I found Eric Zuesse’s “Christ’s Ventriloquists: The Event that Created Christianity” a bipolar book that is self-contradictory. On one hand I agree with the author’s thesis that Christianity was created around the religious division over the issue of Jewish circumcision between James, brother of Jesus in Jerusalem, and Paul the Apostle to the gentile cities in what is now called Turkey. Zeusse claims Jesus “lived and died a Jew and was never a Christian”. Zeusse’s interpretation is in contrast to Christian doctrine that Christianity started by Jesus’s Resurrection and at Pentecost when the Holy Spirit descended upon Christ’s disciples, including Paul.
But Zeusse’s thesis is hardly new. Barrie Wilson, PhD, has a new book out “Paul vs. James: The Battle That Shaped Christianity and Changed the World-An Historical Reconstruction” that in the form of a novel tells the story without all the anti-religious ranting of Zeusse.
Zeusse also contends that his methodology is more important than his findings. This includes three aspects:
Assume as little as possible
Always rely on the best (most reliable) evidence
Explain (not ignore) any contradictions with the evidence p 29
But his contention that he uses legal “forensic” and scientific methods to debunk the New Testament book of Galatians as to how Christianity came about, is mostly itself bunkum.
The Book of Galatians was written around 40 to 50 A.D., describing events in about 20 A.D., and it is entirely hearsay without a first-person witness account or third-party police or court report. Hearsay is not admissible in courts except by expert witnesses in, for example, eminent domain cases where an expert real estate appraiser can testify to their documented interviews with buyers and sellers of properties. Moreover, Paul, the author of Galatians and Jesus’ apostle never met Jesus and would not qualify as a first-person witness nor expert witness who interviewed first person witnesses. Nonetheless, Zeusse contradicts himself when he says Galatians is “universally accepted as a “first person account, not based on hearsay” (p. 27). And Zeusse claims he is the first “cross-examiner” of Galatians in world history. But his book includes no other cross examination of his “witnesses” or thesis by religious experts as would occur in a court of law.
Zeusse goes on to write that “history must be cleansed of myths” such as Christianity. But Zeusse strangely relies on those myths as his evidence. Karl Marx also claimed that religion was an “opiate” and Communism was “scientific” and devoid of myth but Marxism itself was mythic, hypnotically promising an unrealizable utopia. Prominent historian Philip Jenkins, in his book The Lost History of Christianity, makes the point that “religions fails when they are proven true”, not when proven mythical. Religion wouldn’t be religion without myth. I believe that many Christians know Christianity has mythic elements in it.
Moreover, even though I am a Christian, there is no irrefutable evidence that Jesus or Paul ever existed. Zeusse assumes they did exist but claims his book is written with as few assumptions as possible. But how could there be a bigger assumption than Jesus and Paul even existed? Lack of evidence of Jesus or Paul existed outside of scripture, however, does not necessarily prove they did not exist, as the Romans were known book burners. Alexandria, Egypt once was the center of Christianity but the Romans destroyed the library there in order move the center of Christianity to Rome around 275 A.D. A satellite library was demolished in 391 A.D. by the order of Coptic Christian Pope Theophilus. And the Essenes hid their Jewish scriptures from the Romans in caves, now known as the Dead Sea Scrolls, which make no mention of Jesus but only of a “son of God”.
Zeusse makes an interesting observation that Paul was a tentmaker whose probable main customer was the Roman army. This raises the question of whether Paul was a paid propagandist, like the Jewish historian Josephus, of the Roman Empire who wrote to pacify any Jewish resistance against Rome on the border of the Roman Empire.
In sum, I found Zeusse’s book to mainly be a rant and not any legal argument or based on the scientific method as he claims. The book could also have used a good edit to reduce all the overkill of repetitiveness.
Buying Options
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity Kindle Edition
by
Eric Zuesse
(Author)
Format: Kindle Edition
|
Eric Zuesse
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $5.00 to buy -
Paperback
$20.0014 Used from $3.71 8 New from $16.44
-
LanguageEnglish
-
Publication dateMarch 29, 2012
-
File size1164 KB
Customers who read this book also read
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Nailed: Ten Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed At AllKindle Edition$5.99$5.99& Free Shipping
Rabbinic Judaism Debunked: Debunking the myth of Rabbinic Oral LawKindle Edition$2.99$2.99& Free Shipping
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
PAUL VS. JAMES: The Battle That Shaped Christianity and Changed The WorldBarrie WilsonKindle Edition$1.99$1.99& Free Shipping
Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Eric Zuesse is a winner of the Mencken Award for investigative reporting. His previous books include IRAQ WAR: The Truth, and WHY THE HOLOCAUST HAPPENED. PRE-PUBLICATION ENDORSEMENTS of CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: “A winner.” — Bruce Chilton, author of Rabbi Jesus, and Director of the Institute for Advanced Theology at Bard College “My skeptical ear detects a very distinct ring of plausibility in this gripping tale. ... provocatively interesting, ... and forcefully written.” — Richard Dawkins, Oxford University and author of bestsellers The Selfish Gene, and The God Delusion “Great writing; great forensic investigation.” — David Davis, participant in the Jesus Seminar’s discussion group “This book is an absolute must-read for anyone investigating the origins of Christianity ... insightful, well-written, and powerfully informative.” — Joe E. Holman, author of Project Bible Truth “Presents a side of Paul that the general reader of the Bible, or even the scholars, miss.” — Oswald Schrag, Emeritus Professor of Religion at Fisk University, Fellow of the Jesus Seminar, and member of the Westar Institute “It works for explaining Christian origins. ... Paul has to do away with [Judaism’s demand for] circumcision. That is so unambiguous.” — James Crossley, Sheffield University Professor of Biblical Studies, and author of Why Christianity Happened “An open-minded reader/juror will come to the conclusion that [Paul] is guilty of inventing a new religion, illegitimately appropriating Jesus.” — Abe Van Luik, Ph.D., former Christian fundamentalist “It is surprising to me that this view of Paul has not been previously written. ... I love your boldness.” — Reverend Steven Michael Smith, Colona United Methodist Church, and a participant in the Jesus Seminar’s discussion group
--This text refers to the paperback edition.
Product details
- ASIN : B007Q1H4EG
- Publisher : Hyacinth Editions (March 29, 2012)
- Publication date : March 29, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 1164 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 301 pages
- Lending : Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#996,162 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #3,117 in Christian Church & Bible History (Kindle Store)
- #6,368 in Christian Ministry & Church Leadership (Kindle Store)
- #7,018 in World History (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
3.8 out of 5 stars
3.8 out of 5
111 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2020
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Reviewed in the United States on June 28, 2017
Verified Purchase
If you know the Saul con already, and if you can read a brief summary of this book without getting offended, then you already know what it's about and agree with the author. Even so, there's a value in the compilation of so much textual analysis. It is repetitive, overuses emphasis, and is occasionally badly written, but the author was trying to address people who won't agree with him anyway, ergo his over-emphasizing his point. I still considered it valuable given the specific chronological comparisons Zuesse drew between earlier and later evidence.
Unfortunately, Zuesse's interest in forensic analysis and an objective scientific approach does not extend to other topics that he broaches in the book, such as religious warfare, anti Semitism, and the Holocaust, let alone Saul's origins and the net positive effects that revised Jenomic religions have always had for the Semitic peoples. Perhaps someday he will cross that bridge. Until then, there's still some good organized source material in this.
Unfortunately, Zuesse's interest in forensic analysis and an objective scientific approach does not extend to other topics that he broaches in the book, such as religious warfare, anti Semitism, and the Holocaust, let alone Saul's origins and the net positive effects that revised Jenomic religions have always had for the Semitic peoples. Perhaps someday he will cross that bridge. Until then, there's still some good organized source material in this.
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2021
Verified Purchase
Standard scholarship does not usually address the fundamental question of how the Jewish sect of Jesus transformed into Christianity. This book provides a word by word analysis of the new testament letters of Saul of Tarsus (known as St. Paul in latter day Christianity) to arrive at the compelling conclusion that Christianity arose from the Jewish sect of Jesus headquartered in Jerusalem through the efforts of Saul to convince his gentile congregations, located elsewhere in the Roman empire, that the major tenets of Judaism did not apply to them in terms of their entry into the sect of Jesus. This was the first and fundamental step in the splintering of the gentile congregations from the Jewish congregations in the sect.
It is not an easy read. The book is scientific in nature. It begins with an exposition of the methodology of the analysis, which as the author points out - if you do not agree with the methodology stop reading now as it's pointless. I doubt anyone with an understanding of the scientific method and modern legal analysis would object to it.
The author refers to the formation of Christianity from the sect of Jesus as a "hoax". While there is some merit to the use of the term as Saul was playing on the poor understanding of the gentile converts regarding Judaism, which is the religion they thought they were joining, I would suggest that what the analysis reveals is not a hoax but the mechanism of the formation of a splinter sect. It is similar to many others in nature: generate differences between the splinter and the main sect and keep working on those differences to pull individuals away from the original sect into a new direction. At the same time, work toward establishing a new authority within the sect so that as the splinter occurs people can now turn toward for leadership (in this case Saul claiming higher authority than the original authority/ies in Jerusalem, mostly James).
I highly recommend this book and I have read it three times trying to punch holes into it (because that's what a scientist does with a hypothesis, try to falsify it and find flaws - not confirm it, which is a major misunderstanding of the scientific method). I have failed to falsify the analysis and thus consider it to be the gold standard.
I wish the author wold have incorporated the analysis into the history of the first century, which is not a strength of the work. Considerations regarding the outcome and time sequence of the Jewish civil war and the destruction of Jerusalem (where the main sect was housed) and the murder of James (the leader and main authority of the Jerusalem sect after the death of Jesus; See 'Antiquities of the Jews' by Josephus) are important aspects that I would suggest allowed the splintering to be successful, but are not incorporated into this book. Nevertheless, independent consideration of the relevant history and time line only lends further credence into the main conclusion.
If you have ever wondered "how did this major religion arise?", then this is the only book I know of that adequately addresses the question.
It is not an easy read. The book is scientific in nature. It begins with an exposition of the methodology of the analysis, which as the author points out - if you do not agree with the methodology stop reading now as it's pointless. I doubt anyone with an understanding of the scientific method and modern legal analysis would object to it.
The author refers to the formation of Christianity from the sect of Jesus as a "hoax". While there is some merit to the use of the term as Saul was playing on the poor understanding of the gentile converts regarding Judaism, which is the religion they thought they were joining, I would suggest that what the analysis reveals is not a hoax but the mechanism of the formation of a splinter sect. It is similar to many others in nature: generate differences between the splinter and the main sect and keep working on those differences to pull individuals away from the original sect into a new direction. At the same time, work toward establishing a new authority within the sect so that as the splinter occurs people can now turn toward for leadership (in this case Saul claiming higher authority than the original authority/ies in Jerusalem, mostly James).
I highly recommend this book and I have read it three times trying to punch holes into it (because that's what a scientist does with a hypothesis, try to falsify it and find flaws - not confirm it, which is a major misunderstanding of the scientific method). I have failed to falsify the analysis and thus consider it to be the gold standard.
I wish the author wold have incorporated the analysis into the history of the first century, which is not a strength of the work. Considerations regarding the outcome and time sequence of the Jewish civil war and the destruction of Jerusalem (where the main sect was housed) and the murder of James (the leader and main authority of the Jerusalem sect after the death of Jesus; See 'Antiquities of the Jews' by Josephus) are important aspects that I would suggest allowed the splintering to be successful, but are not incorporated into this book. Nevertheless, independent consideration of the relevant history and time line only lends further credence into the main conclusion.
If you have ever wondered "how did this major religion arise?", then this is the only book I know of that adequately addresses the question.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2019
Verified Purchase
I find the author to be confused about the reason for Christs existence here on earth. Christ came to earth to show God's love through his living a sin free life and to replace the ceremonies such as circumcision and ritual sacrifice with his own life. He died taking on the sins of this world and eliminating the need for such rituals.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 8, 2019
Verified Purchase
Zuesse sets out to prove, through what he calls forensic methodology, that Paul of Tauruses distorted the teachings of Jesus to create a new religion. His analysis of Galatians is detailed and plausible, but he does a disservice to his cause by constant repetition.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Felix Rayner
5.0 out of 5 stars
Takes Saul's letter to Galatians as authentic. If this ...
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 21, 2016Verified Purchase
Takes Saul's letter to Galatians as authentic. If this really is so, the conclusions are correct.
One weak point of the theory in my opinion is the explanation of Saul's motivation to undertake the huge effort he did. The author explains it as an effort to self-agrandisment. I find this insufficient a motivation, the guy was too clever for such a thing. Either he was possessed, or the whole thing has some missing parts.
One weak point of the theory in my opinion is the explanation of Saul's motivation to undertake the huge effort he did. The author explains it as an effort to self-agrandisment. I find this insufficient a motivation, the guy was too clever for such a thing. Either he was possessed, or the whole thing has some missing parts.
paul wynter
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 5, 2016Verified Purchase
Item was as described.
Thadeu Martins
5.0 out of 5 stars
Como de fato surgiu o cristianismo pelas palavras de São Paulo
Reviewed in Brazil on July 12, 2016Verified Purchase
Surpreendente o resultado da análise das palavras de São Paulo, em suas cartas a seus seguidores.
Ficam bem clara a situação do surgimento do cristianismo, muito além das aparências e das celebrações que se observam hoje em dia.
Pela primeira vez, a história vista com olhos de um analista forense, ao estilo da apresentação de provas para os jurados, que são os leitores, decidirem como. quando, por que, por quem, para quem, foi criado o que conhecemos como cristianismo.
Uma aula de investigação.
Ficam bem clara a situação do surgimento do cristianismo, muito além das aparências e das celebrações que se observam hoje em dia.
Pela primeira vez, a história vista com olhos de um analista forense, ao estilo da apresentação de provas para os jurados, que são os leitores, decidirem como. quando, por que, por quem, para quem, foi criado o que conhecemos como cristianismo.
Uma aula de investigação.
jatheist
5.0 out of 5 stars
Christ good; Paul bad
Reviewed in Australia on August 6, 2015Verified Purchase
This historian has broken away from a long line of historians reaping each other in the unexamined christian era. He claims to use forensic methodology to examine the work of the man Paul who was the real founder of this religion. Like a breath of fresh air .
Rains Williamson
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Must Read !
Reviewed in Canada on December 25, 2019Verified Purchase
The author makes an excellent case for his proposition. Eye opening and thought provoking !





