Learn more
These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity Kindle Edition
This book also explains and documents the tortuous 14-year-long conflict Paul had had with this sect’s leader, Jesus’s brother James, a conflict which caused Paul, in about the year 50, to perpetrate his coup d’état against James, and to start his own new religion: Christianity.
Then, this historical probe documents that the four canonical Gospel accounts of the words and actions of “Jesus” were written decades after Jesus, by followers of Paul, not by followers of Jesus; and that these writings placed into the mouth of “Jesus” the agenda of Paul. Paul thus became, via his followers, Christ’s ventriloquist.
A work such as this can be documented and produced only now, after the development (during the past 70 years) of modern legal/forensic methodology. Previously, the only available methods, which scholars have used, simply assumed the honesty-of-intent of all classical documents, especially of canonical religious ones, such as Paul’s epistles, and the Four Gospels. Only now is it finally possible to penetrate deeper than that, to reach the writer’s intent, and not merely his assertions, and to identify when this intent is to deceive instead of to inform. Whereas scholars have been able to discuss only the truth or falsity of particular canonical statements, it is now possible to discuss also the honesty or deceptiveness of individual statements. This opens up an unprecedented new research tool for historians, and CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS is the first work to use these new methods to reconstruct, on this legal/forensic basis, not just how crimes took place, but how and why major historical events (criminal or not), such as the event that started Christianity, actually occurred.
The author explains: “What I am doing in this work is to reconstruct from the New Testament the crucial events that produced it, without assuming whether what the NT says in any given passage is necessarily true or even honest. Instead of treating the NT as a work that ‘reports history,’ the NT is treated as a work whose history is itself being investigated and reported. Its origin goes back to this coup d’état that Paul perpetrated in Antioch in the year 49 or 50 against Jesus’s brother James in Jerusalem, whom Jesus in Jerusalem had appointed in the year 30 as his successor to lead the Jewish sect that Jesus had started. The Gospel accounts of ‘Jesus’ reflected Paul’s coup d’état – not actually Jesus, who would be appalled at the Christian concept of ‘Christ.’ That concept was radically different from the Jewish concept of the messiah, and Paul knew this when he created it.”
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B007Q1H4EG
- Publisher : Hyacinth Editions (March 29, 2012)
- Publication date : March 29, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 1.1 MB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 301 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,701,608 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #3,656 in Christian Church & Bible History (Kindle Store)
- #7,776 in History of Christianity (Books)
- #8,748 in World History (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book's analysis interesting and detailed, with one noting its unique approach to the topic. Moreover, they consider it an outstanding read. However, the writing style receives mixed reactions, with several customers describing it as abysmally inept. Additionally, the book is criticized for being endlessly repetitive, and one customer expresses dissatisfaction with the author's statements about Jesus.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book interesting and enlightening, praising its detailed analysis of Christianity's origins.
"...this is to be expected as he does put forth an excellent case for the false basis of Christianity and demonstrates how factual evidence can trump..." Read more
"...the Galatians by applying forensic methodology and ultimately concludes by designating the events, circumstances and players involved in shaping the..." Read more
"I am not religious but the topic was intriguing and that's why I bought the Kindle version...." Read more
"This is an exceedingly important book, and anyone who wants to be knowledgeable about the history of religion must read it...." Read more
Customers find the book to be an outstanding and interesting read, with one customer noting it serves as a great starting point for exploration.
"An excellent analysis that is promising and applicable to not only the subject matter at hand, the start of Christianity, but to other areas of..." Read more
"...It is mind blowing! A great reading! It would be interesting to see what would happen if all Christians would find out about this!..." Read more
"...I recommend this book as a great starting point. Note the author is critical of..." Read more
"...In any case, this an amazing book. I only regret having a mere five stars to rate it." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the writing style of the book, with some appreciating it while others find it abysmally inept.
"...Unfortunately, the author is awful. This is the only source I found which explains the history of the Christian/Catholic religion in a truthful way...." Read more
"This is a really beautiful piece of literary analysis that goes far beyond mere scholarship...." Read more
"...It is repetitive, overuses emphasis, and is occasionally badly written, but the author was trying to address people who won't agree with him anyway..." Read more
"...The author writes a very interesting and detailed analysis of Paul's letter to the Galatians...." Read more
Customers find the book endlessly repetitive.
"...Zuesse is that he is pedantic, condescending, and worst of all, endlessly repetitive. If I told you once, I told you a hundred times!..." Read more
"...It is repetitive, overuses emphasis, and is occasionally badly written, but the author was trying to address people who won't agree with him anyway..." Read more
"...It's difficult to wade through the swamp of redundancies, circumlocutions, lapses in phraseology, non-idiomatic use of English, etc...." Read more
"It's interesting, but too repetitive in some points. Somewhat insists in some conclusions many many times...." Read more
Customers express dissatisfaction with the author's statements about Jesus, and one customer describes Christianity as a hoax.
"...I am yet unsatisfied with the author's statements about Jesus and what Jesus' reactions to Paul's gospel would be/have been...." Read more
"...who may have preached in Palestine at that time, and that Christianity itself is a hoax, at least as far as it claims to truely represent the..." Read more
"Jesus of Nazareth is no Jesus Christ!..." Read more
"False prophets..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 30, 2015An excellent analysis that is promising and applicable to not only the subject matter at hand, the start of Christianity, but to other areas of historical study. The methodological approach here is presented in a somewhat awkward fashion if you are expecting a 'light read', but the application of this approach to the subject results in a fresh new approach that I enjoyed. Many of the reviews of this book focus on Mr. Zuesse's 'bluntness' or, somewhat ridiculously, his lack of love or compassion for attempting to ferret out the truth behind the creation of the most influential religious framework in the history of the world-- Christianity. I suppose that this is to be expected as he does put forth an excellent case for the false basis of Christianity and demonstrates how factual evidence can trump faith. The sad thing is that these comments demonstrate the belligerent, emotional, and unscientific attacks of those that will defend their "faith" at all costs, whether it is unsupported by scientific enquiry or through basic moral analysis. It is really no wonder that the majority of the world's problems today can be attributed to mythological beliefs-- reading comments like these should enlighten those that perhaps are straddling the worlds of faith-based belief and the real world.
One negative in this book is the constant insistence that the type of methodology used to analyze the New Testament, legal/forensic, not only stems from and is based upon a "court of law in a democracy", but that this must be a precondition for careful and reasoned analysis of the evidence in a court of law. This statement is found innumerable times throughout the book. It may be the case that this methodology grew over time at a time when democracy was also becoming more prevalent throughout the world, but it is false to assume that democracy is a pretense for evidentiary based analysis of historical documents with no prior-assumptions or no 'professional' scholarly opinion littering the mind of the person doing the analysis. Democracy is nothing more than mob-rule of a majority of people that live in a geographical area and has absolutely nothing to do with successful analysis of the best evidence when undertaking scientific enquiry. I respect the analogies to a court of law, and the source of this institution for a basis of this analysis, but it is important to understand that "democracy" is a political organization that has nothing to do with truth and fact. A "court of law in a democracy" is composed of a judge and frequently prosecution that work for the government that happens to be in power in the jurisdiction in which the trial occurs. In many cases this same government has influenced on the jurors throughout their lives via propaganda, education in government run schools, and culture. This is hardly an environment in which to discern truth of things. Truth needs to remain independent of not only faith, but political manipulation as well. A court of law in a democracy doesn't necessarily provide this.
This minor quibble aside, Mr. Zuesse, please give us more of this type of forensic analysis-- the world needs it!
- Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2013The author dissects Paul's Letter to the Galatians by applying forensic methodology and ultimately concludes by designating the events, circumstances and players involved in shaping the early Jesus-sect of Judaism which, the case us made, ultimately culminated with the singular moment that changed Paul's message, and thus gave birth to the new religion of Christianity.
I was initially put off by repetitive arguments becoming shoe-pounding the table. However, I later worked through these arguments as the author's way of beating back 2,000 years of indoctrination. The points could have been established without te cumulative arguments perhaps with one more edits prior to publication. One is left with the impression that time pressures may have forced a premature release in these aspects.
I am yet unsatisfied with the author's statements about Jesus and what Jesus' reactions to Paul's gospel would be/have been. Those arguments need to be better laid out instead of, or in conjunction with, the repetitive arguments comparing Galatians and the other Pauline Epistles. Otherwise, I'm left using the author's methodology against those blanket statements. Basically, the reader is left to making sweeping inferences concerning what Jesus' positions would be or were, merely because Jesus was a Jew and, presumably, a strict adherent to Judaism. I would like to see those arguments better laid out and replacing some of the repetitive points about forensic methodology and the Galatians - remaining Pauline letters substantiations of the author's logic. Then, I could give a 5-star rating instead of a 3-1/2 - 4-star rating based solely on effort and workmanship.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2015I am not religious but the topic was intriguing and that's why I bought the Kindle version. Paul, the founder of Christianity based the religion on lies, he never even met Jesus b/c Jesus was already dead. Paul learned from Peter who was a disciple of Jesus and walked with Jesus. Paul changed everything. The whole story is funny to me, just imagine the millions of people who have for 2000 years believed in all the lies! It is mind blowing! A great reading! It would be interesting to see what would happen if all Christians would find out about this! Rome and all its Popes would fall, gone overnight! Talk about a "revolution"! *L* Paul was a great liar, maybe even a psychopath, which back then in those times may have been unusual, but today we have tons of psychopaths, they are everywhere, in the banking system, in politics, you name it, we are so used to be lied to that it almost feels normal. Paul was perhaps the first psychopath in the history? But in a way he did humanity a favor! Jesus was a Jew, as everybody knows, but Paul opened the religion/church to everybody, also Gentiles (non Jews) and therefore gave up the requirement of male circumcision which was the religious requirement among Jews and which they live by even today. I have read elsewhere about the negative side effects of circumcision and that's why I am saying Paul did humanity a favor by not requiring it.
Top reviews from other countries
jatheistReviewed in Australia on August 6, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Christ good; Paul bad
This historian has broken away from a long line of historians reaping each other in the unexamined christian era. He claims to use forensic methodology to examine the work of the man Paul who was the real founder of this religion. Like a breath of fresh air .
Felix RaynerReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 21, 20165.0 out of 5 stars Takes Saul's letter to Galatians as authentic. If this ...
Takes Saul's letter to Galatians as authentic. If this really is so, the conclusions are correct.
One weak point of the theory in my opinion is the explanation of Saul's motivation to undertake the huge effort he did. The author explains it as an effort to self-agrandisment. I find this insufficient a motivation, the guy was too clever for such a thing. Either he was possessed, or the whole thing has some missing parts.
Rains WilliamsonReviewed in Canada on December 25, 20195.0 out of 5 stars A Must Read !
The author makes an excellent case for his proposition. Eye opening and thought provoking !
Umberto SteindlerReviewed in France on September 14, 20155.0 out of 5 stars A milestone in historical research
Eventually an unbiased book on an important subject in the history of religions. I have been waiting for a book like this all my life. Thank you Mr. Zuesse.
Djacir CarvalhoReviewed in Brazil on September 13, 20225.0 out of 5 stars ADMIRABLE MASTERPIECE
Here we have a courageous author who challenges the scholarly community way of research. The thesis of the book is proved almost without any restriction. As this is an unusual scientific approach among religisous studies, Zuesse constantly repeats issues to reach the reader, making reading somewhat tiring. Unfortunately, I didn't find yet his promised new book, JESUS & HIS ENEMIES.

