Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

The Bottomless Well: The Twilight of Fuel, The Virtue of Waste, and Why We Will Never Run Out of Energy

3.4 out of 5 stars 82 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0465031160
ISBN-10: 0465031161
Why is ISBN important?
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Unbeatable customer service, and we usually ship the same or next day. Over one million satisfied customers!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
82 Used from $0.01
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
More Buying Choices
22 New from $1.02 82 Used from $0.01 6 Collectible from $2.89
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

click to open popover

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Contrary to "Lethargist" Chicken Littles who champion gas taxes and mileage standards, this free–market–oriented, techno-optimist manifesto insists that "[h]umanity is destined to find and consume more energy, and still more, forever." Huber, a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute (Hard Green; Galileo's Revenge; etc.), and venture capitalist and former Reagan administration staffer Mills contend that, in conjunction with our ever-increasing scientific know-how, consuming energy yields good things, including the ability to find and harness more energy. The authors develop intriguing contrarian challenges to the conventional wisdom (improved energy efficiency, they argue cogently, boosts energy demand instead of curbing it) and their discussions of new technologies—electric drive trains, awesome lasers, "dexterous robots"—that may profoundly reshape energy usage is illuminating. But their treatment of energy-consumption pitfalls like global warming is cursory and unconvincing, and they devote too little space to explaining exactly where new energy supplies will come from, and too much to assurances that "[f]uels recede, demand grows... but logic ascends, and with the rise of logic we attain the impossible—infinite energy, perpetual motion and the triumph of power." Long on Nietzschean bombast but short on some crucial specifics, theirs is an intriguing but incomplete vision of energy policy and prospects.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

The authors point out that America consumes 25 percent of the world's natural gas, 23 percent of its hard coal, 25 percent of its crude petroleum, 43 percent of its motor gasoline, and 26 percent of its electricity. They reveal that our main use of energy isn't lighting, locomotion, or cooling; what we use energy for, mainly, is to extract, refine, process, and purify energy itself. Huber and Mills list what they call the seven energy heresies: the cost of energy as we use it has less and less to do with the cost of fuel; "waste" is virtuous; the more efficient our technology, the more energy we consume; the competitive advantage in manufacturing is now swinging decisively back toward the U.S.; human demand for energy is insatiable; the raw fuels are not running out; and America's relentless pursuit of high-grade energy does not add chaos to the global environment but rather restores its order. Readers with prior knowledge of this complicated subject will appreciate their conclusions the most. George Cohen
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books (January 17, 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465031161
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465031160
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.4 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (82 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #513,646 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Important Information

Example Ingredients

Example Directions

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

By James Daniel on February 23, 2005
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is very close to being a science book, but the topic keeps it from being strictly a science book. The topic is necessarily conjecture about how we will meet future energy needs. The authors, however, are honest about what is conjecture on their part and what is science, and point to the recent development of inexpensive LED lighting as an example of how long-term plans to save energy (by investing in flourescent lighting) end up being foiled by new technological developments. Their primary suggestion, with regard to energy policy over the next few years, is to see what new technology develops and adapt to it, rather than take our current technological knowledge and assume that it will apply 30 years from now. This is in stark contrast to similar books that attempt to use current scientific and technological knowledge to predict doom for the world with remarkable confidence.

The most engaging and scientific part of the book is the discussion of efficiency and energy and entropy. Most of the author's optimistic conclusions arise from their observations made here. Efficiency often ends up being misused, by their reasoning, to make two incorrect conclusions about energy policy. One such incorrect conclusion is that the US economy makes very, very inefficient use of its energy. To the contrary, such a conclusion assumes that somehow energy in coal form is equivalent to energy in electrical form is equivalent to energy running a laptop PC. The authors argue, convincingly, that energy in coal form is mostly useless, and part of it gets spent reversing entropy enough to generate electricity, and again in the PC, part of it is spent keeping the processor cool enough to actually work.
Read more ›
Comment 263 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
Peter Huber and Mark P. Mills--two master iconoclasts have teamed up to write a fascinating and indeed visionary book on the capture and release of energy in our industrialized society.

The book is all the more entertaining for the fact that it shatters many energy myths in an unapologetic and politically incorrect fashion. This straight-shooting return to truthfulness is a welcome breath of fresh air guaranteed to irritate the automatons of the environmental-left. To be specific, the authors dispel six myths about energy:

1) why the demand for energy will never decrease
2) why "energy waste" (actually refinement to more intensive forms) is beneficial--a good thing
3) why more efficient cars lead to a higher demand for energy
4) why the energy supply is essentially infinite
5) why gasoline prices are less important now than in the past
6) and why hybrid engines will likely lead to increased use of coal and nuclear fuels

On each point the authors make their case using a rigorous, original analysis. Throughout the book, the authors quantify their claims with hard numbers and graphical information, something that is sorely lacking in most articles and texts on this topic.

The authors dispel many other myths with hard facts and inescapable logic. For example, we learn that a century and a half ago, a pioneering American family required 40 acres and a mule in order to survive. This acreage was needed in order to generate enough energy in the form of crops and pasture to fuel and obtain useful work from the livestock. Today, we need far less land per person because we derive our energy from beneath the soil in the form of energy-intensive petroleum products.
Read more ›
1 Comment 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
I got this book because my work demands understanding

energy, and because Mr. William MS Gates was reading it

(Gates was also reading "The Singularity is Near",

according to an interview). It picked my curiosity.

Anyway, I enjoyed having read it. It argues very well

the threee items of the subtitle. Fuel will become less

and less important than the capital goods around energy

generation, as time goes by. If you cut down a tree for

firewood everything is fuel. If you generate electricity

from Uranium virtually everything is capital goods. Same

for renewables (wind generation, solar generation).

Waste is not always a bad thing -- it is a consequence of

putting energy to use, or refining energy for more demanding

use. And we will never run out of energy because we will

use our brains, and the energy we already have, to "find" more

energy (for instance, investing in capital goods).

Particularly interesting was its discussion of entropy and

the problems of measuring energy in BTUs (thermal units).

Why not five stars, then ? First their arguments shied away

from completely nailing some of the issues, often times stopping

just before the quantitative. Examples that come to mind: cars

will become electric, gas engines in vehicles will generate

electricity for an electric motor. New technology allows it.

Great concept, but why, exactly, not yet ? And then, when ?

They don't explain.

Another example: According to this book.
Read more ›
Comment 15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews