| Digital List Price: | $9.95 |
| Kindle Price: | $8.99 Save $0.96 (10%) |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
CLIMATE CATASTROPHE! Science or Science Fiction? Kindle Edition
This book is dedicated to science. Scientists are skeptical, we ask: “Is that idea correct? How can I test it?” Then we resolve to gather and analyze data until we show it isn’t or it might be. If we cannot disprove the idea, it survives. No true scientist “believes in science” because he knows science is a process, a process we use to uncover the truth. One cannot have faith in science, but one can believe in the scientific process or method.
In Climate Catastrophe! Science or Science Fiction?, Andy lays out the scientific facts and torpedoes the false chants of the global warming hysteria mongers. As you read Andy’s book, pay close attention to the graphs of technical and geopolitical data. Then ask the questions:
- Why haven’t I seen this data presented this way before?
- Who is behind the science fiction of the adverse effects of CO2 and fossil fuel consumption?
- What is their goal?
With Andy’s book, you will draw your own conclusions and arrive at your own answers to these questions.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAndy May Petrophysicist
- Publication dateMay 1, 2018
- File size15437 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customer reviews
Our goal is to make sure every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I think I may have figured out where the misunderstanding happened Stephen. You assumed I was discussing the so-called and misnamed greenhouse effect (GHE) as defined by the IPCC and only looked at the quote through that lens. This may all have been largely a point-of-view problem.
A greenhouse warms by restricting circulation and convection, somewhat like your pot with a lid. Adding CO2 to the atmosphere can warm the Earth’s surface by some unknown amount by slowing the cooling of the surface of the Earth, since it absorbs IR emitted by the surface and before it re-emits the absorbed energy it is excited and collides with neighboring molecules “warming” them. The magnitude of this effect is unknown, and it has not been measured, only modeled.
What I tried to do in the quote, was step back from the GHE, and look at the larger picture of recent warming. GHE is not climate and climate is not GHE, it is much more complicated than that regardless of what the warmists want us to believe. In the quote, I don’t care if the GHE contributed to current warming or not or even by how much. I just wanted to show that any effect of CO2 is small in the context of the oceans. The Earth is warming; thus, it is retaining some thermal energy, and as the IPCC says in AR5 (The Physical Science Basis, page 265) the oceans have retained 64% of the energy. All the retained thermal energy for the past 50 or 60 years, at most, has increased the Southern Ocean temperature less than 0.2 degrees (see Wunsch, 2018, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 70, issue 1)! And this is the ocean where all oceans meet, the deep oceans have cooled since 1990 (Wunsch and Heimbach, 2014, American Meteorological Society Journal, August 2014).
Some of recent warming is natural and some is probably due to the CO2 GHE, the warming is obviously due to additional thermal energy being retained. I’m just saying it doesn’t matter. Were it all due to CO2 GHE and the effect lasted another 200 years, the Southern Ocean would warm a whopping 0.6 degrees, at most, since the effect of CO2 diminishes as more is added. This is an extreme estimate from the highest estimates of ocean warming over the last 60 years. The more likely amount of ocean warming from 1994-2013 is 0.02 degrees. The warming, regardless of the cause is not important or a problem due to the high heat capacity of the oceans. That is the point of the quote.
“99.9 percent of the Earth’s surface heat capacity is in the oceans and less than 0.1 percent is in the atmosphere. Further, CO2 is only 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. It beggars belief that a trace gas (CO2), in an atmosphere that itself contains only a trace amount of the total thermal energy on the surface of the Earth, can control the climate of the Earth. This is not the tail wagging the dog, this is a flea on the tail of the dog wagging the dog.”
Apparently, May believes that the way CO2 acts to heat the earth is by getting hot. Then, the CO2 transfers its heat to the rest of the earth. Since the heat capacity of the CO2 is negligible, the earth's temperature cannot rise.
This represents a profound misunderstanding of how the greenhouse effect works. The amount of heat contained in the CO2 has nothing whatsoever to do with CO2's effect on temperature. CO2's effect is to prevent radiative heat transfer from the earth to space. That is, it keeps the heat in.
Here is a way to think about this. Imagine that you have a pot of hot water sitting on the counter. If the pot is open to the air, it will cool quickly. If the pot is covered, it will cool more slowly. It doesn't matter if the cover is made out of Saran wrap, which has no heat capacity--it will still keep the water hot. This analogy isn't perfect since the water may be losing heat mostly by convective heat transfer. But the point is that CO2 is acting by keeping the heat in; it doesn't actually heat the earth
Top reviews from other countries
I commend anyone with an open mind on the subject to read this book as it raises many well substantiated arguments that deserve to be debated.
I am now a confirmed Climate Realist! Excellent book!






