Kindle
$8.99
Available instantly
Kindle Price: $8.99

Save $0.96 (10%)

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Buy for others

Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group.
Learn more

Buying and sending eBooks to others

  1. Select quantity
  2. Buy and send eBooks
  3. Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

CLIMATE CATASTROPHE! Science or Science Fiction? Kindle Edition

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 15 ratings

This book is dedicated to science. Scientists are skeptical, we ask: “Is that idea correct? How can I test it?”  Then we resolve to gather and analyze data until we show it isn’t or it might be.  If we cannot disprove the idea, it survives.  No true scientist “believes in science” because he knows science is a process, a process we use to uncover the truth.  One cannot have faith in science, but one can believe in the scientific process or method.

In Climate Catastrophe! Science or Science Fiction?,  Andy lays out the scientific facts and torpedoes the false chants of the global warming hysteria mongers.  As you read Andy’s book, pay close attention to the graphs of technical and geopolitical data. Then ask the questions:



    • Why haven’t I seen this data presented this way before?

    • Who is behind the science fiction of the adverse effects of CO2 and fossil fuel consumption?

    • What is their goal?



     With Andy’s book, you will draw your own conclusions and arrive at your own answers to these questions.

    Due to its large file size, this book may take longer to download

    Customer reviews

    4.4 out of 5 stars
    4.4 out of 5
    We don’t use a simple average to calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star. Our system gives more weight to certain factors—including how recent the review is and if the reviewer bought it on Amazon. Learn more
    15 global ratings

    Top reviews from the United States

    Reviewed in the United States on July 23, 2018
    This is a reply to “Stephens” comment below.
    I think I may have figured out where the misunderstanding happened Stephen. You assumed I was discussing the so-called and misnamed greenhouse effect (GHE) as defined by the IPCC and only looked at the quote through that lens. This may all have been largely a point-of-view problem.

    A greenhouse warms by restricting circulation and convection, somewhat like your pot with a lid. Adding CO2 to the atmosphere can warm the Earth’s surface by some unknown amount by slowing the cooling of the surface of the Earth, since it absorbs IR emitted by the surface and before it re-emits the absorbed energy it is excited and collides with neighboring molecules “warming” them. The magnitude of this effect is unknown, and it has not been measured, only modeled.

    What I tried to do in the quote, was step back from the GHE, and look at the larger picture of recent warming. GHE is not climate and climate is not GHE, it is much more complicated than that regardless of what the warmists want us to believe. In the quote, I don’t care if the GHE contributed to current warming or not or even by how much. I just wanted to show that any effect of CO2 is small in the context of the oceans. The Earth is warming; thus, it is retaining some thermal energy, and as the IPCC says in AR5 (The Physical Science Basis, page 265) the oceans have retained 64% of the energy. All the retained thermal energy for the past 50 or 60 years, at most, has increased the Southern Ocean temperature less than 0.2 degrees (see Wunsch, 2018, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 70, issue 1)! And this is the ocean where all oceans meet, the deep oceans have cooled since 1990 (Wunsch and Heimbach, 2014, American Meteorological Society Journal, August 2014).

    Some of recent warming is natural and some is probably due to the CO2 GHE, the warming is obviously due to additional thermal energy being retained. I’m just saying it doesn’t matter. Were it all due to CO2 GHE and the effect lasted another 200 years, the Southern Ocean would warm a whopping 0.6 degrees, at most, since the effect of CO2 diminishes as more is added. This is an extreme estimate from the highest estimates of ocean warming over the last 60 years. The more likely amount of ocean warming from 1994-2013 is 0.02 degrees. The warming, regardless of the cause is not important or a problem due to the high heat capacity of the oceans. That is the point of the quote.
    11 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2018
    Good read. Scientific but understandable to the lay person. Andy dispels a lot of bad science and has a common sense approach to good scientific data. Very informative.
    3 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2018
    Based on a quote from the author's web site, this book is at least partly scientific nonsense. Here is the quote:

    “99.9 percent of the Earth’s surface heat capacity is in the oceans and less than 0.1 percent is in the atmosphere. Further, CO2 is only 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. It beggars belief that a trace gas (CO2), in an atmosphere that itself contains only a trace amount of the total thermal energy on the surface of the Earth, can control the climate of the Earth. This is not the tail wagging the dog, this is a flea on the tail of the dog wagging the dog.”

    Apparently, May believes that the way CO2 acts to heat the earth is by getting hot. Then, the CO2 transfers its heat to the rest of the earth. Since the heat capacity of the CO2 is negligible, the earth's temperature cannot rise.

    This represents a profound misunderstanding of how the greenhouse effect works. The amount of heat contained in the CO2 has nothing whatsoever to do with CO2's effect on temperature. CO2's effect is to prevent radiative heat transfer from the earth to space. That is, it keeps the heat in.

    Here is a way to think about this. Imagine that you have a pot of hot water sitting on the counter. If the pot is open to the air, it will cool quickly. If the pot is covered, it will cool more slowly. It doesn't matter if the cover is made out of Saran wrap, which has no heat capacity--it will still keep the water hot. This analogy isn't perfect since the water may be losing heat mostly by convective heat transfer. But the point is that CO2 is acting by keeping the heat in; it doesn't actually heat the earth
    21 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on July 15, 2018
    An interesting and informative book! Andy dispels a lot of myths that have been spread into our culture by bad science and poor journalism. A good read for people interested in getting a clearer picture on the subject of energy and climate change, and it's presented in a very practical way.
    4 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2021
    This author wants you believe that 97% of global climate scientists are wrong, and he's right. Clearly, this is a weak attempt to preserve the status quo for the short-term benefit of the oil industry, and to resist innovation that can benefit future generations as our world population grows. If you're serious about a rational look at climate change, stay away from this guy.
    6 people found this helpful
    Report

    Top reviews from other countries

    Translate all reviews to English
    Amazon Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars The truth is out there.
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 5, 2023
    If you want climate change facts get this book.
    Manuel Toharia
    5.0 out of 5 stars Claro y conciso
    Reviewed in Spain on August 4, 2018
    Interesante punto de vista que rompe ciertos moldes que se dan como verdades absolutas y que están lejos de serlo... No todo es defendible, pero el escepticismo crítico que traslucen sus páginas es reconfortante ante el dogma calentólogo-catastrófico que se supone irrefutable
    Duke8248
    5.0 out of 5 stars A balanced read in an unbalanced subject
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 28, 2021
    Andy May has produced an excellent and well researched coverage of the exaggerations of climate change. The whole subject really does deserve a debate instead of governments and biased scientists dishing out the propaganda. If the science is so settled then a debate would be welcomed but anybody who raises doubts is effectively ruined or scorned without a fair hearing and a fair hearing is what this subject needs.
    I commend anyone with an open mind on the subject to read this book as it raises many well substantiated arguments that deserve to be debated.
    I am now a confirmed Climate Realist! Excellent book!
    One person found this helpful
    Report