Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Charcot's Bad Idea Paperback – February 15, 2009
Enhance your purchase
- Print length182 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publisherlulu.com
- Publication dateFebruary 15, 2009
- Dimensions5.83 x 0.41 x 8.26 inches
- ISBN-101409265420
- ISBN-13978-1409265429
Product details
- Publisher : lulu.com; 1st edition (revised) (February 15, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 182 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1409265420
- ISBN-13 : 978-1409265429
- Item Weight : 10.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.83 x 0.41 x 8.26 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #7,544,229 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #528,455 in Science & Math (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on June 10, 2009
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Simon was kind enough to ask me to write the forward for this book.
An excerpt from the forward text:
"Substantial medical evidence spanning many decades continues to be ignored by those in positions of power who are abusing that power to further their own vested interests. Once an idea takes root in the scientific community it is not reason but the ability to gather kudos and grab research funding that informs dominant thinking. These groups and individuals are helped immeasurably by the creation of bogus disease categories, categories such as 'Chronic Fatigue Syndrome' and other unscientific concepts such as somatisation disorder, functional weakness, conversion disorder, hysteria, and so on.
Despite an utter lack of scientific legitimacy and the enormous costs to the many patients involved and to the community at large, these massive medical frauds have continued in perpetuity almost entirely unchallenged by the world's media, human rights groups, and governments. It is a worldwide disgrace and one of the biggest scandals in the history of medicine.
How much more extreme do the suffering and abuse caused by these malign scams have to be? How many more very ill patients have to be denied even basic medical care? How many more hundreds of thousands of children and adults worldwide have to be left severely disabled or dead through inappropriate treatment?
Simon Overton is to be congratulated for creating such a timely, intelligent and compelling book on this important topic. More uncompromising educational efforts like this one must be produced if change is ever to occur. The fox has been left in charge of the hen house for far too long already. Knowledge is power.
May the day soon come when such books (and other advocacy projects) are no longer needed, and when patients can rely on something as simple as treatment based on legitimate scientific evidence and on the reality of their pathology - rather than being subjected to various self-serving and illogical pseudo-scientific `theories'. Such ideas are extremely unlikely to help any of the patient groups involved to regain their health."
I recommend this book. The chapter which deals with the case of Ean Proctor in particular is a must-read for anyone involved in this field of medicine.
Jodi Bassett, founder of the 'Hummingbirds' Foundation for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis' (HFME)
myths"- Karl Popper
Patients often present to doctors with illness for which there is no
obvious organic explanation despite investigation. Historically
medicine lacks a tradition of ignorance and has a tendency to suggest
explanations for illness and treat the patient accordingly, even when
these explanations and cures are bizarre and absurd. Examples in the
medical canon range from the leeches and bloodletting of the
Ancient Greeks to the lobotomy of pre 1970's neurosurgery. Illness
that is not easily explained can challenge the hegemony of medicine.
Patients and others can see the psychiatric referral that often follows
as a means of controlling this threat to the physician's authority, for
how after millennia of "progress" can medicine itself be deviant or
deficient? Perhaps as a result of this tradition some contemporary
thinkers in neuropsychiatry, (Manu, Sharpe, Wessely and others)
place the blame on the patient for their illness, or more specifically
the ideas held by a patient about their illness1.
By Martin Eden on June 10, 2009
myths"- Karl Popper
Patients often present to doctors with illness for which there is no
obvious organic explanation despite investigation. Historically
medicine lacks a tradition of ignorance and has a tendency to suggest
explanations for illness and treat the patient accordingly, even when
these explanations and cures are bizarre and absurd. Examples in the
medical canon range from the leeches and bloodletting of the
Ancient Greeks to the lobotomy of pre 1970's neurosurgery. Illness
that is not easily explained can challenge the hegemony of medicine.
Patients and others can see the psychiatric referral that often follows
as a means of controlling this threat to the physician's authority, for
how after millennia of "progress" can medicine itself be deviant or
deficient? Perhaps as a result of this tradition some contemporary
thinkers in neuropsychiatry, (Manu, Sharpe, Wessely and others)
place the blame on the patient for their illness, or more specifically
the ideas held by a patient about their illness1.




