What do you get on college campuses when you combine extreme binge drinking among teens, a permissive sexual culture, activist university administrators, a moral philosophy in which feelings override objective facts, and a severely twisted interpretation of Title IX pushed by highly ideological and political bureaucrats? You get absurd, unfair, and life-destroying policies that are not only encouraged, but practically required by the Department of Education.
Time and time again while reading this book, I would read something so shocking and hard to believe that I would think to myself, "there is no way this is true. The authors *have* to be exaggerating." I would then tap on the footnote and open the link to the original source to read the passage in context for myself. And you know what? Every time, the authors' point was confirmed. Unfortunately, they are not stretching the truth at all. Honestly, I wish they were.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$17.23
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
L. B. May & Assoc
Sold by:
L. B. May & Assoc
(222 ratings)
96% positive over last 12 months
96% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$19.43
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
allnewbooks
Sold by:
allnewbooks
(268340 ratings)
92% positive over last 12 months
92% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
$20.90
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Ambis Enterprises
Sold by:
Ambis Enterprises
(17680 ratings)
84% positive over last 12 months
84% positive over last 12 months
Only 4 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Got a mobile device?
You’ve got a Kindle.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back
Flip to front
The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America s Universities Hardcover – January 24, 2017
by
KC Johnson
(Author),
Stuart Taylor Jr.
(Author)
|
Stuart Taylor Jr.
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
In recent years, politicians led by President Obama and prominent senators and governors have teamed with extremists on campus to portray our nation’s campuses as awash in a violent crime waveand to suggest (preposterously) that university leaders, professors, and students are indifferent to female sexual assault victims in their midst. Neither of these claims has any bearing in reality. But they have achieved widespread acceptance, thanks in part to misleading alarums from the Obama administration and biased media coverage led by the New York Times.
The frenzy about campus rape has helped stimulateand has been fanned byideologically skewed campus sexual assault policies and lawless commands issued by federal bureaucrats to force the nation’s all-too-compliant colleges and universities essentially to presume the guilt of accused students. The result has been a widespread disregard of such bedrock American principles as the presumption of innocence and the need for fair play.
This book uses hard facts to set the record straight. It explores, among other things, about two dozen of the many cases since 2010 in which innocent or probably innocent students have been branded as sex criminals and expelled or otherwise punished by their colleges. And it shows why all studentsand, eventually, society as a wholeare harmed when our nation’s universities abandon pursuit of truth and seek instead to accommodate the passions of the mob.
The frenzy about campus rape has helped stimulateand has been fanned byideologically skewed campus sexual assault policies and lawless commands issued by federal bureaucrats to force the nation’s all-too-compliant colleges and universities essentially to presume the guilt of accused students. The result has been a widespread disregard of such bedrock American principles as the presumption of innocence and the need for fair play.
This book uses hard facts to set the record straight. It explores, among other things, about two dozen of the many cases since 2010 in which innocent or probably innocent students have been branded as sex criminals and expelled or otherwise punished by their colleges. And it shows why all studentsand, eventually, society as a wholeare harmed when our nation’s universities abandon pursuit of truth and seek instead to accommodate the passions of the mob.
-
Print length370 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherEncounter Books
-
Publication dateJanuary 24, 2017
-
Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.25 inches
-
ISBN-101594038856
-
ISBN-13978-1594038853
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
KC Johnson is a professor of history at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center, where he specializes in recent U.S. political, diplomatic, and legal matters. He has written five books, co-written a sixth, and edited or co-edited six additional books. He has commented widely on higher education matters, both at the Minding the Campus blog and in op-eds for such publications as the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Daily News.
Stuart Taylor Jr. is a freelance writer focusing on legal and policy issues. He is also a National Journal contributing editor. He has coauthored two critically acclaimed books: In 2012, he and Richard Sander wrote Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It's Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won't Admit It. In 2007, he and KC Johnson wrote Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case.
Stuart Taylor Jr. is a freelance writer focusing on legal and policy issues. He is also a National Journal contributing editor. He has coauthored two critically acclaimed books: In 2012, he and Richard Sander wrote Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It's Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won't Admit It. In 2007, he and KC Johnson wrote Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
In the early morning of February 5, 2012, a student named Alice Stanton met Michael Cheng, her roommate’s boyfriend, in a dormitory common area of Massachusetts’ Amherst College.
