Buy new:
$14.92$14.92
Arrives:
Monday, Dec 4
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $10.70
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Celine Dion's Let's Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste (33 1/3) Paperback – December 15, 2007
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
—
| $8.48 | — |
- Kindle
$9.99 Read with our free app - Paperback
$14.9254 Used from $2.13 34 New from $10.92 - MP3 CD
from $8.486 New from $8.48
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length176 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherContinuum
- Publication dateDecember 15, 2007
- Dimensions4.75 x 0.45 x 6.45 inches
- ISBN-10082642788X
- ISBN-13978-0826427885
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Let's Talk About Love: Why Other People Have Such Bad TastePaperback$9.66 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Dec 4Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Céline: The Authorized BiographyGeorges-Hebert GermainPaperback$9.85 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Dec 4Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Brilliant." -- Alex Ross, author of The Rest is Noise
"It's fascinating stuff...By turns hilarious and heartwarming." -- Guardian Unlimited Arts blog, March 2008
"A wide-ranging book, one predicated on the possibility that what repels us may say more about us than what attracts us...[an] insightful, engaging, and unexpectedly moving book." -- The Globe and Mail, January 19, 2008
"An important study- not just of Dion and pop music but also of the changing nature of criticism in the popular realm." -- Bookforum, January 2008
"This could be the best book of the series...razor-sharp and unerringly intelligent." -- John Wenzel, The Denver Post
“The always critical and erudite Mr. Wilson actually approached Let's Talk About Love as a non-fan grappling with questions of "good" and "bad" taste... -- Idolator.com
“a rigorous, perceptive and very funny meditation on what happens when you realize that there's more to life than being hip, and begin to grapple with just what that "more" might be.” -- Montreal Gazette
“A book pondering the aesthetics of Celine risks going wrong in about 3,000 different ways...Instead, this book goes very deeply right.” --Sam Anderson, New York Magazine
From the Back Cover
Tens of millions of people around the world love Céline Dion. Many millions more can't stand her. Why? Carl Wilson, by no means a Céline fan at the start of his quest, searches for the answer in this extraordinary book. Immersing himself in Dion's 1999 hit album Let's Talk About Love (the one with that Titanic song on it), he examines everything from Céline's Quebec roots to her enormous voice to her tear-jerking sentimentality. As Wilson strives to understand Céline's immense global popularity, he faces the question of what drives personal taste - and whether it's possible to change it.
About the Author
Carl Wilson is a writer and editor at The Globe and Mail, Canada's national newspaper, and his work also has appeared in Pitchfork, Slate, The New York Times, Blender and many other publications. His pieces were selected for two of Da Capo Books' annual Best Music Writing collections, in 2002 and 2007, by guest editors Jonathan Lethem and Robert Christgau. He runs the popular music blog Zoilus.com and is part of the team behind Trampoline Hall, Toronto's acclaimed nightclub series of lectures by non-experts, which toured America in 2002.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Let's Talk About Love
A Journey to the End of TasteBy Carl Wilsoncontinuum
Copyright © 2007 Carl WilsonAll right reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-8264-2788-5
Contents
1. Let's Talk About Hate.....................................................................................12. Let's Talk About Pop (and Its Critics)....................................................................113. Let's Talk in French......................................................................................234. Let's Talk About World Conquest...........................................................................395. Let's Talk About Schmaltz.................................................................................516. Let's Sing Really Loud....................................................................................627. Let's Talk About Taste....................................................................................738. Let's Talk About Who's Got Bad Taste......................................................................879. Let's Talk with Some Fans.................................................................................10510. Let's Do a Punk Version of "My Heart Will Go On" (or, Let's Talk About Our Feelings).....................12011. Let's Talk About Let's Talk About Love...................................................................13512. Let's Talk About Love....................................................................................149Acknowledgments..............................................................................................163Chapter One
Let's Talk About Hate"Hell is other people's music," wrote the cult musician Momus in a 2006 column for Wired magazine. He was talking about, the intrusive soundtracks that blare in malls and restaurants, but his rewrite of Jean-Paul Sartre conveys a familiar truth: When you hate a song, the reaction tends to come in spasms. Hearing it can be like having a cockroach crawl up your sleeve: you can't flick it away fast enough. But why? And why, in fact, do each of us hate some songs, or the entire output of some musicians, that millions upon millions of other people adore?
