Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$25.95$25.95
FREE delivery:
Thursday, May 11
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $11.94
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
92% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
89% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
& FREE Shipping
82% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Change They Can't Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America - Updated Edition Paperback – October 26, 2014
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Hardcover, Illustrated
"Please retry" | $20.98 | $3.94 |
Purchase options and add-ons
How the political beliefs of Tea Party supporters are connected to far-right social movements
Are Tea Party supporters merely a group of conservative citizens concerned about government spending? Or are they racists who refuse to accept Barack Obama as their president because he's not white? Change They Can’t Believe In offers an alternative argument―that the Tea Party is driven by the reemergence of a reactionary movement in American politics that is fueled by a fear that America has changed for the worse. Providing a range of original evidence and rich portraits of party sympathizers as well as activists, Christopher Parker and Matt Barreto show that the perception that America is in danger directly informs how Tea Party supporters think and act.
In a new afterword, Parker and Barreto reflect on the Tea Party’s recent initiatives, including the 2013 government shutdown, and evaluate their prospects for the 2016 election.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrinceton University Press
- Publication dateOctober 26, 2014
- Dimensions5.63 x 0.98 x 9.68 inches
- ISBN-100691163618
- ISBN-13978-0691163611
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of products
White Identity Politics (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology)Paperback - Most purchasedin this set of products
Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a NationPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A scathing analysis of the Tea Party movement, linking it in spirit to the Ku Klux Klan and the John Birch Society. Taking today's conservative populists to be dangerous and their ideas self-incriminating, the authors speculate that Tea Party supporters may perceive of social change as subversion. Based on research and interviews, they suggest racism, desire for social dominance . . . drives the Tea Party." ― Publishers Weekly
"Change They Can't Believe In offers valuable empirical data on the Tea Party, and its focus on supporters' antagonism toward Obama is critical to understanding the movement."---Michael O'Donnell, New Republic
"[A] rigorous scholarly investigation of the tea party. . . . Parker and Barreto make the case that tea party supporters are driven above all by 'anxiety incited by Obama as President.' Intuitively, this may already make sense to many readers, but the authors muster the evidence in support, dividing and subdividing different categories of political activity and belief to arrive at a firm basis for their conclusion. . . . [S]upported by reasoned facts in place of political passions." ― Kirkus Reviews
"[Parker and Barreto's] statistically informed analysis helps us understand the Tea Party's priorities, its fervor, and its contempt for compromise."---Glenn C. Altschuler, Huffington Post
"In Change They Can't Believe In, Parker and Barreto examine the emergence of the Tea Party in the wake of the Obama presidency. . . . In addition to marshaling a great deal of original data, the authors capably place the Tea Party movement in a historical context." ― Choice
Review
"This original and important book is the most well-researched and significant scholarly study of the Tea Party movement and its members yet to appear. Unfolding a profile of Tea Party activists threatened by liberal changes and ill-formulated images of big government and state regulatory power, Parker and Barreto tease out core beliefs and views, ranging from commonplace conservatism to racist antagonism. Their book is an outstanding contribution to understanding American politics."―Desmond King, University of Oxford
"The Tea Party has attracted a great deal of attention since it burst on the scene in 2010, but few books about the movement have rested on as impressive an empirical foundation as this one. The portrait Parker and Barreto paint of the model Tea Party sympathizer is chilling and sure to anger movement apologists who insist the group is made up of typical patriotic conservatives. This timely, important work deserves the widest audience possible."―Doug McAdam, Stanford University
"Through a statistically and historically informed analysis of the views of Tea Party sympathizers, Parker and Barreto show that at bottom, many condemn America as it has come to be: a country in which white straight Christian men do not set standards for all. Precisely because their American dreams must go unfulfilled, the passions of these sympathizers will remain forces in American life for years to come."―Rogers M. Smith, University of Pennsylvania
"This book's main contribution to the growing literature on the Tea Party movement is its focus on the characteristics and political beliefs of Tea Party supporters―rather than activists―and its theoretical framework, which locates the Tea Party in the broader structure of far-right social and political movements in the United States."―Alan Abramowitz, Emory University
