- Hardcover: 330 pages
- Publisher: Encounter Books (September 17, 2007)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1594031932
- ISBN-13: 978-1594031939
- Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.1 x 9.3 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 5 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,226,334 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Bulldozed:'Kelo,' Eminent Domain and the American Lust for Land
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you increase your sales. We invite you to learn more about Fulfillment by Amazon .
See the Best Books of 2018 So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year so far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Kelo, Eminent Domain, & the Lust for Land By Heather Wilhelm
Bulldozed: "Kelo," Eminent Domain, and the American Lust for Land By Carla T. Main Encounter Books, October 2007
Since the dawn of humanity, there have been a few classic, sure-fire incentives to get people to do all sorts of crazy things. Love is one of them. Money is another. And if recent history is any indication, another age-old ingredient for unhinged behavior will loom especially large in the American psyche and public debate for years to come.
The ingredient in question, of course, is land.
Ever since the Supreme Court's infamous Kelo ruling in June of 2005, America has struggled with the case's grim implications: the seizure of private property, often from people who can't afford to fight back. For those who have followed the pre- and post-Kelo saga of eminent domain in the United States, two questions often surface. First: "How the heck did we get to this point?" And second, usually after reading about some little old lady getting kicked to the curb: "Who are these people? Who would do this sort of thing?"
As Carla Main's "Bulldozed" reveals, "these people" are often simply normal people: amped-up bureaucrats in communities gone mad. The book offers a clear-eyed assessment of eminent domain in America, focusing on the insanity that recently engulfed a Texas town over a strip of waterfront land. "Bulldozed" also addresses, through history and case law, how we got to this point - and, now that the bulldozer's out of the proverbial barn, where we go from here.
Situated on a "grimy old industrial river" and nestled next to one of the world's largest chemical plants, Freeport, Texas hardly had "glamorous marina town" written all over it. But that's exactly what Freeport's politicians saw when they cooked up a plan that would eventually tear the town apart. The ingredients were simple but incendiary: a town in dire straits; a family business on the river; a wealthy, marina-building oil scion; and a city council desperately attached to a harebrained scheme.
The Freeport story, played out from 2003-2006, verges on the tragicomic (picture a town with basic infrastructure woes lending $6 million, almost half of their annual budget, to a wealthy young man in a risky deal to build a marina close to a giant Dow chemical plant) but, as Main writes, the council pursued it with "religious zeal." Only one thing stood in their way: the Gore family, whose shrimp business sat next to the marina site. The Gores were pillars of the community, provided dozens of jobs, paid substantial taxes. They were also, however, in the way. They would have to go.
"Bulldozed" outlines in withering detail how, as the Kelo case played out in the Supreme Court, niceties quickly dissolved in Freeport. While the Gores attempted to reason with the city council, the book records, the city council proceeded to go ballistic, pulling stunts that would make Boss Hogg proud: sneaky legal moves, personal attacks on dissenters, taxpayer-funded PR campaigns, subtle assaults on free speech - all so that they can have the privilege of dunking the taxpayers into a questionable marina deal.
If it seems too bizarre to be true, it's happened in more places than Freeport. Main explains it with "the ugly duckling syndrome," in which a town with low self-esteem has a dream of beautification--the equivalent, say, of going to the prom with the homecoming king. The ugly duckling proceeds to lose its mind, alienating friends, racking up an astounding credit card debt, and bending over backwards to woo its hunky suitor. Then, after a whirl of alternating anxiety, euphoria, and chaos, the homecoming king either cancels or ditches Ugly at the dance.
The driving forces behind today's eminent domain horror stories, of course, are often darker than low self-esteem. Common culprits are greed, power, and ruthless ambition. The trail to today's mess, however, began as many messes do: with idealism run awry. "Bulldozed" traces the long and winding road of landmark property rights cases from the days of Daniel Webster, when erosions of property rights were intended to protect "the little guy," to 1954's Berman v. Parker, which cleared the way for hundreds of thousands of "little guys" to be displaced "for the good of the community." Kelo, of course, took such logic to the frightening next level, where no one, as Sandra Day O'Connor pointed out, is safe.
One would think that the spectacular failures of past government adventures in real estate - Main outlines fiascos in Poletown, Michigan, the folly of urban renewal, and other multi-million-dollar mishaps - would make everyone, including liberals on the Supreme Court, a bit gun-shy. Nope. It is especially interesting, as Main notes, that the five judges in the Kelo decision are known for a philosophy advertised for years as "standing up for the little guy." The Kelo decision, along with other current policy debates, makes it clear that this liberal philosophy has evolved, all too often, into "government knows best."
In the wake of Kelo, a backlash swept the country, with dozens of states passing various reforms. As to their impact, Main remains skeptical. With a few exceptions, most of the measures leave room for "blight" loopholes, which, as Main notes, "is in the eye of the beholder." The most obvious consequence is that future victims of eminent domain abuse, like many present victims, will likely be poor. And, unlike the Gores, whose business was soaked of $450,000 in legal fees, most will be unable to fight back.
"The question this book sets out to answer," Main writes in her introduction, "is what price American society pays for economic development takings." Economist Hernando de Soto, who made his name exploring the West's secret to success, might name one price: the erosion of property rights, a key ingredient of prosperity and stability. The Gore family, meanwhile, might say that the price is peace of mind. Other eminent domain victims might say it's nothing less than the American Dream. America's struggle over property rights has been a long, convoluted, and sometimes contradictory path. As for where we go after Kelo, Main argues, only time will tell.
Heather Wilhelm is a writer and communications consultant based in Chicago. -- RealClearPolitics.com, November 9th, 2007
From the Publisher
"When I was a very young attorney in New York City, I worked on condemnations for public authorities that were building public projects. I was moved by the plight of the business owners who came forward to testify at the public hearings. They explained how the takings were going to destroy everything they had worked for. These condemnations were taking place in extremely poor neighborhoods and most of the business owners were immigrants. Those hearings put a human face on the process of eminent domain and made clear the toll such policies take on the very communities they set out to help. I learned that lesson early and I have not forgotten it."
-Carla T. Main
"It is a rare issue, in an age of partisan polarization, that can unite libertarians and liberals. The governmental power of eminent domain, now employed for private profit, is one such issue. This spreading practice pits class against class, wealth against ordinary property-owning citizens, and government power against the powerless. Carla Main's vivid account of the history surrounding the Supreme Court's Kelo decision should frighten every property-owning American and make us all wonder where Tom Paine is when we need him."
--Gary Hart, United States Senator (ret.)
"Like a Greek tragedy unfolding, Carla Main's book chronicles the eminent domain struggles in Freeport, Texas, which pitted the Gore family, with its longtime shrimp business, against the machinations of an unholy alliance between city politicians and avaricious developers. If you have ever shared the Supreme Court's unquestioned deference to the public planning process that shaped its ill-fated Kelo decision, you'll surely change your mind as you follow this sordid saga to its bitter end. You'll never look at eminent domain in the same way again."
--Richard A. Epstein, Professor of Law, University of Chicago; Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution; and author of Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain
"Bulldozed tells the people story behind the great eminent domain cases: Kelo v. New London, Poletown Neighborhood Council v. Detroit, and Western Seafood v. Freeport, Texas. To understand the impact of eminent domain on real people, read Bulldozed. A big bonus is that Carla Mains has written a page-turner."
--John Norquist, President and CEO of the Congress for the New Urbanism
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
No complaints, good service!
She doesn't stop with the Gores, however, and presents case after case of similar situations around the country during the same time period. Putting all that in the light of history, she then outlines the origin of eminent domain and how it went from something for government use only with the assumption that civic conscience would be followed in giving just remuneration, to an economic free-for-all whereby one private party benefits from a property (or properties) being taken from another private party (or parties).
The book is a good basic primer for anyone with an interest in present eminent domain issues, written in a highly readable style. More importantly, it highlights the human cost of this practice.
Main puts forth the idea that in the past eminent domain was used mostly in relation to black or other ethnic communities, citing a case where a large black secton of Washington, DC was taken to build an upscale facility. While this has often been historically true, the takings have not been limited to ethnic groups. Those interested in past use of eminent domain would be interested in reading Stolen Fields: A Story of Eminent Domain and the Death of the American Dream by this author, a memoir of the effects of eminent domain on several generations of a family.
Note: A recent update on the case cited by Main in Long Branch, NJ -- the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld the case for the homeowners. A step forward.
You will get more insight from reading this book about a heroic struggle among life-long friends in a small city, who are fighting for dignity, hope and the fruition of their dreams, than from a dozen legal tomes.
And it might not interest lawyers, but it raises the key question of whether local governments are even able to understand their own best economic interests. It is a microcosm of the conflict between top-down and bottom-up growth.
which is a shame because if even HALF of what Ms. Main writes here is true, this is a story worth telling of arguably the stupidest misuse of eminent domain in US history.
The trouble is that Ms. Main's prose is so dripping with invective for the alleged villains and so ringing with praise for the alleged heroes that in reaction she did the impossible -- she made me sympathize with the alleged total buffoons who gave a clinic on how to exercise eminent domain in the worst possible way, the way most guaranteed to blow millions of dollars, decades of time, and a lifetime of goodwill on a dispute that SANE people could have worked out over a long lunch.
Not surprisingly a considerable portion of the book is devoted to the SCOTUS Kelo decision, a decision over which a disturbing number of otherwise rational conservatives IMHO have lost their minds. The problem is that the wording in the Constitution is quite (IMHO) DELIBERATELY vague for the simple reason that our Founders were not fool enough to place CONSTITUTIONAL limits (beyond the requirement for "just compensation") on the dirty but necessary power of eminent domain. What is the proper definition of the phrase "public use" in this context? I would argue that it is whatever the people through their elected representatives define it to be RATHER THAN what nine unelected philosopher kings define it to be. In other words I AGREE with the anti-Kelo crowd that eminent domain should be strictly controlled, where I DISAGREE is over who should do the strict controlling. I say elected representatives; they say the Supreme Court. Conservatives really OUGHT to know better than to propose taking Yet Another difficult decision out of the hands of the people.
It doesn't help that in her history of the US use of eminent domain Ms. Main essentially admits that the anti-Kelo position was rendered moot over a half century ago by the Berman decision, though this DOES explain the odd SCOTUS arguments of the anti-Kelo side: unable or unwilling to ask the SCOTUS to reconsider Berman, they were left with the Hail Mary of arguing over the definition of "public use". In the end they failed more narrowly than they had any right to expect; we came just one vote short of running every single eminent domain case for the foreseeable future through the Supreme Court -- a recipe for disaster if I ever heard one.
With all these faults I can only recommend this book to a very narrow audience: government officials seriously considering exercising eminent domain.
Read this book and DON'T DO IT!
This could be you; this is certainly how you will be portrayed. What POSSIBLE "public use" could justify this legal and civic carnage? Better to offer the recalcitrant more money; you'll spend much more on legal fees. Better to modify your plans to accommodate the recalcitrant; you'll waste much more time in litigation.
Eminent domain is the atomic bomb of urban planning, and like the original, it is capable of consuming friend and foe alike.
Save the Ultimate Weapon for the Ultimate Situation; for everything less be willing to make a deal.