In the case of me and Cline Dion, it was Madonna's smirk at the 1998 Oscars that sealed it. That night in March, the galleries of Los Angeles's Shrine Auditorium were the colosseum for the latest gladiatorial contest in which art's frail emissaries would get flattened by the thundering chariots of mass culture. And Empress Madonna would laugh.
Until that evening, I'd done as well as anyone could to keep from colliding with Titanic, the all-media juggernaut that had been cutting full-steam through theaters, celebrity rags and radio playlists since Christmas. I hadn't seen the movie and didn't own a TV, but the magazines and websites I read reinforced my sureness that the blockbuster was a pandering fabrication, an action chick-flick, perfectly focus-grouped to be foisted on the dating public.
Now, I realize this attitude, and several to follow, probably makes me sound like a total asshole if, like millions of people, you happen to be a fan of Titanic or of the woman who sang its theme. You may be right. Much of this book is about reasonable people carting around cultural assumptions that make them assholes to millions of strangers. But bear with me. At the time, I thought I had plenty of backup.
For instance, Suck.com, that late 90s fount of whip-smart online snark, called Titanic a "14-hour-long piece of cinematic vaudeville" that "had the most important thing a movie can have: a clear plot that teaches us important new stuff like if you're incredibly good-looking you'll fall ha love." It was contrasted with Harmony Korine's Gummo, a film about malformed but somehow radiant teenagers drifting around rural, tornado-devastated Xenia, Ohio-as if, after the twister, Dorothy's Kansas had been transformed into its own eschatological Oz. Suck said that Gummo evoked "the vertigo we encounter when people discover and make up new standards of cool and beauty," a sensation resisted by mass society because those standards could lye "the wrong ones, and we can't allow ourselves to look at that too hard or long."
CNN.com's review, on the other hand, described Gummo as "the cinematic equivalent of Korine making fart noises, folding his eyelids inside-out, and eating boogers," and the director as a punk-ass straining in vain to be a punk. For cred, the writer namechecked the Sex Pistols, saying that unlike theirs, Korine's rebellion came down to making fun of the hicks.
I knew which argument I bought, and it wasn't just because the same CNN reviewer called Titanic "one swell ride." After all, Korine was a lyrical enfant terible who'd gotten fan letters from Werner Herzog; Titanic director James Cameron made Sylvester Stallone flicks. Korine was New York and Cameron was Hollywood. And just consider their soundtracks: Gummo had a soundscape of doom-metal bands, with an alleviating dash of gospel and Bach. Titanic had Celtic pennywhistles, saccharine strings and ... Cline Dion.
Living in Montreal, Quebec, made it impossible to elude Titanic's musical attack as neatly as the celliloid one. Dion had been intimate with the whole province for years, as first a child star, then a diva of all French-speaking nations and finally an English-French crossover smash. Her rendition of James Homer and Will Jennings's "My Heart Will Go On" had come out first on her bestselling 1997 album Let's Talk. About Love, then on the bestselling movie soundtrack and then again on a bestselling single. (Ten years later, by some measures, it's the fourteenth-most-successful pop song the world has ever seen.) I hadn't listened regularly to pop radio since I was eleven, and I got agoraphobic in malls, but that tin-flute intro would tootle at me from wall speakers ha cafs, falafel joints and corner stores, and in taxis when I could afford them. Dodging "My Heart Will Go On" in 1997-98 would have required a Unabomber-like retreat from audible civilization.
What's more, I was a music critic. I hadn't been one long: I'd done arts writing at a student paper, veered into leftish political journalism and then become the arts editor at one of Montreal's downtown "alternative weeklies." I wrote profiles and CD reviews on the side for the rakish punk rock guitarist who edited the music section (when he dragged himself into the office in the mid-afternoon). I championed experimentalists and the kinds of unpopular-song writers I was prone to calling "literate." I would not have deigned to listen to an entire Cline Dion album, but it was a basic cultural competency in Montreal to know her hits well enough to mock them with precision. In Quebec, Dion was a cultural fact you could bear with grudging amusement-a horror show, but our horror show-until Titanic overturned all proportion and Dion's ululating tonsils dilated to swallow the world.
* * *
With "My Heart Will Go On," Cline-bashing became not just a Canadian hobby but a nearly universal pastime. Then-Village Voice music editor Robert Christgau described her popularity as a trial to be endured. Rob Sheffield of Rolling Stone called her voice "just furniture polish." As late as 2005, her megahit would be ranked the No. 3 "Most Annoying Song Ever" in Maxim magazine: "The second most tragic event ever to result from that fabled ocean liner continues to torment humanity years later, as Canada's cruelest shows off a voice as loud as a sonic boom, though not nearly so pretty." A 2006 BBC TV special went two better and named "My Heart Will Go On" the No. 1 most irritating song, and in 2007 England's Q magazine elected Dion one of the three worst pop singers of all time, accusing her of "grinding out every note as if bearing some kind of grudge against the very notion of economy."
The black belt in invective has to go to Cintra Wilson, whose anti-celebrity-culture book A Massive Swelling describes Dion as "the most wholly repellant woman ever to sing songs of love," singling out "the eye-bleeding Titanic ballad" as well as her "unctuous mewling with Blind Italian Opera Guys in loud emotional primary coloring." Wilson concluded: "I think most people would rather be processed through the digestive tract of an anaconda than be Cline Dion for a day."
My personal favorite is the episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer in which Buffy moves into her freshman university dorm and her roommate turns out to be, literally, a demon-the first clue being that she tacks a Cline Dion poster up on their wall. But the catalogue of slams, from critics to Sunday columnists and talk-show hosts to Saturday Night Live, could fill this book. I've mostly seconded those emotions, even when a blog ran a Dion joke contest that produced the riddle, "Q: Why did they take the Cline Dion inflatable sex doll off the market? A: It sticked too hard."
But it was at the Oscars that things got personal.
* * *
The night was the expected Titanic sweep, capped by director James Cameron's bellowing self-quotation, "I'm the king of the world!" (Which from that podium sounded like, "My brand has total multiplatform synergy!") But in the Best Original Song category, Titanic-and Dion-had one unlikely rival, and it happened to be Elliott Smith.
Smith was a hero of mine and of the late-90s indie subculture, one of those "literate," bedroom-recording songwriters whose take on cool and beauty seemed leagues away from the pop-glamour machine. Pockmarked and shy, with a backstory that included childhood abuse and (though I didn't know it yet) on-and-off heroin addiction, he had recorded mainly for the tiny northwestern Kill Rock Stars label, but had just signed to Dreamworks, which would release his next album, XO, that summer.
Smith wrote songs whose sighing melodies served as bait for lyrics laced with corrosive rage. They dangled glimpses of a sun "raining its guiding light down on everyone," but everyone in them got burned. They were catchy like a fish hook. As his biographer Benjamin Nugent later wrote in Elliott Smith and the Ballad of Big Nothing, "Smith effectively deploys substance abuse as a metaphor for other forms of self-destructive behavior, and the metaphor is a handy one for several reasons. For one, a songwriter taking substance abuse as his literal subject (even if love is the figurative one) can easily steer clear of the Cline Dion clichs of contemporary Top 40 music, the language of hearts, embraces, great divides. [Instead] he participates in a hipper tradition, that of Hank Williams, Johnny Cash and Kurt Cobain-their addiction laments, disavowals and caustic self-portraits."
Smith also dealt frankly, I felt, with one of the ruling paradoxes for partisans of "alternative" culture: It might look like you were asserting superiority over the multitudes, but as a former bullied kid, I always figured it started from rejection. If respect or simple fairness were denied you, you'd build a great life (the best revenge) from what you could scrounge outside their orbit, freed from the thirst for majority approbation. This dynamic is frequently rehearsed in Smith's songs: In "2:45 a.m.," a night prowl that begins by "looking for the man who attacked me / while everybody was laughing at me" ends with "walking out on Center Circle / Been pushed away and I'll never come back." If laments and disavowals were your lot, you would shine those turds until they gleamed. And you'd spread the word to the rest of the alienated, walking wounded-which, in a late-capitalist consumer society, I thought, ought to include everyone but the rich-that they too could find sustenance and sympathy in a voluntary exile.
So how had Smith ended up in center circle at the Shrine Auditorium, smack up against the "Cline Dion clichs," a juxtaposition that seemed as improbable as Gummo winning Best Picture? An accident, really. Years before, he'd met independent filmmaker Gus Van Sant hanging out in the Portland bars where Smith's first band, Heatmiser, played. That friendship led to writing songs for Van Sant's first "major motion picture," Good Will Hunting, and so to Oscar night, featuring (as Rolling Stone put it) "one of the strangest billings since Jimi Hendrix opened for the Monkees," with Smith alongside the pap trio of Trisha Yearwood, Michael Bolton and Cline Dion.