After the two started making out, another student remarked that they should “get a room.” Cheng, who was extremely intoxicated, went with Stanton (who later said she had been “tipsy”) back to her room, where Stanton performed oral sex on him. Her roommate, Cheng’s girlfriend, was out of town for the weekend.
As soon as Cheng left her room, a panicked Stanton texted a male friend (her dorm’s resident counselor): “Ohmygod I jus did something so fuckig stupid.” In subsequent texts to this friend, she implied that she had initiated the sexual contact with Cheng and was worried about the fallout. Fellow students who had seen Cheng and her leave the dorm common area, she complained, were “not gonna believe that we left to NOT fuck.” She floated a cover story about their reason for leaving but worried that Cheng was “too drunk to make a good lie out of shit.”
Stanton soon turned her attention to other matters. Earlier that evening, before her encounter with Cheng, she had been flirtatiously texting another male student. Praising his “military trained bod,” she had advised him that she had her room to herself for the weekend “if you wanted to come over and entertain me.” Now she texted him again. He asked her why her texts had stopped for 45 minutes (the time during which she had been with Cheng). She replied that she had been engaged in “sophomore floor bonding,” since “I thought you were a lost cause.”
At 2:30 a.m., the male student texted Stanton to say that he was coming over. Stanton relayed this information to her friend, who responded encouragingly: “Double your pleasure, double your fun.” Shortly after her new guest arrived, Stanton texted the same friend again, complaining, “OK. Why is he just talking to me? . . . Like, hot girl in a slutty dress. Make. Your. Move. YEAH.” She followed up with the results: “Ohmygod action did not happen til 5 in the fucking morning.”
The next morning, Stanton realized her mistake: “I am a shitty friend,” she conceded. After her texting pal promised not to tell anyone about the episode with Cheng, Stanton resolved that “no one can know,” because if anybody knew, her roommate “would literally never speak to me again.” She tried to rationalize her behavior: “We didn’t technicallyyyy have sex. So that’s not quiteeee as bad?” Her friend wasn’t convinced. “Hahahaha. Technically?” When Stanton countered that she wanted the madness to stop, her friend―far more presciently than he ever could have known―responded, “The madness hasn’t even begun.”
Stanton’s behavior soon was no secret at Amherst, a residential college with fewer than 2,000 students. As a result, Cheng and his girlfriend broke up. And Stanton “lost her group of friends,” as one of the former friends later recalled.
There are countless such casual hookups on college campuses every year. If this one had occurred a few years before, few people would have heard about it. But Alice Stanton’s view of her adventures that night would become swept up in a chain of events that the Obama administration had set in motion―a chain that would, almost two years after Stanton’s encounter with Cheng, upend his life.
In an unprecedented initiative, in 2011 the federal government ordered almost all universities to institute revolutionary changes in their disciplinary policies in order to counter what the Obama administration described as an epidemic of rape and other sexual assaults on college campuses. (We henceforth use “sexual assault” as inclusive of rape.) These changes dramatically weakened accused students’ rights to fair proceedings.
As the initial effects of these commands swept across the country, Amherst, like many other colleges, was in the grip of a moral panic about students’ sexual behavior. What would previously have been a regrettable sexual encounter transformed into actionable sexual misconduct. In this frenzy, Michael Cheng would become a victim.
After the two started making out, another student remarked that they should “get a room.” Cheng, who was extremely intoxicated, went with Stanton (who later said she had been “tipsy”) back to her room, where Stanton performed oral sex on him. Her roommate, Cheng’s girlfriend, was out of town for the weekend.
As soon as Cheng left her room, a panicked Stanton texted a male friend (her dorm’s resident counselor): “Ohmygod I jus did something so fuckig stupid.” In subsequent texts to this friend, she implied that she had initiated the sexual contact with Cheng and was worried about the fallout. Fellow students who had seen Cheng and her leave the dorm common area, she complained, were “not gonna believe that we left to NOT fuck.” She floated a cover story about their reason for leaving but worried that Cheng was “too drunk to make a good lie out of shit.”
Stanton soon turned her attention to other matters. Earlier that evening, before her encounter with Cheng, she had been flirtatiously texting another male student. Praising his “military trained bod,” she had advised him that she had her room to herself for the weekend “if you wanted to come over and entertain me.” Now she texted him again. He asked her why her texts had stopped for 45 minutes (the time during which she had been with Cheng). She replied that she had been engaged in “sophomore floor bonding,” since “I thought you were a lost cause.”
