Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Can a Catholic Support Him? Asking the Big Questions about Barack Obama Paperback – September 15, 2008
"Douglas Kmiec's Can a Catholic Support Him? may very well become the most important comprehensive document written to date on American Catholics, abortion, and candidates for public office." -Martin Sheen
On April 18, 2008, Douglas W. Kmiec was denied Communion at a Catholic Mass in Westlake, California. Ironically, Kmiec had been invited by a Catholic business group to give a dinner address on the Bishop's teaching of "Faithful Citizenship." Kmiec had served as head of the Office of Legal Counsel for both Ronald Regan and George H. W. Bush. But now, he found himself rejected by his faith-simply for endorsing the presidential campaign of Senator Barack Obama.In Can a Catholic Support Him?, Kmiec offers us a thoughtful explanation of his rationale. He addresses the difficult questions at the core of his decision: Can a Catholic support a Pro-Choice candidate? Can there be a reverence for life that embraces a larger set of values? How does a Catholic citizen balance his obligations to the Church and to community? In asking these questions, he challenges those whose partisan interests are provoking a false rift between the Catholic Church and the Democratic party.
This inquiry could hardly be more timely. Catholics have been on the side of the top vote-getter in the last nine presidential elections, and make up roughly one fourth of the electorate. This provocative book-at once a legal and religious treatise and a sincere and personal journey of faith-will be an irreplaceable contribution to the conversation, in 2008 and beyond.
- Print length176 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPENGU
- Publication dateSeptember 15, 2008
- Dimensions5.4 x 0.45 x 8 inches
- ISBN-10159020204X
- ISBN-13978-1590202043
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : PENGU; 1st edition (September 15, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 176 pages
- ISBN-10 : 159020204X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1590202043
- Item Weight : 5.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.4 x 0.45 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #146,453 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Ambassador Kmiec is an American Legal Scholar, Diplomat and Author. Son of Walter Kmiec (1922-2010), a Daley stalwart and regular Democratic campaign captain in Chicago who helped secure the election of U.S. President John F. Kennedy in 1960, Douglas Kmiec was introduced at a young age to big city politics. While he retains the friendly approachability characteristic of the Polish and Irish- American emigrants of the era of his father and grandfather (Jan Kmiec, 1890-1947, a university-educated historian and dissenter of the Holocaust, the Kmiec name is said to have been declared blessed for valiant efforts to secret Jews in agricultural setting even after Kmiec family members were murdered by the Nazi Gestapo). Ambassador Kmiec is a respected voice of civility in a contentious world. Known for his honest appraisal of constitutional and foreign policy issues, he served Republican (Reagan) and Democratic (Obama) presidents during a long career in legal education. Ambassador Kmiec was practicing with a venerable Chicago law firm in 1978, when he was invited to join first the faculty of law at Valparaiso University (IN) and then the faculty at University of Notre Dame Law School from 1980 to 1999. Kmiec completed a term as the Dean & St. Thomas More Professor at The Catholic University of America, and since 2003, has held the Caruso Family Chair in Constitutional law and Human Rights at Pepperdine University (CA).
Selected as a White House Fellow (1982-83), Kmiec later served in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Having served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in OLC from 1985-88, he was nominated by President Ronald Reagan and confirmed by the Senate in 1988 as head of OLC. He returned to Notre Dame in 1989, where he directed the Thomas White Center on Law & Government and founded the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy. In 2009, President Obama named (and the Senate again confirmed) Kmiec to be U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Malta.
A Distinguished Fulbright Scholar on the Constitution in Asia, Ambassador Kmiec's published works include The Attorney General's Lawyer (1992), Can a Catholic Support Him? (2008), three books on the American Constitution, a two-volume legal treatise, related books, and hundreds of published articles and essays. As head of OLC, he authored the opinion underlying the extension of the U.S. territorial sea from 3 to 12 miles and an opinion that brought AIDS victims within the protection of federal laws. His comparative analysis of EU-U.S. market integration was the subject of a recent seminar for members of the ECJ and U.S. Supreme Court in Brussels.
As the U.S. Ambassador to Malta, Kmiec was very warmly received and nationally beloved by the Maltese government and its people. With the Jesuit community he compassionately addressed the plight of north African irregular migrants, visiting them in detention centers, hosting them in his home, and working to resettle many in the United States.