From the Back Cover
"Parker and Barreto have conducted exacting research to probe the contours of support for the Tea Party, and their innovative, scientific, and critical book highlights how Tea Party sympathizers differ from mainstream conservatives in crucial ways. The authors demonstrate that despite the public image of the Tea Party, its supporters cannot be characterized as either patriotic or freedom loving. This is a must-read for all students of American politics and anyone concerned about democracy in America."--Michael C. Dawson, University of Chicago
"This original and important book is the most well-researched and significant scholarly study of the Tea Party movement and its members yet to appear. Unfolding a profile of Tea Party activists threatened by liberal changes and ill-formulated images of big government and state regulatory power, Parker and Barreto tease out core beliefs and views, ranging from commonplace conservatism to racist antagonism. Their book is an outstanding contribution to understanding American politics."--Desmond King, University of Oxford
"The Tea Party has attracted a great deal of attention since it burst on the scene in 2010, but few books about the movement have rested on as impressive an empirical foundation as this one. The portrait Parker and Barreto paint of the model Tea Party sympathizer is chilling and sure to anger movement apologists who insist the group is made up of typical patriotic conservatives. This timely, important work deserves the widest audience possible."--Doug McAdam, Stanford University
"Through a statistically and historically informed analysis of the views of Tea Party sympathizers, Parker and Barreto show that at bottom, many condemn America as it has come to be: a country in which white straight Christian men do not set standards for all. Precisely because their American dreams must go unfulfilled, the passions of these sympathizers will remain forces in American life for years to come."--Rogers M. Smith, University of Pennsylvania
"This book's main contribution to the growing literature on the Tea Party movement is its focus on the characteristics and political beliefs of Tea Party supporters--rather than activists--and its theoretical framework, which locates the Tea Party in the broader structure of far-right social and political movements in the United States."--Alan Abramowitz, Emory University
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; Revised edition (October 26, 2014)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691163618
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691163611
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.63 x 0.98 x 9.68 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #831,342 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #315 in Radical Political Thought
- #466 in Political Parties (Books)
- #1,769 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Basically, the Tea Party folk are a group who believe that the real America is "a heterosexual, Christian, middle-class, (mostly) male, white country." What they see, however, is a black president (whom 90% think is Muslim), a female house speaker, gay and lesbian rights movements, among other things. To them social change is a subversion, and they fear it. When they chant "Take our country back!," these are the people they want to take it back from. They are reactionary conservatives in the sense that they fear change of any kind. Nothing must undermine their way of life notes the authors.
The authors begin by trying to ascertain the conservative nature of this group. An examination of their websites (compared with the National Review Online, a conservative site) show that 33 percent of the content is conspiratorial in nature, a 400 percent greater rate of attacks on the president, and a 600 percent greater rate of attacks on the government, thus showing a significant leaning toward reactionary conservatism. Through a Multi-State Survey of Race and Politics, the authors display many charts (these charts are difficult to read on the Kindle version) and results of many interviews with not only Tea Party folk, but also sympathizers and critics of the Tea Party as well.
According to the authors, the sympathizers of the Tea Party tend to be older, financially well off, well educated, evangelical, and mostly male. They back this claim up with much research, and the book is replete with charts and tables showing the results of various surveys. One thing I found interesting, as suggested by Skocpol and Williamson (see their book here on Amazon), is that Fox News appears to be a clearing house for Tea Party discourse; it is a means to communicate with the masses. Another thing that I found to be, can I say, perverse, is fact that the supporters tend to think that Obama has a secret, socialist, and perhaps subversive agenda. The authors also note important factors associated with supporters: race, gender, religion (primarily evangelical). Attitude orientations believed to contribute to support for the Tea Party are primarily anxiety associated with Obama, racism, social dominance, and, to a much lesser degree, ethnocentrism and authoritarianism. All of these conclusions are backed up by much statistical research, and the details of this are explained for us in the appendix.
