Amazon Prime includes:
| Prime Benefits |
|
|---|---|
| Award winning movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video | ✓ |
| On demand, ad-free music streaming with Prime Music | ✓ |
| Early access to deals and savings with Prime Exclusives | ✓ |
Buy new:
$29.95$29.95
Delivery Friday, August 30
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$13.90$13.90
Delivery Friday, August 30
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ThirdCity
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad Paperback – May 4, 2015
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length790 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 4, 2015
- Dimensions6 x 1.78 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101511617500
- ISBN-13978-1511617505
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
"Bridge-Building" to Nowhere: The Catholic Church's Case Study in Interfaith Delusion (Civilization Jihad Reader Series)Stephen CoughlinPaperback$9.65 shipping
Shepherds for Sale: How Evangelical Leaders Traded the Truth for a Leftist AgendaHardcover$11.35 shippingUsually ships within 7 to 13 days
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (May 4, 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 790 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1511617500
- ISBN-13 : 978-1511617505
- Item Weight : 2.29 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.78 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #263,674 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,558 in International & World Politics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book informative, eye opening, and disturbing. They also appreciate the humor, clarity, and superb detail.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book informative, compelling, and thought-provoking. They also appreciate the well-documented foot notes and references to publications. Readers say the author is rational and has done extensive research. They say the book helps them understand the Muslim faith.
"...“complexity” by using evidence-based arguments, meticulously documented with original sources...." Read more
"...This is the most thoroughly researched and referenced book on Islamic law as it is used, rightly or wrongly it really doesn’t matter, to under gird..." Read more
"Rarely has a book on national security been more timely and comprehensive in its research...." Read more
"With humor, clarity and superb detail Steve Coughlin blows sky-high the politically correct fallacy that extremists have hijacked Islam...." Read more
Customers are mixed about the readability of the book. Some mention it's very clear and to the point, while others say it'll be difficult to read due to the technical jargon and Islamic references.
"With humor, clarity and superb detail Steve Coughlin blows sky-high the politically correct fallacy that extremists have hijacked Islam...." Read more
"This would have gotten 5 stars however, it's not an easy read...." Read more
"...Although a huge amount of info, it is easy to read and understand. Very clear and to the point." Read more
"This is not light reading. It's the type of book you can't just breeze through...." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
“The reference," writes Coughlin, "is to the popular 1999 science fiction movie The Matrix, in which the hero is given the option of taking a red pill that will enable him to see the world as it really is. He is warned, however, that if he takes the pill, he can never return to the computer-generated reality to which he is accustomed, made necessary by the requirement to hide the malevolent nature of the world in which he actually lives.” (p. 66)
Coughlin began in the fall of 2001 by researching authoritative books of Islamic law, and “found they could be mapped, with repeatable precision, to the stated doctrines and information that groups like Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood disclosed about themselves when speaking to each other.”
His work followed the protocols of “traditional threat analysis,” the military intelligence approach into which Coughlin and generations of military personnel before him had been trained.
Classic threat analysis is based on what the enemy says about himself (such as Hitler’s Mein Kampf) and maps that to the enemy’s capabilities and opportunities.
Coughlin’s briefings “easily outperformed competing explanations” — accurately predicting how perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing and Fort Hood massacre would explain why they attacked.
The Red Pill Brief tamed the chaos of politically correct “complexity” by using evidence-based arguments, meticulously documented with original sources.
But the Pentagon fired Coughlin** during the Bush Administration in 2008. His Red Pill Brief-approach was banned by the Obama White House in 2012.
Coughlin relates:
“In October 2011, elements of the American Muslim Brotherhood wrote the White House demanding an embargo or discontinuation of information and materials relating to Islamic-based terrorism — even insisting on firings, ‘re-trainings,’ and ‘purges’ of officers, analysts, special agents and decision makers who created or made such materials available.” (p. 21)
A few months later–
“…the FBI then proceeded to undertake the very purging of documents that the Brotherhood had demanded. The Department of Defense followed shortly thereafter with a Soviet-style purge of individuals along with disciplinary actions and re-education.
Not only did the Secretary of State endorse such curbs on speech, the Assistant Attorney general seemed eager to enforce them. As with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) — and through it, our Middle Eastern allies — also seek to embargo all unsanctioned discussions of Islam as a matter of international law.” (p. 22)
Words such as Shariah and Jihad were mandated into oblivion.
And, shockingly, that gag order continues to hold sway over our intelligence community today, with no clear end in sight.
Coughlin believes there is an underlying philosophical reason why the forces of common sense in the U.S. intelligence community were not able to fight back, remove the blindfold, and prevail.
He points to the corrosive postmodern narrative which claims there is no objective truth, and insists on the need to “balance” arguments based on facts, like Coughlin’s, with the emotional perceptions of trendy subject-matter experts and vetted Islamic “moderates.”
Coughlin calls for the U.S. intelligence community to be guided by a “reality-based threat doctrine analysis.”
“The proposed way forward calls for holding all national security leaders and professionals accountable for what they could have known had reasonable due diligence been undertaken to know.” (p. 502)
He argues that ignorance of the exigent Islamist threat, a tragic failure of America leadership at the beginning of the 21st century, constitutes this very dereliction of duty.
Coughlin points out that it is in our power to heal this self-inflicted weakness.
Most of the struggle on the home front battle in the War on Terrorism occurs in the “information battlespace.”
Since “language is the key terrain in information warfare,” the first step is “understanding the enemy and using accurate descriptors.”
This, he writes, “is essential to exposing and countering the enemy’s ‘civilization-jihad’ ‘by our hand.’” (p. 505)
Of course, to implement this step in our country would require a sea change of political will in both political parties and in the military.
If you read this book you will probably lose all your friends, become a pariah, never work in this town again, lose everything you ever worked for, and maybe even have to file bankruptcy. On the other hand, you may just help save Western Civilization.
In Stephen Coughlin’s own words, quoted directly from the book, “…this book focuses on law and legal analysis, not theology and hermeneutics.” pg. 250. This is important to remember as one goes through this nearly 800-page tome of an analysis of Islamic law as it pertains to the war against dar al-harb, the non-Muslim world.
From the book, “To start, Islamic law does not allow for the actual recognition of other religions. The Qur’an—and Islamic law—recognizes only Islam. Surah 3 tells us that:
“Allah said, “If anyone desires a religion other the Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost All spiritual good.” (Qur’an 3:85)
“Translator Yusuf Ali footnotes this passage with commentary #418:
“The Muslim position is clear. The Muslim does not claim to have a religion peculiar to himself. Islam is not a sect or an ethnic religion. In its view all Religion is one, for the Truth is one.”
In the Reliance of the Traveler, in the section titled, “The Finality of the Prophet’s Message,” it states that “Islam is the final religion that Allah Most High will never lessen or abrogate until the Last Day.” All other religions were “abrogated by the universal message of Islam…” and that “it is unbelief (kufr) to hold that the remnant cults now bearing the names of formerly valid religions, such as “Christianity” or “Judaism” are acceptable to Allah Most High after He sent the final Messenger to the entire world. This is a matter over which there is no disagreement among the scholars…”
This is the take away message that you must memorize for the next time you hear that Islam just wants to get along with all the other religions in the United States; (1) all other religions have been abrogated by Islam; (2) “denying or not mentioning” the abrogation of the other religions is described as “unbelief (kufr)” or apostasy; and (3) this is a universally held doctrine within the Sunni world because there is consensus among the scholars—imja.
This is the most thoroughly researched and referenced book on Islamic law as it is used, rightly or wrongly it really doesn’t matter, to under gird the actions of the Islamist groups, from the Ummah representing Organization for the Islamic Cooperation, to the Dawah representing Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates, to the Jihad representing groups that have attacked the U.S. in the past, and are expected to attack in the future.
After reading this book on Kindle (only $6!), I realized that I wanted to study it thoroughly, so I bought the hard copy. The hard copy contains an index in the back that is worth the price of the book.
This book is the Red Pill that will free you from the Matrix of disinformation and delusion. As Morpheus said, “Remember, all I’m offering is the truth, nothing more.” But if you take the Red Pill, you can’t go back. Choose wisely.
Top reviews from other countries
I was about 10% into the book and finding it tough going and had decided to postpone further reading until I felt I was better equipped to continue. I had bought the book on the recommendation of the reviewer Jak in order to hopefully answer a question I had posed when reviewing Tommy Robinson and Peter McLoughlin’s book “Mohammed’s Koran:Why Muslims kill for Islam”, without reading the reviews first, which I normally do.
There it was in the title of Jak’s review “not for the faint hearted”. So that’s what I was! After reading the reviews particularly those of Jak and Paul Middleton and, gaining heart, I continued and I am so glad that I did. There are areas that are very dense and for me require re-reading several times and even then I am still not sure that some paragraphs actually have a point. But these are interspersed with areas of stark clarity and these become more frequent as the book progresses.
I am of the opinion that the authors training and expertise as a lawyer (attorney) leads him to write in these convoluted ways at times but underneath it all I get the strong impression that there is no pebble on the Islamic literature beach that has not been turned over and closely examined and interpreted. With regard to the latter I was impressed that the author could take what seems to non Muslims to be a perfectly reasonable statement and show it is linked back to Sharia, which then gives it a totally different meaning.
There is a human side to the book too with reference to the Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan imposed on the US soldiers that placed their lives in great danger from “friendly forces”. The book details the multitude of failings within the management of the War on Terror that would, in my opinion amount to treason.
“It’s really this simple: There is no knowing this enemy without understanding that doctrine. We can lose a war - and our country – for want of facts that could have been known had there not been a policy decision to ignore and misrepresent them”.
“There are career ending penalties for telling the truth”
Although the book deals with America in particular, the same failings are obvious and pertinent with regard to the UK and Europe. The author frequently references The US Constitution and it’s Amendments, but as the UK we doesn’t have a written constitution as such these particular references, for us, need a bit of thought as to their applicability.
The book is crying out for rationalisation and editing, not necessarily to shorten it but to make it more readable and accessible. With regard to the latter a comprehensive index would enable the book to be used more easily as a very valuable reference source.
And the answer I was looking for is stated explicitly, speaking of Edward Said.
“It’s a sobering commentary on the War on terror that our entire national security apparatus has been brought to it’s knees by a literature professor. This is the successful execution of Joseph Peiper’s abuse of language in anticipation of abuse of power”
For example it demonstrates, using the 'insider texts' (that are freely available) how sharia law is constituted, how it is made incumbent upon Muslims (both those that are politically active and those that are not) to follow, how it is incorporated in the constitutional documents of organisations relied upon by Western governments and considered as partners (or advisers) by churches. Most importantly, how non-Muslims have been convinced or blind-sided by multiple narratives designed to silence opposition while preventing real investigation.
This book collates in one place a good number of the sources, you would need to explain and formulate a variety of arguments, about how this most important subject matter influences politics, security, democracy and human rights today.