At 2:30 a.m., the male student texted Stanton to say that he was coming over. Stanton relayed this information to her friend, who responded encouragingly: “Double your pleasure, double your fun.” Shortly after her new guest arrived, Stanton texted the same friend again, complaining, “OK. Why is he just talking to me? . . . Like, hot girl in a slutty dress. Make. Your. Move. YEAH.” She followed up with the results: “Ohmygod action did not happen til 5 in the fucking morning.”
The next morning, Stanton realized her mistake: “I am a shitty friend,” she conceded. After her texting pal promised not to tell anyone about the episode with Cheng, Stanton resolved that “no one can know,” because if anybody knew, her roommate “would literally never speak to me again.” She tried to rationalize her behavior: “We didn’t technicallyyyy have sex. So that’s not quiteeee as bad?” Her friend wasn’t convinced. “Hahahaha. Technically?” When Stanton countered that she wanted the madness to stop, her friend―far more presciently than he ever could have known―responded, “The madness hasn’t even begun.”
Stanton’s behavior soon was no secret at Amherst, a residential college with fewer than 2,000 students. As a result, Cheng and his girlfriend broke up. And Stanton “lost her group of friends,” as one of the former friends later recalled.
There are countless such casual hookups on college campuses every year. If this one had occurred a few years before, few people would have heard about it. But Alice Stanton’s view of her adventures that night would become swept up in a chain of events that the Obama administration had set in motion―a chain that would, almost two years after Stanton’s encounter with Cheng, upend his life.
In an unprecedented initiative, in 2011 the federal government ordered almost all universities to institute revolutionary changes in their disciplinary policies in order to counter what the Obama administration described as an epidemic of rape and other sexual assaults on college campuses. (We henceforth use “sexual assault” as inclusive of rape.) These changes dramatically weakened accused students’ rights to fair proceedings.
As the initial effects of these commands swept across the country, Amherst, like many other colleges, was in the grip of a moral panic about students’ sexual behavior. What would previously have been a regrettable sexual encounter transformed into actionable sexual misconduct. In this frenzy, Michael Cheng would become a victim.
Product details
- Publisher : Encounter Books (January 24, 2017)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 370 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594038856
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594038853
- Item Weight : 1.59 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,235,741 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #85 in Federal Education Legislation
- #187 in Educational Law & Legislation Law
- #315 in School Safety
- Customer Reviews:
Start reading The Campus Rape Frenzy on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Read moreRead less
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
55 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2018
Verified Purchase
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 29, 2017
Verified Purchase
Johnson and Taylor show yet again the problems caused by campus ideologues and Title IX zealots driven to persecute others on college campuses, especially heterosexual men, and deny them constitutional protections. The authors' analysis picks apart the shoddy research campus ideologues rely on to manufacture the fantasy that women are remarkably unsafe on college campuses. They clearly don't defend nor justify genuine cases of sexual assault; it happens and it does happen too often although campuses are relatively safe places. But they instead show how activists have invented new definitions of sexual assault and applied them in discriminatory ways to the detriment of innocent people often with the full backing of college administrators and faculty. I suspect that activists won't read this book and instead will simply call the authors all sorts of bad names. I also suspect that none of them would want to debate either of the authors on the issues examined in this book because they probably are secretly aware that, for most people, facts and careful, reasoned analysis trump opinions divorced from reality all day long.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2017
Verified Purchase
This book should be read by every parent who has a son in college. It points out the one-sided assault on due process. It is extremely well researched. The stories are true and alarming.
As a lawyer I have seen the abuses first hand at Virginia Tech. One particular case involved an African-American student. The accuser never went to the police or the Commonwealth's Attorney. I was not allowed to participate. The student was denied any meaningful cross-examination. Due process was denied at every turn. It was truly a kangaroo court.
Rape is serious charge and there should be police involvement. I doubt that the negative reviewers read the book. .
As a lawyer I have seen the abuses first hand at Virginia Tech. One particular case involved an African-American student. The accuser never went to the police or the Commonwealth's Attorney. I was not allowed to participate. The student was denied any meaningful cross-examination. Due process was denied at every turn. It was truly a kangaroo court.
Rape is serious charge and there should be police involvement. I doubt that the negative reviewers read the book. .