When the Arab Spring uprisings took place in February 2011, it fell to Ambassador Kmiec to figure out a rescue of close to 100 US personnel caught behind the lines of the shooting in Tripoli. His friendship with the Maltese people led to the temporary acquisition of a catamaran, and drawing on the excellent morale he maintained among all elements of his embassy, Ambassador Kmiec successfully directed the rescue of not only the Americans but also several hundred foreign nationals as well. Before leaving his post, Ambassador Kmiec completed a substantial expansion of the embassy in Malta to a 10 acre compound Capable of undertaking regional operations In efforts to stem human trafficking, illicit drug and weapons transport, and the opening of markets into North Africa that can be of advantage to the United States and Populations much in need.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Concise arguments without bloating that sometimes come up in political books.
Good read.
I would also like to point out that denying professor Kmiec communion is not supported by Canon law, however, his arguments for supporting Senator Obama, most especially with regard to the life issue, are fundamentally flawed. They are based on human law and human reasoning, and as scripture tells us, God's ways are not our ways.
The central moral argument that the professor offers for his position (bottom of pg 135) is that Senator Obama will improve the economic conditions of mothers in poverty, therefore we can overlook the Senator's advocacy for a legal system which supports abortion. First, the automatic conclusion that the Senator's economic policies will be better for poor women is presumptuous, or at the very least debateable, but what is not debatable is that Senator Obama advocates strenghtening the legal framework which supports abortion, and he provides detailed reasoning in his public addresses.
We must listen carefully to what a candidate says about this most important issue, and then see how that language relates to our Church's teaching. In answer to the direct question, which the professor asks on page 78 of his book, "Does Senator Obama contradict any part of that Papal list? (a list of non-negotiable items for the Catholic Church expressed by Benedict XVI) The clear answer is yes.
The reason the professor is misled is because he fails to acknowledge Senator Obama's number one priority when it comes to this issue. The single most important message here is that Senator Obama's first agenda is not to reduce abortions, though he may well aspire to that as a desirable consequence of his approach, however, Senator's Obama's number one agenda, and he admits this, is to protect a woman's right to choose. This is not an approach which will change a culture of death.
Senator Obama stated publicly that he cannot define when life begins. In fairness, and with all due respect to the Senator, who I believe is a good person that simply does not understand these issues - we all know when life begins. I fail to understand how you can affirm life when you cannot even take a stand on when it begins.
Senator Obama said publicly that he believes Roe v. Wade hangs in the balance with this election, and that he will appoint judges who will defend it. Depite the considerable confusion in the chapter of the book that deals with this very complicated topic, no one can debate that Roe defends and allows for abortions, and Senator Obama continues to support it. The professor suggests (pg 50) that the only issue Pro-Lifers (or what he uncharitably refers to as Republican Faith Partisans) have against Senator Obama is Roe. This is both disingenuous and false. However, the fact remains that supporting evil in hopes that good will come of it is inconsistent with Catholic doctrine.
Beyond Roe, the Senator stated that he believes this is a debate about fairness, and that he wants to make sure that our young girls have the same opportunities as our young boys. One can only conclude from this that he means he would not want a young girl to have to carry the burden of a child when the young boy does not. If you doubt this, you need only listen to what Senator Obama said about his own daughters, who are neither poor nor disadvantaged. He said that if one of his daughters should make a mistake, he would not want her punished with a baby.
It is a debate about fairness, but it has nothing to do with economic disadvantages. To suggest that by improving people's "social conditions" (pg 63) we will reduce abortions, is to enter into the terribly unfortunate discussion about the economic level at which individuals will no longer find abortion acceptable. We either value life or we do not, it is not an economic question. Honestly, does anyone really believe that by providing more money or better living conditions we will encourage people to stop having sex, or that we will incentivize them to choose life when our political leadership tells them it is their "right" to choose otherwise. Social programs will not solve moral problems. We must provide care for expectant mothers, no one disagrees, but this is not sufficient to address a mind-set, perpetuated by a legal framework, that accepts the option of terminating a life.
Please help me to understand where in our Church's teaching we find support for Senator Obama's position. Better still, please, and I mean this sincerely, tell me how the professor's argument for helping the poor is supported by Senator Obama's statement about his own daughters. Where is the "ethic for life" to be found in this perspective when referring to two people who will be well educated and well provided for?
