Amazon Vehicles Up to 80 Percent Off Textbooks Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Gemini Syndrome Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Totes Summer-Event-Garden Amazon Cash Back Offer ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Shop Now
Bright Lights And Blonde Haired Women

Bright Lights And Blonde Haired Women

May 14, 2010
5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

More options
Your Amazon Music account is currently associated with a different marketplace. To enjoy Prime Music, go to Your Music Library and transfer your account to (US).


  • Sample this song
    Title by Artist
    0:00 / 0:00
Bright Lights And Blonde Haired Women
Bright Lights And Blonde Haired Women
Listen Now $0.99 In MP3 cart View MP3 Cart

Product Details

  • Original Release Date: May 14, 2010
  • Release Date: May 18, 2010
  • Label: Columbia Nashville
  • Record Company Required Metadata: Music file metadata contains unique purchase identifier. Learn more.
  • Duration: 2:23 minutes
  • Genres:
  • ASIN: B003KQQJL0
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #136,889 Paid in Songs (See Top 100 Paid in Songs)

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By A. J. Rhino on February 18, 2013
Verified Purchase
Ray Price pulls out all the stops on this one,and just brings a whole new feel to country music.From what I heard,not the feel alot of folks were looking for,either.Too modern for some at the time, who were used to his honky tonk music and signature shuffles.I myself think it was a great mixture of blues,country,pop,with a pinch of jazz.Buddy Emmons steel playing is nothing short of amazing on this album.This record has stood the test of time,and will always be considered a standard in my book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse