Limited Time Offer
3 months free
- For a limited time, get Audible Premium Plus free for 3 months.
- Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection—yours to keep (you'll use your first credit now).
- Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, podcasts, and Originals.
- Auto-renews at $14.95/mo. after 3 months. Cancel online anytime.
Buy
Broken Glass: Mies van der Rohe, Edith Farnsworth, and the Fight Over a Modernist Masterpiece
Audible Audiobook
– Unabridged
The true story of the intimate relationship that gave birth to the Farnsworth House, a masterpiece of twentieth-century architecture—and disintegrated into a bitter feud over love, money, gender, and the very nature of art.
“An intimate portrait . . . alive with architectural intrigue.”—Architect Magazine
In 1945, Edith Farnsworth asked the German architect Mies van der Rohe, already renowned for his avant-garde buildings, to design a weekend home for her outside of Chicago. Edith was a woman ahead of her time—unmarried, she was a distinguished medical researcher, as well as an accomplished violinist, translator, and poet. The two quickly began spending weekends together, talking philosophy, Catholic mysticism, and, of course, architecture over wine-soaked picnic lunches. Their personal and professional collaboration would produce the Farnsworth House, one of the most important works of architecture of all time, a blindingly original structure made up almost entirely of glass and steel.
But the minimalist marvel, built in 1951, was plagued by cost overruns and a sudden chilling of the two friends’ mutual affection. Though the building became world famous, Edith found it impossible to live in, because of its constant leaks, flooding, and complete lack of privacy. Alienated and aggrieved, she lent her name to a public campaign against Mies, cheered on by Frank Lloyd Wright. Mies, in turn, sued her for unpaid monies. The ensuing lengthy trial heard evidence of purported incompetence by an acclaimed architect, and allegations of psychological cruelty and emotional trauma. A commercial dispute litigated in a rural Illinois courthouse became a trial of modernist art and architecture itself.
Interweaving personal drama and cultural history, Alex Beam presents a stylish, enthralling narrative tapestry, illuminating the fascinating history behind one of the twentieth century’s most beautiful and significant architectural projects.
- Listening Length8 hours and 48 minutes
- Audible release dateMarch 17, 2020
- LanguageEnglish
- ASINB084P2KBQP
- VersionUnabridged
- Program TypeAudiobook
Read & Listen
Get the Audible audiobook for the reduced price of $8.99 after you buy the Kindle book.
People who viewed this also viewed
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
People who bought this also bought
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
Only from Audible
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
Product details
| Listening Length | 8 hours and 48 minutes |
|---|---|
| Author | Alex Beam |
| Narrator | Kimberly Farr |
| Whispersync for Voice | Ready |
| Audible.com Release Date | March 17, 2020 |
| Publisher | Random House Audio |
| Program Type | Audiobook |
| Version | Unabridged |
| Language | English |
| ASIN | B084P2KBQP |
| Best Sellers Rank |
|
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well written and packed with information, making it a great read. Moreover, they appreciate its architectural content, describing it as a fascinating look into the history of a particular moment in architecture.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book well written and easy to read, with one customer describing it as a richly detailed literary work.
"...Nonetheless, it is a masterpiece." Read more
"I loved this book. This is "recent" history - and I have always loved the super modernist style...." Read more
"...What a fascinating, richly detailed literary work with an impressive vocabulary!..." Read more
"...A fascinating look into the history of an iconic modern structure, a marvel, that, while no longer inhabited, has withstood the test of time and..." Read more
Customers find the book interesting, with one customer noting it is well researched and steeped in drama, while another describes it as a fascinating look into history.
"I loved this book. This is "recent" history - and I have always loved the super modernist style...." Read more
"My husband and I both just finished reading “Broken Glass.” What a fascinating, richly detailed literary work with an impressive vocabulary!..." Read more
"...A fascinating look into the history of an iconic modern structure, a marvel, that, while no longer inhabited, has withstood the test of time and..." Read more
"An interesting, sometimes tedious, read about the infamous Farnsworth house and the mid-century modernist movement in the US...." Read more
Customers appreciate the architectural elements of the book, with one describing it as a very particular moment in architectural history and another noting its iconic house design.
"...This is "recent" history - and I have always loved the super modernist style. I can't wait to visit the Farnsworth house next time I am in Chicago...." Read more
"...We thoroughly enjoyed this book as we learned more about modern architecture and the personalities dedicated to the field...." Read more
"...A fascinating look into the history of an iconic modern structure, a marvel, that, while no longer inhabited, has withstood the test of time and..." Read more
"...into the infamous Farnsworth/Mies relationship, their feud, the iconic house. Well written, a front seat to a very particular moment of architecture...." Read more
Customers find the book packed with information and very detailed.
"...It's so interesting and so packed with information - not to mention the 30+ words I had to look up - that it is really a deep read, as well as a..." Read more
"...What a fascinating, richly detailed literary work with an impressive vocabulary!..." Read more
"Very detailed and well written book, gives a lot of space to the client of the house, Dr. Farnsworth...." Read more
"I love this book and the Authors enthusiasm and attention to detail! I am hoping that he will write a book about the Miller House!" Read more
Reviews with images
Edith's Lawyer was my Grandfather
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 17, 2025Could not put it down. Quite an absorbing story of building of Edith Farnsworth House. The patron had quite a falling out with the architect. Nonetheless, it is a masterpiece.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2020I'm an architect with a particular interest in the Farnsworth House and have visited it and read extensively about it. Until now, anyone wanting the personal story behind this fundamental act of architecture had to be content with 25 pages in Franz Schulze and Edward Windhorst's definitive Mies biography. Among many other fascinating revelations, Alex Beam suggests how far Mies may have indulged his own domestic dreams in designing the Farnsworth House, perhaps even expecting to make use of it. Beam also brings to life Edith Farnsworth. One of architecture's great patrons, she paid the pioneer's price for exploring new architectural territory with all its risks. Mies famously said, "God is in the details." Alex Beam gives us the details.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2021I read this book with special interest. Randolph Bohrer, Edith Farnsworth's attorney, was my grandfather. I was disappointed that the book had only speculation on why Randy was such a pit bull for Dr. Farnsworth. Here's my take on it:
1. Randy's health was poor throughout his adult life. He was born in 1906, so he was only 45 in 1951, not 59 like the book says. Edith Farnsworth probably did save his life. Randy was always looking for specialists to improve his health. Randy died in 1957, from complications from surgery, in Quebec, Canada. The Quebec specialist failed. At his death, he was only 51. Randy lied about his age to look more established for business reasons, and because my grandmother was 8 years older than he was. Randy also wanted people to believe his stepson, Mason Bohrer (1923-2002), was his biological son, which only worked if Randy was older.
2. Randy was Jewish, the son of immigrants from Budapest. Randy grew up speaking Yiddish at home. Mies Van der Rohe tried to play nice with Hitler, and only left Germany after he failed to please the Nazis. I am positive Randy knew this.
3.Randy admired strong, independent women. He married one. My grandmother, Audiss E. Waite (1898-1978), was a Protestant widow with a 6-year-old son when they met on a blind date, then married in 1929. Audie's husband had died 3 weeks before my dad, Mason Bohrer, was born in 1923. Randy would have been very angry that men were kicking Edith Farnsworth around.
4. Randy was an upstart. Growing up, he sold newspapers on street corners to help support his family. He worked his way through a Bachelor of Law degree from Chicago Kent by clerking in law offices. In other words, Randy's undergraduate degree was law. He had no graduate degree. Mies Van der Rohe's lawyers were from a big Chicago firm, and had fancy degrees. Randy wanted to show he was better than they were.
5. Randy was very familiar with making real estate work. Randy made his money by gathering investors and putting together real estate deals. They would buy defaulted building bonds, 10 cents on the dollar, foreclose on the buildings, fix them up and sell them or rent them out completely. If the roof leaked, the fire place didn't draw, the house flooded and oil smudged the windows, nobody would want to live there. The building needed fixing up.
6. When Randy asked Mies Van der Rohe about snoring visitors in the Farnsworth house, it was a personally relevant question. The custom designed house my grandparents built at the Glory B Ranch, near St. Ignatius, MT, in 1957, had a wall between Randy’s bed and my grandmother’s bed. This was to cut down on the noise of Randy’s snoring, which kept my grandmother from sleeping well.
7. Randolph Bohrer was a very generous man, usually anonymously. It's very likely he provided legal services to Edith Farnsworth for free, but he would never have admitted it publicly. In another example, Randy owned a place near Missoula, MT, which my grandmother named Legendary Lodge, from 1946 to 1950. In 1950, Missoula County raised the taxes on it something fierce. Randy sold or gave the place to the Diocese of Helena, which the church still operates as a summer camp. In June, 1957, Randy and Audie moved to a ranch near St. Ignatius, MT. The Bishop of Helena called on Randy regularly until his death in December, 1957. Randy was Jewish. His wife was Protestant. After Randy's death, the Bishop wrote letters to both the paper in Missoula and the Chicago Tribune offering condolences to our family.
I remember family discussions about the Farnsworth house. Everyone agreed it had to be a livable house first, and then a masterpiece. It was obvious to my family that it wasn't worth anything if you couldn't live in it. Mies Van der Rohe had not delivered the product he promised, a livable house.
The picture is Randolph Bohrer ca 1948.
4.0 out of 5 starsI read this book with special interest. Randolph Bohrer, Edith Farnsworth's attorney, was my grandfather. I was disappointed that the book had only speculation on why Randy was such a pit bull for Dr. Farnsworth. Here's my take on it:Edith's Lawyer was my Grandfather
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2021
1. Randy's health was poor throughout his adult life. He was born in 1906, so he was only 45 in 1951, not 59 like the book says. Edith Farnsworth probably did save his life. Randy was always looking for specialists to improve his health. Randy died in 1957, from complications from surgery, in Quebec, Canada. The Quebec specialist failed. At his death, he was only 51. Randy lied about his age to look more established for business reasons, and because my grandmother was 8 years older than he was. Randy also wanted people to believe his stepson, Mason Bohrer (1923-2002), was his biological son, which only worked if Randy was older.
2. Randy was Jewish, the son of immigrants from Budapest. Randy grew up speaking Yiddish at home. Mies Van der Rohe tried to play nice with Hitler, and only left Germany after he failed to please the Nazis. I am positive Randy knew this.
3.Randy admired strong, independent women. He married one. My grandmother, Audiss E. Waite (1898-1978), was a Protestant widow with a 6-year-old son when they met on a blind date, then married in 1929. Audie's husband had died 3 weeks before my dad, Mason Bohrer, was born in 1923. Randy would have been very angry that men were kicking Edith Farnsworth around.
4. Randy was an upstart. Growing up, he sold newspapers on street corners to help support his family. He worked his way through a Bachelor of Law degree from Chicago Kent by clerking in law offices. In other words, Randy's undergraduate degree was law. He had no graduate degree. Mies Van der Rohe's lawyers were from a big Chicago firm, and had fancy degrees. Randy wanted to show he was better than they were.
5. Randy was very familiar with making real estate work. Randy made his money by gathering investors and putting together real estate deals. They would buy defaulted building bonds, 10 cents on the dollar, foreclose on the buildings, fix them up and sell them or rent them out completely. If the roof leaked, the fire place didn't draw, the house flooded and oil smudged the windows, nobody would want to live there. The building needed fixing up.
6. When Randy asked Mies Van der Rohe about snoring visitors in the Farnsworth house, it was a personally relevant question. The custom designed house my grandparents built at the Glory B Ranch, near St. Ignatius, MT, in 1957, had a wall between Randy’s bed and my grandmother’s bed. This was to cut down on the noise of Randy’s snoring, which kept my grandmother from sleeping well.
7. Randolph Bohrer was a very generous man, usually anonymously. It's very likely he provided legal services to Edith Farnsworth for free, but he would never have admitted it publicly. In another example, Randy owned a place near Missoula, MT, which my grandmother named Legendary Lodge, from 1946 to 1950. In 1950, Missoula County raised the taxes on it something fierce. Randy sold or gave the place to the Diocese of Helena, which the church still operates as a summer camp. In June, 1957, Randy and Audie moved to a ranch near St. Ignatius, MT. The Bishop of Helena called on Randy regularly until his death in December, 1957. Randy was Jewish. His wife was Protestant. After Randy's death, the Bishop wrote letters to both the paper in Missoula and the Chicago Tribune offering condolences to our family.
I remember family discussions about the Farnsworth house. Everyone agreed it had to be a livable house first, and then a masterpiece. It was obvious to my family that it wasn't worth anything if you couldn't live in it. Mies Van der Rohe had not delivered the product he promised, a livable house.
The picture is Randolph Bohrer ca 1948.
Images in this review
- Reviewed in the United States on June 15, 2020I loved this book. This is "recent" history - and I have always loved the super modernist style. I can't wait to visit the Farnsworth house next time I am in Chicago. This book also inspired me to get van der Mies biography and to read more of Alex Beam's book. I am reading 'The Feud' - about the literary antagonism between Nabokov and Wilson. It's so interesting and so packed with information - not to mention the 30+ words I had to look up - that it is really a deep read, as well as a look into literary academia and "Nabokovism."
- Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2024I bought this as a Christmas gift for my husband. His opinion was, "excellent".
- Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2020My husband and I both just finished reading “Broken Glass.” What a fascinating, richly detailed literary work with an impressive vocabulary! We thoroughly enjoyed this book as we learned more about modern architecture and the personalities dedicated to the field. The complicated relationship between Mies and Edith was carefully developed. Thank you for adding a beautifully written resource which increased our understanding of human nature and fundamental needs. This book is a treasure!
- Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2023All was as described and it arrived faster than expected
Top reviews from other countries
StephenReviewed in the United Kingdom on June 27, 20214.0 out of 5 stars the architect as celebrity
An absorbing account of the building of the Farnsworth House near Chicago, by the architect Mies van der Rohe. He was a menace. Never mind that the house was supposed to be lived in, it was a statement by the great man. His client was gullible to a degree. She never seems to have asked for an estimate of cost, or challenged Mies's extravagances, such as the travertine floor. So when it went to law things became very messy.
Architects (apparently) think the house is wonderful. But it floods, it gets too hot in summer, and it doesn't have proper rooms. Which I think tells you a lot.
A good book, but in my view much too indulgent to Mies.
FitzReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 6, 20214.0 out of 5 stars First rate client-architect saga
… this is an entertaining and eye opening account of a famous client from hell—architect from hell relationship … the writing is unremarkable, the photographs’ quality lets things down dramatically., Better to have had one great image rather than the murky mess so carelessly presented.
















