Buy new:
$9.83$9.83
FREE delivery:
Wednesday, May 31
Ships from: Kodiak Booksellers Sold by: Kodiak Booksellers
Buy used: $8.61
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
82% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science Hardcover – May 1, 2007
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $20.76 | — |
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length293 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHoughton Mifflin Harcourt
- Publication dateMay 1, 2007
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100618242953
- ISBN-13978-0618242955
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Lowest Pricein this set of productsThis item:
The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of ScienceHardcover
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Bookmarks Magazine
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"Every sentence sparkles with wit and charm. . . it all adds up to an intoxicating cocktail of fine science writing." --Richard Dawkins
"Natalie Angier provides a masterful, authoritative synthesis of the state of knowledge across the entire scientific landscape." --Howard Gardner, Harvard University, author of Five Minds for the Future and Frames of Mind
"An essential experience . . . How dare she write so artfully, explain so brilliantly, rendering us scientists simultaneously proud and inarticulate!" --Leon Lederman, Nobel laureate
"Every single sentence . . . sparkles with enough intelligence and wit to delight science-phobes and science-philes alike. I loved it!" --Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Bait and Switch and Nickel and Dimed
"Natalie Angier makes planets and particles sexy. . .She turns guys with lab coats and pocket protectors into Daniel Craig." --Sylvia Nasar, author of A Beautiful Mind
"Exuberant . . . She writes with such verve, humor, and warmth." Library Journal Starred
"This bestselling author's love of words is writ large here . . . the excitement and challenge of science [is] masterfully conveyed." Kirkus Reviews, Starred
"Angier is a nimble stylist with a playful sense of alliteration and consonance." --Ben Dickinson Elle
"An excellent introduction (or refresher) to the beautiful basics of science, and I hope it is widely read." --Steven Pinker The New York Times Book Review
About the Author
A New York Times bestseller and National Book Award finalist, Woman is a text so necessary and abundant and true that all efforts of its kind, for decades before and after it, will be measured by it (Los Angeles Times Book Review). Angier lives with her husband and daughter outside of Washington, D.C.
Product details
- Publisher : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; First Edition (May 1, 2007)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 293 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0618242953
- ISBN-13 : 978-0618242955
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #802,784 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #279 in Scientific Reference
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

NATALIE ANGIER writes about biology for the New York Times, where she has won a Pulitzer Prize, the American Association for the Advancement of Science journalism award, and other honors. She is the author of The Beauty of the Beastly, Natural Obsessions, and Woman, named one of the best books of the year by the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, People, National Public Radio, Village Voice, and Publishers Weekly, among others. A New York Times bestseller and National Book Award finalist, Woman is “a text so necessary and abundant and true that all efforts of its kind, for decades before and after it, will be measured by it” (Los Angeles Times Book Review). Angier lives with her husband and daughter outside of Washington, D.C.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
A decision to side with mainstream science is almost always the right decision, but it would be nice to know what mainstream science is saying (read "Discover" or other science magazines), why it is so valid, and how the scientific method works. Of course, it's not perfect - it's administered by people, with all their tendencies to delusion, misuse of data, and greed; but it's relentlessly self-correcting and it has consistently provided the most usable strategy to find out how things work.
Natalie Angier has written a book that will help us with our scientific literacy. The first three chapters cover basics about the scientific method. The human default method of decision-making, gut instinct, worked well for hunter-gatherers, but today we can do better. Read these chapters if you don't read anything else (one chapter inspired me to order a book on probabilities). The next six chapters are about the specific fields of physics, chemistry, evolutionary biology, molecular biology, geology, or astronomy.
How much physics can you learn in 34 pages? Well, you get a feel for how and why electrons can be harnessed to power our homes - or perhaps you'd like to know how the Houdini-like maneuver, "quantum leap" got its name. The chapter on chemistry gives an overview of chemical bonds - why DNA has hydrogen bonds, a weaker type (so they can easily unzip for reading by messenger RNA) and stronger types of bonds are on nitrogen (and why that makes them useful as explosives). In the evolution chapter, you learn why "nothing in biology makes any sense outside of evolution," with a strong outline on the basics. Despite what you may have heard, "Natural selection is about as nonrandom a force as you can imagine." - Richard Dawkins.
In the chapter on molecular biology, you learn how a cell bristles with proteins, looking (if you could lift the lid and look inside) like a beehive or ant-bed of activity, but at fast-forward speed. This beautifully written chapter reminded me of Lewis Thomas's classic, "Lives of a Cell" from 1974. Geologists immediately descend onto the site when a new tunnel is blasted through a hillside. We live on a planet that records its own history and each stone is a potential Rosetta stone. Astronomy is among the most popular of sciences, "chaster than other sciences, purer of heart and freer of impurities, mutagens, teratogens, and animal testing." It answers the eternal questions: Who are we? Where do we come from?
Each chapter covers enough basics to be able to provide a strong finish. For the scientifically challenged, for the reader who needs a science booster, or for the confirmed science nut like me, don't let this book get away. It is even available in audio so you can buff up your education the easy way.
Now for the disclaimer: The 5 stars is for the subject matter. Her deliver is "too cute" to the point of distraction. The last book I recall of this type was Bill Bryson's - "A Short History of Nearly Everything." His book doesn't suffer from maladies of this sort and is superior.
The Canon is full of enthusiasm, bubbling prose, brilliant puns and autobiographic images--components that make a fashionable human-interest magazine article or work of fiction. What it makes up for in style and earnest good intentions, it lacks in content and clarity. The widely-praised opening chapters on the nature of scientific thinking, while giving lip service to the unexplained concept of "control", never actually clarify the nature of critical inquiry, the detective-story misdirection and pitfalls and reasons for proceeding systematically and questioning continuously. Angier attempts to use the board game of Mastermind as a metaphor for science, but leaves the overwhelming impression that she just doesn't get Mastermind, is driven to tears by it, and doesn't get how people do real science, either. Far better it would have been to tell a real story of scientists getting things wrong first, then getting them more nearly right later, in each chapter. The sparse sponge of facts amid its 264 pages of anecdote and imagery are largely out of context of each other, and completely out of context of the fascinating story of how they were discovered. For instance, even if you leave out the discovery of quantum dynamics, she has missed the opportunity to explain its connections with acoustics and spectroscopy.
I was going to give The Canon higher marks for giving information without disinformation, and then a whole paragraph of disinformation showed up, blaming the combustion of meteors on friction (air friction cools them--it's the shock wave of compressed air before them that heats them until some of them are slowed enough to reach the ground extremely cold) induced by the speed at which they zip around the solar system (the earth's gravity is the main accelerator of their falls).
I'm recommending that anybody who is thinking of buying The Canon instead get Asimov's New Guide to Science, or any similar book by Isaac Asimov or Carl Sagan. Yes, those books are dated, but any book of science is dated, because science doesn't sit still. Even in the short months since The Canon's publication, evidence for successful photography of planets of other stars has emerged.
Natalie Angier's The Canon sets out to deliver a basic course in what all non-scientists should know about science. It delivers a catalog of facts wrapped in rhapsodic words. But it fails to deliver science itself, its pitfalls and corrupting influences, and, most of all, its painstaking, open, social methods for self-correction and purification. An understanding of these processes is critical to every citizen's informed judgment.






