Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (Good to Great, Book 2)
Audible Audiobook
– Abridged
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Abridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Abridged, CD
"Please retry" | $20.60 | $1.87 |
Drawing upon a six-year research project at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras took 18 truly exceptional and long-lasting companies and studied each in direct comparison to one of its top competitors. They examined the companies from their very beginnings to the present day - as start-ups, as midsize companies, and as large corporations. Throughout, the authors asked: "What makes the truly exceptional companies different from the comparison companies and what were the common practices these enduringly great companies followed throughout their history?"
Filled with hundreds of specific examples and organized into a coherent framework of practical concepts that can be applied by managers and entrepreneurs at all levels, Built to Last provides a master blueprint for building organizations that will prosper long into the 21st century and beyond.
- Listening Length6 hours and 16 minutes
- Audible release dateNovember 7, 2019
- LanguageEnglish
- ASINB0813QCVN9
- VersionAbridged
- Program TypeAudiobook
Your audiobook is waiting!
Enjoy a free trial on us
$0.00$0.00
- Click above for unlimited listening to select audiobooks, Audible Originals, and podcasts.
- One credit a month to pick any title from our entire premium selection — yours to keep (you'll use your first credit now).
- You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
- $14.95$14.95 a month after 30 days. Cancel online anytime.
Buy with 1-Click
-13% $26.16$26.16
People who viewed this also viewed
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
People who bought this also bought
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
Related to this topic
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
- Audible Audiobook
Product details
| Listening Length | 6 hours and 16 minutes |
|---|---|
| Author | Jim Collins |
| Narrator | Jim Collins, Jerry I. Porras |
| Audible.com Release Date | November 07, 2019 |
| Publisher | HarperAudio |
| Program Type | Audiobook |
| Version | Abridged |
| Language | English |
| ASIN | B0813QCVN9 |
| Best Sellers Rank | #3,035 in Audible Books & Originals (See Top 100 in Audible Books & Originals) #12 in Company Business Profiles (Books) #20 in Entrepreneurship (Audible Books & Originals) #45 in Business Management (Audible Books & Originals) |
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
According to Jim Collins and Jerry Porras, it does not matter what the company ideology is, as long as it is passionately believed by the management and employees. I find this a dubious claim, and not supported by the data. The ideological frameworks of the companies that were studied are not interchangeable, not for the trivial reason that the ideology of another company happens not to be the one believed by each of them. Boeing is unlikely to spend money on a program to cure river blindness in Africa. Why does Merck do this? Clearly, a pharmaceutical firm does well to invest in a reputation for medical generosity that flows from a passion for making people well? Merck is purchasing precisely the trust that pays-off in the medical market place. Trust reduces transaction costs, and in some cases is almost as good as a monopoly. Boeing, on the other hand, must buy a brand name attached to their dedication to engineering excellence. It does matter what companies are passionate about.
My company operates on the Internet. Our pledge includes the words: "The tragedy of the commons is the propensity of users to take more from the commons than they give. We undertake to contribute more to the commons than we take. Our presence shall make the Internet safer, more useful and greater fun." Why is this a suitable ideology for our company? The answer is not that this is one we happen to believe in, and feel passionate about - although we do. Rather, this ideology is strategically fitting. We enhance to our brand name, and therefore the value of our software, by adding our reputation to the web applications we write.
In one of our daughter businesses we are a broker of information from merchants to consumer (information about products that are available) and from consumer to merchant (we generate real time demand curves for a large range of commodities). We have pledged not to become a trader. Why? In ethical terms, we should not be a trader because our insider information would give rise to conflict of interest. The trust that we gain by not being a trader, and hence remaining a disinterested supplier of market information, enables us to broker Coasian agreements with reduced transaction costs between the parties on the Internet. The advantage is large. It is on the Internet commons that trust is scarce. We are able to purchase this by foregoing some potentially profitable trades, and that pays us more in the long term in our role as an information service provider.
Our ideology was designed to give us the greatest possible strategic advantage in our markets. That is not to say we do not believe in our ideals, but that the nature of our ideology is important. It does matter what we believe. It matters what you believe, and it matters that you understand that it matters.
I strongly recommend "The Modern Firm" by Roberts. Read this alongside "Built to Last". Roberts is a harder read, but he gets under the logic of corporate dynamics better than Collins and Porras. Because "Built to Last" is characterized by an ubiquitous analytical paucity, Jim Collins and Jerry Porras' interpretations of their data are not always correct. That is a pity. Their findings are exciting, inspiring even, and the book despite its limitations is a good read.
This is another Collins book that is a total game changer, along with Good to Great and How the Mighty Fall. It’s a classic read of brilliant proportions. Any business or organizational leader who seeks to build something that lasts and thrives long after our own tenures passed to someone else, needs to read this book. NOW!
Mr. Collins and Mr. Porras researched many companies and identified several characteristics which identify companies which are built to last a long time. The book is written in a way of discussion on concepts and characteristics which distinguish these visionary companies from the rest of the companies. By highlighting these concepts the authors provide surprising facts and insights and breaking several myths about the reasons for a company long term success.
The authors took a very interesting approach of comparing a visionary (build to last) company to a comparison company. As you read the book it seems as if the "comparison" company should be the one to last. However, after the authors provide the different approaches, characteristics and choices made by the two companies, we, the readers, are slowly coming to the realization it is the visionary companies which lasted. It is often the case the comparison companies do not even exist today.
The book was first published in 1994 and a lot has changed since then. It is interesting to note that today (2012) few of the visionary companies are performing worse than their comparison company. And over the years I have heard readers being disappointed with the selection of companies and even stated, "This book is wrong, you see, these companies were not build to last".¹
I believe the key to understand the book lessons, is not by focusing on the specific companies, but it is by observing the characteristics and concepts which define visionary companies as brilliantly described in this book.
I highly recommend the book for leaders of companies, builders of companies and all who wish to understand how a company can be built (or changed) to last.
Amir Avitzur
Author of "Why do we sell low and buy high? The guide you must read BEFORE you invest"
¹ Mr. Collins researched and wrote about the cause of companies to fail in a more recent book called "How the mighty fall".
Top reviews from other countries
Die wissenschaftliche Analyse wird von Colins spannend vorgetragen, mit anschaulichen Metaphern und lebendig geschilderten Beispielen. Die meisten Analysen kann ich gut nachvollziehen und finde sie voll überzeugend. Nur selten denke ich mir, das kann man auch anders sehen.
Bei diesem Produkt habe ich stundenlang nach einer Angabe zum Umfang gesucht. Es sind insgesamt 5 CDs. Daher vermute ich, es ist zum Original etwas gekürzt. Aber ich vermisse aber nichts. Collins packt die Botschaft in wenige, einfache Prinzipen. Er beginnt mit den Prinzipen und einer kurzen verteidigung seiner Argumentation, dann kommt die ausführliche Analyse mit Beispielen und Storys, dann kommt eine Zusammenfassung der Prinzipien, am Ende kommen noch ein paar typische Fragen und Antworten. Der Umfang ist voll ausreichend.
Collins liest seinen Teil mit großem Engagement und sehr lebendig, als würde er eine Rede vor einem interesserten kritischen Publikumhalten. Er geht richtig mit. Er wechselt sich jedoch mit seinem Co-Autor Porras ab. Der liest eher gelangweilt, etwas schleppend und etwas nuschelnd.
Based on scientific research on “visionary” companies, a lot of interesting findings are formulated. I several times felt like reading thoughts which I have been (subconsciously) thinking for years, and applied professionally. What a relief the see them so nicely formulated ! Why haven’t I read this book before?
Ideas I liked most:
- Preserve the Core and Stimulate Progress: you should separate the Core Ideology (which shouldn’t change) from the drive for Progress (which can change and should never be satisfied)
- No tyranny of the OR: instead of having to choose between Continuity OR Change (for example), you should choose Continuity AND Change. The authors put it like this: “The ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain ability to function”
- Good enough never is: visionary companies always go for better, good enough (or the 80/20 rule) is not enough.
Mas é interessante notar que algumas das empresas citadas pelo autor como visionárias que sobreviveram a períodos de turbulência estão no momento quase fora de combate devido à Revolução Digital e novo ciclo industrial. É o caso da Motorola, HP e IBM.
Como diz Flávio Augusto: estabilidade não existe!



