He tried to refuse the invitation, "but then they said that if I didn't play it, they would get someone else to play the song," he told Under the Radar magazine. "They'd get someone like Richard Marx to do it. I think when they said that, they had done their homework on me a little bit. Or maybe Richard Marx is a universal scare tactic."
(Richard Marx, for those who've justifiably forgotten, was the balladeer who in 1989 sang, "Wherever you go, whatever you do, I will be right here waiting for you"-threatening enough? But if Dion hadn't been booked, her name might have worked too.)
On Oscar night, Madonna introduced the performers. Smith ended up following Trisha Yearwood's rendition of Con Air's "How Do I Live?" (written by Dianne Warren, who also penned "Because You Loved Me" and "Love Can Move Mountains" for Dion). He shuffled onstage in a bright white suit loaned by Prada-all he wore of his own was his underwear-and sang "Miss Misery," Good Will Hunting's closing love song to depression. The Oscar producers had refused to let Smith sit on a stool, leaving him stranded clutching his guitar on the wide bare stage. The song seemed as small and gorgeous as a sixteenth-century Persian miniature.
And what came next? Cline Dion swooshing out in clouds of fake fog, dressed in an hourglass black gown, on a set where a white-tailed orchestra was arrayed to look like they were on the deck of the Titanic itself. She'd played the Oscars several times, and brought on her full range of gesticulations and grimaces, at one point pounding her chest so robustly it nearly broke the chain on her multimillion-dollar replica of the movie's "Heart of the Ocean" diamond necklace. Then Dion, Smith and Yearwood joined hands and bowed in what Rolling Stone called a "bizarre Oscar sandwich."
"It got personal," Smith said later, "with people saying how fragile I looked on stage in a white suit. There was just all of this focus, and people were saying all this stuff simply because I didn't come out and command the stage like Cline Dion does."
And when Madonna opened the envelope to reveal that the Oscar went to "My Heart Would Go On," she snorted and said, "What a shocker."
I liked Madonna, who danced on the art/commerce borderline its nimbly as anyone. But right then, I squeezed my fists washing she'd preserved a more dignified neutrality ("dignified neutrality" being the phrase that springs right to mind when you say "Madonna"). In retrospect, I realize she was making fun of the predictability, not of Elliott Smith; my umbrage only showed how overinvested I was. I wasn't surprised the Oscars had behaved like the Oscars, that the impossibly good-looking people had spotted each other across the room and as usual run sighing into one another's arms. But the carnivalesque reversal that wedged Elliott in there with Cline and Trisha was one of those rips in the cultural-space continuum that make you feel anything may happen. I was enough of a populist even then to dream that love might move mountains and heal the great divide.
But when Madonna seemed to chuckle at Elliott Smith, the grudge was back on. And not with Madonna. With Cline Dion.
* * *
Lamentably, this story requires a coda: Elliott Smith had an adverse reaction to his dose of fame. Paranoid that his friends resented him, he distanced himself, relapsing into mood swings and substance abuse, even public brawls. His songwriting suffered, with the so-so Figure 8 in 2000 and then zip until 2003, when he reportedly had sobered up and was finishing a new album. Then, on October 2l, 2003, police in Los Angeles got a call from Smith's girlfriend in their Echo Park apartment. They had been arguing. She had locked herself in the bathroom. Then she heard a scream. She came out to find Smith with a steak knife plunged into his chest, dead at thirty-four.
I hadn't thought much about the Oscar debacle between 1998 and 2003. I'd moved from Montreal to Toronto, from the alternative weekly to a large daily paper, gotten married (to a woman with a severe Gummo fixation), and settled into a new circle of friends. But the day Smith died, I flashed back to that night when the whole world had gotten to hear what one of its fragile, unlovely outcasts had to offer, and it answered, No, we'd prefer Cline Dion.
"Tastes," wrote the poet Paul Valry, "are composed of a thousand distastes." So when the idea came to me recently to examine the mystery of taste-of what keeps Titanic people and Gummo people apart-by looking closely at a very popular artist I really, really can't stand, Dion was waiting at the front of the line.