Finally, on page 92, the professor points out that it is perfectly appropriate for an Archbishop to "reaffirm the unambiguous teaching of the Church" when a politician actively sponsors legislation which advocates the acceptability of abortion. But then the professor fails to acknowledge his own glaring inconsistency on this very issue. Senator Obama said that his very first act as President would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act.
It is important to note that Senator Obama did not say he would first sign legislation to assist the poor, he did not say he would first provide for more assistance to unwed mothers, he did not say he would first provide support to reduce violent crime, no, instead, he made it very clear that his very first act as President of the United States would be to sign a piece of legislation that would dramatically increase the number of abortions in this country.
We do not need to reiterate the clear teachings of our Church on this most important issue, but then with all Christian charity, I cannot understand how anyone can reconcile these teachings with the publicly stated positions of Senator Obama. What is remarkably clear in all of this debate, is that the Church is being divided. We must all remember that Satan is smarter then we are, and when he wants to divide the Church he will do it through brilliantly articulated contradictions.
Please pray, I know I will.
This book is illogical and poorly thought out and Mr. Kmiec is incoherent when interviewed.
Alas I stand corrected; Douglas Kmiec's Bishop is the odious Roger "The Dodger" Mahoney who did not support his priest for denying the effeminate and whiny Doug the Blessed Sacrament. Mr. Kmiec in the spirit of chasten sinner immediately fled to arms of his Most Catholic Majesty E.J. Dionne who immediately absolved him of all wrongdoing and promulgates his cause for leftist sainthood to the ever shrinking and elderly Liberal Catholic Amen corner.
A more interesting observation of Mr. Kmiec by his former friends and colleagues is his burning desire for a seat on the Supreme Court which he seeks to garner from a grateful President Obama.
Such a noble character is a worthy addition to the humane left who would drown us in the blood of the innocent but recoil from the termination of the life of the guilty.
A Catholic can't support Obama who is the most rabid pro-abortion candidate in our history without limit or restraint. Obama's record of financial support of Charity is non-existent and indicative of a complete lack of any real moral character.
2/8/2009
Kmiec was a simple minded shill and now we all enjoy noting the immense succuess of the Chicago Coummuity Organizer in chief and his well documented support for the Freedom of Choice Act but Pro-Obama Catholics weren't listening when in January 22, 2008 he stated
Obama Statement on 35th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade Decision
Chicago, IL | January 22, 2008
Chicago, IL -- Senator Barack Obama today released the following statement on the 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision.
"Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, it's never been more important to protect a woman's right to choose. Last year, the Supreme Court decided by a vote of 5-4 to uphold the Federal Abortion Ban, and in doing so undermined an important principle of Roe v. Wade: that we must always protect women's health. With one more vacancy on the Supreme Court, we could be looking at a majority hostile to a women's fundamental right to choose for the first time since Roe v. Wade. The next president may be asked to nominate that Supreme Court justice. That is what is at stake in this election.
"Throughout my career, I've been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100% pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America.
"When South Dakota passed a law banning all abortions in a direct effort to have Roe overruled, I was the only candidate for President to raise money to help the citizens of South Dakota repeal that law. When anti-choice protesters blocked the opening of an Illinois Planned Parenthood clinic in a community where affordable health care is in short supply, I was the only candidate for President who spoke out against it. And I will continue to defend this right by passing the Freedom of Choice Act as president.
"Moreover, I believe in and have supported common-sense solutions like increasing access to affordable birth control to help prevent unintended pregnancies. In the Illinois state Senate, when Congress failed to require insurance plans to cover FDA-approved contraceptives, I made sure those contraceptives were covered for women in Illinois. In the U.S. Senate, I've worked with Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) on a bill that would make birth control more affordable for low-income and college women, and introduced the Senate version of Representative Hilda Solis' bill to reduce unintended pregnancies in communities of color. As President, I will improve access to affordable health care and work to ensure that our teens are getting the information and services they need to stay safe and healthy.
"But we also know that Roe v. Wade is about more than a woman's right to choose; it's about equality. It's about whether our daughters are going to have the same opportunities as our sons. And so to truly honor that decision, we need to update the social contract so that women can free themselves, and their children, from violent relationships; so that a mom can stay home with a sick child without getting a pink slip; so that she can go to work knowing that there's affordable, quality childcare for her children; and so that the American dream is within reach for every family in this country. This anniversary reminds us that it's not enough to protect the gains of the past - we have to build a future that's filled with hope and possibility for all Americans."

