Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
72% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Britain AD: A Quest for Arthur, England and the Anglo-Saxons Paperback – Illustrated, September 5, 2005
Purchase options and add-ons
Leading archaeologist Francis Pryor retells the story of King Arthur, legendary king of the Britons, tracing it back to its Bronze Age origins.
The legend of King Arthur and Camelot is one of the most enduring in Britain's history, spanning centuries and surviving invasions by Angles, Vikings and Normans. In his latest book Francis Pryor – one of Britain’s most celebrated archaeologists and author of the acclaimed ‘Britain B.C.’ and ‘Seahenge’ – traces the story of Arthur back to its ancient origins. Putting forth the compelling idea that most of the key elements of the Arthurian legends are deeply rooted in Bronze and Iron Ages (the sword Excalibur, the Lady of the Lake, the Sword in the Stone and so on), Pryor argues that the legends' survival mirrors a flourishing, indigenous culture that endured through the Roman occupation of Britain, and the subsequent invasions of the so-called Dark Ages.
As in ‘Britain B.C.’, Pryor roots his story in the very landscape, from Arthur’s Seat in Edinburgh, to South Cadbury Castle in Somerset and Tintagel in Cornwall. He traces the story back to the 5th-century King Arthur and beyond, all the time testing his ideas with archaeological evidence, and showing how the story was manipulated through the ages for various historical and literary purposes, by Geoffrey of Monmouth and Malory, among others.
Delving into history, literary sources – ancient, medieval and romantic – and archaeological research, Francis Pryor creates an original, lively and illuminating account of this most British of legends.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarper Perennial
- Publication dateSeptember 5, 2005
- Dimensions5.08 x 0.79 x 7.8 inches
- ISBN-100007181876
- ISBN-13978-0007181872
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
‘Controversial deceptively clever and a damn good read.’ BBC History Magazine
Praise for ‘Britain B.C.’:
‘Francis Pryor has given us a remarkable, imaginative and persuasive account of those other Britons…its enthusiastic and confident approach deserves to be very influential.’ TLS
‘A compulsive narrative intertwining prehistory, the excitement of discovery and personalities. It bounds along, wonderfully enlivened by Pryor’s earthy enthusiasm.’ New Scientist
Praise for ‘Seahenge’:
‘A magnificent book…a vivid story, superbly told. It gives a wonderfully clear explanation of how archaeology works, written in plain language which all can understand and enjoy.’ Magnus Magnusson
About the Author
Dr Francis Pryor has spent thirty years studying the prehistory of the Fens. He has excavated sites as diverse as Bronze Age farms, field systems and entire Iron Age villages. From 1980 he turned his attention to pre-Roman religion and has excavated barrows, ‘henges’ and a large site dating to 3800 B.C. In 1987, with his wife Maisie Taylor, he set up the Fenland Archaeological Trust. He appears frequently on TV’s ‘Time Team’ and is the author of ‘Seahenge’, ‘Britain B.C.’ and ‘Britain A.D.’
Product details
- Publisher : Harper Perennial; TV Tie in Ed edition (September 5, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0007181876
- ISBN-13 : 978-0007181872
- Item Weight : 2.31 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.08 x 0.79 x 7.8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,278,949 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #271 in Prehistory
- #2,085 in England History
- #2,228 in Archaeology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
But you should still read this book. Pryor does indeed expend a lot of words on how and why many of his predecessors were wrong. And anyone new to reading the popular literature of the field does need to understand that this is no different from other scientific endeavors. The academics are just as childish and pig-headed and blind to anything that doesn't suit the thesis that made their reputations as any other field. And you need to understand this when you read any of them.
I suspect he is more strident here than in his Britain BC book because prehistory is his specialty, and in this one, the historians will be outraged that he is trespassing. But when it comes to what people left behind in Britain, there are as good authorities but none better.
The focus of Britain AD is the so-called "Dark Ages", the period between the end of Roman rule in Britain, at the beginning of the 5th century, and the emergence of the English kingdoms (e.g. Alfred the Great) in the 8th and 9th centuries. It was during this period that King Arthur and his knights were supposedly battling to defend Romano-British civilization from the advances of the Anglo-Saxons, whose invasion of Britain from Continental Europe followed the withdrawal of the Roman legions. In fact, Pryor's main thrust is to debunk both King Arthur and the Anglo-Saxon invasion.
Pryor takes issue with what he calls the "cultural-historical" process which he says has given rise to a series of myths about Arthur and the Anglo-Saxons. The proponents of this process either ignore archaeology completely, or use it selectively to support their entrenched views of history.
While much of the Arthur mythology is know to originate from much later sources (Geoffrey of Monmouth 12th century, Thomas Mallory "Morte D'Arthur" 15th century), Pryor casts doubt on any historicity of Arthur. He believes that the growth and embellishment of the Arthur legend was due to a desire to promote a genuine English identity, as compared to the Germanic Anglo-Saxon one which had partially eclipsed it in the Dark Ages; he points out that the original Arthur was Welsh - representing the "Celtic twilight" of Romano-British civilization - until he was hijacked to England by Richard I in the late 11th century, with the staged "discovery" of his bones and an accompanying inscription in the grounds of Glastonbury Abbey. Pryor suggest that a similar process, designed to emphasize the Germanic origins of the English, occurred following the installation of German royalty as English monarchs in the 18th century. At this point, he says, The Anglo-Saxon "invasion" was canonised, and Alfred the Great became the original English monarch of choice.
In presenting the counter-arguments -based on archaeology - Pryor does his usual thorough job. He points out that many of the characteristics of Anglo-Saxon settlement in Britain - the types of building, "pagan" burial and cremation practices, the move away from towns - in fact pre-dated the withdrawal of the Roman legions in 410 by as much as a hundred years. Informed by his intimate knowledge of landscapes, particularly in eastern England, Pryor argues that the continuity of settlement in most locations - often from pre-Roman times through the Anglo-Saxon period - refutes the idea of the violent replacement of Britains/Celts by invading Continentals. In its place, he argues for the gradual adoption of life-styles via acculturation. Pryor maintains that the people of Britain were far more mobile than we give them credit for, and that this would account - as Roman influence waned - for the the seepage -particularly into eastern and south-eastern England - of a dominant Anglo-Saxon culture.
As someone who had unquestioningly accepted the conventional history of Anglo-Saxon invasion, I found my initial resistance gradually giving ground to the persuasiveness of Pryor's archaeological arguments. However, while I can accept that the acquisition of many Anglo-Saxon characteristics may have occurred via a process of gradual acculturation, I remain unconvinced that the Old English language - with its heavy Germanic influence - could have made its way to Britain without being carried by substantial numbers of its speakers. Some historians have advanced the idea that the Roman legions based in Britain consisted of many Anglo-Saxon mercenaries, who settled down among the ancient Brits and never left (this would also account for the appearance of Anglo-Saxon settlement characteristics before the end of the Roman period). Pryor does not accept this point of view, but it seems to me that this owes more to the strength of his conviction about "acculturation" rather than to actual evidence.
As usual, wherever you come out in relation to Pryor's point of view, the joy of reading his books is that all is transparent. He freely admits that his theories may prove to be incorrect, and shares with the reader everything he knows that has brought him to his point of view. " If archaeologists and historians care about their subject, they will have axes to grind, and I prefer to sharpen mine in public."
Moreover, "It also patronizes the indigenous people, because it assumes that the post-Roman inhabitants of Britain would not have been capable of "inventing" England themselves." The local indigenous population deserves much more credit, he argues; that the changes in language and culture and the changes in the archaeological record of eastern and south-eastern Britain over this time was not the result of new blood, so to speak, but "are better explained by `acculturation' than migration."
"Acculturation," he adds---aided by the internet and other means, "is the process behind, for example, the coming together of Britain and the United States today." So, you see, it's all rather simple: The story of the `Anglo-Saxons' and their invasions is but a myth, according to Mr. Pryor, "an essential part of England's origin myth." And "the changes attributed to the arrival of Anglo-Saxons were usually caused by people changing their minds, rather than their places of residence."
Well, that's food for thought, certainly, and it is intellectually stimulating to contemplate such new takes on old issues, but not meaning to patronize the inhabitants on England circa the 5th & 6th centuries I nevertheless wonder how Sussex, Middlesex and Essex (to name but a few) came to become known as such; communities (which mean) `land of the southern Saxons,' `land of the middle Saxons' and `land of the East Saxons,' bereft of a significant influx of Saxons. (14Apr)
Top reviews from other countries
Combining archaeology, sociology and personal insight Francis presents some very interesting views on how everyday life looked for people in the first millennium AD.
He never shies away from challenging conventional views, most notably the nature of the Saxon "invasion", which seems to have irked a few reviewers.
L'auteur est un des plus grands archéologues britanniques, mais il sait rester abordable pour les non spécialistes.
I have always thought that the 'Dark Ages' was a false term and now I can see it explained in great detail. If you like History to be told with a purpose this is for but if you if you think what you have been taught is undeniable then you should stick to the norm.
Good suff I say and I want more, lol.






