- Publication dateMay 27, 2014
- File size2235 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
"...[I]llustrates the more general and persistent betrayal of lost objectivity with which the academic world has long been plagued." -- Culture Wars, April 2002
"[R]eaders who enjoy common sense expressed in vigorous prose are going to love The Bonfire of the Humanities." -- Academic Questions, Winter 2001-02
From the Inside Flap
About the Author
Bruce S. Thornton is Professor of Classics and Humanities and in the Department of Foreign Languages at California State University in Fresno. Thorntons books include Eros: The Myth of Ancient Greek Sexuality (Westview, 1997), Plagues of the Mind: The New Epidemic of False Knowledge(ISI Books, 1999), The Humanities Handbook (Prentice Hall, 2000), and Greek Ways: How the Greeks Created Western Civilization (Encounter, 2000).
Product details
- ASIN : B00KFTZON4
- Publisher : Intercollegiate Studies Institute (May 27, 2014)
- Publication date : May 27, 2014
- Language : English
- File size : 2235 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 450 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #585,364 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #68 in Education Aims & Objectives
- #126 in Education Policy
- #632 in Ancient & Classical Literary Criticism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow in military history and classics at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and a professor emeritus of classics at California State University, Fresno. He is the author of over two dozen books, including The Second World Wars, The Dying Citizen, and The End of Everything. He lives in Selma, California.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Many within the Classics professoriate followed this lead, placing professional opportunity above public need. The result was a decline in Classics enrollments, a reduction in faculty, the near-abandonment of the study of Greek and a widening of the gap between the senior faculty of privilege and the contingent faculty teaching multiple sections of introductory courses. The new ‘research’ was of little interest to the general public and the tradition of ‘outreach’ in the form of translations such as Richmond Lattimore’s and books for general readers by such figures as Gilbert Highet receded into the past as the senior professoriate distanced itself from taxpayers, tuition payers and the general public.
Since the careers of the privileged members of the professoriate hung in the balance the internecine skirmishes which always characterized the academy (Johnson discusses them in his Preface to Shakespeare, long before there was even an English professoriate per se) multiplied in both number and intensity.
Hanson, Heath and Thornton speak for the ‘old ways’: an emphasis on conscientious teaching, the practice of historical/empirical/philological research, and an understanding of the historical role of Greek and Roman thought, particularly Greek, which involves the giving of proper credit but not the donning of rose-tinted spectacles. Their central method here is to examine collections of essays which advocate the ‘new ways’ and underscore the predictable and dubious assumptions which undergird them. These ‘theories’ are often questionable in the extreme; their progenitors have earned far more plaudits from the unquestioning humanists than from their disciplinary colleagues. Foucault has been characterized as doing ‘history without facts’ by a distinguished historian; Rorty went to Stanford’s Comp Lit department, not its Philosophy department. Lacan is invisible within the modern psychological sciences and Derrida is now largely seen as a passing fad who has not displaced Aristotle, Plato, Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Wittgenstein, et al.
BONFIRE OF THE HUMANITIES is particularly valuable because it names names and recounts actual battles; this provides the general reader with a deep sense of the self-interested ugliness which has characterized many of the events.
A note in passing: the identity politics that forms the basis for the race/class/gender obsessions of the current Humanities professoriate is often lamented because of the explicit politicization which it entails. An interesting take on this is Stephen Hicks’s EXPLAINING POSTMODERNISM, whose first edition appeared 3 years after the BONFIRE OF THE HUMANITIES. Hicks argues that capital-T Theory is implicitly political, in that it represents a desire for the socialism which history has failed to produce. Since socialism as experienced under modern dictators and bloodstained elites cannot stand up to historical facts and the empirical method the French Nietzscheans and their ephebes launched an attack on the Enlightenment itself, an attack which would, in effect, deflate its truth claims by denying the existence of facts, the possibility of ‘meaning’, the precision of language, and so on. This book sketches an overarching explanation and Hanson, Heath and Thornton provide a sense of how this all plays out on the ground when salaries, promotions, titles and workloads are on the chopping block. The greatest victims, of course, are our culture, our public discourse and our system of higher education, particularly as it impacts previously-marginalized students.
Highly recommended.
No longer is such the case, and although the decline in teaching and study of the humanities is a general one, classics, a demanding discipline at best, is particularly hard hit, and what was once seen as the revealer of a noble ethic toward which we should aspire is dead or dying, say the authors here in Bonfire of the Humanities, a collection of essays and reviews by three classicists who protest the decline of their profession in the face of an onslaught coming both from outside and from within the profession itself.
The evolution of the university, once a refuge for those who sought objective truths, which then were believed to exist, into a mega-business where careerism and self-promotion are the criteria of excellence, provides the framework in which this decline proceeds. A renewed emphasis on teaching, on revitalizing studies at the undergraduate level, is suggested as one solution to the problem of indifference now projected to aspiring students by a professorial elite, although this reviewer hastens to add that indifference and bad teaching are not new creatures, as one occasionally may infer from the authors, but were certainly alive and well back in the fifties. Within this corporate structure, as society changed over the last thirty years, classics came to be seen as a privileged, white, all-male enclave busily perpetuating the repression and victimization not only of women, but also of every other kind of ethnic and minority group imaginable, and doing so in the name of teaching Western civilization, a concept which is not only no better than any number of other cultural paradigms, but perhaps with its oppressive tactics, not even as good as most, and perhaps more worthy of elimination from the curriculum than of emulation. Thus perhaps following the adage about knowing one's enemy, some with this new and jaundiced view of the classics actually entered the field to become classicists themselves, creating a schism of outlook and purpose within the discipline, where they continue to pursue vigorously a predetermined political agenda which dominates their outlook and pervades their work, the irony being that these self-appointed spokespersons for the downtrodden and oppressed, these radical-chic saviours of those who have been victimized by the classics and by Western civilization, are the most avid practitioners of the careerism and self-promotion afforded by the corporate-like university, where, the authors say, the student is avoided and forgotten. This type is well known to this reviewer from the area of social services, which was invaded in the late sixties by hordes of reformers, characterized by shallow educations, and with overriding political agendas, and although it is difficult to imagine any classicist with a shallow education, perhaps such shallowness can come about when the stream of thinking is filled in by the sediments of excessive ego and politicization. Add to this mixture, say our authors, the new literary theories which have become not only trendy but also the stairways to elevation within the university, where research now is a euphemism for the same old thing said over in new and more obfuscating jargon, and we have completed the final recipe for the decline and fall.
The book's personal revelations are humorous in the context of the academic world, but sad too when one realizes how such behavior reflects the pettiness and disingenuousness of some of its members, who think, as the modern theorists hold, that there is no objective truth, that our texts and values are meaningless, or mean only what we want them to mean, and that therefore perjury cannot be committed or intellectual dishonesty exist. Beleaguered from without and sprinkled within with enough loonieness, a quality which Professor Hanson seems to use in despair when thinking of one of his esteemed colleagues, classics as a discipline seems bombarded by nuts as they fall from the nut tree.
This book deserves a wider readership than probably it will attain, for the problems described are broad and general in scope, not confined even to just the humanities, but reflective of major changes in our society at large and what its concept now is of the university and what it expects from that institution.
They are just going to carry on as they always have, relying on their position of power, and their ability to indoctrinate children to secure themselves against their detractors.
They will not stop, because they believe they are right, and everyone else is wrong.