The authors provide much detailed analysis of the Tea Party's commitment to freedom and patriotism. Here we learn how "reactionary conservatism is a predisposition motivated by the anxiety associated with the perception that real Americans are losing their country." Over 70 percent of sympathizers are very concerned that the country they know is changing too fast and for the worse. Regarding patriotism, the authors examine the differences between true believers and true skeptics, as well as between reactionary conservatives verse more moderate conservatives. Again, many charts accompany their analysis. There is more information concerning support for the DREAM Act, support for birthright citizenship, as well as immigration's effect on crime and political influence, and homophobia. We learn from the data collected by the authors just how Tea Party supporters view these things. Again the findings indicate that "Tea Party conservatives are really reactionary conservatives in disguise [...] conservatism - in its own - cannot account for Tea party supporters' attitudes."
The authors now discuss the "Obamaphobic" nature of the Tea Party supporters. They start with the Tea Party's roots back in 2007 and their subsequent "coming-out" in 2009. I remember hearing a lot of negative rhetoric in the press and elsewhere concerning the president, and I wondered where it was coming from. I learned here that the source was, in fact, the Tea Party. Some of their claims were that Obama was un-American, a secret Muslim, had no valid birth certificate, was anti-Christian, was a secret socialist or communist, yadda, yadda, yadda. Do people really believe this stuff, or are they just trying to denigrate the president? Why, in 2011, a book was even published claiming to prove Obama wasn't qualified for the presidency.
What was really shocking to me was the statistics on presidential traits and attitudes toward Obama. Concerning Obama being knowledgeable, caring about people, being moral, and a good leader, Tea Party sympathizers measured significantly less on these parameters then Tea Party skeptics. Also revealed was the lower approval of Obama as a person and, most disturbing, the percent who wished for Obama's policies to fail - an astonishing 79 percent! Only 29 percent thought the president was a Christian, and only 41 percent believed he was born in the U.S. These trends held even when comparing the Tea Partiers with other conservatives thus emphasizing the reactionary nature of the party. In the final chapter, the authors discuss Tea Party participation in nonelectoral and electoral (voting) political activity showing a clear increase in such activity by true believers in the party.
In this book, the authors have bolstered their claims about Tea Party support "to rigorous tests across several domains using multiple evidentiary sources, including historical analysis, content analysis of Tea Party websites, in-depth interviews, and a comprehensive public opinion survey." Furthermore they also make the claim that, "As social scientists, we sought to bring an objective, theory-driven, data-supported examination to the study of the Tea Party movement." I think they have accomplished their mission.
In conjunction with the use of their polling data, they placed it easy to understand form. After the reader has digested the text, he or she can verify the authors' conclusion be perusing the charts and diagrams. iew
This brings me to another point: the use of polling data. There will be some readers who will not take the time to examine the results of their findings. Some readers could jump to the false conclusion that the authors are racially motivated in their analysis. The only way this opinion can be made is to believe that the members of the Tea Party movement misrepresented their views. The question then is why would they?
Another point that must be taken with regard to studies about the Tea Party movement is that they are written either by historians, political pundit, or politicians. In none of those works do the authors apply the rigid tools of social science analysis. They use either historical trends, political anecdotes, and personal political philosophy.
A possible flaw in the book is that the authors surveyed only a portion of the Tea Party movement. Two other books on the Tea Party, Theda Skopcol and Vanessa Williamson, The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism and Jill Lepore, The Whites of their Eyes, examined the New England Tea Party Movement and saw a less racist but still non-mainstream Republicanism.
After finishing the book, two questions can to mind: the first is if Barack Obama had not been elected and Obamacare not been passed, would there have a Tea Party? The second is will the Tea Party movement disappear after Obama leaves office? These are points the reader should ponder.








