A wonderful exposition of the complicated evolution of the Cromwellian Years.
Woolrych, a distinguished historian, whose depth of scholarship is matched by a lightness of expression which makes this a very accessible and enjoyable read. He introduces the various characters and their shifting alliances and the spectrum of opinion very lucidly.
I think the positive points area the following
1. excellent description of the evolution of the opposition to Charles I, great feeling of the gradual coming to power of Cromwell and the interplay between the pragmatic and dogmatic parliamentarian forces. For the initial period the main opposition to Charles came from the powerful lords and it is only the division of the initial opposition forces and the prospect of defeat which leads to the creation of the efficient New Model Army and the rise of Cromwell and Faifax, this is accompanied by the rise in influence of the Commons and the Army
2. the power of religious belief - the spectrum of belief (and fanaticism) is well described, and the divisions among various proponents, and the ultimate division between dogmatism and pragmatism is well described.
3. Cromwell's pragmatic foreign policies - especially the opposition to the Dutch, co-religionists but commercial rivals; and the cooperation with the French and the acquisition of Dunkirk to deter naval invasion.
4. the book is strong in pointing towards the political traditions which would become more explicit in the party wars of the Restoration era. There are hints of the emergence of the privy council in the descriptions of `Protectorate Council' which advised Cromwell. Unfortunately the records of this council do not exist, but there are some fascinating characters - Shaftesbury, Sandwich - introduced here, who have major impacts in later years.
However the veneration of Cromwell, in my view, goes to far. His implacable opposition to Catholicism reached its nadir in the Irish massacres, I feel Woolrych goes to far in saying that they were comparable to other sieges of the time and that the worst of the them were outside his control. Woolrych is justified in admiring Cromwell's fortitude and determination, and reveals his rather surprising periods of indecision (awaiting a sign from the Almighty), however I think the portrait should also call the ruthlessness for what it was.
A more major flaw, I think, is that it is quite difficult to grasp `popular' opinion from the text. The action is told in terms of high diplomacy, parliamentary and military history - for which records exists and clear-cut choices and consequences can be adduced. It is less easy to interpret from the text, how the mood of the population changed during the time - was the time of the Commonwealth and Protectorate gloomy and oppressive? Why was the 1660 Restoration welcomed with such popular enthusiasm, but Charles II Scottish-led invasion in the early 1650's ignored? At the risk of some speculation it is possible to infer reasons - and work by Tim Harris has given some insight into contemporary `popular' thinking, however it is not to be found here.
Overall I found this book to be an excellent description of military and political history of the era, it is a comprehensive introduction to trying to make sense of the political controversies which dogged the later Stuarts and led to the 1688 revolution. It leaves me wishing to know more about the evolution of popular opinion and the mechanism of governance during the Commonwealth and Protectorate eras.
Britain in Revolution: 1625-1660 First Edition
by
Austin Woolrych
(Author)
|
Austin Woolrych
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0198200819
ISBN-10:
0198200811
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms, 1638-1660. Trevor RoyleUniversity Fellow Trevor RoylePaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
`Review from other book by this author carefully and meticulously researched; it argues cogently and shrewdly . . . and it is beautifully written ' Times Literary Supplement
`impeccably researched and admirably presented monograph on the earlier climacteric of the English Revolution in the later 1640s . . . There is so much to praise and so little to criticise here . . . Here is a book that any historian could justly be proud to have written. ' Historical Association
`a book of meticulous scholarship which gives the soldiers the consideration they so richly deserve. ' Society for Army Historical Research
`Written with clarity and controlled enthusiasm, emphatically scholarly but never ponderous, Soldiers and Statesmen is a work of major importance. ' History and Archaeology Review
`The author writes clearly and brings to his subject years of research, teaching and, most important, reflection ... readers wil be rewarded by Prof. Woolrych's clarity and understanding.' Contemporary Review
`This book is a sure guide to mid-seventeenth-century Britain, and is unlikely to be rivaled for many years to come.' Stephen K. Roberts, H-Albion, History of Parliament Trust, London
`the author writes clearly and brings to his subject years of research, teaching and, most important, reflection ... readers wil be rewarded by Prof. Woolrych's clarity and understanding.' Contemporary Review
`The military history is particularly sharp, as might be expected from the author of some of the best studies to civil war battles. Perhaps the greatest strengths lie in Professor Woolrych's coverage of the political debates in the army in the late 1640s. Yet this is not to deny the strength of the analysis of the republican years, and Cromwell's rule in particular is dealt with perceptively and very fairly.' History Review
`impeccably researched and admirably presented monograph on the earlier climacteric of the English Revolution in the later 1640s . . . There is so much to praise and so little to criticise here . . . Here is a book that any historian could justly be proud to have written. ' Historical Association
`a book of meticulous scholarship which gives the soldiers the consideration they so richly deserve. ' Society for Army Historical Research
`Written with clarity and controlled enthusiasm, emphatically scholarly but never ponderous, Soldiers and Statesmen is a work of major importance. ' History and Archaeology Review
`The author writes clearly and brings to his subject years of research, teaching and, most important, reflection ... readers wil be rewarded by Prof. Woolrych's clarity and understanding.' Contemporary Review
`This book is a sure guide to mid-seventeenth-century Britain, and is unlikely to be rivaled for many years to come.' Stephen K. Roberts, H-Albion, History of Parliament Trust, London
`the author writes clearly and brings to his subject years of research, teaching and, most important, reflection ... readers wil be rewarded by Prof. Woolrych's clarity and understanding.' Contemporary Review
`The military history is particularly sharp, as might be expected from the author of some of the best studies to civil war battles. Perhaps the greatest strengths lie in Professor Woolrych's coverage of the political debates in the army in the late 1640s. Yet this is not to deny the strength of the analysis of the republican years, and Cromwell's rule in particular is dealt with perceptively and very fairly.' History Review
About the Author
Austin Woolrych is a former Professor of History, University of Sheffield.
Start reading Britain in Revolution: 1625-1660 on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
The Sandman Act 1
The Sandman offers a dark, literary world of fantasy and horror. Listen free
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; First Edition (January 23, 2003)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 814 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0198200811
- ISBN-13 : 978-0198200819
- Item Weight : 2.92 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.1 x 2.1 x 6.2 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#193,727 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #361 in European History (Books)
- #1,057 in Great Britain History (Books)
- #7,370 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
8 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2005
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2004
Britain in Revolution by Austin Woolrych covers the time period from 1625 through 1660. This begins with the tail-end of the reign of James I (of "King James Version" fame). Charles I is regent when the civil wars begin. Woolrych spends much time on the civil wars, detailing troop movements; politics amongst England, Scotland, and Ireland; and of course battles. Maps (in the back matter) are provided. These give the reader a better sense of what happened where.
Woolrych then progresses through the various forms of war government (both during and after the civil war) that the parliament contrives. None of them are very effective. It seems the main problem was that there were too many inflexible wills amongst the many groups, all of which were defined on primarily religious grounds. Woolrych provides excellent detail of these groups and their particularities. Lack of compromise amongst these groups eventually led Oliver Cromwell to say, "Enough!" and sack them all.
Woolrych paints Cromwell in a flattering light. Woolrych's Cromwell is not a zealot, he's not vindictive, he's not a military dictator. He's a guy committed to the idea of "commonwealth": committed to the idea of a non-Catholic, non-Church-of-England Republic working. Much happened with Cromwell at the helm -- and had he had a few more years before his death, posits Woolrych, things may have been very different. During the commonwealth, Britain was, for the most part, a united kingdom. There were problems with Ireland, but there were always (and still are) problems with Ireland in the context of the UK. But in several naval battles, Britain rose to power in the international scene. Virtually every important foreign government recognized Cromwell's government. Cromwell negotiated as a mediator in several skirmishes (wars) such as in Denmark. Anyway, Woolrych's point is that Cromwell was an effective leader nationally and internationally, providing reason to view the Protectorate as at least a limited success.
After Cromwell dies, however, the whole thing falls apart. The power-hungry parties that only Cromwell was able to subdue (largely due to the relationship between Cromwell and the Army) quickly rose up and scuttled the term of Richard Cromwell as Lord Protector. From there, it was all downhill, and in a matter of months, Charles II returned from exile back to the throne, welcomed by virtually everyone. This is in large part due to George Monck -- an interesting character whom it would be fun to read more about.
Should you read this book? If you've ever wondered what happened in England that led the parliament to revolt, behead the king, and go it on their own -- the answer is a resounding "YES!". Though you must realize that the book is fairly detailed -- this is history, not a fictionalized story or narrative, and sometimes the details do seem to bog one down.
Woolrych then progresses through the various forms of war government (both during and after the civil war) that the parliament contrives. None of them are very effective. It seems the main problem was that there were too many inflexible wills amongst the many groups, all of which were defined on primarily religious grounds. Woolrych provides excellent detail of these groups and their particularities. Lack of compromise amongst these groups eventually led Oliver Cromwell to say, "Enough!" and sack them all.
Woolrych paints Cromwell in a flattering light. Woolrych's Cromwell is not a zealot, he's not vindictive, he's not a military dictator. He's a guy committed to the idea of "commonwealth": committed to the idea of a non-Catholic, non-Church-of-England Republic working. Much happened with Cromwell at the helm -- and had he had a few more years before his death, posits Woolrych, things may have been very different. During the commonwealth, Britain was, for the most part, a united kingdom. There were problems with Ireland, but there were always (and still are) problems with Ireland in the context of the UK. But in several naval battles, Britain rose to power in the international scene. Virtually every important foreign government recognized Cromwell's government. Cromwell negotiated as a mediator in several skirmishes (wars) such as in Denmark. Anyway, Woolrych's point is that Cromwell was an effective leader nationally and internationally, providing reason to view the Protectorate as at least a limited success.
After Cromwell dies, however, the whole thing falls apart. The power-hungry parties that only Cromwell was able to subdue (largely due to the relationship between Cromwell and the Army) quickly rose up and scuttled the term of Richard Cromwell as Lord Protector. From there, it was all downhill, and in a matter of months, Charles II returned from exile back to the throne, welcomed by virtually everyone. This is in large part due to George Monck -- an interesting character whom it would be fun to read more about.
Should you read this book? If you've ever wondered what happened in England that led the parliament to revolt, behead the king, and go it on their own -- the answer is a resounding "YES!". Though you must realize that the book is fairly detailed -- this is history, not a fictionalized story or narrative, and sometimes the details do seem to bog one down.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 28, 2006
If you are looking for a comprehensive, single volume on this turbulent period in England's history, this is the book.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
M V.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 21, 2017Verified Purchase
good price for this copy
JMG
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great book (in both senses of the word)
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 19, 2015Verified Purchase
At 800 pages this is a real opus. I'm about 200 pages through (unsure exactly as its a Kindle version). Very readable though at times verbose. Must be one of the seminal texts although it misses on the experiences of the "man in the street" covered so ably by authors like Purkiss.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse

