Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Chemistry of Tears Hardcover – Deckle Edge, May 15, 2012
| Peter Carey (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" | $23.76 | — |
London 2010: Catherine Gehrig, conservator at the Swinburne museum, learns of the sudden death of her colleague and lover of thirteen years. As the mistress of a married man, she must struggle to keep the depth of her anguish to herself. The one other person who knows Catherine’s secret—her boss—arranges for her to be given a special project away from prying eyes in the museum’s Annexe. Usually controlled and rational, but now mad with grief, Catherine reluctantly unpacks an extraordinary, eerie automaton that she has been charged with bringing back to life.
As she begins to piece together the clockwork puzzle, she also uncovers a series of notebooks written by the mechanical creature’s original owner: a nineteenth-century Englishman, Henry Brandling, who traveled to Germany to commission it as a magical amusement for his consumptive son. But it is Catherine, nearly two hundred years later, who will find comfort and wonder in Henry’s story. And it is the automaton, in its beautiful, uncanny imitation of life, that will link two strangers confronted with the mysteries of creation, the miracle and catastrophe of human invention, and the body’s astonishing chemistry of love and feeling.
- Print length229 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAlfred A. Knopf
- Publication dateMay 15, 2012
- Dimensions6.66 x 1 x 9.57 inches
- ISBN-100307592715
- ISBN-13978-0307592712
Popular titles by this author
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
Review
—The Economist (UK)
“Characters that beguile and convince, prose that dances or is as careful as poetry, an inventive plot that teases and makes the heart quicken or hurt, paced with masterly precision, yet with a space for the ideas to breathe and expand in dialogue with the reader, unusual settings of place and time: this tender tour de force of the imagination succeeds on all fronts.”
—The Independent (UK)
“A powerful novel on the frailty of the human body and the emotional life we imbue in machines . . . Catherine and Henry, linked both by the automaton and by grief, ponder questions of life and death, questions that, as posed by Carey, are more fascinating than any solution.”
—Publishers Weekly (starred, pick of the week)
“Carey’s exceptional storytelling talents are all on prominent display here. Catherine’s and Henry’s voices are lustily generated and expertly distinguished from one another; contemporary London and 19th-century Germany are conveyed in lightly distributed yet powerfully evocative physical detail; both narratives are invigorated throughout by a thrilling verbal energy, and an almost unfailing knack for alighting on the mot juste. These are precisely the qualities that have always characterised Carey’s novels, and which have twice made him an eminently deserving winner of the Booker Prize.”
—The Observer (UK)
“Carey’s world is always interesting and thought-provoking . . . It is a unique combination of raw human passion and complicated puzzling about human ingenuity . . . Completely convincing.”
—A. S. Byatt, Financial Times (UK)
“Carey’s latest book is just as beautifully written and entertaining as its predecessors. Written in his signature style, moving and witty at the same time, his narrative takes hold right from the beginning and maintains its pace throughout . . . Profoundly moving but leavened with Carey’s characteristic whimsical humour together with his refined and polished narrative style, this is a most delightful read.”
—The Chronicle (Australia)
“The Chemistry of Tears isn’t only about life and inventiveness: it overflows with them.”
—Sunday Times (UK)
“An excellent novel . . . The appeal of science might lie in its promise to solve the world’s most difficult problems, but Carey’s achievement with The Chemistry of Tears is, by means of a story about science, to depict our most taxing problems in their full insolubility.”
—The National
“Carey [demonstrates] the same easy-seeming mastery that he shows in all his novels. But here the fluency seems especially apt, because it is always devoted to the service of machines that themselves depend on being cunningly assembled and delightful. In other words, there is an immaculate fit of means with themes.”
—The Guardian (UK)
“A tender novel of secrets, sorrow, and heartache . . . Carey writes like a dream. His twelfth novel is a compelling cocktail or beautiful prose, emotional complexity, and impressive ingenuity.”
—The Express (UK)
“Beautifully made, entertaining, and comic . . . A story that’s as ingenious as any piece of clockwork.”
—Irish Independent
“I loved this book . . . It is not an exaggeration to say that Peter Carey has given new meaning to the term ‘historical fiction’ . . . Impressively, he continues to produce another masterclass every couple of years.”
—Daily Telegraph (UK)
“A beautifully elegiac hymn to lost love . . . Audacious yet restrained, tender yet sardonic, and filled with moments of emotional complexity.”
—Australian Book Review
“Wonderful . . . This deeply moving, intellectually profound novel on the heartbreaking grief of ‘living machines’ tells the story of the essential human desire to return to the individual Edens that we inhabited before we knew about the unavoidable pain of our mechanical lives . . . Beautifully told.”
—Nature
“This is a brilliant book, full of secrets, mystery, grief and love . . . Impossible to put down.”
—Sunday Mail (Brisbane, Australia)
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Catherine
Dead, and no one told me. I walked past his office and his assistant was bawling.
“What is it Felicia?”
“Oh haven’t you heard? Mr. Tindall’s dead.”
What I heard was: “Mr. Tindall hurt his head.” I thought, for God’s sake, pull yourself together.
“Where is he, Felicia?” That was a reckless thing to ask. Matthew Tindall and I had been lovers for thirteen years, but he was my secret and I was his. In real life I avoided his assistant.
Now her lipstick was smeared and her mouth folded like an ugly sock. “Where is he?” she sobbed. “What an awful, awful question.”
I did not understand. I asked again.
“Catherine, he is dead,” and thus set herself off into a second fit of bawling.
I marched into his office, as if to prove her wrong. This was not the sort of thing one did. My secret darling was a big deal—the Head Curator of Metals. There was the photo of his two sons on the desk. His silly soft tweed hat was lying on the shelf. I snatched it. I don’t know why.
Of course she saw me steal it. I no longer cared. I fled down the Philips stairs into the main floor. On that April afternoon in the Georgian halls of the Swinburne Museum, amongst the thousand daily visitors, the eighty employees, there was not one single soul who had any idea of what had just happened.
Everything looked the same as usual. It was impossible Matthew was not there, waiting to surprise me. He was very distinctive, my lovely. There was a vertical frown mark just to the left of his big high nose. His hair was thick. His mouth was large, soft and always tender. Of course he was married. Of course. Of course. He was forty when I first noticed him, and it was seven years before we became lovers. I was by then just under thirty and still something of a freak, that is, the first female horologist the museum had ever seen.
Thirteen years. My whole life. It was a beautiful world we lived in all that time, sw1, the Swinburne Museum, one of London’s almost-secret treasure houses. It had a considerable horological department, a world-famous collection of clocks and watches, automata and other wind-up engines. If you had been there on 21 April 2010, you may have seen me, the oddly elegant tall woman with the tweed hat scrunched up in her hand. I may have looked mad, but perhaps I was not so different from my colleagues—the various curators and conservators—pounding through the public galleries on their way to a meeting or a studio or a store room where they would soon interrogate an ancient object, a sword, a quilt, or perhaps an Islamic water clock. We were museum people, scholars, priests, repairers, sand-paperers, scientists, plumbers, mechanics—train-spotters really—with narrow specialities in metals and glass and textiles and ceramics. We were of all sorts, we insisted, even while we were secretly confident that the stereotypes held true. A horologist, for instance, could never be a young woman with good legs, but a slightly nerdy man of less than five foot six—cautious, a little strange, with fine blond hair and some difficulty in looking you in the eye. You might see him scurrying like a mouse through the ground-floor galleries, with his ever-present jangling keys, looking as if he was the keeper of the mysteries. In fact no one in the Swinburne knew any more than a part of the labyrinth. We had reduced our territories to rat runs—the routes we knew would always take us where we wanted to go. This made it an extraordinarily easy place to live a secret life, and to enjoy the perverse pleasure that such a life can give.
In death it was a total horror. That is, the same, but brighter, more in focus. Everything was both crisper and further away. How had he died? How could he die?
I rushed back to my studio and Googled “Matthew Tindall,” but there was no news of any accident. However my inbox had an email which lifted my heart until I realized he had sent it at 4 p.m the day before. “I kiss your toes.” I marked it unread.
There was no one I dared turn to. I thought, I will work. It was what I had always done in crisis. It is what clocks were good for, their intricacy, their peculiar puzzles. I sat at the bench in the workroom trying to resolve an exceedingly whimsical eighteenth-century French “clock.” My tools lay on a soft grey chamois. Twenty minutes previously I had liked this French clock but now it seemed vain and preening. I buried my nose inside Matthew’s hat. “Snuffle” we would have said. “I snuffle you.” “I snuffle your neck.”
I could have gone to Sandra, the line manager. She was always a very kind woman but I could not bear anyone, not even Sandra, handling my private business, putting it out on the table and pushing it around like so many broken necklace beads.
Hello Sandra, what happened to Mr. Tindall, do you know?
My German grandfather and my very English father were clockmakers, nothing too spectacular—first Clerkenwell, then the city, then Clerkenwell again—mostly good solid English five-wheel clocks—but it was an item of faith for me, even as a little girl, that this was a very soothing, satisfying occupation. For years I thought clockmaking must still any turmoil in one’s breast. I was so confident of my opinion, so completely wrong.
The tea lady provided her depressive offering. I observed the anticlockwise motion of the slightly curdled milk, just waiting for him, I suppose. So when a hand did touch me, my whole body came unstitched. It felt like Matthew, but Matthew was dead, and in his place was Eric Croft, the Head Curator of Horology. I began to howl and could not stop.
He was the worst possible witness in the world.
Crafty Crofty was, to put it very crudely, the master of all that ticked and tocked. He was a scholar, a historian, a connoisseur. I, in comparison, was a well-educated mechanic. Crofty was famous for his scholarly work on “Sing-songs” by which is meant those perfect imperial misunderstandings of oriental culture we so successfully exported to China in the eighteenth century, highly elaborate music boxes encased in the most fanciful compositions of exotic beasts and buildings, often placed on elaborate stands. That was what it was like for members of our caste. We built our teetering lives on this sort of thing. The beasts moved their eyes, ears and tails. Pagodas rose and fell. Jewelled stars spun and revolving glass rods provided a very credible impression of water.
I bawled and bawled and now I was the one whose mouth became a sock puppet.
Like a large chairman of a rugger club who has a chihuahua as a pet, Eric did not at all resemble his Sing-songs, which one might expect to be the passion of a slim fastidious homosexual. He had a sort of hetero gung-ho quality “metals” people are expected to have.
“No, no,” he cried. “Hush.”
Hush? He was not rough with me but he got his big hard arm around my shoulder and compelled me into a fume cupboard and then turned on the extractor fan which roared like twenty hairdryers all at once. I thought, I have let the cat out of the bag.
“No,” he said. “Don’t.”
The cupboard was awfully small, built solely so that one conservator might clean an ancient object with toxic solvent. He was stroking my shoulder as if I were a horse.
“We will look after you,” he said.
In the midst of bawling, I finally understood that Crofty knew my secret.
“Go home for now,” he said quietly.
I thought, I’ve betrayed us. I thought, Matthew will be pissed off.
“Meet me at the greasy spoon,” he said. “Ten o’clock tomorrow? Across the road from the Annexe. Do you think you can manage that? Do you mind?”
“Yes,” I said, thinking, so that’s it—they are going to kick me out of the main museum. They are going to lock me in the Annexe. I had spilled the beans.
“Good.” He beamed and the creases around his mouth gave him a rather catlike appearance. He turned off the extractor fan and suddenly I could smell his aftershave. “First we’ll get you sick leave. We’ll get through this together—I’ve got something for you to sort out,” he said. “A really lovely object.” That’s how people talk at the Swinburne. They say object instead of clock.
I thought, he is exiling me, burying me. The Annexe was situated behind Olympia where my grief might be as private as my love.
So he was being kind to me, strange macho Crofty. I kissed him on his rough sandalwood-smelling cheek. We both looked at each other with astonishment, and then I fled, out onto the humid street, pounding down towards the Albert Hall with Matthew’s lovely silly hat crushed inside my hand.
i arrived home still not knowing how my darling died. I imagined he had fallen. He had hit his head. I hated how he always tipped back on his chair.
Now there would be a funeral. I tore my shirt in half, and ripped the sleeves away. All night I imagined how he had died, been run over, squashed, knifed, pushed onto the tracks. Each vision was a shock, a rip, a cry. I was in this same condition fourteen hours later when I arrived at Olympia to meet with Eric.
No one loves Olympia. It is a hateful place. But this was where the Swinburne Annexe was, so this was where I would be sent, as if I was a widow and must be burned alive. Well, light the leaves and pyre wood, I thought, because nothing could hurt more than this.
The footpaths behind the exhibition centre were unnaturally hot and narrow. The lanes were looped and dog-legged. Lethal high-speed vans lifted the dust and distributed the fag ends up and down the street where the Annexe awaited. It was not a prison—a prison would have had a sign—but its high front gates were festooned with razor wire.
Many of the Swinburne’s conservators had spent a season in the Annexe, working on an object whose restoration could not be properly undertaken at the main museum. Some claimed to have enjoyed their stay, but how could I be severed from my Swinburne, my museum, my life where every stairway and lowly hallway, every flake of plaster, every molecule of acetone contained my love for Matthew and my evacuated heart?
Opposite the Annexe I found George’s Café with its doors wide open to the freakish heat.
You would think the author of Balance of Payments: The Sing-song Trade with China in the Eighteenth Century would be clearly distinguishable from the four sweaty policemen at the back booth, the drivers from Olympia, the postal workers from the West Kensington Delivery Office who, it seems, had been given permission to wear shorts. Not a good idea, but never mind. If the distinguished curator had not risen (awkwardly, for the plywood booths did not encourage large men to make this sort of motion) I might not have picked him out at all.
Crofty liked to say that he was a perfect no one. Yet although he was so opaquely estuary and his bone-crushing handshake had roots somewhere in the years of his birth, in the manly 1950s, he might turn up to drinks for the Minister for Arts where you, if you were lucky enough to be invited, might learn that he had been in Scotland hunting with Ellsworth (Sir Ellis Crispin to you) on the previous weekend. It appeared that I was now to be protected by this powerful man.
I saw his eyes—all the frightening sympathy. I fussed with my umbrella and placed a notebook on the table, but he covered my hand with his own—it was large and dry and warm like something you would hatch eggs in.
“What a horror it all is,” he said.
“Tell me. Please, Eric. What happened?”
“Oh Christ,” he said. “Of course you do not know.”
I could not look at him. I rescued my hand and hid it in my lap.
“Heart attack, big one. So sorry. On the tube.”
The tube. I had seen the tube all night, the dark hot violence of it. I snatched the menu and ordered baked beans and two poached eggs. I could feel Eric watching me with his soft wet eyes. They were no help, no help at all. I rearranged my cutlery violently.
“They got him off at Notting Hill.”
I thought he was going to say that this was good, to die so close to home. He didn’t. But I could not bear the thought that they had taken him back to her.
And she, that great designer of marital “understanding,” would play the grieving widow. “I suppose it is Kensal Green, the funeral?” Just up the Harrow Road, I thought, so handy.
“Tomorrow actually.”
“No, Eric. That is totally impossible.”
“Tomorrow at three.” Now he could not look at me. “I don’t know what you wish to do.”
Of course, of course. They would all be there, his wife, his sons, his colleagues. I would be expected to go, but I could not. I would give everything away.
“No one gets buried that quickly,” I said. “She’s trying to hide something.” I thought, she wants him in the ground away from me.
“No, no, old love, nothing like that. Not even the awful Margaret is capable of that.”
“Have you ever tried to book a funeral? It took me two weeks to get my father buried.”
“In this case, they had a cancellation.”
“They what?”
“Had a cancellation.”
I don’t know who laughed first, maybe it was me because once I started it took a while to stop. “They had a cancellation? Someone decided not to die.”
“I don’t know, Catherine, perhaps they got a lower price from a different cemetery, but it is tomorrow at three o’clock.” He pushed a folded piece of paper across the table.
“What’s this?”
“A prescription for sleeping pills. We’ll look after you,” he said again.
“We?”
“No one will know.”
We sat quietly then, and a suffocating mass of food was placed in front of me. Eric had wisely ordered a single hardboiled egg.
I watched him crack its shell, peeling it away to reveal a soft and shiny membrane.
“What happens to his emails?” I asked, because I had been thinking about that all night as well. Our personal life was preserved on the Swinburne server in a windowless building in Shepherd’s Bush.
“It’s down,” he said.
“You mean down, or you mean deleted?”
“No, no, the whole museum system is down. Heat wave. Air conditioning failed, I’m told.”
“So it’s not deleted at all.”