7 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2017
Verified Purchase
Absolutely, every parent and their sons and daughters who are seniors in high school and plan to attend any university should read this book before starting college.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on September 21, 2017
Verified Purchase
Outstanding treatment of a very controversial subject. Balanced and well written and researched.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
Once accused of sexual misconduct, a male student will almost certainly be expelled, regardless of the actual FACTS!
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2017Verified Purchase
An absolutely phenomenal book that discusses what so few people are willing to talk about - the biased investigations of campus disciplinary committees. This book should be required reading for all college students and parents of college students, male or female. Well written, well researched, and extraordinarily well documented, this balanced book shines a bright (and frankly, quite frightening) light on the anti-male culture that is alive and well in university Title IX departments. Page 150 gives an especially eye-opening example of how these so-called investigators are trained. Due process and the presumption of innocence no longer exist for young men on our campuses. In some cases, school administrators are intentionally ruining the lives of innocent students by ignoring important facts. It's high time that campus kangaroo courts come to an end - this book may very well help make that happen. Potentially life-changing, "The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America's Universities" should be your go-to graduation gift for every graduating senior, as well as their parents.
51 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2017
Verified Purchase
A deeply troubling exposure of the denial of rights to those accused of sexual assault on campus. I read this after reading another book on the same topic - Unwanted Advances. Campus Rape Frenzy avoids virtually all the problems I had with Unwanted Advances. It is presented in a scholarly manner, with the facts being allowed to speak for themselves. My view of Unwanted Advances (although not generally that of other reviewers) was that that author had put too much of her own ego into the book. Whilst I have given ***** to the current book and only ** to its competitor, I should acknowledge that the current book deals almost exclusively with student to student encounters, whereas Unwanted Advances has much to say about accusations against faculty members. The content of both books has left me shocked. I am so glad to have retired from a faculty position and so glad that I have no children (male or female) undergoing study at a US university.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2017
Verified Purchase
This book is essential reading on the issue. Regardless of one's sympathies, we need more facts and more logic. And Johnson and Taylor deliver both. What is fascinating and terrifying is how the ostensible issue of physical violence (rape/assault) has been transmuted into much more problematic concerns about "safe spaces" and "talk = assault." I say nothing of the highly-questionable extension by the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights of a "guidance" into what is in practice an absolute edict; nor will I say anything of the instant and complete capitulation by the higher education industry in that strategy.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars
Give a Copy of this book to your sons and nephews before they step foot on a US University
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 7, 2020Verified Purchase
The best part of the book was the advice suggested by the author for boys attending US Universities:
"You should of course treat women with respect; avoid making unwanted sexual overtures; and be quick to help the victim of any apparent assault, sexual or otherwise. What may be less obvious is that - just as women in college face grave dangers from rapists and other sexual predators - men like you face grave dangers from false accusers who have been misled by colleges and activists [feminists]. They have been propagandized and lobbbied to believe that they should make claims against you whenever they end up unhappy about sexual contact, even if it was clearly consensual. You also face danger from egregiously unfair disciplinary processes and from campus sex bureaucrats [Title IX coordinators and gender studies departments] who are, in many cases, extremely biased against males. For this reason, be aware that any fellow student with whom you have sexual contact may have the power to get you expelled for sexual assault if she feels regret or becomes angry with you an hour, a day, a month a year, or even two years later. Casual sex with someone you barely know is especially dangerous."
"You should of course treat women with respect; avoid making unwanted sexual overtures; and be quick to help the victim of any apparent assault, sexual or otherwise. What may be less obvious is that - just as women in college face grave dangers from rapists and other sexual predators - men like you face grave dangers from false accusers who have been misled by colleges and activists [feminists]. They have been propagandized and lobbbied to believe that they should make claims against you whenever they end up unhappy about sexual contact, even if it was clearly consensual. You also face danger from egregiously unfair disciplinary processes and from campus sex bureaucrats [Title IX coordinators and gender studies departments] who are, in many cases, extremely biased against males. For this reason, be aware that any fellow student with whom you have sexual contact may have the power to get you expelled for sexual assault if she feels regret or becomes angry with you an hour, a day, a month a year, or even two years later. Casual sex with someone you barely know is especially dangerous."
Back to top
Get to Know Us
Make Money with Us
Amazon Payment Products
© 1996-2021, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates








