Other Sellers on Amazon
$20.67
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Sandy Dunes Surplus
Sold by:
Sandy Dunes Surplus
(906 ratings)
89% positive over last 12 months
89% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$39.79
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
SuperBookDeals-
Sold by:
SuperBookDeals-
(347718 ratings)
75% positive over last 12 months
75% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate Hardcover – October 28, 2015
by
James W. Jones
(Author)
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length248 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherOxford University Press
-
Publication dateOctober 28, 2015
-
Dimensions8.3 x 1.1 x 5.8 inches
-
ISBN-100190249382
-
ISBN-13978-0190249380
An Amazon Book with Buzz: "The Therapist" by B. A. Paris
"Suspicion, betrayal and dark secrets abound in this tense story." ―T.M. Logan Learn more
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers also viewed these products
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Get everything you need
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"[T]his volume will be useful to students and scholars alike interested in deepening their engagement with the field of cognitive approaches to religion and will be a useful addition to course or module materials for students studying in this area."-Paul-François Tremlett, Religion
"This is a tour de force. Jones takes the reader through the full range of debates concerning the use and abuse of cognitive science with respect to religion, displaying both expertise and panache. His unique perspective comes from his work as a clinical psychologist. He calls the different parties
to take responsibility for their abstract theories in an argument that is both compelling and morally serious." --Timothy Jenkins, Reader in Anthropology and Religion, University of Cambridge
"Few scholars are better suited than James W. Jones to explore the new frontiers of science and religion. He brings philosophical acumen, psychotherapeutic experience, and spiritual sensitivity to bear on the question of what, if anything, new findings in brain-mind science can tell us about
religious beliefs and practices. A necessary book for anyone interested in the future of scientific approaches to religion." --Kelly Bulkeley, author of The Wondering Brain: Thinking about Religion With and Beyond Cognitive Neuroscience
"This stimulating book on the attempts of cognitive science to explain away religion has the virtue of being fair-minded and comprehensive, without the too-common fault of being boring. Bringing together a knowledge of contemporary science and a sympathy for religion, there is much of value to both
believers and those who doubt. It may not be, as the author rather hopes, the last word on the subject. But it is certainly much more than the first word." --Michael Ruse, author of Atheism: What Everyone Needs to Know
About the Author
James W. Jones is Distinguished Professor of Religion at Rutgers University. He is the author of fifteen books and numerous professional papers, and the editor of several volumes of collected papers dealing with religion, psychology, and science. He serves on the editorial boards of several
publications. He is an ordained priest in the Episcopal Church USA and has maintained a private practice of clinical psychology, specializing in psychophysiology and behavioral medicine.
Start reading Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (October 28, 2015)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 248 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0190249382
- ISBN-13 : 978-0190249380
- Item Weight : 1.03 pounds
- Dimensions : 8.3 x 1.1 x 5.8 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#458,423 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #270 in Psychology & Religion
- #391 in Cognitive Neuroscience & Neuropsychology
- #1,965 in Cognitive Psychology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
6 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2018
Verified Purchase
The title of this book is a bit of a misnomer since it may lead one to believe that Jim Jones is questioning hard science and the various scientific discoveries that indicate that people biologically develop a religious outlook to deal with the unknown. As near as I can figure, it turns out that the author basically agrees with that; the rustling noise in the forest can eventually lead to various imaginary concepts, which, at some stage, within a tribe may become a formal religion with its own dogma and doctrine. However, the author then addresses the new atheists who, he feels, are saying: Science shows religion is an artificial construct and therefore let's chuck religion. Again, the author may not be entirely adverse to this argument when we are dealing with scientifically incorrect dogma and doctrines, and even outdated doctrines such as slavery, but where he takes a stand is that neuroscience cannot chuck out the spiritual part of religions. That is not an unreasonable approach, and if the new atheists are actually promoting the wholesale chucking of religion, Jim Jones' book provides an important counter balance. What is left is to determine is what the spiritual part of religion actually is. Is it: Love thy neighbor? Is it reverence for certain comforting and mostly harmless historical rituals? Or is it more like Einstein's approach: God and religion are those things that science has not yet explained. Good food for thought and inherently supportive for the better angels of our nature.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 12, 2016
Verified Purchase
This is by far the best book I've read on the relationship science has to religion. Not focusing on any particular religion, the author provides powerful arguments that religion needs to be seen in its own terms rather than as just a simplistic holdover of our ancestral DNA. I particularly liked his multiple explanations argument, showing that something like suicide can be explained sociologically, psychologically, economically and even through physics (the rate of a falling body off a tall building) rather than as a simple one-cause. I get tired of hearing reductionist explanations that attribute religion to evolutionary processes and so am so pleased that this book was written. I've been recommending it to my friends and hope that it becomes widely known and read. Maybe someone could be ambitious and consider doing an unabridged audio version. I give it my highest recommendation!
Reviewed in the United States on December 4, 2016
Verified Purchase
A great expose on where we stand in the Grand scheme of things. We basically dont know up from down. There are many opinions on the nature of reality. Each comes from a special point of view or context. Every possible explanation is incomplete, :) as constraints, and is rendered from a specific worldview. A pluralistic universe requires many types of explanations. This is the thrust of this work.. well worth the read.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2016
Should be required reading for all budding scientists. Practicing scientists need to read this book, but will they take the medicine it offers? On the other hand, if you are not in this field, the first chapter may bog you down with all the personalities and seemingly trivial understandings and developments in the field.
Chapter 2 heats up! Finally an ADULT enters the room, someone who has lived a fuller life outside the mind-distorting ivory lab, has seen these same ideas meet their proper nemesis and back off. Don't worry we'll never wake up to a newspaper headline: "Science has discovered that God is dead!" but this book gives you the insight and analysis you need to take on similar thinking and assertions. You are not merely imagining that such an anti-religious effort is underway; it is.
James W Jones does not present a religious outlook of his own, but argues that many cognitive scientists have not been neutral -- and should be. He shows you in detail their failure of rationality, their self-contradictions, and uneducated narrowness of thought. (It appears many of these folk, never read outside their own field.)
Those who claim expertise and authority over religion as cognition, minimize the actual content of the cognition (something strange about that). Religion is understood to be simply rooted in childhood (you don't say) and treated as evolutionary "modules" serving various survival or reproductive purposes alone, (or else are "accidents," an evolutionary catch-all category).
Religion is never approached by these scientists at its most serious and rational but only as a "popular" cultural phenomenon, weak and lazy in contrast to science's serious effort, supposedly rigorous thought and hard work. Jones argues this state of affairs in his discipline is a tragedy because scientific study can give us much greater insights into religion.
The new atheists --weather in the closet or out-- are determined to own science. Now is the time to demand that science serve truth and honest rationality -- not religion -- but not ideological anti-religious, anti-human, ends either
This book is excellent. Plan to read parts of it again.
Chapter 2 heats up! Finally an ADULT enters the room, someone who has lived a fuller life outside the mind-distorting ivory lab, has seen these same ideas meet their proper nemesis and back off. Don't worry we'll never wake up to a newspaper headline: "Science has discovered that God is dead!" but this book gives you the insight and analysis you need to take on similar thinking and assertions. You are not merely imagining that such an anti-religious effort is underway; it is.
James W Jones does not present a religious outlook of his own, but argues that many cognitive scientists have not been neutral -- and should be. He shows you in detail their failure of rationality, their self-contradictions, and uneducated narrowness of thought. (It appears many of these folk, never read outside their own field.)
Those who claim expertise and authority over religion as cognition, minimize the actual content of the cognition (something strange about that). Religion is understood to be simply rooted in childhood (you don't say) and treated as evolutionary "modules" serving various survival or reproductive purposes alone, (or else are "accidents," an evolutionary catch-all category).
Religion is never approached by these scientists at its most serious and rational but only as a "popular" cultural phenomenon, weak and lazy in contrast to science's serious effort, supposedly rigorous thought and hard work. Jones argues this state of affairs in his discipline is a tragedy because scientific study can give us much greater insights into religion.
The new atheists --weather in the closet or out-- are determined to own science. Now is the time to demand that science serve truth and honest rationality -- not religion -- but not ideological anti-religious, anti-human, ends either
This book is excellent. Plan to read parts of it again.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: james jones