Product details
- Publisher : Alfred A. Knopf; 1st edition (May 15, 2012)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 229 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0307592715
- ISBN-13 : 978-0307592712
- Item Weight : 13 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.66 x 1 x 9.57 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,943,815 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7,695 in Cultural Heritage Fiction
- #113,820 in Literary Fiction (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In PARROT AND OLIVIER IN AMERICA , Carey showed his ability to write -- and subvert -- the traditional historical novel. But the elements of art and fantasy that tinted that earlier book are given fuller rein here, despite a framing story that theoretically keeps its feet on the ground. Catherine Gehrig is a rationalist. A horologist at the fictional Swinburne Museum in London, her job is to catalogue and restore rare mechanical objects. But she has become unmoored by the unexpected death of a colleague, with whom she had been conducting a secret affair for years. Her boss gives her a project to distract her: the restoration of what turns out to be a mechanical silver swan, built in the Black Forest in the 1850s. Accompanying the pieces of the automaton are a series of diaries by the patron who commissioned the object, an Englishman called Henry Brandling, looking for a toy duck to restore life to his dying son. His journey to Southwest Germany brings him into contact with an extraordinary individual called Sumper, who virtually hijacks his project because he feels it is his sacred mission to build him something better.
Seen as a piece of straight narrative, this book would be rather a mess. Carey crams a lot into it, from Charles Babbage's Analytical Engine (a forerunner of the computer), through the invention of the internal combustion engine, to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. But I don't think it IS meant to be taken straight. Having just come from reading Italo Calvino, I must admit to a tendency to read everything as though it were surreal, but all the same I see a deliberate excess in Catherine's language, and certainly in her behavior, as she purloins precious objects to study them at home, and gives in to drinking and uncontrolled mood swings. Gradually, the alternating chapters headed "Catherine" and "Henry" are interspersed with others entitled "Catherine & Henry," as the two grief-stricken narrators virtually combine.
We are no longer in straight historical novel territory here, even the relative clarity of split-period novels such as Simon Mawer's MENDEL'S DWARF . The manner is much more like Peter Ackroyd's CASEBOOK OF VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN or even more his HAWKSMOOR . There were moments when I felt the shadow of Kazuo Ishiguro, or Paul Auster, or Orhan Pamuk. This is relatively new territory for Carey, and I don't know that he has mastered it yet. But he writes well. "The sky was black and bleeding like a Rothko," he says of an approaching London storm. Later on, one of his characters references the painter in defense of the aesthetic of ambiguity: "Without ambiguity you have Agatha Christie, a sort of aesthetic whodunnit. But look at any Rothko. You can look and look but you never get past the ambiguities of colour, and form, and surface." The first step in Catherine Gehrig's healing is her acceptance of ambiguity. It may be a frustrating process for the reader, but I did find it an interesting one.
The Chemistry of Tears is a fairly quick and easy read. The protagonist, Catherine Gehrig works as a conservator at a London museum who is distraught upon the sudden death of her older lover. Her boss kindly reassigns her to a project to work on the restoration of a duck automaton.
From there, the story becomes a dual narrative alternating between the present day Catherine dealing with her grief while wrestling with the puzzle of the automaton and an English gentleman,Henry Brandling, who commissioned the construction of the mechanical duck in a remote German town in the 1850’s.
The book explores some interesting themes including how the loss of a loved one can expose the emotional safety net that a long term relationship can provide and the challenge of forging a new path -with the support of the odd bottle of vodka! However, this reader did not become emotionally invested in the characters and the narrative impact therefore fell short.
Top reviews from other countries
Having said that, I got a surprising amount out of this book. Both narratives are unique and extraordinary. Catherine Gehrig in modern times behaves very badly right left and centre following the sudden death of the married man with whom she's had an affair of 13 years. We believe in her, and we also sympathise - quite an achievement. Henry Brandling, at whose wish the swan is first constructed, is extraordinary lacking in knowledge and self-knowledge. Yet once again, we believe in him and we sympathise.
Why do I feel I have failed to understand this? Simply, Henry decides towards the end of the novel that he is a fool, as he looks at the Latin motto. Catherine can't make head or tail of her relationship with her assistant curator, who maybe has deep insight, and is maybe deluded about the swan and its original makers. I found this impossible to work out....
This is very unlike the only other novel of Peter Carey I've read (The True History of the Kelly Gang). It certainly inclines me to read more.
Two very small points. The first is that Carey lists a lot of acknowledgements, but no-one has told him that we do not have a "Ministry for Arts' but a Department of Culture, Media and Sport. Also it seems very strange that Catherine can guess her lover's password at work to his email. It is simply her name - no capital letter, no numeral, no symbol - and presumably it has remained unchanged for 13 years. Perhaps there are workplaces with security like this - not that many public bodies, I would have thought, though...
Disappointing overall but with just enough mystery to have made it not altogether a waste of time.
I'm afraid I would not recommend this book to anyone that I know....my book group disliked it even more than I did.