Chapter Two
Let's Talk About Pop (and Its Critics)I did not hate Cline Dion solely on Elliott Smith's account. From the start, her music struck me as bland monotony raised to a pitch of obnoxious bombast-R&B with the sex and slyness surgically removed, French chanson severed from its wit and soul-and her repertoire as Oprah Winfrey-approved chicken soup for the consumerist soul, a neverending crescendo of personal affirmation deaf to social conflict and context. In celebrity terms, she was another dull Canadian goody-goody. She could barely muster up a decent personal scandal, aside from the pre-existing squick-out of her marriage to the twice-her age Svengali who began managing her when she was twelve.
As far as I knew, I had never even met anybody who liked Cline Dion.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from Let's Talk About Loveby Carl Wilson Copyright © 2007 by Carl Wilson. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Continuum; First Edition (December 15, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 176 pages
- ISBN-10 : 082642788X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0826427885
- Item Weight : 5.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 4.75 x 0.45 x 6.45 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #652,000 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #228 in Music Appreciation (Books)
- #1,594 in Music History & Criticism (Books)
- #2,343 in Rock Music (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Wilson's fresh summary of Pierre Bourdieu's *Distinction* and some more recent empirical work is very good and benefits greatly from his pop-culture examples. I was surprised to learn of the survey results demonstrating that people with greater musical tolerance easily learn to appreciate the music associated with racial minorities (jazz, latin, etc.), but only extremely tolerant listeners do not shun heavy metal, gospel, and other music associated with low education. I suspect Wilson is on to something when he suggests that critics' extreme distaste for Celion Dion is partly motivated by a desire to distance themselves from low education / "white trash" culture.
The author also name-checks Hume, Kant, and other deep thinkers on the nature of taste, but these philosophical parts of the book are the shortest and least enlightening.
Later in the book Wilson meets with some fans of Dion to discuss why they like her music and what she means to them. This section cashes out the more speculative, sociological/philosophical passages. Wilson displays a deep humanity in these chapters. The fans have their own complicated backgrounds, as everyone does, and their admiration for Dion rings true in the context of their convictions, affiliations, bonds, heritage, and ways of living. These portraits make apparent how easily a critic could denigrate their musical tastes in the course of thoughtless social jockeying.
The book ends with a review of the album *Let's Talk About Love*, informed by what Wilson has learned in the course of his research. It's very charitable, but it wouldn't convince me to buy the album. Almost, though.
There are elitists -- those in search of ways to reinforce an egotistical notion that they are better than the masses.
There are negativists -- those who are reflexively critical of things affirmed by others.
There are the tone-deaf -- those who are unable to appreciate perfect pitch and melodic brilliance.
Once in a while these four negative qualities apparently converge in one person. That person is the author of this book. Sorry, guy -- feel for ya.
Even if there were nothing else appealing about Celine's music, her ability to enter each note at nearly perfect pitch across a wide range of musical styles and octaves is an amazing talent. The author's failure to mention this speaks to his likely inability to recognize it.
But there is much more. The work and passion she puts into her creations is incredible. It has given me much enjoyment over many years.
I was curious about this book because when Celine was at her high point I began hearing criticisms of her that were so mean and vitriolic that it baffled me. I eventually concluded that some people are simply unable to appreciate what I hear. This was based on observing that Celine critics often seem to prefer music that is off-pitched and not very melodic. But there also seemed to be an underlying desire to bring down the mighty. It was similar to hearing people badmouth a president or CEO. This tendency is obviously a part of the human condition. What a shame that some people are apparently unable to allow themselves to simply appreciate heartfelt emotions expressed in music.
It seems that it never occurred to the author that Celine is so popular because her talent is world-class, and that for some reason he is simply unable to appreciate it. Or, even simpler, that different people have different tastes in music, as they do in many things like food, fashion, and so on. Strange. He works himself into a intellectual Gordian knot trying to convince himself that since others like her and he doesn't, this proves that he is superior. And it is all about capitalism, cultural elitism, education, globalization, conformity, and taste being a "means to distinguish ourselves from others."
Dude, give it a rest. It's OK. If you don't like her, just don't listen to her. We don't care what you think and trust me on this, my love of Celine's music does not make me inferior to you.
I think it would be far more interesting to read an analysis of why there are people who seem to LOVE viciously badmouthing a woman who is so talented and hard working, whose music is loved by so many, and who seems infinitely more genuine than most other weird, eccentric stars in her class. I've heard people say that they don't like the shrillness of her voice. I don't buy it because the same people will turn around and say something like David Sanborne -- who will break your ear drums with loud piercing blasts -- is awesome. No. I think some people are insecure about their identity and need to feel that their taste in things validates them. In my mind it does precisely the opposite. Celine represents an opportunity for these folks to ostensibly validate their identity and "bring down the mighty" at once. Sorry lot.
At any rate, this book offers a very lopsided, and thus very poor, analysis of the subject. It brings to mind a quote I heard recently: "If someone tells you you are putting too much peanut butter on your bread, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life."
Let's Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste, is memoir, music criticism, philosophy, anthropology, and more. Wilson investigates how our personal history, our thoughts, and emotions, our place in society all help explain what we like and what we don't.
The book's been reissued with a new subtitle as, Let's Talk About Love: Why other People Have Such Bad Taste, and with a Part II that includes some dozen essays by others. I intend to read that version too, but this review is about the earlier version.
I began the book with no special like or dislike for Dion, and ended without any new opinions about her. She is really not the point of the book though, only a well-examined example. Maybe more well examined than necessary.
What Wilson's book does for me is help in finding ways to process through some of the opinions I might have about a movie, a book, a poem, even a philosopher or a politician, and realize the complex ways I came to those opinions. I see even more that, if my life experiences had been different, I might like and dislike different things. That might be the most important point of the book.
Top reviews from other countries
What’s your response? Like me, it’s probably: ick. Right?
Well, you’re not alone as nearly everyone seems to have this response to Dion mostly thanks to her obnoxious monster hit, My Heart Will Go On, from James Cameron’s Titanic that won an Oscar and sold bazillions of copies worldwide. But chances are you won’t have heard much of her music beyond that song, or know much about her as a person, and yet the response to Dion is still: ick. Why?
That’s what Carl Wilson sets out to discover in his look at Dion’s album Let’s Talk About Love. But unlike the other books in the 33 ⅓ series, Dion’s album is barely touched upon as Wilson chooses instead to examine what “taste” is and how people form critical opinions in culture.
What Wilson does in the book is definitely interesting and laudable but I found his conclusions to be a little obvious and his approach a bit too academic at times. He basically comes to chastise himself for being too much of a snob to exclude Dion and pop music in general because he perceives it to be schmaltzy and decides to be more inclusive of his cultural intake - which is fine, but isn’t an eye-opening revelation (not to me anyway as this is already my own personal approach to all things cultural) especially when that’s what you’d expect in a book that sets itself up the way it has.
I appreciate the extensive research Wilson’s put into his book like informing the reader of Dion’s life and background, and putting her personality into the context of her Quebec upbringing - if nothing else, you’ll come away knowing a lot about Dion as a person. But did we really need an entire chapter on schmaltz? I understand why it was included but some of the topics here have only the most tenuous connection to the basic thesis that my attention was strained at times throughout. As relatively short as the book is - 160 pages - I feel if Wilson had tightened it up a bit, it’d be a more satisfying read that’d be as informative.
But I did enjoy many sections of the book. I liked Wilson’s autobiographical notes such as his trip to Las Vegas to watch one of Dion’s last shows when she was a resident there and feeling momentarily touched by her singing, and that he wore headphones when listening to her music at home so his neighbours wouldn’t know he was listening to Celine Dion. Also as a huge Elliott Smith fan, I appreciated his anecdote about how Smith always defended Dion after meeting her at the Oscars (his song Miss Misery was nominated the same year as My Heart Will Go On and Smith performed it before Dion came out) saying that he may not like her music but he respected her as a person for coming up to him pre-show and showing him a basic level of courtesy that no-one else did at the ceremony.
I think Wilson hit upon a really great idea with this book: take an album you have zero personal connection to and use it to examine music criticism itself, and for that alone it’s a standout in the excellent 33 ⅓ series. It’s just that at times it’s a little long-winded and it’s conclusions aren’t as inspired as the premise. If you want a thoughtful book that takes a nuanced look at music criticism and its faults, or an intellectual review of Dion’s seemingly bland songs, Let’s Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste is worth a look.



